Sirija
Page 39 of 50
Page 39 of 50 • 1 ... 21 ... 38, 39, 40 ... 44 ... 50
Re: Sirija
bogomdani wrote:gat point...ko da si mu rekao da je pedercinaMaximusDecimusMiridije wrote:Yehudi wrote:bogomdani wrote:Dans vrludam po gradu popodne i gdje god vidim Khozoepa,dobacim mu-habibi..1!!
Prvo se trznu,kao opareni,potom kad vidju da je pred njima nes slicno grizliju,pokunje se i bijesno zagledaju u stranu..
.usput poceo Vajndorf..bit ce pijanih i ebenih Svabica...
Habibi znači - dragi -
biće oni misle da im se udvaraš pa se boje za guzice
Kolko sam uspio uhvatit to ono bas kao svakodnevnu postapalicu koriste vise u Egiptu....u svim drugim mjestima dosta manje. U Siriji je to onako na liniji uvrede i omalovazavanja nekome reci.
Tocno to. Ali otprilike pandan americkog "nigger". Ovisno tko kaze i u kakvoj situaciji....moze te zagrliti ili ti mozak raznijeti. Luda kuca....
Guest- Guest
Re: Sirija
pogledah neki video o toj napetoj situaciji sa amerima,ovi jebaci kamila se zapjenili kao bijesni psi u zavrsnoj fazi bjesnila,ameri se pokupili i ostavli saveznike na cjedilu hahaYehudi wrote:MaximusDecimusMiridije wrote:Yehudi wrote:MaximusDecimusMiridije wrote:Yehudi wrote:
Naravno da su pucali i to žestoko............zašto bi ovi inače utekli?
Snimka je sa turske granice di su ih turski tenkovi štitili.
jesi vidio onu drugu snimku di ti " umjereni " arlauču da su došli klati Amere
Pa pogledao sam dva snimka cini mi se. Na jednome vicu, na drugom se vide tenkovi na zacelju kolone.
Mislim da nije bilo pucnjave nego samo uvrede i tako to. Takodjer mislim da nisu otisli u Tursku. Ali ajd...nice touch :)
Šta imaš misliti kad svi prenose da su " umjereni " fsa napali Amere a ovi utekli u TR uz pratnju turskih tenkova.
Jerbo ne piše da su ih napali :) barem ne di god da sam ja citao. Pise da su vikali na njih, psovali ih i tako to :)
Najbolje da su čekali da ih pobiju u par sec. ili ih zarobe pa pokolju. Situacija je bila na rubu incidenta a Ameri se očito ne osjećaju sigurnima
pa su se zato evakuirali.........ma utekli su i gotovo, to je to. Da nisu pozvali turske tenkove da ih isprate, tko zna šta bi bilo do jutra,
ja mislim da bi se glave kotrljale.
'Crusaders! Infidels! Dogs! Get out!'
American-backed rebels force US commandos to leave Syrian town
Mogućno da su ih Turci natentali na taj postupak
- "We don't want a single American fighting in Syria alongside us," says a man in the second video. "We are Muslims, we are not infidels. Get out!"
Later, a group of rebels purporting to be representatives of Ahrar al-Sharqiya, a militia operating in the area, circulated a video statement, saying that US support of Kurds, who are also fighting Islamic State, was behind their protest.
"We and other FSA groups fighting in and around Aleppo say that we remain a free army, and refuse to fight on the side of Americans, who support the terrorist Kurdish PKK.
We are halting all military activities until US troops leave the region."
“We’ve discovered this many times in Muslim world, where the US deploys its troops, whether it’s Iraq, or Afghanistan, or Syria, it is seen as the enemy, the occupier.
Secondly, the incident highlights the problems the US has been having in identifying moderate Syrian rebels – despite spending billions of dollars 'developing' them - and the fact that this is coming from the supposed allies in the FSA isn’t actually surprising,” Max Abrahms, an associate professor of political science at Northwestern told RT.
_________________
И показа ми чисту реку воде живота, бистру као кристал, која излажаше од престола Божијег и Јагњетовог.
Winter is coming-
Posts : 9181
2014-04-14
Re: Sirija
[size=35]THE US WAR ON TERROR HAS COST $5 TRILLION AND INCREASED TERRORISM BY 6,500%[/size]
Darius Shahtahmasebi | [size=17]Anti Media - SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 18 Comments
[/size]
[size=15][size=12]50
0
0
[/size]
[/size]
On September 11, 2001, one of the most tragic events in recent American history took place. Close to 3,000 civilians lost their lives in horrific terror attacks that took place on American soil. Fifteen years later, it is time to ask the question: have our counterterror efforts helped to reduce the amount of terrorism in the world? Or at the very least, have they tried to make the world safer?
According to a report released by Dr. Neta Crawford, professor of political science at Brown University, spending by the United States Departments of Defense, State, Homeland Security, and Veteran Affairs since 9/11 is now close to $5 trillion USD. Before we have the chance to ask how a country that has racked up over $19.3 trillion USD in debt can spend $5 trillion USD on war, the focus of this article is to ask: What has all of this spending achieved?
As Reader Supported News reported at the end of last year, terrorism has increased 6,500 percent since 2002 (they probably should rename it “the war of terror”). In 2014, the outlet noted, it was reported that 74 percent of all terror-related casualties occurred in Iraq, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, or Syria. As stated by Paul Gottinger, a staff reporter for Reader Supported News, out of the aforementioned countries, “only Nigeria did not experience either U.S. air strikes or a military occupation in that year.”
Omitted from that assessment is the fact that the U.S. has been meddling in Nigeria for some time now. Why wouldn’t they?Until recently, Nigeria was Africa’s largest oil producer, as well as the continent’s largest economy until last month.
Hillary Clinton herself refused repeated requests from the CIA to place Boko Haram, the al-Qaeda and ISIS-linked terror group wreaking havoc across Nigeria (statistically they are far more deadly than ISIS), on the U.S. official list of foreign terrorist organizations.
Further, it was Hillary Clinton’s war in Libya that helped catapult Boko Haram into the menace it is today. In 2009, Boko Haram was a small-scale group with very limited weaponry. Following the invasion of Libya and the fall of Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan armories were looted, and much of the weaponry was sent over to Syria. However, Boko Haram was able to capitalizeon these looted weapons and the instability that rippled throughout Africa following the NATO-led war in Libya. As Peter Weber stated in The Week:
“[Boko Haram’s weaponry] shifted from relatively cheap AK-47s in the early days of its post-2009 embrace of violence to desert-ready combat vehicles and anti-aircraft/ anti-tank guns.”
Boko Haram is just one example of an unforeseen consequence, right? At least we removed a dictator who was going to massacre his own people in Libya, right? Despite one’s thoughts on Gaddafi’s moral compass, he was able to transform Libya into Africa’s most prosperous democracy with the highest standard of living on the continent. Since then, Libya has fallen massively in the U.N. Human Development Index ratings (in 2015 alone, Libya fell 27 places). According to UNICEF, there are two million Libyan children out of school in a country that is now plagued by militants, civil war, and extremism. What are the chances of those children out of school being swayed to join a militant group?
Last year, four former U.S. air force service members wrote a letter to Barack Obama warning him that the single most effective recruitment tool for groups like ISIS was the drone program being implemented across the Muslim world, courtesy of the president himself. In fact, three former U.S. air force drone operators have even backed a lawsuit against the state, brought by a Yemeni man who lost members of his family in a drone strike in 2012.
According to Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick’s “Untold History of the United States”:
“When the U.S. began its Yemeni drone campaign in 2009, Al-Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula had fewer than 300 militants in Yemen. By mid-2012, that number had jumped to over 1,000.”
Still believe there is no relationship between bombing a country to death and the resulting extremist groups that emerge from the rubble?
It seems as though recent history is just repeating itself over and over — not to mention the cruel and unnecessary havoc unleashed on the people of Iraq and Afghanistan. As Ben Swann, an investigative journalist and outspoken critic of U.S. foreign policy, stated:
“Before the 2003 U.S. invasion, do you know how many suicide attacks there were in Iraq? None. In the country’s history there had never been one. But since the 2003 invasion, there have been 1,892.
“In Iraq, prior to the start of the Iraq war, there were reportedly just over 1.5 million Christians living in that country. And yet shortly after the war started, more than one million of them fled to Syria. That didn’t work out well. Today fewer than half a million Christians remain and yet are being exterminated by groups like ISIS.”
The list of ways in which the $5 trillion USD effort to stamp out terrorism has either caused more terrorism or done nothing remotely towards curbing terrorism is endless. Even College Humor, in their show “Adam Ruins Everything,” put together an informative piece on how the TSA is almost completely useless, having never prevented a single terrorist attack – ever.
Yet how much money has been flowing into these programs – and still is today?
It’s time for a realistic talk about our counterterrorism efforts. One can only assume the U.S. establishment is not genuine in their bid to fight terrorism across the globe given that they have continued policies that merely exacerbate terrorism and have created a world less safe for future generations.
The first step in preventing future terrorism would be to admit that our current strategy isn’t working. Anyone who believes otherwise — or who decides to run for president on the promise they will further expand these failed policies — is not only wasting our time, but will be wasting countless lives in the process.
The first step in preventing future terrorism would be to admit that our current strategy isn’t working
Darius Shahtahmasebi | [size=17]Anti Media - SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 18 Comments
[/size]
[size=15][size=12]50
0
0
[/size]
[/size]
On September 11, 2001, one of the most tragic events in recent American history took place. Close to 3,000 civilians lost their lives in horrific terror attacks that took place on American soil. Fifteen years later, it is time to ask the question: have our counterterror efforts helped to reduce the amount of terrorism in the world? Or at the very least, have they tried to make the world safer?
According to a report released by Dr. Neta Crawford, professor of political science at Brown University, spending by the United States Departments of Defense, State, Homeland Security, and Veteran Affairs since 9/11 is now close to $5 trillion USD. Before we have the chance to ask how a country that has racked up over $19.3 trillion USD in debt can spend $5 trillion USD on war, the focus of this article is to ask: What has all of this spending achieved?
As Reader Supported News reported at the end of last year, terrorism has increased 6,500 percent since 2002 (they probably should rename it “the war of terror”). In 2014, the outlet noted, it was reported that 74 percent of all terror-related casualties occurred in Iraq, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, or Syria. As stated by Paul Gottinger, a staff reporter for Reader Supported News, out of the aforementioned countries, “only Nigeria did not experience either U.S. air strikes or a military occupation in that year.”
Omitted from that assessment is the fact that the U.S. has been meddling in Nigeria for some time now. Why wouldn’t they?Until recently, Nigeria was Africa’s largest oil producer, as well as the continent’s largest economy until last month.
Hillary Clinton herself refused repeated requests from the CIA to place Boko Haram, the al-Qaeda and ISIS-linked terror group wreaking havoc across Nigeria (statistically they are far more deadly than ISIS), on the U.S. official list of foreign terrorist organizations.
Further, it was Hillary Clinton’s war in Libya that helped catapult Boko Haram into the menace it is today. In 2009, Boko Haram was a small-scale group with very limited weaponry. Following the invasion of Libya and the fall of Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan armories were looted, and much of the weaponry was sent over to Syria. However, Boko Haram was able to capitalizeon these looted weapons and the instability that rippled throughout Africa following the NATO-led war in Libya. As Peter Weber stated in The Week:
“[Boko Haram’s weaponry] shifted from relatively cheap AK-47s in the early days of its post-2009 embrace of violence to desert-ready combat vehicles and anti-aircraft/ anti-tank guns.”
Boko Haram is just one example of an unforeseen consequence, right? At least we removed a dictator who was going to massacre his own people in Libya, right? Despite one’s thoughts on Gaddafi’s moral compass, he was able to transform Libya into Africa’s most prosperous democracy with the highest standard of living on the continent. Since then, Libya has fallen massively in the U.N. Human Development Index ratings (in 2015 alone, Libya fell 27 places). According to UNICEF, there are two million Libyan children out of school in a country that is now plagued by militants, civil war, and extremism. What are the chances of those children out of school being swayed to join a militant group?
Last year, four former U.S. air force service members wrote a letter to Barack Obama warning him that the single most effective recruitment tool for groups like ISIS was the drone program being implemented across the Muslim world, courtesy of the president himself. In fact, three former U.S. air force drone operators have even backed a lawsuit against the state, brought by a Yemeni man who lost members of his family in a drone strike in 2012.
According to Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick’s “Untold History of the United States”:
“When the U.S. began its Yemeni drone campaign in 2009, Al-Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula had fewer than 300 militants in Yemen. By mid-2012, that number had jumped to over 1,000.”
Still believe there is no relationship between bombing a country to death and the resulting extremist groups that emerge from the rubble?
It seems as though recent history is just repeating itself over and over — not to mention the cruel and unnecessary havoc unleashed on the people of Iraq and Afghanistan. As Ben Swann, an investigative journalist and outspoken critic of U.S. foreign policy, stated:
“Before the 2003 U.S. invasion, do you know how many suicide attacks there were in Iraq? None. In the country’s history there had never been one. But since the 2003 invasion, there have been 1,892.
“In Iraq, prior to the start of the Iraq war, there were reportedly just over 1.5 million Christians living in that country. And yet shortly after the war started, more than one million of them fled to Syria. That didn’t work out well. Today fewer than half a million Christians remain and yet are being exterminated by groups like ISIS.”
The list of ways in which the $5 trillion USD effort to stamp out terrorism has either caused more terrorism or done nothing remotely towards curbing terrorism is endless. Even College Humor, in their show “Adam Ruins Everything,” put together an informative piece on how the TSA is almost completely useless, having never prevented a single terrorist attack – ever.
Yet how much money has been flowing into these programs – and still is today?
It’s time for a realistic talk about our counterterrorism efforts. One can only assume the U.S. establishment is not genuine in their bid to fight terrorism across the globe given that they have continued policies that merely exacerbate terrorism and have created a world less safe for future generations.
The first step in preventing future terrorism would be to admit that our current strategy isn’t working. Anyone who believes otherwise — or who decides to run for president on the promise they will further expand these failed policies — is not only wasting our time, but will be wasting countless lives in the process.
_________________
И показа ми чисту реку воде живота, бистру као кристал, која излажаше од престола Божијег и Јагњетовог.
Winter is coming-
Posts : 9181
2014-04-14
Re: Sirija
Vikali im Smrt nevjernicima heheheAlfaOmega wrote:Pro-turski pobunjenici na sjeveru Sirije kod al-Raia isprašili američke vojnike koji su došli pomoći.
Kermit-
Posts : 26479
2014-04-17
Re: Sirija
[size=42]ISLAMSKA DRŽAVA izvršila hemijski napad u Alepu
19:26 16.09.2016.
2
[/size]
Podeli na Fejsbuku
[url=https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=ISLAMSKA DR%C5%BDAVA izvr%C5%A1ila hemijski napad u alepu&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsrbin.info%2F2016%2F09%2F16%2Fislamska-drzava-izvrsila-hemijski-napad-u-alepu%2F&via=srbininfo][/url]
Objavi na Tviteru
[url=https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=ISLAMSKA DR%C5%BDAVA izvr%C5%A1ila hemijski napad u alepu&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsrbin.info%2F2016%2F09%2F16%2Fislamska-drzava-izvrsila-hemijski-napad-u-alepu%2F&via=srbininfo][/url]
Borci terorističke organizacije Islamska država izvršili su hemijski napad na naselja Hirbel i Huš na severu provincije Alep, otrovano je osmoro ljudi, saopštio je izvor iz redova kurdskih ustanika.
Напад се догодио у петак ујутру, док је на снази прекид борбених дејстава у Сирији.
„Исламска држава је напала насеља Хуш и Хирбел пројектилима с хемијским супстанцама. Међу отрованима је петоро цивила и троје бораца организације Џејш ел Сивар“, рекао је саговорник РИА Новости. Извор је рекао да су лекари у болници у Африну рекли да су довезени пацијенти изгубили свест два сата после напада.
„На телу пацијената појавили су се трагови отровних хемијских супстанци и они су и даље без свести“, навео је он.
Амерички државни секретар Џон Кери и шеф руске дипломатије Сергеј Лавров договорили су се у среду током телефонског разговора да се за још 48 сати продужи примирје које је ступило на снагу 12. септембра. Русија и САД ће координисати нападе на циљеве Нусра фронта, Исламске државе и других терориста у договореним областима, где ће дејства сиријске авијације бити обустављена. За координацију је задужен Заједнички извршни центар.
_________________
И показа ми чисту реку воде живота, бистру као кристал, која излажаше од престола Божијег и Јагњетовог.
Winter is coming-
Posts : 9181
2014-04-14
Re: Sirija
šta je ovo izrael non stop lupa po sirijskoj vojsci? lol
evo i ameri danas "slučajno" bombardirali SAA,
evo i ameri danas "slučajno" bombardirali SAA,
Guest- Guest
Re: Sirija
Nego yoda što je ovo amerovehabije isprašili američke instruktore :D opet nesporazum sa saveznicima :)
epikur37- Posts : 45339
2015-08-06
Re: Sirija
[size=42]ŠAMAR DOGOVORU SA RUSIMA: Amerikanci BOMBARDOVALI sirijsku vojsku u Deir ez Zoru![/size]
Сиријска војска оптужила је америчку коалиција за бомбардовање положаја сиријске војске у Деир ез-Зор, пренела је новинска агенција САНА.
Сиријска војска оптужила је америчку коалиција за бомбардовање положаја сиријске војске у Деир ез-Зор, пренела је новинска агенција САНА.
_________________
И показа ми чисту реку воде живота, бистру као кристал, која излажаше од престола Божијег и Јагњетовог.
Winter is coming-
Posts : 9181
2014-04-14
Re: Sirija
primirje jos nije ni pocelo a ovi ga vec krse
_________________
И показа ми чисту реку воде живота, бистру као кристал, која излажаше од престола Божијег и Јагњетовог.
Winter is coming-
Posts : 9181
2014-04-14
Re: Sirija
a tako im i treba kada su u savezu sa kanibalima, budaleepikur37 wrote:Nego yoda što je ovo amerovehabije isprašili američke instruktore :D opet nesporazum sa saveznicima :)
Guest- Guest
Re: Sirija
ok Amerima se ovo "prvi" put desilo, eh sada jel namjerno ili slučajno, i još gledamo vijesti..
ali zašto Rusija dopušta da recimo Izraelci i danas opet raskasapili Sirijske mladiće koji su čuvali frontu protiv ISISa.. ovi svako malo mlate po Sirijcima
ali zašto Rusija dopušta da recimo Izraelci i danas opet raskasapili Sirijske mladiće koji su čuvali frontu protiv ISISa.. ovi svako malo mlate po Sirijcima
Guest- Guest
Re: Sirija
Winter is coming wrote:[size=42]ŠAMAR DOGOVORU SA RUSIMA: Amerikanci BOMBARDOVALI sirijsku vojsku u Deir ez Zoru![/size]
Сиријска војска оптужила је америчку коалиција за бомбардовање положаја сиријске војске у Деир ез-Зор, пренела је новинска агенција САНА.
Stvarno su zadnji gnoj....
Šta ih ovi ne obore
Yehudi- Posts : 14715
2014-04-20
Re: Sirija
meni se sve ovo cini kao uvod u neku malo vecu svinjarijuYehudi wrote:Winter is coming wrote:[size=42]ŠAMAR DOGOVORU SA RUSIMA: Amerikanci BOMBARDOVALI sirijsku vojsku u Deir ez Zoru![/size]
Сиријска војска оптужила је америчку коалиција за бомбардовање положаја сиријске војске у Деир ез-Зор, пренела је новинска агенција САНА.
Stvarno su zadnji gnoj
_________________
И показа ми чисту реку воде живота, бистру као кристал, која излажаше од престола Божијег и Јагњетовог.
Winter is coming-
Posts : 9181
2014-04-14
Re: Sirija
Yehudi wrote:Winter is coming wrote:[size=42]ŠAMAR DOGOVORU SA RUSIMA: Amerikanci BOMBARDOVALI sirijsku vojsku u Deir ez Zoru![/size]
Сиријска војска оптужила је америчку коалиција за бомбардовање положаја сиријске војске у Деир ез-Зор, пренела је новинска агенција САНА.
Stvarno su zadnji gnoj....
Šta ih ovi ne obore
žAmeri otvoreno pokrivaju islamsku državu, pravo zlo su....skidaj to s neba
epikur37- Posts : 45339
2015-08-06
Re: Sirija
to bi bilo onda krsenje nekog nepostojeceg primirja
_________________
И показа ми чисту реку воде живота, бистру као кристал, која излажаше од престола Божијег и Јагњетовог.
Winter is coming-
Posts : 9181
2014-04-14
Re: Sirija
Poginulo 80 ljudi
Pentagon: Nismo namjerno napali sirijsku armijuObjavljeno: 17. 09. 2016 - 22:53 Globus » Svijet
A
A
A
[size]TimesArial[/size]
Najmanje 80 sirijskih vojnika poginulo je danas u vazdušnim napadima na položaje sirijske vojske na istoku zemlje, dok Moskva i Damask optužuju međunarodnu koaliciju predvođenu SAD da je odgovorna za taj napad.
Vojnici su poginuli u napadima na položaje na istoku Sirije, kod aerodroma Deir Ezora, navela je sirijska opoziciona Opservatorija za ljudska prava.
Sirijska vojska i Rusija optužile su međunarodnu vojnu koaliciju za taj napad.
"Avioni američke koalicije gađali su položaje sirijske vojske kod aerodroma Deir Ezora na istoku zemlje", navela je sirijska vojska u saopštenju prenijetom na državnoj televiziji.
"Ukupno 62 sirijska vojnika su ubijena a oko 100 je ranjeno u tim napadima", navela je ruska vojska.
Napadi su izvedeni petog dana krhog primirja u Sirji postignutog u dogovoru izmedju SAD i Rusije.
Sirijska vojska navodi da je napadom koalicije koju predvode SAD na njenu bazu u istočnoj provinciji omogućeno Islamskoj državi da napreduje u toj zoni, javlja AP.
U saopštenju se kaže da je riječ o "ozbiljnom i otvorenom napadu na Siriju i njenu vojsku" i "čvrstom dokazu američke podrške Daešu (Islamskoj državi) i drugim terorističkim grupama".
Pentagon je saopštio da su koalicione snage na čelu sa SAD danas izvele vazdušni napad na Islamsku državu u blizini Deir el-Zora na istoku Sirije, ali da su napad obustavile nakon što su ih ruski zvaničnici upozorili da je u tom udaru možda pogođena sirijska vojska, javile su agencije.
U saopštenju Pentagona se kaže da je "vazdušni napad obustavljen odmah nakon što su ruski zvaničnici obavjestili zvaničnike koalicije da postoji mogućnost da su osoblje i vozila koji su uzeti na nišan dio sirijske vojske", navodi AP.
"Koalicione snage ne bi namjerno gađale sirijsku vojnu jedinicu", ističe se u saopštenju vojske
- See more at: http://www.avaz.ba/clanak/255006/14#sthash.TZHGZqVe.dpuf
jastreb- Posts : 34059
2014-04-22
Re: Sirija
U zračnom napadu kojeg je izvela Amerika poginulo je oko 80 sirijskih vojnika.
Ameri tobože žale i vele da nisu namjerno ubili sirijske vojnike.
Rusija konstatirala da SAD nije sposoban izvoditi koordinirane akcije.
Ameri tobože žale i vele da nisu namjerno ubili sirijske vojnike.
Rusija konstatirala da SAD nije sposoban izvoditi koordinirane akcije.
jastreb- Posts : 34059
2014-04-22
Re: Sirija
Kao sta sam pisao prije par mjeseci ,USA imaju monopol na pogresno bombardiranje. Bolnice, nedavno, zene i djeca, tko im jebe mater jer nisu nasi a nasi(Rusi) su bombardirali. Danas su nasi(sirijska vojska) bombardirali njihovi tj USA. Koja lakoca. Koja jednostavnost.
_________________
But I'm near the end and I just ain't got the time
And I'm wasted and I can't find my way home.
abraham-
Posts : 14661
2014-04-14
Re: Sirija
Švecka veli da evropa bez problema može primiti milion njihovih na godinu.abraham wrote:Kao sta sam pisao prije par mjeseci ,USA imaju monopol na pogresno bombardiranje. Bolnice, nedavno, zene i djeca, tko im jebe mater jer nisu nasi a nasi(Rusi) su bombardirali. Danas su nasi(sirijska vojska) bombardirali njihovi tj USA. Koja lakoca. Koja jednostavnost.
mutava baštarda- Posts : 21037
2015-09-14
Re: Sirija
Sveckoj je isti kurac. Nece ni u Rusiju ni u USA. To je tu kod vas navijanje za nase tj Ruse i Assada.
_________________
But I'm near the end and I just ain't got the time
And I'm wasted and I can't find my way home.
abraham-
Posts : 14661
2014-04-14
Page 39 of 50 • 1 ... 21 ... 38, 39, 40 ... 44 ... 50
Page 39 of 50
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum