Denkverbot

aben wrote:
kazes, government subsidies, a drives price up, eh?

nego, puno si toga napiso, ali ne i je li proizve jeftine lampe ke su ljudi dobrovoljno kupovali jer su ih cijenili vise od svojih soldov?

aben wrote:

From the time of his first job, where he earned 50 cents a day, the 16-year-old Rockefeller gave to his local Baptist church, to missions in New York City and abroad, and to the poor—black or white. As his salary increased, so did his giving. By the time he was 45, he was up to $100,000 per year; at age 53, he topped the $1,000,000 mark in his annual giving. His eightieth year was his most generous: $138,000,000 he happily gave away.

The more he earned the more he gave, and the more he gave the more he earned. To Rockefeller, it was the true fulfillment of the Biblical law: “Give, and it shall be given unto you; good measure, pressed down, and shaken together, and running over, shall men give into your bosom.” Not “money” itself but “the love of money” was “the root of all evil.”

Paying higher than market wages was Rockefeller’s controversial policy: he believed it helped slash costs in the long run. For example, Standard was rarely hurt by strikes or labor unrest. Also, he could recruit and keep the top talent and command their future loyalty.

jebate,

ebenica wrote:

aben wrote:
kazes, government subsidies, a drives price up, eh?

nego, puno si toga napiso, ali ne i je li proizve jeftine lampe ke su ljudi dobrovoljno kupovali jer su ih cijenili vise od svojih soldov?

ne kažem ja ništa, kažu događaji i povijest.
kakve jebene lampe, dijelio ih je besplatno po kini da si proširi tržište, jebale te bezvrijedne lampe tebe i tvog isusa i konje dobro zbrinute.

aben wrote:

ebenica wrote:

aben wrote:
kazes, government subsidies, a drives price up, eh?

nego, puno si toga napiso, ali ne i je li proizve jeftine lampe ke su ljudi dobrovoljno kupovali jer su ih cijenili vise od svojih soldov?

ne kažem ja ništa, kažu događaji i povijest.
kakve jebene lampe, dijelio ih je besplatno po kini da si proširi tržište, jebale te bezvrijedne lampe tebe i tvog isusa i konje dobro zbrinute.

kazes, dili ih muhte, prokletnik

ebenica wrote:jebale te bezvrijedne lampe tebe i tvog isusa

Some of the oil producers were unhappy, but American consumers were pleased that Rockefeller was selling cheap oil. Before 1870, only the rich could afford whale oil and candles. The rest had to go to bed early to save money. By the 1870s, with the drop in the price of kerosene, middle- and working-class people all over the nation could afford the one cent an hour that it cost to light their homes at night. Working and reading became after-dark activities new to most Americans in the 1870s.

aben wrote:

ebenica wrote:jebale te bezvrijedne lampe tebe i tvog isusa

Some of the oil producers were unhappy, but American consumers were pleased that Rockefeller was selling cheap oil. Before 1870, only the rich could afford whale oil and candles. The rest had to go to bed early to save money. By the 1870s, with the drop in the price of kerosene, middle- and working-class people all over the nation could afford the one cent an hour that it cost to light their homes at night. Working and reading became after-dark activities new to most Americans in the 1870s.

ebenica wrote:

aben wrote:

From the time of his first job, where he earned 50 cents a day, the 16-year-old Rockefeller gave to his local Baptist church, to missions in New York City and abroad, and to the poor—black or white. As his salary increased, so did his giving. By the time he was 45, he was up to $100,000 per year; at age 53, he topped the $1,000,000 mark in his annual giving. His eightieth year was his most generous: $138,000,000 he happily gave away.

The more he earned the more he gave, and the more he gave the more he earned. To Rockefeller, it was the true fulfillment of the Biblical law: “Give, and it shall be given unto you; good measure, pressed down, and shaken together, and running over, shall men give into your bosom.” Not “money” itself but “the love of money” was “the root of all evil.”

Paying higher than market wages was Rockefeller’s controversial policy: he believed it helped slash costs in the long run. For example, Standard was rarely hurt by strikes or labor unrest. Also, he could recruit and keep the top talent and command their future loyalty.

jebate,

di ti vadiš ta usrana sranja?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludlow_Massacre

da, jeboteeeeeeeee

aben wrote:

kic wrote:
da su nas bar Ameri oslobodili 45'e a ne Sovjeti..

eh...da bar.

ali hayek je identificiro mocne silnice ke vodu ka socijalizmu. socijalizam igro na evoluitivnu prilagodbu covjeka, suosjecanje, zoto smo uvik u konstantnoj ooasnosti od sovjeta.

.      As The Economist reported recently, 51% of those polled between ages 18–29 have a positive view of socialism. That should scare you.  

ebenica wrote:

aben wrote:

ebenica wrote:

aben wrote:
kazes, government subsidies, a drives price up, eh?

nego, puno si toga napiso, ali ne i je li proizve jeftine lampe ke su ljudi dobrovoljno kupovali jer su ih cijenili vise od svojih soldov?

ne kažem ja ništa, kažu događaji i povijest.
kakve jebene lampe, dijelio ih je besplatno po kini da si proširi tržište, jebale te bezvrijedne lampe tebe i tvog isusa i konje dobro zbrinute.

kazes, dili ih muhte, prokletnik

drži se ti floskula, pusti ljude i događaje. prikaži ga k'o isusa, u floskulama si najjači.
ai odjeb.

ebenica wrote:

aben wrote:

ebenica wrote:jebale te bezvrijedne lampe tebe i tvog isusa

Some of the oil producers were unhappy, but American consumers were pleased that Rockefeller was selling cheap oil. Before 1870, only the rich could afford whale oil and candles. The rest had to go to bed early to save money. By the 1870s, with the drop in the price of kerosene, middle- and working-class people all over the nation could afford the one cent an hour that it cost to light their homes at night. Working and reading became after-dark activities new to most Americans in the 1870s.

tako je, jebeš stvarne događaje

kic wrote:

aben wrote:

kic wrote:
da su nas bar Ameri oslobodili 45'e a ne Sovjeti..

eh...da bar.

ali hayek je identificiro mocne silnice ke vodu ka socijalizmu. socijalizam igro na evoluitivnu prilagodbu covjeka, suosjecanje, zoto smo uvik u konstantnoj ooasnosti od sovjeta.

.      As The Economist reported recently, 51% of those polled between ages 18–29 have a positive view of socialism. That should scare you.  

uopće ne krivim institucije koje su ti mladi prošli, no-no

aben wrote:

kic wrote:

aben wrote:

kic wrote:
da su nas bar Ameri oslobodili 45'e a ne Sovjeti..

eh...da bar.

ali hayek je identificiro mocne silnice ke vodu ka socijalizmu. socijalizam igro na evoluitivnu prilagodbu covjeka, suosjecanje, zoto smo uvik u konstantnoj ooasnosti od sovjeta.

.      As The Economist reported recently, 51% of those polled between ages 18–29 have a positive view of socialism. That should scare you.  

uopće ne krivim institucije koje su ti mladi prošli, no-no

mislis na skule?
jel ih tribo preorati...?

kic wrote:

aben wrote:

kic wrote:

aben wrote:

kic wrote:
da su nas bar Ameri oslobodili 45'e a ne Sovjeti..

eh...da bar.

ali hayek je identificiro mocne silnice ke vodu ka socijalizmu. socijalizam igro na evoluitivnu prilagodbu covjeka, suosjecanje, zoto smo uvik u konstantnoj ooasnosti od sovjeta.

.      As The Economist reported recently, 51% of those polled between ages 18–29 have a positive view of socialism. That should scare you.  

uopće ne krivim institucije koje su ti mladi prošli, no-no

mislis na skule?
jel ih tribo preorati...?

većinu da-

svjedodžbe bez vrijednosti

aben wrote:

kic wrote:

aben wrote:

kic wrote:

aben wrote:

kic wrote:
da su nas bar Ameri oslobodili 45'e a ne Sovjeti..

eh...da bar.

ali hayek je identificiro mocne silnice ke vodu ka socijalizmu. socijalizam igro na evoluitivnu prilagodbu covjeka, suosjecanje, zoto smo uvik u konstantnoj ooasnosti od sovjeta.

.      As The Economist reported recently, 51% of those polled between ages 18–29 have a positive view of socialism. That should scare you.  

uopće ne krivim institucije koje su ti mladi prošli, no-no

mislis na skule?
jel ih tribo preorati...?

većinu da-

svjedodžbe bez vrijednosti

you just made my day:)

Gnječ wrote:

violator wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

violator wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben mene zanima kad ti nešto tvrdiš kako znaš da si u pravu? u pravu si jer ..........

Pa to je bjelodano. On se koristi razumom, ostali dupetom. Mislim, i ti svasta pitas.

on nas prezire mi ovdje njemu služimo jedino za zabavu to je već nekoliko puta napisao mnogi su mislili da se šali ja mislim da govori istinu. njemu nije do debate debata mu služi kao sredstvo za zabavu self-amusment da urbi et orbi i samome sebi dokaže kako je pametan i kako verbalnim smicalicama pobijedi svakog sugovornika.

Ali kako uopce moze pobijediti sugovornike, ako koristi verbalne smicalice? To je varanje.

naravno da je varanje pa i sam je napisao da ima cijeli arsenal logical fallacies i još sijaset drugih verbalnih smicalica i da se njima u razgovoru i debatama koristi. svi sofisti to rade. teško je ako ne i nemoguće s takvom osobom voditi ikakav normalni razgovor i debatu.

kic wrote:
čak ni igrajući obe KOTOR igre, nisam mogao postati Sith, kolikogod se trudio uvijek bi me moja djela bacala na Jedi council stranu..

violator wrote:

kic wrote:
čak ni igrajući obe KOTOR igre, nisam mogao postati Sith, kolikogod se trudio uvijek bi me moja djela bacala na Jedi council stranu..

Dobro je! Ako su ti igre referentni okvir...