ex-iskon-pleme
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Page 1 of 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by AssadNaPodmornici 22/5/2021, 18:24

Inače kako smo ja , gnječ i još dosta forumaša tvrdili a ludi Ero opet tvrdio suprotno i falio po zna koji put.
Virus je nastao u Kineskom labu, Tucker Carlson je imao emisije o tome skoro prije godinu dana, ali ovih dana sve više i drugih "liberalnih medija" -koji su to opvrgavali cijelo vrijeme, jer većina njih je bila na platnom spisku kineske komunističke partije, ali šaka onih koji nisu sada potvrđuje ono što je dosta nas nagađalo. Virus je nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju koji su financirali USA porezni obveznici a zanimljivo lovu je potpisivao dr.Fauchi. Ovo nije teorija zavjere ovo je činjenica.

pogledajte legendarnog Tucker Carlsona imao je nekoliko gostovanja sa Kineskom znanstvenicom koja je radila u tom labaratoriju i koja je utekla u USA(i tamo su je hrpa njih optuživali da "širi teorije zavjere") ali eto..



ima  i drugih



evo i Rand Paul (jedan od mojih omiljenih konzervativaca, ja osobno imam svjetonazor i ideologiju najbližu (ako ne istu) kao i on). Ispituje dr.Faucija oko virusa iz Kineskog laba ovaj se izvlači



AssadNaPodmornici
AssadNaPodmornici

Posts : 22267
2018-06-14


kic likes this post

Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by AssadNaPodmornici 22/5/2021, 18:28

ostaje pitanje da li je virus pušten iz laba slučajno ili namjerno. iskreno vjerujem da im je slučajno utekao, ali kada im je utekao , dezinformacijama i lažima su ga proširili po cijelom svijetu.

samo da podsjetimo neke stvari.

prvo su zataškavali da postoji taj virus, doktore koji su ga otkrili u kini i obavjestili javnost - kineska komunistička partija je "uspavala" i izvadila im organe. (to radi njihova partija sa političkim protivnicima).

zatim su napravili neki čudni lockdown gdje su ipak milijuni ljudi iz wuhana utekli u ostale djelove kine a zatim ostatka svijeta, a nama prodavali priču da ih zaključavaju.

zatim su iz kine dolazile snimke gdje ljudi umiru na ulicama padaju sa nogu(dezinformacije) a isto vremeno govorili da nema potrebe zatvarati granicu prema kini da je to rasizam i da se virus ne širi tako...

eto.. neki čak tvrde da su namjerno ga pustili , ja mislim da im je utekao slučajno ali su ga iskoristili za svjetsku dominaciju

_________________
May Allah destroy Australia
AssadNaPodmornici
AssadNaPodmornici

Posts : 22267
2018-06-14


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by Šandor Winnetou 22/5/2021, 18:36

treba im sad uši zavrniti na globalnoj razini i zahtjevati odštetu jer su napravili ekonomsku krizu na globalnoj razini.

_________________
Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Himars10
Šandor Winnetou
Šandor Winnetou

Male
Posts : 19783
2017-12-31


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by AssadNaPodmornici 22/5/2021, 18:40

Šandor Winnetou wrote:treba im sad uši zavrniti na globalnoj razini i zahtjevati odštetu jer su napravili ekonomsku krizu na globalnoj razini.
teško jer više manje postavili su svoje na vlast po cijelom svijetu.
u USA pola demokratske stranke, većina kapitalista, hrpa fakulteta, medija - sve je više manje povezano ili kupljeno od kineske komunističke partije.
zanimljivo ista ta ekipa gura sukob sa Rusijom. u prijevodu Kinezi guraju USA u sukob sa Rusijom.

EU imaju nešto manji utjecaj ,ali EU je svaka ovca svoju travu pase, plus hrpa država tipa Njemačka ima super korist od Kineske ekonomije, jer izvoze.

Ludi srbi su najgori - kinezi im prvo uvalili virus(a i svima nama) a onda im poslali cijepiva koja kurca ne valjaju a ovi im ližu šupak, glavno da ringo napiše da srbi imaju "digniteta i kičmu"
AssadNaPodmornici
AssadNaPodmornici

Posts : 22267
2018-06-14


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by Šandor Winnetou 22/5/2021, 18:48

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:treba im sad uši zavrniti na globalnoj razini i zahtjevati odštetu jer su napravili ekonomsku krizu na globalnoj razini.
teško jer više manje postavili su svoje na vlast po cijelom svijetu.
u USA pola demokratske stranke, većina kapitalista, hrpa fakulteta, medija - sve je više manje povezano ili kupljeno od kineske komunističke partije.
zanimljivo ista ta ekipa gura sukob sa Rusijom. u prijevodu Kinezi guraju USA u sukob sa Rusijom.

EU imaju nešto manji utjecaj ,ali EU je svaka ovca svoju travu pase, plus hrpa država tipa Njemačka ima super korist od Kineske ekonomije, jer izvoze.

Ludi srbi su najgori - kinezi im prvo uvalili virus(a i svima nama) a onda im poslali cijepiva koja kurca ne valjaju a ovi im ližu  šupak, glavno da ringo napiše da srbi imaju "digniteta i kičmu"
da, nema više snage za bilo što ali da su druga vremena i da ameri nisu postali pičke drugačije bi ova priča završila.

_________________
Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Himars10
Šandor Winnetou
Šandor Winnetou

Male
Posts : 19783
2017-12-31


kic likes this post

Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by Guest 22/5/2021, 18:54

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:ostaje pitanje da li je virus pušten iz laba slučajno ili namjerno. iskreno vjerujem da im je slučajno utekao, ali kada im je utekao , dezinformacijama i lažima su ga proširili po cijelom svijetu.

samo da podsjetimo neke stvari.

prvo su zataškavali da postoji taj virus, doktore koji su ga otkrili u kini i obavjestili javnost - kineska komunistička partija je "uspavala" i izvadila im organe. (to radi njihova partija sa političkim protivnicima).

zatim su napravili neki čudni lockdown gdje su ipak milijuni ljudi iz wuhana utekli u ostale djelove kine a zatim ostatka svijeta, a nama prodavali priču da ih zaključavaju.

zatim su iz kine dolazile snimke gdje ljudi umiru na ulicama padaju sa nogu(dezinformacije) a isto vremeno govorili da nema potrebe zatvarati granicu prema kini da je to rasizam i da se virus ne širi tako...

eto..  neki čak tvrde da su namjerno ga pustili  , ja mislim da im je utekao slučajno ali su ga iskoristili za svjetsku dominaciju

ovo podebljano nije dezinformacija jer jesu ljudi padali po cesti ne samo u Kini nego i drugdje ali to je zbog nedostatka kisika (Hypoxemia) u tijelu a uzrok tome je SARS-CoV2 virus.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by veber 22/5/2021, 18:58

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:treba im sad uši zavrniti na globalnoj razini i zahtjevati odštetu jer su napravili ekonomsku krizu na globalnoj razini.
teško jer više manje postavili su svoje na vlast po cijelom svijetu.
u USA pola demokratske stranke, većina kapitalista, hrpa fakulteta, medija - sve je više manje povezano ili kupljeno od kineske komunističke partije.
zanimljivo ista ta ekipa gura sukob sa Rusijom. u prijevodu Kinezi guraju USA u sukob sa Rusijom.

EU imaju nešto manji utjecaj ,ali EU je svaka ovca svoju travu pase, plus hrpa država tipa Njemačka ima super korist od Kineske ekonomije, jer izvoze.

Ludi srbi su najgori - kinezi im prvo uvalili virus(a i svima nama) a onda im poslali cijepiva koja kurca ne valjaju a ovi im ližu  šupak, glavno da ringo napiše da srbi imaju "digniteta i kičmu"
yoda, njemačka ima samo interes s rusijom. i tu gleda svoje.
rusima paše njemačka je imaju super odnose. i izvoz.
najmanje tu paše amerima pogotovo jer talijani imaju super odnose sa sjeverom afrike.
u četvrtak su ameri opet postali br1 u proizvodnji nafte.
no ležišta plina u sredozemlju plus rusija jebu američku ekonomiju.
projekt baterija po svemu sudeć neće saživjet i opla eto rusa i maroka u oku eu.
veber
veber

Male
Posts : 53509
2014-12-30


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by mutava baštarda 22/5/2021, 19:00

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:ostaje pitanje da li je virus pušten iz laba slučajno ili namjerno. iskreno vjerujem da im je slučajno utekao, ali kada im je utekao , dezinformacijama i lažima su ga proširili po cijelom svijetu.

samo da podsjetimo neke stvari.

prvo su zataškavali da postoji taj virus, doktore koji su ga otkrili u kini i obavjestili javnost - kineska komunistička partija je "uspavala" i izvadila im organe. (to radi njihova partija sa političkim protivnicima).

zatim su napravili neki čudni lockdown gdje su ipak milijuni ljudi iz wuhana utekli u ostale djelove kine a zatim ostatka svijeta, a nama prodavali priču da ih zaključavaju.

zatim su iz kine dolazile snimke gdje ljudi umiru na ulicama padaju sa nogu(dezinformacije) a isto vremeno govorili da nema potrebe zatvarati granicu prema kini da je to rasizam i da se virus ne širi tako...

eto..  neki čak tvrde da su namjerno ga pustili  , ja mislim da im je utekao slučajno ali su ga iskoristili za svjetsku dominaciju
Ako za 5 godina budemo u društvenom uređenju korporativnog komunizma, onda će značiti da je velika šansa da su ga pustili namjerno.

_________________
Iduća dva tjedna su ključna
mutava baštarda
mutava baštarda

Posts : 21037
2015-09-14


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by mutava baštarda 22/5/2021, 19:01

Do tad cijepiti se, po mogućnosti sa 16 doza.

_________________
Iduća dva tjedna su ključna
mutava baštarda
mutava baštarda

Posts : 21037
2015-09-14


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by Guest 22/5/2021, 19:17

Šandor Winnetou wrote:
AssadNaPodmornici wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:treba im sad uši zavrniti na globalnoj razini i zahtjevati odštetu jer su napravili ekonomsku krizu na globalnoj razini.
teško jer više manje postavili su svoje na vlast po cijelom svijetu.
u USA pola demokratske stranke, većina kapitalista, hrpa fakulteta, medija - sve je više manje povezano ili kupljeno od kineske komunističke partije.
zanimljivo ista ta ekipa gura sukob sa Rusijom. u prijevodu Kinezi guraju USA u sukob sa Rusijom.

EU imaju nešto manji utjecaj ,ali EU je svaka ovca svoju travu pase, plus hrpa država tipa Njemačka ima super korist od Kineske ekonomije, jer izvoze.

Ludi srbi su najgori - kinezi im prvo uvalili virus(a i svima nama) a onda im poslali cijepiva koja kurca ne valjaju a ovi im ližu  šupak, glavno da ringo napiše da srbi imaju "digniteta i kičmu"
da, nema više snage za bilo što ali da su druga vremena i da ameri nisu postali pičke drugačije bi ova priča završila.

kako kad su ameri sudjelovali u razvijanju i sintetiziranju SARS-Cov2 virusa. ustvari ameri su iskemijali taj virus u USA vidi Ralph Barich jer su radili GOF gain of function. kad je GOF bio zabranjen memorandumom u USA i drugdje ameri su te eksperimente outsourcali u Kinu u Wuhan. i nastavili financirati eksperimente preko cover humanitarne organizacije koju su osnovali a zove se  EcoHealth Alliance na čijem je čelu Peter Daszak koji je cijelo vrijeme radio u Wuhanu.

hoćeš još dokaza? imam ih 3.9Gb pohranjenih na hard disk čak i one koji su odjednom netragom nestali sa neta odmah u početku pandemije.

evo kome se da čitati ili ga zanima ogromna baza emailova na linkovima

EcoHealth Alliance Orchestrated Key Scientists’ Statement on “natural origin” of SARS-CoV-2

Emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know show that a statement in The Lancet authored by 27 prominent public health scientists condemning “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin” was organized by employees of EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit group that has received millions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer funding to genetically manipulate coronaviruses with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The emails obtained via public records requests show that EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak drafted the Lancet statement, and that he intended it to “not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person” but rather to be seen as “simply a letter from leading scientists”. Daszak wrote that he wanted “to avoid the appearance of a political statement”.

The scientists’ letter appeared in The Lancet on February 18, just one week after the World Health Organization announced that the disease caused by the novel coronavirus would be named COVID-19.

The 27 authors “strongly condemn[ed] conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” and reported that scientists from multiple countries “overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife.” The letter included no scientific references to refute a lab-origin theory of the virus. One scientist, Linda Saif, asked via email whether it would be useful “to add just one or 2 statements in support of why nCOV is not a lab generated virus and is naturally occuring? Seems critical to scientifically refute such claims!” Daszak responded, “I think we should probably stick to a broad statement.”

Growing calls to investigate the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a potential source of SARS-CoV-2 have led to increased scrutiny of EcoHealth Alliance. The emails show how members of EcoHealth Alliance played an early role in framing questions about possible lab origin of SARS-CoV-2 as “crackpot theories that need to be addressed,” as Daszak told The Guardian.

Although the phrase “EcoHealth Alliance” appeared only once in The Lancet statement, in association with co-author Daszak, several other co-authors also have direct ties to the group that were not disclosed as conflicts of interest. Rita Colwell and James Hughes are members of the Board of Directors of EcoHealth Alliance, William Karesh is the group’s Executive Vice President for Health and Policy, and Hume Field is Science and Policy Advisor.

The statement’s authors also claimed that the “rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins.” Today, however, little is known about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and investigations into its origins by the World Health Organization and The Lancet COVID-19 commission have been shrouded in secrecy and mired by conflicts of interests.

Peter Daszak, Rita Colwell, and The Lancet Editor Richard Horton did not provide comments in response to our requests for this story.

This article is reprinted from the website of US Right to Know.

For more information:

A link to the entire batch of EcoHealth Alliance emails can be found here: EcoHealth Alliance emails: University of Maryland (466 pages)

U.S. Right to Know is posting documents obtained through public freedom of information (FOI) requests for our Biohazards investigation in our post: FOI documents on origins of SARS-CoV-2, hazards of gain-of-function research and biosafety labs.


https://www.independentsciencenews.org/news/ecohealth-alliance-orchestrated-key-scientists-statement-on-natural-origin-of-sars-cov-2/

FOI documents on origins of SARS-CoV-2, hazards of gain-of-function research and biosafety labs

U.S. Right to Know is researching the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and the hazards of biosafety laboratories and gain-of-function research, which aims to increase the infectivity or lethality of potential pandemic pathogens. We post updates and new findings on our Biohazards Blog.

       Saif emails batch #1: Ohio State University (4.7.21) (303 pages).
       Emails of Ohio State University Professor and coronavirus expert Linda Saif.

           See our reporting: Chinese-linked journal editor sought help to rebut Covid-19 lab origin hypothesis
       Baric emails batch #2: University of North Carolina (2.17.21) (332 pages).
       Records of University of North Carolina (UNC) Professor Ralph Baric.
           See our reporting: Emails show scientists discussed masking their involvement in key journal letter on Covid origins and Chinese scientists sought to change name of deadly coronavirus to distance it from China
       CSU Records (1.21.21) (2276 pages).
       Records of Colorado State University (CSU) Professors Rebekah Kading and Tony Schountz– virologists who study bat-associated pathogens of security concern in hot-spots all over the world.

           See our reporting: How safe are the biolabs at Colorado State? and Colorado State University documents on bat pathogen research
       NCBI Emails (12.29.20) (63 pages).
       National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) emails with coronavirus scientists who authored four key studies on coronavirus origins, about their revisions to genomic datasets associated with these studies.

           See our reporting: Altered datasets raise more questions about reliability of key studies on coronavirus origins
       Baric emails: University of North Carolina (12.14.20) (83,416 pages).
       Dr. Ralph Baric’s emails with EcoHealth Alliance, Wuhan Institute of Virology, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, COVID-19 experts and experts in biodefense and infectious diseases. Dr. Baric is William R. Kenan, Jr. Distinguished Professor in the Department of  Epidemiology and Professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

               See our reporting: New emails show scientists’ deliberations on how to discuss SARS-CoV-2 origins and Items from coronavirus expert Ralph Baric‘s emails
           EcoHealth Alliance emails: University of Maryland (11.18.20)(466 pages).
           Professor Rita Colwell’s emails with staff of EcoHealth Alliance. Dr. Colwell is distinguished university professor, biomolecular sciences at the University of Maryland. She is a member of the EcoHealth Alliance board of directors.

https://usrtk.org/biohazards/foi-documents-on-origins-of-sars-cov-2-risks-of-gain-of-function-research-and-biosafety-labs/
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by veber 22/5/2021, 19:21

mutava baštarda wrote:Do tad cijepiti se, po mogućnosti sa 16 doza.
mislim da cjepljenje ne bu prošlo.
ja imam zdravstveno tu. i dobrovoljni sam davatelj krvi.
i ako primiš cjepivo nemreš dati krv. i tu i tamo.
nix cjepljenje, bitnije im je da mi posišu krv.
moja ex alergična na histamine, nix.
a pazi na jordanovcu 40% imalo covid, rak pluća i nikom nikaj.
umrli ljudi. od pljuge ne od covida.
veber
veber

Male
Posts : 53509
2014-12-30


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by catabbath 22/5/2021, 19:22

Kako bi rejao YuGiOh - stavljam kartu slabo kuhanog šišmiša na polje wuhanske tržnice :)

_________________
Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Fb_img10
catabbath
catabbath

Male
Posts : 12437
2015-08-22


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by veber 22/5/2021, 19:26

catabbath wrote:Kako bi rejao YuGiOh - stavljam kartu slabo kuhanog šišmiša na polje wuhanske tržnice :)
a bogtejebo koliko ti imaš godina?
pikaču je zakon
veber
veber

Male
Posts : 53509
2014-12-30


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by Guest 22/5/2021, 19:35

In 2018, Diplomats Warned of Risky Coronavirus Experiments in a Wuhan Lab. No One Listened.

After seeing a risky lab, they wrote a cable warning to Washington. But it was ignored.

To some inside the government, the name of the laboratory was familiar. Its research on bat viruses had already drawn the attention of U.S. diplomats and officials at the Beijing Embassy in late 2017, prompting them to alert Washington that the lab’s own scientists had reported “a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.”

But their cables to Washington were ignored.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/03/08/josh-rogin-chaos-under-heaven-wuhan-lab-book-excerpt-474322

čitajte:

https://usrtk.org/biohazards/origin-of-sars-cov-2-gain-of-function-readings/
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by Šandor Winnetou 22/5/2021, 19:57

Gnječ wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:
AssadNaPodmornici wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:treba im sad uši zavrniti na globalnoj razini i zahtjevati odštetu jer su napravili ekonomsku krizu na globalnoj razini.
teško jer više manje postavili su svoje na vlast po cijelom svijetu.
u USA pola demokratske stranke, većina kapitalista, hrpa fakulteta, medija - sve je više manje povezano ili kupljeno od kineske komunističke partije.
zanimljivo ista ta ekipa gura sukob sa Rusijom. u prijevodu Kinezi guraju USA u sukob sa Rusijom.

EU imaju nešto manji utjecaj ,ali EU je svaka ovca svoju travu pase, plus hrpa država tipa Njemačka ima super korist od Kineske ekonomije, jer izvoze.

Ludi srbi su najgori - kinezi im prvo uvalili virus(a i svima nama) a onda im poslali cijepiva koja kurca ne valjaju a ovi im ližu  šupak, glavno da ringo napiše da srbi imaju "digniteta i kičmu"
da, nema više snage za bilo što ali da su druga vremena i da ameri nisu postali pičke drugačije bi ova priča završila.

kako kad su ameri sudjelovali u razvijanju i sintetiziranju SARS-Cov2 virusa. ustvari ameri su iskemijali taj virus u USA vidi Ralph Barich jer su radili GOF gain of function. kad je GOF bio zabranjen memorandumom u USA i drugdje ameri su te eksperimente outsourcali u Kinu u Wuhan. i nastavili financirati eksperimente preko cover humanitarne organizacije koju su osnovali a zove se  EcoHealth Alliance na čijem je čelu Peter Daszak koji je cijelo vrijeme radio u Wuhanu.

hoćeš još dokaza? imam ih 3.9Gb pohranjenih na hard disk čak i one koji su odjednom netragom nestali sa neta odmah u početku pandemije.

evo kome se da čitati ili ga zanima ogromna baza emailova na linkovima

EcoHealth Alliance Orchestrated Key Scientists’ Statement on “natural origin” of SARS-CoV-2

Emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know show that a statement in The Lancet authored by 27 prominent public health scientists condemning “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin” was organized by employees of EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit group that has received millions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer funding to genetically manipulate coronaviruses with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The emails obtained via public records requests show that EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak drafted the Lancet statement, and that he intended it to “not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person” but rather to be seen as “simply a letter from leading scientists”. Daszak wrote that he wanted “to avoid the appearance of a political statement”.

The scientists’ letter appeared in The Lancet on February 18, just one week after the World Health Organization announced that the disease caused by the novel coronavirus would be named COVID-19.

The 27 authors “strongly condemn[ed] conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” and reported that scientists from multiple countries “overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife.” The letter included no scientific references to refute a lab-origin theory of the virus. One scientist, Linda Saif, asked via email whether it would be useful “to add just one or 2 statements in support of why nCOV is not a lab generated virus and is naturally occuring? Seems critical to scientifically refute such claims!” Daszak responded, “I think we should probably stick to a broad statement.”

Growing calls to investigate the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a potential source of SARS-CoV-2 have led to increased scrutiny of EcoHealth Alliance. The emails show how members of EcoHealth Alliance played an early role in framing questions about possible lab origin of SARS-CoV-2 as “crackpot theories that need to be addressed,” as Daszak told The Guardian.

Although the phrase “EcoHealth Alliance” appeared only once in The Lancet statement, in association with co-author Daszak, several other co-authors also have direct ties to the group that were not disclosed as conflicts of interest. Rita Colwell and James Hughes are members of the Board of Directors of EcoHealth Alliance, William Karesh is the group’s Executive Vice President for Health and Policy, and Hume Field is Science and Policy Advisor.

The statement’s authors also claimed that the “rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins.” Today, however, little is known about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and investigations into its origins by the World Health Organization and The Lancet COVID-19 commission have been shrouded in secrecy and mired by conflicts of interests.

Peter Daszak, Rita Colwell, and The Lancet Editor Richard Horton did not provide comments in response to our requests for this story.

This article is reprinted from the website of US Right to Know.

For more information:

A link to the entire batch of EcoHealth Alliance emails can be found here: EcoHealth Alliance emails: University of Maryland (466 pages)

U.S. Right to Know is posting documents obtained through public freedom of information (FOI) requests for our Biohazards investigation in our post: FOI documents on origins of SARS-CoV-2, hazards of gain-of-function research and biosafety labs.


https://www.independentsciencenews.org/news/ecohealth-alliance-orchestrated-key-scientists-statement-on-natural-origin-of-sars-cov-2/

FOI documents on origins of SARS-CoV-2, hazards of gain-of-function research and biosafety labs

U.S. Right to Know is researching the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and the hazards of biosafety laboratories and gain-of-function research, which aims to increase the infectivity or lethality of potential pandemic pathogens. We post updates and new findings on our Biohazards Blog.

       Saif emails batch #1: Ohio State University (4.7.21) (303 pages).
       Emails of Ohio State University Professor and coronavirus expert Linda Saif.

           See our reporting: Chinese-linked journal editor sought help to rebut Covid-19 lab origin hypothesis
       Baric emails batch #2: University of North Carolina (2.17.21) (332 pages).
       Records of University of North Carolina (UNC) Professor Ralph Baric.
           See our reporting: Emails show scientists discussed masking their involvement in key journal letter on Covid origins and Chinese scientists sought to change name of deadly coronavirus to distance it from China
       CSU Records (1.21.21) (2276 pages).
       Records of Colorado State University (CSU) Professors Rebekah Kading and Tony Schountz– virologists who study bat-associated pathogens of security concern in hot-spots all over the world.

           See our reporting: How safe are the biolabs at Colorado State? and Colorado State University documents on bat pathogen research
       NCBI Emails (12.29.20) (63 pages).
       National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) emails with coronavirus scientists who authored four key studies on coronavirus origins, about their revisions to genomic datasets associated with these studies.

           See our reporting: Altered datasets raise more questions about reliability of key studies on coronavirus origins
       Baric emails: University of North Carolina (12.14.20) (83,416 pages).
       Dr. Ralph Baric’s emails with EcoHealth Alliance, Wuhan Institute of Virology, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, COVID-19 experts and experts in biodefense and infectious diseases. Dr. Baric is William R. Kenan, Jr. Distinguished Professor in the Department of  Epidemiology and Professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

               See our reporting: New emails show scientists’ deliberations on how to discuss SARS-CoV-2 origins and Items from coronavirus expert Ralph Baric‘s emails
           EcoHealth Alliance emails: University of Maryland (11.18.20)(466 pages).
           Professor Rita Colwell’s emails with staff of EcoHealth Alliance. Dr. Colwell is distinguished university professor, biomolecular sciences at the University of Maryland. She is a member of the EcoHealth Alliance board of directors.

https://usrtk.org/biohazards/foi-documents-on-origins-of-sars-cov-2-risks-of-gain-of-function-research-and-biosafety-labs/
tnx za trud i linkove
No kako god bilo ameri financiraju sve i svašta po svijetu ali kinezima je utekao iz labosa i jedini su neokrznuti izašli iz ovog sranja.

_________________
Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Himars10
Šandor Winnetou
Šandor Winnetou

Male
Posts : 19783
2017-12-31


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by Guest 22/5/2021, 20:13

Šandor Winnetou wrote:
tnx za trud i linkove
No kako god bilo ameri financiraju sve i svašta po svijetu ali kinezima je utekao iz labosa i jedini su neokrznuti izašli iz ovog sranja.

nema na čemu. vrijedi pročitati sve ma da je meni trebalo više od dva mjeseca nonstop čitanja i još nisam stigao sve pročitati jer ima pun brod mailova a treba ih najprije download na hard disk pa otvorii u pdf i čitati. ja sam izgubio punih dva mjeseca i više. ali i bez mailova ima dosta materijala na linkovima.

evo ovaj nalaz jedne farmaceutske kompanije koja je radila na cjepivu za Covid:

The Evidence which Suggests that This Is No Naturally Evolved Virus

A Reconstructed Historical Aetiology of the SARS-CoV-2

SpikeBirger Sørensen, Angus Dalgleish& Andres SusrudImmunor& St Georges University of London

ABSTRACT

To discover exactly how to attack SARS-CoV-2 safely and efficiently, our vaccine candidate Biovacc-19 was designed by first carefully analysing the biochemistry of the Spike.

We ascertained that it is highly unusual in several respects, unlike any other CoV in its clade. The SARS-CoV-2 general mode of action is as a co-receptor dependent phagocyte. But data shows that simultaneously it is capable of binding to ACE2 receptors in its receptor binding domain. In short, SARS-CoV-2 is possessed of dual action capability.

In this paper we argue that the likelihood of this being the result of natural processes is very small. The spike has six inserts which are unique fingerprints with five salient features indicative of purposive manipulation.

We then add to the bio-chemistry a diachronic dimension by analysing a sequence of four linked published research projects which, we suggest, show by deduction how, where, when and by whom the SARS-CoV-2 Spike acquired its special characteristics.

This reconstructed historical aetiology meets the criteria of means, timing, agent and place to produce sufficient confidence to reverse the burden of proof. Henceforth, those who would maintain that the Covid-19 pandemic arose from zoonotic transfer need to explain precisely why this more parsimonious account is wrong before asserting that their evidence is persuasive, most especially when, as we also show,there are puzzling errors in their use of evidence.

Introduction: Why does this matter?

https://www.minervanett.no/files/2020/07/13/TheEvidenceNoNaturalEvol.pdf
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by veber 22/5/2021, 20:22

meni je nešto drugo zanimljivo, a vezano je uz hrvatsku.
da bi se vratio u njemačku morao sam napraviti test.
s 400 skočio je na 500 kuna.
dođem s testom i moram odraditi još jedan. moja firma ga plaća
obrazloženje zašto još jedan jer s našeg područja toliko muljaju i krivotvore.
ok-doduše rekao je najviše iz bosne.
testeri sada koštaju 3€ i uz račun, kutiju i broj vrijedi 24h.
naši i dalje lupaju 20€
danas sam bio na policiji, pokažem čovjeku tester i velim da sam zaboravio u stanu račun.
kaj mi veli?
sve ok
ne treba vam ni maska, ali čuvajte tester.

jebomupasmater, tko je sada tu lud?

meni je jasno da erini čobani žele sažmikati zadnju kunu, ali ovdje u njemačkoj, osim trgovina nitko nigdje ne nosi maske.

_________________
AfD
veber
veber

Male
Posts : 53509
2014-12-30


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by niels 22/5/2021, 21:25

Čekaj, onda DDK neće moći putovati, ići u kina, na vjenčanja??
niels
niels

Male
Posts : 4797
2021-04-26

Age : 85

Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by AlfaOmega 22/5/2021, 21:59

Svaka čast Kini na usporavanju SAD-a i zapada. SAD luzeri 😎

_________________
I ask not for a lighter burden, but for broader shoulders.
AlfaOmega
AlfaOmega

Posts : 10386
2015-09-11


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by AlfaOmega 22/5/2021, 22:01

Glupi krampa je tu najviše kriv. Busa se protiv Kineza, ovi mu pustili bio weapon i sjebali i planove o jakom SAD-u i drugi mandat.

_________________
I ask not for a lighter burden, but for broader shoulders.
AlfaOmega
AlfaOmega

Posts : 10386
2015-09-11


Back to top Go down

Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju Empty Re: Virus ipak nastao u Kineskom labaratoriju

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum