Cijene najma u ovom momentu padaju

aben wrote:uglovnomu, veberova ideja kontroliranja najmova, popularno rečeno reguliranje, dovođenje reda u iznojmljivonje, proizvodi nestašice stanova, lošu kvalitetu i visoke cijene najma (van kategorije). u tomu se složu svi ki su ikad iti malo razmislili o tomu, od slobodoljubivih ljudi, do socijalistov.

jedino ča efektnije od rent controla uništava grod je bonbardiranje.

In a late-seventies poll of 211 economists published in the May 1979 issue of American Economic Review, slightly more than 98 percent of U.S. respondents agreed that "a ceiling on rents reduces the quantity and quality of housing available." Similarly, the June 1988 issue of Canadian Public Policy reported that over 95 percent of the Canadian economists polled agreed with the statement. The agreement cuts across the usual political spectrum, ranging all the way from Nobel Prize winners Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek on the "right" to their fellow Nobel Laureate Gunnar Myrdal, an important architect of the Swedish Labor Party's welfare state, on the "left." Myrdal stated, "Rent control has in certain Western countries constituted, maybe, the worst example of poor planning by governments lacking courage and vision." Fellow Swedish economist (and socialist) Assar Lindbeck, asserted, "In many cases rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing."

veber wrote:

aben wrote:uglovnomu, veberova ideja kontroliranja najmova, popularno rečeno reguliranje, dovođenje reda u iznojmljivonje, proizvodi nestašice stanova, lošu kvalitetu i visoke cijene najma (van kategorije). u tomu se složu svi ki su ikad iti malo razmislili o tomu, od slobodoljubivih ljudi, do socijalistov.

jedino ča efektnije od rent controla uništava grod je bonbardiranje.

In a late-seventies poll of 211 economists published in the May 1979 issue of American Economic Review, slightly more than 98 percent of U.S. respondents agreed that "a ceiling on rents reduces the quantity and quality of housing available." Similarly, the June 1988 issue of Canadian Public Policy reported that over 95 percent of the Canadian economists polled agreed with the statement. The agreement cuts across the usual political spectrum, ranging all the way from Nobel Prize winners Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek on the "right" to their fellow Nobel Laureate Gunnar Myrdal, an important architect of the Swedish Labor Party's welfare state, on the "left." Myrdal stated, "Rent control has in certain Western countries constituted, maybe, the worst example of poor planning by governments lacking courage and vision." Fellow Swedish economist (and socialist) Assar Lindbeck, asserted, "In many cases rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing."

ti po običaju zoč pa zć ne lažeš.
cijena je cijena, ali ne da ti ili epi ili bilo tko drugi izbaci najmoprimca iz stana.

nigdje ja nisam rekao niti napisao cijenu. samo sigurnost najmoprimca.
ne laži

veber wrote:

aben wrote:uglovnomu, veberova ideja kontroliranja najmova, popularno rečeno reguliranje, dovođenje reda u iznojmljivonje, proizvodi nestašice stanova, lošu kvalitetu i visoke cijene najma (van kategorije). u tomu se složu svi ki su ikad iti malo razmislili o tomu, od slobodoljubivih ljudi, do socijalistov.

jedino ča efektnije od rent controla uništava grod je bonbardiranje.

In a late-seventies poll of 211 economists published in the May 1979 issue of American Economic Review, slightly more than 98 percent of U.S. respondents agreed that "a ceiling on rents reduces the quantity and quality of housing available." Similarly, the June 1988 issue of Canadian Public Policy reported that over 95 percent of the Canadian economists polled agreed with the statement. The agreement cuts across the usual political spectrum, ranging all the way from Nobel Prize winners Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek on the "right" to their fellow Nobel Laureate Gunnar Myrdal, an important architect of the Swedish Labor Party's welfare state, on the "left." Myrdal stated, "Rent control has in certain Western countries constituted, maybe, the worst example of poor planning by governments lacking courage and vision." Fellow Swedish economist (and socialist) Assar Lindbeck, asserted, "In many cases rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing."

ti po običaju zoč pa zć ne lažeš.
cijena je cijena, ali ne da ti ili epi ili bilo tko drugi izbaci najmoprimca iz stana.

nigdje ja nisam rekao niti napisao cijenu. samo sigurnost najmoprimca.
ne laži

epikur37 wrote:

veber wrote:

aben wrote:uglovnomu, veberova ideja kontroliranja najmova, popularno rečeno reguliranje, dovođenje reda u iznojmljivonje, proizvodi nestašice stanova, lošu kvalitetu i visoke cijene najma (van kategorije). u tomu se složu svi ki su ikad iti malo razmislili o tomu, od slobodoljubivih ljudi, do socijalistov.

jedino ča efektnije od rent controla uništava grod je bonbardiranje.

In a late-seventies poll of 211 economists published in the May 1979 issue of American Economic Review, slightly more than 98 percent of U.S. respondents agreed that "a ceiling on rents reduces the quantity and quality of housing available." Similarly, the June 1988 issue of Canadian Public Policy reported that over 95 percent of the Canadian economists polled agreed with the statement. The agreement cuts across the usual political spectrum, ranging all the way from Nobel Prize winners Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek on the "right" to their fellow Nobel Laureate Gunnar Myrdal, an important architect of the Swedish Labor Party's welfare state, on the "left." Myrdal stated, "Rent control has in certain Western countries constituted, maybe, the worst example of poor planning by governments lacking courage and vision." Fellow Swedish economist (and socialist) Assar Lindbeck, asserted, "In many cases rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing."

ti po običaju zoč pa zć ne lažeš.
cijena je cijena, ali ne da ti ili epi ili bilo tko drugi izbaci najmoprimca iz stana.

nigdje ja nisam rekao niti napisao cijenu. samo sigurnost najmoprimca.
ne laži

Što je to?

Ako sklopimo ugovor zaštićen je ugovorom , ako ne nije.

Nadalje, ja iznajmljujem smještaj od.  1.10. do 15.6.

i zanimljivo, imama baš takvu klijentelu kojoj to paše.
Nakon sezone mi se vraća


kaj sad

veber wrote:

epikur37 wrote:

veber wrote:

aben wrote:uglovnomu, veberova ideja kontroliranja najmova, popularno rečeno reguliranje, dovođenje reda u iznojmljivonje, proizvodi nestašice stanova, lošu kvalitetu i visoke cijene najma (van kategorije). u tomu se složu svi ki su ikad iti malo razmislili o tomu, od slobodoljubivih ljudi, do socijalistov.

jedino ča efektnije od rent controla uništava grod je bonbardiranje.

In a late-seventies poll of 211 economists published in the May 1979 issue of American Economic Review, slightly more than 98 percent of U.S. respondents agreed that "a ceiling on rents reduces the quantity and quality of housing available." Similarly, the June 1988 issue of Canadian Public Policy reported that over 95 percent of the Canadian economists polled agreed with the statement. The agreement cuts across the usual political spectrum, ranging all the way from Nobel Prize winners Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek on the "right" to their fellow Nobel Laureate Gunnar Myrdal, an important architect of the Swedish Labor Party's welfare state, on the "left." Myrdal stated, "Rent control has in certain Western countries constituted, maybe, the worst example of poor planning by governments lacking courage and vision." Fellow Swedish economist (and socialist) Assar Lindbeck, asserted, "In many cases rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing."

ti po običaju zoč pa zć ne lažeš.
cijena je cijena, ali ne da ti ili epi ili bilo tko drugi izbaci najmoprimca iz stana.

nigdje ja nisam rekao niti napisao cijenu. samo sigurnost najmoprimca.
ne laži

Što je to?

Ako sklopimo ugovor zaštićen je ugovorom , ako ne nije.

Nadalje, ja iznajmljujem smještaj od.  1.10. do 15.6.

i zanimljivo, imama baš takvu klijentelu kojoj to paše.
Nakon sezone mi se vraća


kaj sad

vi sančosti ste po defaultu ili vam onako fali daska?
ako s tobom potpišem ugovor do dana X nema frke.
ako dođe mladi bračni par s djetetom i ti im veliš da mogu do sezone.
jer ćeš ti iznajmit apartman za 30€/dan. oni to ne mogu platiti.

ja ne pišem o cijeni. 
pišem o garanciji podstanara.
nikaj drugo.

cijena je stvar tržišta, ali podstanarstvo nije.