Sirija

Rusija je razmestila sedam tenkova u sirijskoj vazduhoplovnoj bazi u blizini Latakije, uporišta sirijskog predsednika Bašara Asada, saopštili su američki zvaničnici.

Neimenovani američki zvaničnik je agenciji Rojters rekao da je u bazi viđeno sedam ruskih tenkova "T-90".

Britanska agencija navodi da dva zvaničnika tvrde da su Rusi tamo razmestili i artiljeriju.

http://www.blic.rs/Vesti/Svet/590600/SIRIJA-Sedam-ruskih-tenkova-u-vazduhoplovnoj-bazi

https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-90

Polako oni budu navukli masu toga..kom krivo kom pravo..a Ubama se naso komentirati strategiju,lik koji ima par sto savjetnika za svaki qrc sto mora odluciti..

COLUMNISTS
20:42 15.09.2015(updated 20:53 15.09.2015) Get short URL
Andrew Korybko
21186260

The US’ obsessive insistence that “Assad must go” is the most dangerous expression of American arrogance in years.

White House Press Secretary Joshua Earnest channeled President Obama’s famous chant that “Assad must go” when he claimed during a regular press briefing that:
“The international community has decided that it’s time for Assad to go.  He clearly has lost legitimacy to lead.  He has lost the confidence of those citizens of his country — at least the ones that — or I guess I should say particularly the ones that he is using the resources of the military to attack.”
The arrogance on display is both stupefying and dangerous. The problem in Syria isn’t, nor ever has been, President Assad – it’s always been the US’ arrogance in dictating demands and then militarily enforcing them after they’ve been rejected.
American Arrogance
Syria’s ills are directly traceable to the failure of American foreign policy in the Mideast. The US rabidly went on a regime change streak that began during the Bush years, with former Supreme Allied Commander of Europe for NATO General Wesley Clarkrevealing in his 2007 memoirs that a senior general showed him a memo and said:
“‘Here’s the paper from the Office of the Secretary of Defense [then Donald Rumsfeld] outlining the strategy. We’re going to take out seven countries in five years.’ And he named them, starting with Iraq and Syria and ending with Iran.”


[size]
Saudi Arabia Backs Political Settlement in Syria Without Assad
Earlier that year, investigative journalist Seymour Hersh wrote anexpose in The New Yorker in which he detailed, among other proposed regional regime change specifics, that the Bush Administration was planning to use the Muslim Brotherhood to launch a Gulf-funded sectarian war against the Syrian government.

At the time, the reason was supposedly because of Damascus’ closeness to Tehran, but later information as reported by The Guardian reveals that the decision to build a Friendship Pipeline between Iran, Iraq, and Syria in 2010, and Damascus’ rejection of a similar one from Qatar, likely had a lot to do with why the anti-government terrorist plan was pushed forward for activation the year after.
Beginning in 2011, the Mideast was rocked by the so-called “Arab Spring”, which Russian General Chief of Staff Valery Gerasimov would in hindsight categorize as a theater-wide Color Revolution during an official conference on the topic last year in Moscow.
What the US had wanted to do is overthrow all of the Mideast’s republics (even those allied with the US such a Egypt) in order to bring a transnational Muslim Brotherhood clique to power in each of them that would thus make it a lot easier to control the entire region.


[/size][size]
Arab Nations 'Paying Back' to Europe for its Destructive Middle East Policy
Think of it as the neocons’ version of a 21st-century communist party, but directed towards control of the Mideast and not Europe (which has the EU for that).

The Gulf Monarchies were not targeted because of their staunch pro-American allegiance and the potential that any domestic disruption would have in upsetting the US’ economic interests there.
Between the pro-American Gulf Monarchies and the pro-American EU thus lay a handful of republics that weren’t so firmly under the US’ sway (or not at all influenced by it like Syria), so in order for the US to securely control the broad swatch of Afro-Eurasia stretching from Iceland to Yemen, it needed to overthrow those governments, ergo the “Arab Spring” Color Revolutions.
The People’s Will


[/size][size]
EU Migrant Crisis: Coincidence or Plot Aimed at Starting Military Operation in Syria?
But something went wrong as it always does with the US’ plans, and it was that the Syrian people wholeheartedly rejected the Muslim Brotherhood’s ploy at regime change, instead favoring to preserve the secular and multicultural society that Syrian civilization is historically known for.

For this simple reason, the Color Revolution attempt was a dismal failure from the very beginning, hence why the US and its allies (notably Turkey, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia) sought to transform it into an Unconventional War by arming their proxies and ordering them to escalate their soft coup attempt into a hard one.
The resultant Hybrid War that’s been raging for the past four and a half years is thus a manifestation of the US’ geopolitical obsession for regime change. Far from realizing that the people had resoundingly rejected such an approach from the very beginning, the US and its allies dug in by reinforcing their proxy elements inside the country and allowing foreign fighters to flood into Syria via the Turkish border.


[/size][size]
Assad: Europe Must Stop Supporting Terrorists to End Migrant Crisis
Amidst this external onslaught being launched against them, the Syrian people continued to bravely soldier on and democratically show the rest of the world that they supported their government.

A constitutional referendum in 2012passed by an 89% margin and with the participation of 57% of the population, while President Assad was reelectedin 2014 with 88.7% of the vote in which 73% of the electorate took part.
Both sets of numbers trump the civil society participation and political legitimacy of Western countries and their leaders, and as President Assad once said, there is no way he could remain in office during this war if he didn’t truly have the support of the vast majority of the population.
It’s also telling that most of the country’s refugees haven’t fled the country, but have instead decided to stay in their homeland and seek safety under the protection of the Syrian Arab Army, which currently provides security to around 80% of Syria’s citizens.
Be that as it is, the US and its allies stubbornly ignored the people’s will, and instead continued to blindly pump weapons and fighters into the country in clear confirmation of the adage that insanity is “repeating the same thing over again but expecting different results”. 

“If the situation unravels there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in Eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).


[/size][size]
Putin: Russian Support of Syrian Gov't Averts Deterioration of Situation
This bombshell dovetails with what Syrian Ambassador to Russia Riyad Haddad recently said in an interview where he accused the US of using terrorism to promote regime change in his country. President Putin followed up at the CSTO summit bywarning countries of the risks inherent in employing double-standards towards terrorists and directly or indirectly using them to further certain tactical objectives.

In order to stem the tide of terror that the US unleashed in the Mideast, Russia is rapidly moving forward with assembling an inclusive anti-ISIL coalition, and President Putin is expected to use his keynote speech at the UN General Assembly later this month to make his case that the situation is far too pressing to care about regime change, and that the world must unite in supporting Syria as it fights on its behalf on the frontlines against terror.  
American arrogance got the world into this mess, but if you ask Russia, it’ll be Syrian humility that gets it out in one piece.[/size]


Read more: http://sputniknews.com/columnists/20150915/1027039805.html#ixzz3lrJ62eSY

Die besseren Argumente: Putin drängt in Syrien-Krise die USA in die Defensive
Russlands Präsident Putin gewinnt langsam die Oberhand in der Diskussion über die Lösung des Syrien-Konflikts. Die US-Regierung steht ohne politischen Plan da. Statt alles zu unternehmen, um die Massen-Vertreibung aus dem Nahen Osten zu stoppen, schicken die Amerikaner Think Tanks in die Schlacht: Sie bauen die Legende auf, dass eigentlich Putin am Chaos in Syrien schuld sei.

Die EU ist bereits zu weiten Teilen auf Putins Seite: Vor allem Deutschland hat überraschend verlauten lassen, dass ein Ende der Kämpfe in Syrien nur mit Putin und Assad möglich sei. Zuvor hatten Spanien und Österreich dieselbe Position eingenommen. Italiens größte Oppositionspartei Forza Italia fordert auch eine Normalisierung des Verhältnisses mit Russland. Ex-Premier Silvio Berlusconi hat vor einigen Tagen sogar Putin auf der Krim besucht.

http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2015/09/15/die-besseren-argumente-putin-draengt-in-syrien-krise-die-usa-in-die-defensive/

----------------------------------------------------


  Boljim argumentima Putin stavlja Ameriku u defanzivu


Ne čineći ništa da zaustave rat u Siriji, jer nemaju plana i ideja, Amerika provodi
samo Think Tanks ,pričajući bajke da je Rusija kriva za rat u Siriji i izbjeglice po Europi.


 EU je takodjer većim djelom  na Putinovoj strani. Čak prvenstveno Njemačka
 sada potvrdjuje da se kriza može riješiti jedino uz Putina. 


 Istoga stajališta su Španjolska, Austrija, Češka, Italija.


  Izvrstan članak i analiza Njemačkog DWN

Yehudi wrote: 
 EU je takodjer većim djelom  na Putinovoj strani. Čak prvenstveno Njemačka
 sada potvrdjuje da se kriza može riješiti jedino uz Putina. 


 Istoga stajališta su Španjolska, Austrija, Češka, Italija. 

Samo jedna zemlja je na sasvim suprotnom stajalištu.

I toliko su uporni u tome da je to grdo za slušat.

Da.

MIDDLE EAST

[size=47]Russian military planes land in Syria[/size]

Moscow says it airlifted supplies to set up refugee camp, as Syria's main opposition blasts military intervention.

12 Sep 2015 18:06 GMT | [size=12]Middle East, Syria, Russia, Bashar al-Assad[/size]

•  
  
• 89
  
•   
  
• 188
  
• 
  
  
• 
  

• 
  
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

Russia has confirmed it is airlifting weapons to Syria, a longtime ally, and Russian troops are training the Syrian army [AP]
Russian military cargo planes have landed in the Syrian city of Latakia, Russia's defence ministry says, as Syria's main opposition group blasted Moscow over its military presence in the country.
Defence Ministry spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov said on Saturday the supplies were sent to set up a tent camp for more than 1,000 refugees and included beds, mattresses, stoves, water cisterns and food.
Syrian state media confirmed that two Russian planes carrying humanitarian aid had arrived in the coastal city.

Russia confirms weapons on flights to Syria

[size]
US President Barack Obama on Friday expressed concern about Russia's increased military activity in Syria, particularly at an air base near Latakia.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said that Russia is airlifting weapons to Syria, a longtime ally, and Russian troops are training the Syrian army on how to use them.
On Saturday the Syrian National Coalition condemned what it called "direct Russian military intervention," describing such a step as "hostile behaviour".
The coalition's statement said the Russian intervention put Moscow in a position that is "hostile to the Syrian people and turns its forces in Syria to occupation forces".
Russia has been a longtime backer of Syria's government, and it has supported Syrian President Bashar Assad throughout the civil war by shielding him from UN sanctions and providing weapons.
It also appears eager to send a broader message that Moscow remains loyal to its allies and strongly resents forceful change of regimes through foreign interference.
"The direct Russian military intervention will not lead to the regime's rescue, give it legitimacy or rehabilitate it," the coalition said in a statement. It added that the Russian intervention will "lead to more killing, destruction and displacement".
Meanwhile, in the Mediterranean island of Cyprus close to the Syrian coast, the government confirmed that Russian authorities have informed it of live-fire naval exercises to be conducted off Syria.
An official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to publicly discuss military matters told the Associated Press on Saturday that such exercises were "routine" and occurred every couple of months.
The official said they would not affect civilian air traffic. It was not known when the exercises would take place.[/size]

http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2015/09/17/inside-the-only-sas-and-delta-force-raid-on-an-isis-leader-how-baghdadi-deputy-was-shot-twice-in-the-chest-as-he-grabbed-gun-and-his-wife-pretended-to-be-a-yazidi-sex-slave-in-cowardly-bid-to-evade-c/

 O tome kako je ustvari ubijen visoki  isis-ovac Abu Sayaf

i ne, nije ga ubila sex-robinja Jezidkinja....

„Im Syrien-Krieg auf Russland zugehen“

Die Rolle Russlands bei der Lösung des Syrien-Konflikts wird immer wichtiger. EU-Parlamentspräsident Martin Schulz spricht sich auf der Konferenz „Denk ich an Deutschland“ dafür aus, mit Moskau zu kooperieren, um den Krieg zu beenden.


Martin Schulz -18.09.2015, von MAJID SATTAR, BERLIN


 Der Präsident des Europäischen Parlaments Martin Schulz hat sich dafür ausgesprochen, im Syrien-Krieg auf Moskau zuzugehen. 
-----------------------------------------------
 Predsjednik Eu Parlamenta  Martin Schulz podržava Moskvu
 u nastojanjima zaustavljanja rata u Siriji-

Koliko ruskih vojnika je potrebno da bi Assad povratio cijeli izgubljeni teritorij? 10? 20?

 Mislim stvarno !

Vrime je za Križarski rat koji će ovaj put pokreniti Rusija.

Islamistički krvavi pir se mora zaustaviti.