Re: Popišala se po Kuranu i spalila ga

by Trinity Fri 17 Feb - 20:32

Ground Biscuits wrote:
Triny wrote:
Bracala wrote:
govinda wrote:I kad grune bomba onda muslimani krivi...

ona to radi bas zato sto gruvaju bombe...
Pišanjem protiv bombi?Biserka.
zbog vas su Grci unistili Troju

Helena se popišala na neku knjigu? geek

by Guest Fri 17 Feb - 20:32

Triny wrote:
Ground Biscuits wrote:
Triny wrote:
Bracala wrote:
govinda wrote:I kad grune bomba onda muslimani krivi...

ona to radi bas zato sto gruvaju bombe...
Pišanjem protiv bombi?Biserka.
zbog vas su Grci unistili Troju
Helena se popišala na neku knjigu?

nije nego je utekla od kuce ili tako nesto

by Trinity Fri 17 Feb - 20:33

n_razbojnik wrote:zna longi, emančipačija je napravil više sranja nego religije...

zbog nevjernih žena se više ratovalo nego zbog knjige

E krivo...zbog napaljenih muškaraca koji nisu mogli odoljeti ženama... geek

by veber Fri 17 Feb - 20:33

Ground Biscuits wrote:
Triny wrote:
Bracala wrote:
govinda wrote:I kad grune bomba onda muslimani krivi...

ona to radi bas zato sto gruvaju bombe...
Pišanjem protiv bombi?Biserka.
zbog vas su Grci unistili Troju

malo obnovi povijest.

by Guest Fri 17 Feb - 20:34

veber wrote:
Ground Biscuits wrote:
Triny wrote:
Bracala wrote:
govinda wrote:I kad grune bomba onda muslimani krivi...

ona to radi bas zato sto gruvaju bombe...
Pišanjem protiv bombi?Biserka.
zbog vas su Grci unistili Troju
malo obnovi povijest.

hocu,ti malo obnovi humor jocolor

by jastreb Fri 17 Feb - 20:35

n_razbojnik wrote:Nitko neće reći da su za najveće zločine i sukobe u svjetskoj povijesti krivi uvjereni ateisti i/ili ljudi uvjereni u premoć jednoga čovjeka nad drugim...ali no, Kuran i Bibliju užgat' i sve će magično sjesti na svoje mjesto

Bibliju i Koran ti izjednačuješ???

Za početak ti preporučujem da pročitaš samo prva dva poglavlja Ivanaovog Evanđelja,a potom i Pavlove poslanice.

by Guest Fri 17 Feb - 20:35

Triny wrote:
n_razbojnik wrote:zna longi, emančipačija je napravil više sranja nego religije...

zbog nevjernih žena se više ratovalo nego zbog knjige
E krivo...zbog napaljenih muškaraca koji nisu mogli odoljeti ženama...

mislis da je to,jebemu,pa tad se moglo imati vise zena jel tako,zamisli 5 zena pa to bi mu bilo dovoljno i da ima 2 kukca cat

by veber Fri 17 Feb - 20:37

Triny wrote:
n_razbojnik wrote:zna longi, emančipačija je napravil više sranja nego religije...

zbog nevjernih žena se više ratovalo nego zbog knjige
E krivo...zbog napaljenih muškaraca koji nisu mogli odoljeti ženama...

što naravno nije istina.

teoretski gledano, helena je bila sponzoruša, a mali nije nikad vidio pičke do helene.
pa su se malo zaratili.
neke vozikali mrtve na leđima, neke spizdili u petu.

neki plutali deset godinas da se ženi ne vrate. pred mirovinu se vratili.

i tak to..

by Guest Fri 17 Feb - 20:40

ja mislim da je onaj grcki kralj samo trazio izgovor da sjebe troju,i eto upotrijebio helenu za to,da nije bilo nje bilo bi nesto drugo

by n_razbojnik Fri 17 Feb - 20:40

jastreb wrote:
n_razbojnik wrote:Nitko neće reći da su za najveće zločine i sukobe u svjetskoj povijesti krivi uvjereni ateisti i/ili ljudi uvjereni u premoć jednoga čovjeka nad drugim...ali no, Kuran i Bibliju užgat' i sve će magično sjesti na svoje mjesto
Bibliju i Koran ti izjednačuješ???

Za početak ti preporučujem da pročitaš samo prva dva poglavlja Ivanaovog Evanđelja,a potom i Pavlove poslanice.

ja izjendačujem napisanu riječ...Mein Kampf ima svoju težinu, imaju Biblija, i Kuran, ima i Zločin i Kazna...knjige uništavaju samo primitivci

svoje preporuke ostavi za nekoga tko nije čitao navedeno

by michaellcmacha Fri 17 Feb - 20:40

metilda wrote:
michaellcmacha wrote:
metilda wrote:
kaja wrote:
metilda wrote:ja imam Kuran na počasnom mjestu u obiteljskoj knjižnici, dobila ga za poklon od prijatelja Muslimana kojemu smo za vrijeme rata slali pomoć u Sarajevo.. pitao me kako nam se može odužiti - rekoh - Kuranom. pa Kuran više časti Mariju i Isusa nego tzv. kršćanska Europa ... a ako je većina Muslimana shvatila Kuran kao boj protiv bezbožnika kršćana - nisu pogriješili - Europa i Amerika leglo su bezvjerja, ubojstava i bogohulništva... Kuran je religija mira - kao što su konkvistadoru pogrešno razumjeli NZ tako je moguće i većina Muslimana pogrešno shvatila Kuran.. rekla bih - Šejtan na djelu kao nikad do sada. :P
Nije, zapakirali su ti bombu u šareni bombon.Lako za Kuran mada i tamo ima agresivnih dijelova na djelu imaju politički islam kao pokret koji drži da je islam religija, način života i država a što nije slučaj kod kršćanstva, to je razlika, te da država treba biti uređena u skladu s odredbama islamskog prava. Kakve su to odredbe znamo svi (klanjanje sto puta dnevno, nekonzumiranje alkohola, brada, pokrivene žene, odrezati ruku za krađu, kamenovati ženu za preljub i sl., nevjernicima odrezati glavu u radikalnijem izdanju ). Znači karakter im je isključivo politički . Onda prevare europljanima radi mahnu Kuranom ispred nosa želeći reći - pa tu ne piše ništa agresivno, to je religija mira!
Je, kurac...
nisu mi ništa zapakirali - Kuran sam pročitala od prvog do zadnjeg ajeta, kao što sam pročitala i Toru - nema tu velike razlike ni u poimanju Boga ni u poimanju države i državnog uređenja, kao što nema razlike u interpretaciji bližnjega pa se bližnjim smatra samo pripadnik svoje religije.. ne ide mi se u detalje, ali samo je Jedan objavio "ljubite svoje neprijatelje" i objasnio da smo svi jedni drugima bližnji.. a ne židovsko "oko za oko zub za zub" no ipak, nemoguće je zatvoriit oči pred činjenicom da kršćani (mada su to većinom američki protestanti) ubijaju muslimane u muslimanskim državama - to je postalo tako svakodnevno da se smatra i normalnim i moralnim da ameri poubijaju cijelo selo jer su tamo navodno džihadisti - e pa sad reci tko je kome podvalio šareni bombon..
rukne... znaš li što su...

ne znam...

sory metilda ali svatko tko ustvrdi da je pročitao Kuran, ne može a da ne zna da su rukn-e, ili rukn-ovi stupovi temelja islamskog vjerovanja a koji pogotovo upadaju u oči svima onima koji se prvi put čitajući ga susreću sa Kuranom. ali dobro s obzirom da si bit će brzala čitajući evo da ti ukažem na jedan od vrlo značajnih rukn-i, odnosno temelja a on je dosta bitan za nas nevjernike, tj točnije rečeno krivovjernike...
Uzvišeni Allah je svojim poslanicima slao knjige u kojima je bila uputa, spas i svako dobro.
a) Tevrat (hb. Tora), a to je knjiga koju je Sveznajući Allah objavio svome poslaniku Musau, as. Tevrat je najcjenjenija knjiga kod sinova Israilovih.
b) Indžil (Evanđelje) koji je Allah objavio Svome poslaniku Isau, as.
c) Zebur kojeg je Svemogući objavio Davudu, as.
d) Suhuf Ibrahim (Ibrahimove stranice) koje su date Ibrahimu, as.
e) Kur’an Časni kojeg je Allah, džele š’anuhu, objavio Svome posljednjem poslaniku Muhamedu, salallahu alejhi ve selem. Objavljivanjem Kur’ana derogirane su sve prijašnje knjige. Uzvišeni Allah se obavezao da će Kur’an čuvati neiskrivljenim kako bi on ostao uputa i dokaz protiv svih ljudi sve do Sudnjega dana.

by Trinity Fri 17 Feb - 20:41

Ground Biscuits wrote:
Triny wrote:
n_razbojnik wrote:zna longi, emančipačija je napravil više sranja nego religije...

zbog nevjernih žena se više ratovalo nego zbog knjige
E krivo...zbog napaljenih muškaraca koji nisu mogli odoljeti ženama...
mislis da je to,jebemu,pa tad se moglo imati vise zena jel tako,zamisli 5 zena pa to bi mu bilo dovoljno i da ima 2 kukca

Mogao je ali on zapeo baš za tu. I sad je ona kriva.

by Guest Fri 17 Feb - 20:42

Triny wrote:
Ground Biscuits wrote:
Triny wrote:
n_razbojnik wrote:zna longi, emančipačija je napravil više sranja nego religije...

zbog nevjernih žena se više ratovalo nego zbog knjige
E krivo...zbog napaljenih muškaraca koji nisu mogli odoljeti ženama...
mislis da je to,jebemu,pa tad se moglo imati vise zena jel tako,zamisli 5 zena pa to bi mu bilo dovoljno i da ima 2 kukca
Mogao je ali on zapeo baš za tu. I sad je ona kriva.

zasto bi zapeo bas za nju? mogao je imati koju je htio skoro i bas za nju zapeo

by Trinity Fri 17 Feb - 20:43

Ground Biscuits wrote:ja mislim da je onaj grcki kralj samo trazio izgovor da sjebe troju,i eto upotrijebio helenu za to,da nije bilo nje bilo bi nesto drugo

Naravno, ali eto Helena ispala kriva.

by Guest Fri 17 Feb - 20:44

veber wrote:
metilda wrote:
pismejker wrote:
metilda wrote:
kaja wrote:
vrlo perverzno..neprijatelj ti siluje zenu i djecu,,tebe izmasakrira,a ti ga jos onda ljubi..ma jebem ja tu logiku..
MIR POSTOJI samo kad neprijatelj zna,da nakon sto on tebi nesto poradi,ti ces mu isim nacinom vratiti...sve ostal oje preseravanje...
Ljucka bica su ipak sam stepenica vise zivina...nista duhovno..čista mesina..

ne trebaš mi objašnjavati svoju logiku i logiku tvoje religije.. kako moju ne poznaješ osim po negativnoj propagandi neću ti ni pojašnjavati.. no Evropa se puno prije imigranata odrekla kršćanstva i kršćanskih vrijednosti, crkve su u Evropi prazne, uništava se kršćanski moral i kršćanske vrijednosti.. Evropa je davno u svoje temelje ugradila i ozakonila ubojstvo .. i zato i ne zna što je čeka, bit će krvi do koljena.. imigranti su u samo nuspojava
a jes pametna, jeblo mater.

svojoj kćeri sam za 14 i rođendan poklonio WALTER, 5,56. Ima 5+1 za ispalit.
iza kuće sam postavio metu i neka mala vježba.

gej is okej nije moja odrednica.

hvala, ja pijem mineralnu

by Trinity Fri 17 Feb - 20:44

Ground Biscuits wrote:
Triny wrote:
Ground Biscuits wrote:
Triny wrote:
n_razbojnik wrote:zna longi, emančipačija je napravil više sranja nego religije...

zbog nevjernih žena se više ratovalo nego zbog knjige
E krivo...zbog napaljenih muškaraca koji nisu mogli odoljeti ženama...
mislis da je to,jebemu,pa tad se moglo imati vise zena jel tako,zamisli 5 zena pa to bi mu bilo dovoljno i da ima 2 kukca
Mogao je ali on zapeo baš za tu. I sad je ona kriva.
zasto bi zapeo bas za nju? mogao je imati koju je htio skoro i bas za nju zapeo

Imala je ono nešto...

by Guest Fri 17 Feb - 20:45

Triny wrote:
Ground Biscuits wrote:ja mislim da je onaj grcki kralj samo trazio izgovor da sjebe troju,i eto upotrijebio helenu za to,da nije bilo nje bilo bi nesto drugo
Naravno, ali eto Helena ispala kriva.

pa nije ona nego onaj gelipter sto ju je oteo cat

by RayMabus Fri 17 Feb - 20:46

22
Aug
HOMER AND THE TROJAN WAR
Posted in History

Popišala se po Kuranu i spalila ga - Page 16 Homer_Trojan_War

[size][url][/url][/size]

[size=30]HOMER AND THE TROJAN WAR[/size]

DID THE CITY OF TROY REALLY EXIST?

SESSION 18/MAY/04.
Medium: Jorge Raul Olguin.

Entity that came to talk: Master Ruanel.
Interlocutor: Now I want to continue with the famous "War of Troy" I have some scheduled questions here to make a quick “ping pong” because the time of the session passes by very fast. Do you agree?
Ruanel: Yes, It seems good to me, you can start.
Interlocutor: Did Homer exist? I ask it because there are historians that question about it and they speak about several authors.
Ruanel: Yes, he existed.
Interlocutor: Was he prolific at writing?
Ruanel: Yes, he was.
Interlocutor: Where was he born?
Ruanel: He was born really in the North coast of what now is knows as Turkey. Then he moved to the part of Greece.
Interlocutor: Nothing to do, then, with the cities that dispute his birthplace, Argus, Athens, Rhodes, Salamis, Cyprus, Esmyrna?
Ruanel: Correct, the majority are cities from Greece.
Interlocutor: Was Melesigines his real name?
Ruanel: Yes, that was his real name.
Interlocutor: Was Homer truly blind?
Ruanel: That’s right.
Interlocutor: When was he born?
Ruanel: In the IX Century IX B.C.
Interlocutor: Did Homer wrote alone all his works? I refer especially to Iliad and The Odyssey.
Ruanel: Yes, he wrote them alone, although some detractors say he didn’t.
Interlocutor: Was Homer by chance the reincarnation of somebody who lived in Troy in the time of the famous war?
Ruanel: I know what you are looking for, but the answer is no.
Interlocutor: Did The so-called "Trojan War" exist?
Ruanel: Yes, it existed, and also the characters, but not all the cases their names are those that Homer gave them in Iliad. And neither the story of Homer is completely reliable, because there are many things invented.
Interlocutor: Obviously the famous “Trojan Horse” didn't exist.
Ruanel: It doesn’t make sense something so childish.
Interlocutor: I was guessing something like that. And the so commented Achilles heel?
Ruanel: Achilles didn't have any invulnerability and even less in the heel, his armor simply didn't shield him and a poisoned arrow crossed him and he died in 20 minutes.
Interlocutor: Was he lucky or he had skills to be able to survive so much time?
Ruanel: Some the two things. In fact he was a warrior who had a lot of skill in combat.
Interlocutor: Was Paris the one who killed him with the poisoned arrow?
Ruanel: Yes, but Paris was not his name. This name was invented by Homer.
Interlocutor: Did the Famous Helen have something to do with the war?
Ruanel: Her name was not Helen either, but she existed.
Interlocutor: Did Paris abduct her like Homer wrote?
Ruanel: No, they fell in love. Helen was with the king of Esparta for charity, besides, he was also a much older man than her. Helen meets Paris and she leaves with him. There is no kidnapping.
Interlocutor: But the war had something to do with this fact?
Ruanel: Yes, it had to do, because the wars take place for two reasons, maybe not at the present time, but in the old days yes, because the wars were smaller and the passions bigger: on one hand, because of affairs, spites and those things, and on the other hand because of longings for power, economic issues, etc.
Interlocutor: Definitely, any excuse is good to start a war.
Ruanel: That’s the exact point.
Interlocutor: Does the movie "Troy" have similarity as to the cute blond guy Brad Pitt?
Ruanel: No, because it is very Hollywood-style. For example, they depict Achilles as a righteous man and actually Achilles was very cruel.
Interlocutor: Well, but the movie is right because Helen was not kidnapped by Paris but rather both of them fell in love.
Ruanel: In that aspect, yes.
Interlocutor: How did Homer know all these things? Was he a medium maybe?
Ruanel: That’s right, he communicated with Entities of Light.
Interlocutor: Did Homer know about this communication or he believed those things came out from his imagination?
Ruanel: The second thing.
Interlocutor: Didn't Homer know then that what he wrote was real?
Ruanel: That’s correct. Homer even received messages about Atlantis. He was one of the few of the antiquity who spoke about it.
Interlocutor: What is the percentage of historical accuracy the Iliad has?
Ruanel: It almost has 90% of accuracy; except by the names that are invented. In addition, Homer has exaggerated some things.
Interlocutor: Was there really a Siege of Troy 10 years?
Ruanel: No, that’s absurd. Where would they get so many foods to resist one decade?
Interlocutor: How long did it last then?
Ruanel: At the most 6 months, and this time is even too much.
Interlocutor: Why did Troy fall?
Ruanel: Troy fell because it was not unassailable at all. You have to keep in mind the time in which that happened. There were no castles like those of the Middle Age, with their moats and their drawbridges.
Interlocutor: Nothing to do then, with the movie?
Ruanel: Absolutely not. The movie exhibits Troy as a fortress and in reality it was like that. Don't forget that Hollywood magnifies all things.
Interlocutor: The movie shows Achilles challenging Hector and he accepting the challenge. Did something like that happen in reality?
Ruanel: Yes, that was real.
Interlocutor: Was it something common that two warriors fought alone in front of everybody?
Ruanel: No, what happened is that Achilles was extremely conceited.
Interlocutor: Is it real the scene in which Achilles kills Hector and then he drags him through the dirt taking his corpse away?
Ruanel: Yes, it is real.
Interlocutor: Was Homer a similar medium to Benitez with its "Horse of Troy”?
Ruanel: What happens is that Benitez put more things that Homer. But Homer, although he was more faithful to the messages he received, he also magnified some facts.
Interlocutor: Did Priam exist?
Ruanel: Yes, but not with that name.
Interlocutor: Was Troy completely destroyed by fire?
Ruanel: Yes, the fact is correct.
Interlocutor: A wealthy German merchant called Heinrich Schliemann not only discovered the city of Troy, demonstrating that it existed, but also others more, I believe that it was reconstructed nine times.
Ruanel: No, not so many times. It was reconstructed only twice. They simply modified the constructions, by removing or adding things.
Interlocutor: I understand. When did the conflict take place more or less?
Ruanel: Around the XIII Century B.C, some hundreds of years before the birth of Homer.
Interlocutor: To conclude with this topic, was there some kind of homosexual relationship between Patroclus and Achilles?
Ruanel: No, Achilles was not homosexual.
Interlocutor: Well, all the questions that I had scheduled are already responded.

by Leviathan2 Fri 17 Feb - 20:46

michaellcmacha wrote:
Leviathan2 wrote:
michaellcmacha wrote:
Leviathan2 wrote:
pismejker wrote:
Da,kao humor..jer i jeste humor..Ako imas IQ kako kazes,jasno ti mora biti da su religije uzrok usukobljavanja nacija i vjera.Mos ti vjerovati u Boga,to je uredu,ali slijediti neke vjerske doktrine koje postoje sam oda bi se mase ljudi uredno vodile poput copora ovaca,malo razmisli..
I ponovno..vjera je u covjeku,ne napisanoj rijeci..Postoji samo Bog,nikakve institucije koje smatraju ljude bedastim,tako da im oni trebaju pojasnjavati neke stvari...
religije su rak rana covjekova postojanja, i dok je religija bit ce i sukoba

postoji pun kurac bogova, neki veci neki manji al svi spadaju u rang bogova i oni su skoro svi neprijatelj covjeka
Bog je stvorio čovjeka... ne mre mu još i prijatelj biti... to ti je kao d aočekuješ da soroš bude prijatelj draganu zeliću... :))))... jebote pa stvorio ga je, dao mu kruh, najebo cijelu naciju da plaća taj kruh dok ovaj kurcom ne mrda i tako godinama, i sad još soroš i da mu bude prijatelj... jbg nema soroš vremena za te niskoprizemne zajebancije....;)
bog nije stvorio covjekam to su vam prodali zhidovske price
ok nije Bog, ali nekakva kreacija kako za cijeli neživi svemir, tako i za ovu zeru života je morala proizaći... a kad bacimo pogled, bar onoliko koliko seže kroz prostor i "vrijeme" vidimo da je bar tu u našoj" bližoj" okolini sve neka "slučajnost" do slučajnosti... ;)

nisu slucajnosti :D
bas naprotiv medjutim bogovi nemaju nista s tim, njihova moc kreacije je mizerna,
prouci religiju starih slavena, iako su stovali bogove oni su jos uvijek imali znanje o poretku , ima u i nekim drugim izumrlim nazovimo religijama,
medjutim ovaj zhidovski jahve je definitivno mucak al zesci, kao i hrpetina drugih bogova,
paraziti
ako pogledas staro pismo malo pazljivije vidjeces da on trazi stovanje samo njega i da nemogu imat drugih bogova osim njega
imas i onu pricu o mojsiju iz egipta gdje se mojsije bori sa svestenicima protiv moci drugih bogova,
entitet dosta mocan i krvolocan , nis drugo, medjutim i on je prdnuo na rosu, ne moze pohodit zemlju vec eonima

by Guest Fri 17 Feb - 20:47

Triny wrote:
Ground Biscuits wrote:
Triny wrote:
Ground Biscuits wrote:
Triny wrote:
E krivo...zbog napaljenih muškaraca koji nisu mogli odoljeti ženama...
mislis da je to,jebemu,pa tad se moglo imati vise zena jel tako,zamisli 5 zena pa to bi mu bilo dovoljno i da ima 2 kukca
Mogao je ali on zapeo baš za tu. I sad je ona kriva.
zasto bi zapeo bas za nju? mogao je imati koju je htio skoro i bas za nju zapeo
Imala je ono nešto...

imala je nešto junferasto u sebi a kralj se ložio baš na to geek

by n_razbojnik Fri 17 Feb - 20:50

Svi se zapale za tu Troju koja je ipak legenda ispisana od slijepog pjesnika...dakle Helena je mogla, ako je postojala biti i najljepša kobila u uzgoju king

ali tko bi to uzimao srcu da je zaista i bila

meni je ipak interesantnija spika o Rozamundi, i tu je Triny na tragu

by Sponsored content