Merekelica će internet ksenofobima davati otkaze, te oduzimati djecu zbog "negativnog utejcaja"

by Kermit Wed 30 Sep - 3:29

https://anwaltauskunft.de/magazin/leben/ehe-familie/1178/rassismus-und-kindererziehung-droht-verlust-des-umgangsrechtes/

by Kermit Wed 30 Sep - 3:30

he discussion about reception and accommodation of refugees promotes some pleasant but also shocking pages of Deutsche evident: More and more people speak out "concerned" to openly xenophobic or even demonstrate against refugee homes.This can these people not only cost Facebook and real friendships, but also their jobs. Can it have an impact on the access and custody of their child? That should especially mothers and fathers interested, the joint with a xenophobic active ex-partner educate her child - and worry that the child by him or the wrong values are taught, they fall into the wrong circles, respectively.
"Children can not properly classify much, they are so much more suggestible than adults," explains lawyer Eva Becker, Chair of the Working Group on Family Law in the German Bar Association (DAV). However, when it therefore go, the access rightsto restrict a parent or to withdraw, first count only one thing: the welfare of the child.

It is one of the child's welfare - and common sense

This means that the political or religious convictions of a parent only has an effect on rights of the child when it is jeopardized. If one parent has only a controversial opinion, is not enough that to deprive him of the right of access or restrict.Responsible for this is the Family Court.
Where is the line? "What counts is the common sense, common sense," says Eva Becker. A dramatic example: Anyone who says that it would prefer it if in his neighborhood no Syrian refugees would live, so that the child's welfare is not tangent. Does a father or a mother, however before the child that would be best to kill all the refugees, it clearly exceeds thus the critical limit.
Worse than statements generally weigh actions: There is something else to talk in the presence of the child with friends disparagingly of asylum seekers, as the child take to xenophobic demonstrations. But even here, not one action per se, but the impact on the child. A mother who attends the lectures of a so-called hate preacher, while the child is in daycare, and in time with the child about the content of these sermons says nothing, thereby jeopardizing not the child's welfare.

Criminality not initially decisive

When handling legal matters, it is also only once irrespective of whether the parent is liable to prosecution with his statements or actions. This also applies to outside political commitment. Another example: One of the parents has been active in the drug scene as a dealer and therefore was attacked and beaten on several occasions.He would probably get no visitation rights with the child - but not (only) because of criminal activities, but also because a renewed attack is likely and thus the child is in danger.

Even apolitical, harmful influence can cost visitation rights

Negative influence of the child, which can lead to the deprivation of rights, may not always be politically. So it'll be before that grandparents trying to incite the child against the ex-son-or ex-daughter. You may have been always against the parents' relationship and are now trying the discharge over the child. In such a case, which can deal with the grandparents will be banned.

Accompanied or reduced handling possible

What opportunities have mothers and fathers now, to protect the child from the negative influence of the other parent or other relatives? Is the child's welfare at risk, the right of access is often initially limited. A accompanied handling is possible. Then, for example, is a teacher present at the meeting who can intervene if necessary. It is also possible to prohibit certain acts, manifestations or meetings in the presence of the child.

Loss of custody only ultimate consequence

The affected parent Displays unreasonable or he does not change his behavior, give him or her the handling can be completely denied. So far, only talk of the rights of access - it is suspected that a parent influences the child in the wrong direction, this is first restricted. The Custody, which is mainly about decisions about the child is deprived of one parent only in the final analysis. Suspected to be occupied
The question remains: Suppose you suspected that the ex-partner the child conveys values that can damage it - how could that prove? Lawyer Becker admits: "In oral statements word against statement. The affected parent can deny everything afterwards. "The statements of children could of course be considered. However, I'm on the age and maturity of the child.
"As a rule, the court must, however, not solely rely on the information from children. Often is also known from other sources that he who moves in circles critical or more often, for example, expresses xenophobic ", informed the family law expert from Berlin. Be so, are also given easy evidence and witnesses.

Racism on the Internet? Collect screenshots and printouts

The Internet in general and social networks in particular, the possibility to provide excellent services. Who is concerned about the attitude of an ex-partner, could be found confirmed in his comments, what he suspected. Attorney Becker advises to make the relevant pages of screenshots or print the pages. If it came to the process, such evidence may be helpful.

Youth welfare office does not always turn on offer

Many wonder also when the youth welfare office must inform. "That one must not" informed Eva Becker. "Sometimes it's even better not to do that." If you'd had earlier conflicts with an employee of the Youth Welfare Office, it was unhelpful to or contact with his worries to him or her.
If you suspect the first step should be to reach agreement with the other parent in a two-person conversation to establish a basic consensus of values to be conveyed.

When should you turn on a lawyer?

If you suspect that your ex-partner their child may face harmful influences, and a private conversation leads to no solution, you should appoint a lawyer. A lawyer or a lawyer can tell you how to behave in a particular case and what documents you need for it. A family law expert can also decide whether it makes sense to turn to the Youth Welfare Office or not. Because: While youth welfare offices for working families, struggling lawyers for the parents. Here you find a lawyer or a family law attorney in your area.

by Guest Wed 30 Sep - 3:32

Durchfall

by epikur37 Wed 30 Sep - 3:40

Kraljica Merkel :) čelična dama :D

by prckov Wed 30 Sep - 4:01

zar nije lakse takvim roditeljima dio mozga (koji je odgovoran za te stvari) kiruski odstranit, nesto kao u letu iznad kukavicjeg gnijezda

by prckov Wed 30 Sep - 4:02

moramo svi mislit isto

by Guest Wed 30 Sep - 4:27

Očito Merkelica misli da će Arapima podijeliti hrpe državljanstva inaće je na sljedećim izborima fasovala.

by catabbath Wed 30 Sep - 4:27

Rasizam vrijedi samo za bijelce. A šta je s ovim muslićima koji urlaju "sharia for Europe" i sl.? To je njihovo ljudsko pravo?

by Guest Wed 30 Sep - 4:28

epikur37 wrote:Kraljica Merkel :) čelična dama :D

Da Bismarck vidi što radi nikada ne bi ni stvarao Njemačku.

by Guest Wed 30 Sep - 4:29

dawson wrote:Rasizam vrijedi samo za bijelce. A šta je s ovim muslićima koji urlaju "sharia for Europe" i sl.? To je njihovo ljudsko pravo?

Da barem samo to urlaju. To ovi umjereni urlaju. Ovi malo radikalni već viči pobiti čemo nevjernike.

by jastreb Wed 30 Sep - 4:31

Merkelica će uništiti Njemačku.

Onaj Šreder uopće nije bio loš.

by v_vlado Wed 30 Sep - 4:34

Već je uništena zato svi hoće u njemačku a hrvatska svakim danom napreduje ....

by kaya Wed 30 Sep - 4:35

A jebote, ova se internetom bavi a miljon luđaka sto se bodu noževima a nisu kirurzi joj pred vratima...

by Guest Wed 30 Sep - 5:09

To su njeni glasači ;)

by dzango Wed 30 Sep - 5:12

kaja_333 wrote:A jebote, ova se internetom bavi a miljon luđaka sto se bodu noževima a nisu kirurzi joj pred vratima...

Hirurzi se ne bodu noževima.

by catabbath Wed 30 Sep - 5:13

Uf samo da Merkelici neko ne dojavi za ovaj forum, bilo bi posla za socijalne službe :)

by Guest Wed 30 Sep - 5:15

Meni može uzeti guštera samo. I dao bi joj ga samo tako. I ovako i onako taj kurac od nastambe troši hrpu struje. Ali žao mi ga je ubiti. Tako da mogao bi ga udomiti kod Merkalice. Ako uzima ove Arape može i mog guštera.

by Guest Wed 30 Sep - 5:46

Iguana?

by dzango Wed 30 Sep - 5:56

U EU je na delu Veliki brat. Sledeće je Policija misli koja će oduzimati decu zbog pisanja po internetu. Onda valjda sledi odvođenje u logor na prevaspitavanje. Taman da preurede i aktiviraju Aušvic, Dahau...

by catabbath Wed 30 Sep - 7:21

dzango wrote:Onda valjda sledi odvođenje u logor na prevaspitavanje.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_Camp_of_Tolerance

by Sponsored content

Merekelica će internet ksenofobima davati otkaze, te oduzimati djecu zbog "negativnog utejcaja"