Uhljeb the planet

Weberovi svapski geni,ljudima sigurno gule kozu sa ledja...

bogomdani wrote:Weberovi svapski geni,ljudima sigurno gule kozu sa ledja...

pa plaćeni su za to. moj odio je najmlađi, najobrazovaniji i najbolje plaćen.
svi sretni i zadovoljni.

1.   Države stranke priznaju djetetu pravo na zaštitu od ekonomskog izrabljivanja i obavljanja svakog rada koji bi za nj bio pogibeljan ili ometao njegovo obrazovanje, ili bio štetan za njegovo zdravlje ili njegov tjelesni, duševni, duhovni, moralni ili socijalni razvoj.
2.   Države stranke će poduzeti zakonodavne, upravne, socijalne i prosvjetne mjere kako bi osigurale primjenu ovoga članka. U tom cilju i uzimajući u obzir odgovarajuće odredbe drugih međunarodnih instrumenata, države stranke će napose:
 
a)  odrediti minimalnu dob ili minimalne dobi za zapošljavanje;
b)  predvidjeti odgovarajuće propisivanje radnog vremena i uvjeta zapošljavanja;
c)  predvidjeti odgovarajuće kazne i druge mjere kako bi osigurale djelotvornu primjenu ovoga članka.

gargamel0101 wrote:Na sastanku ZET-ovih predstavnika Sindikata vozača i prometnih radnika s Upravom postignut je dogovor da prednost pri zapošljavanju imaju djeca ili supružnici njihovih radnika.
http://www.jutarnji.hr/nevjerojatan-nepotizam-na-djelu-u-zet-u-sluzbeno-odluceno-da-prednost-pri-zaposljavanju-imaju-djeca-i-supruznici-njihovih-radnika/1389914/

Pa normalno da imaju prednost. Ipak su djeca i supružnici godinama slušali interna događanja za vrijeme obiteljskih okupljanja, i znaju šta su radili i Julije i Ivan, rodijak Mijo, koga su kad smijenili i di su bili na janjetini. 

Tako da  novozaposleni ne treba imati mentora kad dođe. Sve zna o svima te mu nije potrebno buljiti u organigram da skuži ko je gdje u hijerarhiji. 
Praktično  

The Trouble With Child Labor Laws

• 
  
  

FEBRUARY 11, 2008Jeffrey A. Tucker
TAGS Free MarketsMedia and CultureInterventionism
Let's say you want your computer fixed or your software explained. You can shell out big bucks to the Geek Squad, or you can ask — but you can't hire — a typical teenager, or even a preteen. Their experience with computers and the online world is vastly superior to that of most people over the age of 30. From the point of view of online technology, it is the young who rule. And yet they are professionally powerless: they are forbidden by law from earning wages from their expertise.
Might these folks have something to offer the workplace? And might the young benefit from a bit of early work experience, too? Perhaps — but we'll never know, thanks to antiquated federal, state, and local laws that make it a crime to hire a kid.
Pop culture accepts these laws as a normal part of national life, a means to forestall a Dickensian nightmare of sweat shops and the capitalist exploitation of children. It's time we rid ourselves of images of children tied to rug looms in the developing world. The kids I'm talking about are one of the most courted of all consumer sectors. Society wants them to consume, but law forbids them to produce.
You might be surprised to know that the laws against "child labor" do not date from the 18th century. Indeed, the national law against child labor didn't pass until the Great Depression — in 1938, with the Fair Labor Standards Act. It was the same law that gave us a minimum wage and defined what constitutes full-time and part-time work. It was a handy way to raise wages and lower the unemployment rate: simply define whole sectors of the potential workforce as unemployable.
By the time this legislation passed, however, it was mostly a symbol, a classic case of Washington chasing a trend in order to take credit for it. Youth labor was expected in the 17th and 18th centuries — even welcome, since remunerative work opportunities were newly present. But as prosperity grew with the advance of commerce, more kids left the workforce. By 1930, only 6.4 percent of kids between the ages of 10 and 15 were actually employed, and 3 out of 4 of those were in agriculture.1
In wealthier, urban, industrialized areas, child labor was largely gone, as more and more kids were being schooled. Cultural factors were important here, but the most important consideration was economic. More developed economies permit parents to "purchase" their children's education out of the family's surplus income — if only by foregoing what would otherwise be their earnings.
The law itself, then, forestalled no nightmare, nor did it impose one. In those days, there was rising confidence that education was the key to saving the youth of America. Stay in school, get a degree or two, and you would be fixed up for life. Of course, that was before academic standards slipped further and further, and schools themselves began to function as a national child-sitting service. Today, we are far more likely to recognize the contribution that disciplined work makes to the formation of character.
And yet we are stuck with these laws, which are incredibly complicated once you factor in all state and local variations. Kids under the age of 16 are forbidden to earn income in remunerative employment outside a family business. If dad is a blacksmith, you can learn to pound iron with the best of 'em. But if dad works for a law firm, you are out of luck.
From the outset, federal law made exceptions for kid movie stars and performers. Why? It probably has something to do with how Shirley Temple led box-office receipts from 1934–1938. She was one of the highest earning stars of the period.
If you are 14 or 15, you can ask your public school for a waiver and work a limited number of hours when school is not in session. And if you are in private school or home school, you must go ask your local Social Service Agency — not exactly the most welcoming bunch. The public school itself is also permitted to run work programs.
This point about approved labor is an interesting one, if you think about it. The government doesn't seem to mind so much if a kid spends all nonschool hours away from the home, family, and church, but it forbids them from engaging in private-sector work during the time when they would otherwise be in public schools drinking from the well of civic culture.
The legal exemption is also made for delivering newspapers, as if bicycles rather than cars were still the norm for this activity.
Here is another strange exemption: "youth working at home in the making of wreaths composed of natural holly, pine, cedar, or other evergreens (including the harvesting of the evergreens)." Perhaps the wreath lobby was more powerful during the Great Depression than in our own time?
Oh, and there is one final exemption, as incredible as this may be: federal law allows states to allow kids to work for a state or local government at any age, and there are no hourly restrictions. Virginia, for example, allows this.
The exceptions cut against the dominant theory of the laws that it is somehow evil to "commodify" the labor of kids. If it is wonderful to be a child movie star, congressional page, or home-based wreath maker, why it is wrong to be a teenage software fixer, a grocery bagger, or ice-cream scooper? It makes no sense.
Once you get past the exceptions, the bottom line is clear: full-time work in the private sector, for hours of their own choosing, is permitted only to those "children" who are 18 and older — by which time a child has already passed the age when he can be influenced toward a solid work ethic.
What is lost in the bargain? Kids no longer have the choice to work for money. Parents who believe that their children would benefit from the experience are at a loss. Consumers who would today benefit from our teens' technological knowhow have no commercial way to do so. They have been forcibly excluded from the matrix of exchange.
There is a social-cultural point, too. Employers will tell you that most kids coming out of college are radically unprepared for a regular job. It's not so much that they lack skills or that they can't be trained; it's that they don't understand what it means to serve others in a workplace setting. They resent being told what to do, tend not to follow through, and work by the clock instead of the task. In other words, they are not socialized into how the labor market works. Indeed, if we perceive a culture of sloth, irresponsibility, and entitlement among today's young, perhaps we ought to look here for a contributing factor....

https://mises.org/library/trouble-child-labor-laws