Progres, wokizam, nastavnici i marksizam

Woke Teacher-Prep Programs Produce Mediocre Teachers | National Review 


My teacher training featured Black Lives Matter friendship bracelets, lectures on acupuncture and essential oils, acrostic poems as final projects, and a solid grounding in critical race theory.


 Notably lacking was a robust emphasis on teaching, learning, cognitive science, child psychology, behavior management, curriculum, or any other practicalities of the classroom. They were present but secondary to progressive politics.


One such review from the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal solicited syllabi from three of the most prestigious schools of education in the country to determine the most assigned readings at each. Lo and behold, the syllabi are replete with critical race theory, political activism, and even outright Marxism.



Gloria Ladson-Billings topped the list. Notably, she introduced critical race theory into the academic field of education in 1995. She argues that because of racism’s ubiquity, our society “requires sweeping changes,” and so “liberalism has no mechanism for such a change.” Where the essay actually addresses education — and it does so sparsely — she calls existing school curricula a “culturally specific artifact designed to maintain a white supremacist master script.”



Another common name, Paulo Freire, set the groundwork for an influential approach to education called “critical pedagogy,” which envisions the classroom as a place of advocacy and revolutionary change, not instruction or learning. His seminal work, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, is an attempt to map the oppressor-oppressed dichotomy onto the student-teacher relationship. He criticizes schooling that emphasizes knowledge transmission and cites the Russian and Maoist cultural revolutions as models of his thought in action.



Name after name declares a radical bent at these schools. Jean Anyon wrote Marx and Education. Carlos Alberto Torres co-founded the Paulo Freire Institute. Throughout the curricula are explicit references to Marxism, critical pedagogy, radical feminism, and other fringe political stances.



Another paper by David Steiner, the executive director of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Education Policy, found a similar state of affairs after reviewing 15 different university teacher-prep programs — a mixture of both elite and non-elite campuses. Radicals such as Freire and romantics such as Dewey dominate the curricula.





Steiner makes special mention of what does not make an appearance on these lists: educational conservatives, essays older than 30 years, authors outside of America, and courses on the history or philosophy of education. He notes how few programs asked their teachers to demonstrate competence on the methods of reading instruction, going so far as to call most of the syllabi “intellectually barren.” It is, he concludes, a “serious effort to shape the fundamental worldview of future teachers,” not an effort to form effective teachers.



This imposition of a worldview extends even into public policy. The Illinois standards for teacher preparation encourage teachers to assess their “biases” and how to mitigate their own “racism, sexism, homophobia, unearned privilege, [and] Euro-centricism.” Perhaps most gallingly, the standards require that teachers “will support and create opportunities for student advocacy.”

to sad ide u europu na još jače.
rujo nije ništa uvjetovao kad je isporučivao naftu i plin.
samo plati ono što je isporučeno.
amer će europi sad isporučivati skuplju naftu i skupli plin od vehabistana.
ali i pojačati izvoz wokizma u europu.

demonkratizacija.

;)

The whole Marxist vision is moving those it deems marginalized by structural power into the center of structural power, i.e., it's unambiguously a power grab and intrinsically totalitarian
Notice that "power" is in the center. Their explicit program (read Lukács or Freire) is to raise consciousness so that the margin can occupy the CENTER, from which it can see the totality of society. That's why they're always talking about centering, decentering, and margins

Woke Marxists believe childhood innocence (sexual, racial, etc.) is an ideological narrative privileged people use to transmit privilege to (just) their kids

nije bio odavno ... biljezim jedan woke bez sorosa i boze petrova

debotoijusto wrote:nije bio odavno ... biljezim jedan woke bez sorosa i boze petrova

biljezim jedno gradansko obrazovanje i pola matije babica

biljezim jedan kanadski bill 67 koji uskoro ide u proceduru
u skole uvest komesare za citanje nesvjesne pristrasnosti 

bilkjezim jedno oduzimanje privatne svojine u kanadskom kapitalizmu

Normalcy is bourgeois property, defined and policed by people who designated themselves "normal" to exclude everyone else from the benefits they want to retain to themselves. The Queer are the politically awakened/conscious underclass. Queer Theory exists to awaken them


To retain access to normalcy and the capacity to define normalcy, thus to exclude the abnormal, those calling themselves "normal" create an ideology called cisheteronormativity that justifies their privileged status and excludes everyone else from it.


The awakened, with a queer political conscious, can find solidarity in a class (LGBTQIA+++), become aware of their class position as excluded other and their role as "change agents" to bring about a revolution that makes the abnormal normal and the normal problematic
Grooming your kids is the primary way they can create more revolutionary activists. That's why they're so insistent on doing it. Your pronouns are hammer/sickle.


Biology and chromosomes are just bourgeois science, part of the ideology the so-called "normal" created to justify their privileged positionality.


kako ono vele debicevci na onoj zagrebackoj gej biciklijadi prosle godine, - "nema normalno"

normalno je opresivno
cis-heteronormativnost je opresivna, treba se oslobodit normalnog, zato moramo reinventirat kapitalizam koji radi za sve i koji je odrziv 

uostalom ne moze se rijesit rasizma ukoliko se kapitalizam ne srusi, evo nek mi otac borbe protiv rasizma ibram x kendi neda lagat

prckov wrote:biljezim jedan kanadski bill 67 koji uskoro ide u proceduru
u skole uvest komesare za citanje nesvjesne pristrasnosti 

dakle, u sve srednje skole i univerzitete uvest ministarstvo kojem je cilj i svrha trazenje svjesnih i nesvjesnih predrasude kod studenata i osoblja, i koje ce kupit podatke od anonimnih prijava studenata i osoblja

genijalno, Mao je zanjih mala beba

da pogodim, jedini koji mogu imat svjesne/nesvjesne pristrasnosti su bijeli hetero muskarci