Umrla Madeleine Albright

https://www.index.hr/mobile/clanak.aspx?category=vijesti&id=2350002&index_ref=naslovnica_vijesti_prva_m

nju srbi napose 'obozavaju'..ona im je maznula kosovo

Divna zena kojoj nikada ne treba zaboraviti zasluge za zaprašivanje gamadi koja je nanosila patnju polovici balkana godinama.

MDMiridije wrote:Divna zena kojoj nikada ne treba zaboraviti zasluge za zaprašivanje gamadi koja je nabosila patnju polovici balkana godinama.

pa jedina od tih americkih politicara koja nikad nije igrala u rukavicama kontra srbalja..

Nikada se ne javljam na ovakve vijesti ali iizgleda je pozvao sebi djavo jer nije ispunila njegova ochekivanja .Boli bi naslov bio "Umrla zidovska kuja",jedna karika manje u Dubokoj drzavii.

Umrlo zlo.

spada u pravednike, s pravom, shvatit će to srbi malo kasnije, kao i obično

Ustaške i šiptarske pravednike, da.

spasila vas je, malo prije oluje...frank i dan danas žali zbog toga

hvala joj za zasluge na Balkanu
počivala u miru

Burn baby , burn

Kad vidim kako olosh rezi tek sad vidim koliko je ta zena uradila dobroga. Pocivala u miru.

Debela masonska kuja. Po nju je jutros,  došao feldmaršal Gering u vatrenoj kočiji koji vuku veliki leteći psi .

Mamu vam jebem bolesnu.

Madeleine Albright - The deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children was worth it for Iraq's non existent WMD's

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8

detektirala je tocno tko je bio agresor i tko je poceo ratove....

Dan Zalosti u Hrvatskoj, Kosovu, Bosni, Albaniji...

vuksadinare wrote:detektirala je tocno tko je bio agresor i tko je poceo ratove....

Isti se istom raduje. Ništa nije slučajno.

mentalitet wrote:Mamu vam jebem bolesnu.

Madeleine Albright - The deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children was worth it for Iraq's non existent WMD's

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8

2 grama mozga, Polusvet.

jastreb wrote:Debela masonska kuja. Po nju je jutros,  došao feldmaršal Gering u vatrenoj kočiji koji vuku veliki leteći psi .

Goering ne bi ni pogledao tako ružnu ženu a ne da bi još kočijom došao po nju...

mentalitet wrote:Mamu vam jebem bolesnu.

Madeleine Albright - The deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children was worth it for Iraq's non existent WMD's

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8

aj kretenu, ne dokazuj dodatno koliki si kreten....
zajebi to podmetanje, ostaje činjenica da je vama srbima gospođa spasila guzice

https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2010.00437.x

In 1996 US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright had a rather astonishing exchange with CBS newscaster Lesley Stahl on the subject of economic sanctions against Iraq¹:

Stahl: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?
Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price – we think the price is worth it.

Albright later regretted that she did not challenge the premise of Stahl's question: that economic sanctions against Iraq were killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children. Instead, Albright implied that it was worth sacrificing the lives of vast numbers of innocent children so that the goals being pursued by the international community in Iraq might be achieved. This is a difficult case to make, to say the very least. Stahl won an Emmy for her interview.
In January 2010, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair testified in front of the official British panel investigating his Iraq policy (the Chilcot Inquiry) and, in effect, turned the tables on Lesley Stahl. Blair insisted that the invasion of Iraq and its aftermath had been beneficial to the Iraqi people. The main argument Blair offered to justify the war was²:

In 2000 and 2001 and 2002 [i.e. during sanctions] they had a child mortality rate of 130 per 1,000 children under the age of five, worse than the Congo … That figure today is not 130, it is 40. That equates to about 50,000 young people, children [alive today who would have died if Saddam Hussein had remained in power], … that's the result that getting rid of Saddam makes.

The Chilcot committee, like Madeleine Albright, did not challenge Blair's contention that child mortality rates were extremely high in Iraq under sanctions. Thus, Tony Blair claimed credit for saving the lives of tens of thousands of Iraqi children much on the same basis that Madeleine Albright had implicitly accepted responsibility for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children fifteen years earlier.
The idea that economic sanctions killed vast numbers of Iraqi children had travelled full circle. A claim originally used to advocate lifting economic sanctions against Iraq had evolved into an after-the-event justification for the Second Gulf War. The war had enabled sanctions to be ended, and thus saved the lives of children. Of course, the primary pro-war argument before the invasion had been the false claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Below I argue that the contention that sanctions had caused the deaths of more than half a million children is also very likely to be wrong. I am able to do this simply by drawing on published literature, notably the important paper of Tim Dyson³ that is known to some specialists but that has been overlooked by many policymakers and academics.
In retrospect it is surprising that so many people seem to have believed so strongly in the massive child death numbers emanating from Iraq. Common sense dictates that any survey work conducted within the confines of a ruthless and powerful dictatorship with a huge stake in the outcome has to be received with caution. An estimate of half a million child deaths due to sanctions appeared in 1995 and was quickly withdrawn in 1997 amidst clear signs of manipulation. Yet, when virtually the same estimate sprang back to life a few years later based on a survey that already displayed a questionable reversal of fortune between the Kurdish zone and the South/Centre, it quickly gained widespread acceptance.

The credibility of the half-a-million-plus figure seems to have remained largely intact even as evidence has piled up against it.
Thus, Tony Blair was able to defend himself in front of the Chilcot Inquiry by citing ICMMS-inspired figures, extrapolated beyond the 1990s, to argue that the invasion of Iraq had saved lives. The evidence suggests that this claim should now take up its rightful place in the historical record next to Iraq's mythical weapons of mass destruction.