Re: Biden: cuvajte demokreaciju kao zjenicu oka svoga

by Šandor Winnetou 2/10/2022, 11:23

prckov wrote:
dijagram wrote:
prckov wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:
prckov wrote:
dijagram wrote:Tako kaze na forumu.
U stvari tesko je odluciti cije su biljeznice urednije, njegove, epijeve ili moje uciteljice:)
Sve u bojama, uciteljica crven bijeli plavi, epi zelena, aben dugine boje.
Samo da je napredno i woke.
znaci aben je najnapredniji a nista ne prica, skroman
takvi su najgori, pije svoje vino i zavidi epikuru jer se bolje snašao u državnim službama!!

pije svoje vino, drugima prodaje razmuceno a zavidi epiju na vodi

Oni su jos ok, od dolje je najgori brand,...nema ga pa mogu napisati da ne vidi:)
vjerujem da jest
sigurno kupuje ono jeftino makedonsko vino i ramuti ga sa vodom pa prodaje pod domace

i on zavidi epikuru jer ima neograničen pristup vodi dok to brend plaća i ne može biti konkurentan snalažljivom epiju!!

by prckov 2/10/2022, 11:23

In fact, we see this notion of “Inclusion” behind almost every attempt to restrict speech, representation, and action to the narrow set of each of these that positively ensures absolute psychological comfort for all members of protected “minoritized” classes at all times. Given that “Diversity” requires hiring people who are trained to find egregious offense in everything, including microaggressions and wild interpretations, “Inclusion” becomes a wide-open license for utter control of speech, representation, and behavior, even down to the level of physical presence in a space or organization. This includes literal calls for re-segregation under a label of “desegregation.

by prckov 2/10/2022, 11:24

Šandor Winnetou wrote:
prckov wrote:
dijagram wrote:
prckov wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:
prckov wrote:
dijagram wrote:Tako kaze na forumu.
U stvari tesko je odluciti cije su biljeznice urednije, njegove, epijeve ili moje uciteljice:)
Sve u bojama, uciteljica crven bijeli plavi, epi zelena, aben dugine boje.
Samo da je napredno i woke.
znaci aben je najnapredniji a nista ne prica, skroman
takvi su najgori, pije svoje vino i zavidi epikuru jer se bolje snašao u državnim službama!!

pije svoje vino, drugima prodaje razmuceno a zavidi epiju na vodi

Oni su jos ok, od dolje je najgori brand,...nema ga pa mogu napisati da ne vidi:)
vjerujem da jest
sigurno kupuje ono jeftino makedonsko vino i ramuti ga sa vodom pa prodaje pod domace
i on zavidi epikuru jer ima neograničen pristup vodi dok to brend plaća i ne može biti konkurentan snalažljivom epiju!!

epi ih tuce ko malu djecu

by prckov 2/10/2022, 11:26

prckov wrote:In fact, we see this notion of “Inclusion” behind almost every attempt to restrict speech, representation, and action to the narrow set of each of these that positively ensures absolute psychological comfort for all members of protected “minoritized” classes at all times. Given that “Diversity” requires hiring people who are trained to find egregious offense in everything, including microaggressions and wild interpretations, “Inclusion” becomes a wide-open license for utter control of speech, representation, and behavior, even down to the level of physical presence in a space or organization. This includes literal calls for re-segregation under a label of “desegregation.

So, when some organization says it is essential to increase “Inclusion” within its halls, what it means is that there can be allowed absolutely no dissent from the Critical Theory party line.

Why? Any disagreement would make people who embrace the relevant Critical Theory, which they will have synonimized with their personal identity, feel “uncomfortable.” Disagreement subjects them to idea-based “harms” or “traumas,” and the mere presence of people who disagree reminds them of how “dominant” groups “take up too much space.”

by prckov 2/10/2022, 11:28

This is not an exaggeration. Because the relevant Critical Social Justice Theory literally explains that every disagreement with it is an attempt to “preserve privilege,” every disagreement is comprehensible in that Theory only as a hostile act against “marginalized” and “oppressed” groups.

Thus, “Inclusion” means only allowing people to think, act, and speak in accordance with the shifting and often nonsensical demands of the Critical activists who are embedding themselves in the organization through the requirements of DIE.

by Šandor Winnetou 2/10/2022, 11:31

prckov wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:
prckov wrote:
dijagram wrote:
prckov wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:
prckov wrote:
dijagram wrote:Tako kaze na forumu.
U stvari tesko je odluciti cije su biljeznice urednije, njegove, epijeve ili moje uciteljice:)
Sve u bojama, uciteljica crven bijeli plavi, epi zelena, aben dugine boje.
Samo da je napredno i woke.
znaci aben je najnapredniji a nista ne prica, skroman
takvi su najgori, pije svoje vino i zavidi epikuru jer se bolje snašao u državnim službama!!

pije svoje vino, drugima prodaje razmuceno a zavidi epiju na vodi

Oni su jos ok, od dolje je najgori brand,...nema ga pa mogu napisati da ne vidi:)
vjerujem da jest
sigurno kupuje ono jeftino makedonsko vino i ramuti ga sa vodom pa prodaje pod domace
i on zavidi epikuru jer ima neograničen pristup vodi dok to brend plaća i ne može biti konkurentan snalažljivom epiju!!

epi ih tuce ko malu djecu

i još im uši zavrće, svašta čovjek nauči kad si sorošev student

by prckov 2/10/2022, 11:35

Šandor Winnetou wrote:
prckov wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:
prckov wrote:
dijagram wrote:
prckov wrote:
Šandor Winnetou wrote:
prckov wrote:
dijagram wrote:Tako kaze na forumu.
U stvari tesko je odluciti cije su biljeznice urednije, njegove, epijeve ili moje uciteljice:)
Sve u bojama, uciteljica crven bijeli plavi, epi zelena, aben dugine boje.
Samo da je napredno i woke.
znaci aben je najnapredniji a nista ne prica, skroman
takvi su najgori, pije svoje vino i zavidi epikuru jer se bolje snašao u državnim službama!!

pije svoje vino, drugima prodaje razmuceno a zavidi epiju na vodi

Oni su jos ok, od dolje je najgori brand,...nema ga pa mogu napisati da ne vidi:)
vjerujem da jest
sigurno kupuje ono jeftino makedonsko vino i ramuti ga sa vodom pa prodaje pod domace
i on zavidi epikuru jer ima neograničen pristup vodi dok to brend plaća i ne može biti konkurentan snalažljivom epiju!!

epi ih tuce ko malu djecu
i još im uši zavrće, svašta čovjek nauči kad si sorošev student

nema ga odavno pa ne znam sta rade nasem napacenom narodu

by prckov 2/10/2022, 11:54

“Equity”

cuvajte demokraciju

by prckov 2/10/2022, 11:57

equity 18:20

by prckov 2/10/2022, 11:59

jos equity

by prckov 2/10/2022, 12:03

by prckov 2/10/2022, 12:07

equity task force

by prckov 2/10/2022, 12:14

“Equity”

Equity and equality are not the same thing. Equality means “arranging the system so that citizens are treated equally.” “Equity” means “adjusting shares so that outcomes are made equal from one citizen to another.” It arises from what is known as “social equity theory,” and it means engineering equality of outcome.

by prckov 2/10/2022, 12:17

“Equity” justifies its “essential” necessity by identifying any disparity in outcome that comes out on average in the negative for the “protected classes” defined by Theory (so, not white and usually not Asian, e.g.) as the result of bigotry. This results in DIE approaches using the worst-possible means of measuring when “Equity” has been achieved and when it lacks.

On-average differences, according to Critical Social Justice Theory, are “inequities,” and these must imply discrimination and bigotry in a systemic sense, and therefore must be adjusted for.

This demand for “Equity” is taken to be true even if there is no evidence of (or strong evidence against) any discrimination whatsoever (asking for this evidence is also taken as evidence of racism because it suggests something overrides the experience of “lived realities”).

by prckov 2/10/2022, 12:30

prckov wrote:“Equity” justifies its “essential” necessity by identifying any disparity in outcome that comes out on average in the negative for the “protected classes” defined by Theory (so, not white and usually not Asian, e.g.) as the result of bigotry. This results in DIE approaches using the worst-possible means of measuring when “Equity” has been achieved and when it lacks.

On-average differences, according to Critical Social Justice Theory, are “inequities,” and these must imply discrimination and bigotry in a systemic sense, and therefore must be adjusted for.

This demand for “Equity” is taken to be true even if there is no evidence of (or strong evidence against) any discrimination whatsoever (asking for this evidence is also taken as evidence of racism because it suggests something overrides the experience of “lived realities”).

This is where “systemic racism” (to name just one form of systemic bigotry) becomes relevant, serving as a kid of “bigotry of the gaps” catch-all explanation for all differences that Theory would call “oppression.” The underlying belief in the Theory is that everyone must be intrinsically the same, therefore any differences on average must be the result of overt or hidden discrimination, especially when the relevant causes aren’t known or knowable. The DIE Theorist’s job is to find the “hidden” discrimination, especially since the overt parts have been eliminated in law for decades.

by prckov 2/10/2022, 12:37

by prckov 2/10/2022, 12:42

That hidden discrimination might be found in the organization itself (which will be charged with it, no matter how much it bends backwards to do the opposite) or in the vague workings of society, culture, education, representation, language, feelings, or anything ever experienced.

Women being “assigned” the female sex at birth, for example, is often construed as sufficient to have begun “socializing” (what Critical Theory calls brainwashing by society) them into a set of beliefs and attitudes that lead them to feel unsuited to work in certain industries, like technology and on oil rigs (wait, no, not the second one). From there, everything that goes into their entire experience as as girl, then woman, is part of the “systemic” bigotry (here, sexism and misogyny) that “must” be the cause of this result. “Equity” wants to make up for it through social engineering, but not so much on the oil rig.

by prckov 2/10/2022, 13:03

The objective of “Equity” is to create perfectly “Equitable” outcomes in high-status employment sectors (and basically nowhere else). On a superficial reading, as we will see, this means that employment statistics in high-status jobs, especially where cultural production or potential harms are concerned, will have to match exactly the prevailing demographic percentages in the population, even though this is literally impossible without large-scale social engineering including forced quotas.

(Random stochasticity, that is, noise in the system, should make perfect alignment with prevailing demographic percentages extremely improbable, after all, even if the system were perfectly free of difference and discrimination of every sort.) That means that “Equity” implies using identity-based quotas and vigorous social engineering to achieve them. Because outcomes have to be perfectly equitable for “Equity” to have been achieved, it genuinely represents something close to an ethno-communist totalitarianism if it were put into full practice.

by prckov 2/10/2022, 13:08

Bear in mind that “Equitable” outcomes require discrimination. In Ibram X. Kendi’s bestselling book How to Be Antiracist, he makes no bones about this point; it’s not like it’s some secret Theory is trying to keep from us. Kendi writes, “The defining question is whether the discrimination is creating equity or inequity. If discrimination is creating equity, then it is antiracist. If discrimination is creating inequity, then it is racist.” It is on this line of thought precisely that we have recently seen the California State Legislature vote to remove the anti-discrimination verbiage from its state constitution. “Equity” would require us to discriminate against “dominant” groups and in favor of “oppressed ones,” as Theory has defined it, so achieving “Equity” means doing identity-based discrimination, potentially endlessly because they’ll be virtually impossible to achieve just due to random fluctuations in population dynamics.

by prckov 2/10/2022, 13:13

Even creating “Equitable” outcomes like perfect parity won’t be enough, however, because Critical Race Theory is also what might be described as “ethno-historical.” Thus, even if there are no current disparities to be found (and there always will be because they can also be made up at the level of culture or subjective feelings), in any cases where there are historical ones to appeal to, those will have to be made up for too in order to achieve “Equity.”

Thus, applying “Equity” from a Critical perspective results something like a combination of affirmative action and reparations, in one form or another.

by prckov 2/10/2022, 13:19

Be that as it may, if we believe the Theory upon which it is now based, the demand for “Equity” becomes hopeless and perpetual. This is because of the fundamentally cynically pessimistic beliefs defining Critical Race Theory. Among these, in particular, is Derrick Bell’s idea of “Interest Convergence,” which has been a core part of Critical Race Theory from the beginning and is currently regarded among its central tenets.

Interest Convergence insists that people in dominant positions in society only give oppressed people opportunities and access to resources when it’s in their own best interests, and thus even anti-discrimination and reparations could be understood as forms of racism—and would be by at least the most aggressive Critical Race agitators.

This means that Critical Race Theory holds, and has held from its beginning, that racism can never go away and never be made up for (without a complete and total remake of the entire system, anyway). Thus, “Equity” is, in some sense, a perpetual demand for more reparations, either in opportunities, power, or direct payments, none of which will ever be good enough.

So, “Equity” understood Critically is a clumsy tool for a power grab.

by Sponsored content