Korona novosti i spoznaje

Glupkakurac wrote:

veber wrote:btw došao mi mail iz austrije.
iz hotela.
da za skijanje nema lockdown-a

pa tu alpsku stoku treba pobiti zajedno s bavarcima i slovencima.

Logično. Znaju se prioriteti. Ples s virusom. Al stvarno ne znam koji kurac ti Bavarci toliko smetaju.

 zato jer ta savezna pokrajina ima najrigiroznije mjere od svih pokrajina u njemačkoj.

vi korona udbaši ako se bojite normalnog života, čak i ako ste cijepljeni/preboljeli, zašto se ne zaključate doma u podrum i ostavite nas normalne da normalno živimo?

vili40 wrote:

Glupkakurac wrote:

veber wrote:btw došao mi mail iz austrije.
iz hotela.
da za skijanje nema lockdown-a

pa tu alpsku stoku treba pobiti zajedno s bavarcima i slovencima.

Logično. Znaju se prioriteti. Ples s virusom. Al stvarno ne znam koji kurac ti Bavarci toliko smetaju.

 zato jer ta savezna pokrajina ima najrigiroznije mjere od svih pokrajina u njemačkoj.

Ma ima on neki svoj dublji razlog, siguran sam... : )

vi cijepljeni s famoznim potvrdama, koji se panično bojite zdravih necijepljenih, vi se morate bojati baš takvih kao vi...bahatih covidpozvrdaša koji i kad se zaraze, okolo se klatare i dalje s aktivnim covid potvrdama..

(...)covid-potvrde imaju jednu veliku manu - ne prestaju vrijediti kada se čovjek zarazi koronavirusom. Tada nastupa mjera samoizolacije, no potvrda i dalje ostaje aktivna. Naravno, pri provjeri covid-potvrda nitko ne zna da je osoba zaražena, jer "covid-redari“ nemaju pristup medicinskim kartonima, pa ljudi tako mogu zlorabiti svoju covid-potvrdu, otići u poštu, trgovinu ili u kafić te proširiti zarazu među drugim cijepljenima, necijepljenima te osjetljivim skupinama u društvu(...)

kao što sam već rekla, te potvrde su totalno besmislene, a virus ide dalje!!

https://net.hr/danas/hrvatska/covid-potvrde-ostaju-aktivne-i-ako-je-osoba-zarazena-e8900354-4b9b-11ec-83ce-ea1ca08e8d63

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:vi korona udbaši ako se bojite normalnog života,  čak i ako ste cijepljeni/preboljeli, zašto se ne zaključate doma u podrum i ostavite nas normalne da normalno živimo?

zato jer imaju usrani ništkoristi ausweiss...može im se

Gnječ wrote:

ljubo1212 wrote:

naravno da ti vjerujem, samo reci kako si to provjerio i što točno na zadnja dva linka
a da, prva stranica na koju se referiraš ti je čisti fake
kao i većina stvari na ovoj temi, pa se komotno može zvati teorije zavjere i druge gluposti

prva stranica nije fake. po čemu si ti zaključio da je fake?

i ovo što na temi o covidu stavljam nije fake  uvijek stavim linkove koje svatko može provjeriti.

kako sam provjerio?    pa klikneš na link i pod C potražiš covid-19 vakcine ima ih 4 izabereš koju želiš klikneš i otvori ti se Oracle baza podataka ( ako se ne znaš služti Oracle bazom podataka evo ti tvoj kolega kovidiot marčelo bananino će ti objasniti jer on ima certifikat za Oracle) pa u gornjoj traci klikneš na Number of individual cases for a selected reaction i onda skrolaš dolje gdje piše OUTCOME pa čitaš FATAL pa NOT RECOVERED NOT RESOLVED itd... i tako za svaku grupu u lijevom izborniku gdje odabereš REACTION GROUPS

eto točno sam provjerio ono što je objavljeno u onom prvom linku kojeg si ti etiketirao da je fake i točno su napisali. a točno sam provjerio za sve 4 vakcine:  FATAL OUTCOME i NON RECOVERED NON RESOLVED bez ovih drugih stavki: recovered resolved, recovered resolved with sequelae, recovering resolving i unknown.

naravno da je fake, u svojoj srži, pogotovo po pitanju covida, visoko 4 i 6 mjesto u svijetu, čestitke

The Gateway Pundit is known as a source of viral falsehoods and hoaxes.^[15][27][49] It has been described by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology as one of the websites that "primarily propagate fake news",^[18] by Newsweek as a fake news website,^[50] and by CNN as a website "prone to peddling conspiracy theories".^[51] In August 2019, journalism professors Erik P. Bucy and John E. Newhagen observed that "The most aggressive fake news sites and associated YouTube channels, such as InfoWars, The Gateway Pundit, and The Daily Stormer, are routinely sued by victims of these published reports for libel and defamation."^[17] As a result of a number of lawsuits against The Gateway Pundit over its false stories, it was reported in March 2018 that Jim Hoft had told his writers to be more careful: "I don't want any more lawsuits so we have to be really careful with what we put up."^[52] Hoft stated that he believes the lawsuits "are part of a multi-pronged effort to attack media outlets on the right."^[52]
In November 2019, the Wikipedia community deprecated The Gateway Pundit as an untrustworthy source of information.^[53]
A 2020 study by researchers from Northeastern, Harvard, Northwestern and Rutgers universities found that among Republicans and older people The Gateway Pundit was the most shared fake news domain in tweets related to COVID-19, significantly outperforming other fake news domains such as InfoWars, WorldNetDaily, Judicial Watch and Natural News. The study also found that The Gateway Pundit was the 4th and 6th most shared domain overall, in August and September 2020 respectively.^[16]
In July 2021, a spokesperson for Google said that the company had demonetized The Gateway Pundit's homepage and some of its articles, stating: "We have strict publisher policies that prohibit content promoting anti-vaccine theories, COVID-19 misinformation, and false claims about the 2020 U.S. Presidential election – and our enforcement can be as targeted as demonetizing a specific page. We already actioned the majority of pages shared from this report back in 2020 or early 2021 and similarly stopped serving ads on the site’s homepage last year. We will continue to take appropriate action if new content is uploaded that violates our policies."^[54] In September 2021, Google demonetized the site.^[37][38] A Google spokesman stated: "We gave the Gateway Pundit ample notice to address persistent policy violations before we took action. We will not serve Google ads on the site until they can comply with our guidelines."^[37]


a sad o bazi podataka, šteta što ni ti ni pogotovo ovi koji objavljuju kakti znanstveni članak ne čitaju prije toga upute za uporabu baze podataka (pod understanding reports - data quality i understanding a report)



The information on this website relates to suspected side effects, in other words, effects that have been observed following administration of, or treatment with, a medicine. However, these suspected side effects may not be related to or caused by the medicine.
A case can be reported on the basis of a suspicion that the side effect is associated with the medicine. It does not necessarily mean that any link between the medicine and the side effect has been established; the side effect may have occurred due to other factors, for example the disease for which the medicine is being taken or an interaction between two or more of the patient's medicines.
The information on this website cannot be used to determine the likelihood of experiencing a side effect.


ovo je posebno za covid fatalne slučajeve


This website does not provide the total number of cases reported with a fatal outcome. It provides the number of cases reported as fatal for specific reactions groups (e.g. cardiac disorders) and for specific reactions (e.g. myocardial infarction). Since one individual case may contain more than one suspected side effect, the sum of the number of fatal cases per reaction group will always be higher than the total number of fatal cases.


a ovo je kako se pravilno koristi baza podataka


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jth.15493
https://www.pro-memoria.info/wp/wp-content/uploads/Morti-vaccini-Covid-verso-malattia_-The-safety-of-COVID-19-vaccinations_-We-should-rethink-the-policy-_and-review-Vaccines.pdf



i omiljeno, fact check


https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-eu-idUSL1N2S924P
One meme, posted to Facebook on Oct. 27, claims Eudravigilance shows COVID-19 vaccines caused 2.5 million “injuries”, more than 27,000 of which were fatal.
Fact Check-EudraVigilance does not say COVID-19 vaccines have killed tens of thousands of people

Noor wrote:a virus ide dalje!!

Brojevi novozaraženih (nažalost, ne i preminulih, ali oni uobičajeno malo kasne za novozaraženima) već stagniraju, a do kraja mjeseca će početi i ozbiljno opadati.
I to usprkos velikoj posjećenosti utakmici u Splitu i skupu u Zagrebu.
Ni virus ne može protiv prirode.

ljubo1212 wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

ljubo1212 wrote:

naravno da ti vjerujem, samo reci kako si to provjerio i što točno na zadnja dva linka
a da, prva stranica na koju se referiraš ti je čisti fake
kao i većina stvari na ovoj temi, pa se komotno može zvati teorije zavjere i druge gluposti

prva stranica nije fake. po čemu si ti zaključio da je fake?

i ovo što na temi o covidu stavljam nije fake  uvijek stavim linkove koje svatko može provjeriti.

kako sam provjerio?    pa klikneš na link i pod C potražiš covid-19 vakcine ima ih 4 izabereš koju želiš klikneš i otvori ti se Oracle baza podataka ( ako se ne znaš služti Oracle bazom podataka evo ti tvoj kolega kovidiot marčelo bananino će ti objasniti jer on ima certifikat za Oracle) pa u gornjoj traci klikneš na Number of individual cases for a selected reaction i onda skrolaš dolje gdje piše OUTCOME pa čitaš FATAL pa NOT RECOVERED NOT RESOLVED itd... i tako za svaku grupu u lijevom izborniku gdje odabereš REACTION GROUPS

eto točno sam provjerio ono što je objavljeno u onom prvom linku kojeg si ti etiketirao da je fake i točno su napisali. a točno sam provjerio za sve 4 vakcine:  FATAL OUTCOME i NON RECOVERED NON RESOLVED bez ovih drugih stavki: recovered resolved, recovered resolved with sequelae, recovering resolving i unknown.

naravno da je fake, u svojoj srži, pogotovo po pitanju covida, visoko 4 i 6 mjesto u svijetu, čestitke

The Gateway Pundit is known as a source of viral falsehoods and hoaxes.^[15][27][49] It has been described by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology as one of the websites that "primarily propagate fake news",^[18] by Newsweek as a fake news website,^[50] and by CNN as a website "prone to peddling conspiracy theories".^[51] In August 2019, journalism professors Erik P. Bucy and John E. Newhagen observed that "The most aggressive fake news sites and associated YouTube channels, such as InfoWars, The Gateway Pundit, and The Daily Stormer, are routinely sued by victims of these published reports for libel and defamation."^[17] As a result of a number of lawsuits against The Gateway Pundit over its false stories, it was reported in March 2018 that Jim Hoft had told his writers to be more careful: "I don't want any more lawsuits so we have to be really careful with what we put up."^[52] Hoft stated that he believes the lawsuits "are part of a multi-pronged effort to attack media outlets on the right."^[52]
In November 2019, the Wikipedia community deprecated The Gateway Pundit as an untrustworthy source of information.^[53]
A 2020 study by researchers from Northeastern, Harvard, Northwestern and Rutgers universities found that among Republicans and older people The Gateway Pundit was the most shared fake news domain in tweets related to COVID-19, significantly outperforming other fake news domains such as InfoWars, WorldNetDaily, Judicial Watch and Natural News. The study also found that The Gateway Pundit was the 4th and 6th most shared domain overall, in August and September 2020 respectively.^[16]
In July 2021, a spokesperson for Google said that the company had demonetized The Gateway Pundit's homepage and some of its articles, stating: "We have strict publisher policies that prohibit content promoting anti-vaccine theories, COVID-19 misinformation, and false claims about the 2020 U.S. Presidential election – and our enforcement can be as targeted as demonetizing a specific page. We already actioned the majority of pages shared from this report back in 2020 or early 2021 and similarly stopped serving ads on the site’s homepage last year. We will continue to take appropriate action if new content is uploaded that violates our policies."^[54] In September 2021, Google demonetized the site.^[37][38] A Google spokesman stated: "We gave the Gateway Pundit ample notice to address persistent policy violations before we took action. We will not serve Google ads on the site until they can comply with our guidelines."^[37]


a sad o bazi podataka, šteta što ni ti ni pogotovo ovi koji objavljuju kakti znanstveni članak ne čitaju prije toga upute za uporabu baze podataka (pod understanding reports - data quality i understanding a report)



The information on this website relates to suspected side effects, in other words, effects that have been observed following administration of, or treatment with, a medicine. However, these suspected side effects may not be related to or caused by the medicine.
A case can be reported on the basis of a suspicion that the side effect is associated with the medicine. It does not necessarily mean that any link between the medicine and the side effect has been established; the side effect may have occurred due to other factors, for example the disease for which the medicine is being taken or an interaction between two or more of the patient's medicines.
The information on this website cannot be used to determine the likelihood of experiencing a side effect.


ovo je posebno za covid fatalne slučajeve


This website does not provide the total number of cases reported with a fatal outcome. It provides the number of cases reported as fatal for specific reactions groups (e.g. cardiac disorders) and for specific reactions (e.g. myocardial infarction). Since one individual case may contain more than one suspected side effect, the sum of the number of fatal cases per reaction group will always be higher than the total number of fatal cases.


a ovo je kako se pravilno koristi baza podataka


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jth.15493
https://www.pro-memoria.info/wp/wp-content/uploads/Morti-vaccini-Covid-verso-malattia_-The-safety-of-COVID-19-vaccinations_-We-should-rethink-the-policy-_and-review-Vaccines.pdf



i omiljeno, fact check


https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-eu-idUSL1N2S924P
One meme, posted to Facebook on Oct. 27, claims Eudravigilance shows COVID-19 vaccines caused 2.5 million “injuries”, more than 27,000 of which were fatal.
Fact Check-EudraVigilance does not say COVID-19 vaccines have killed tens of thousands of people

This “debunking” and “fact-checking” is pedestrian journalism of the lowest caliber, but it is always predictable in style and approach. It says everything but says nothing at the same time, never offering any concrete or tangible evidence to support its claims while sewing doubt and confusion in your mind. In short, it is partisan propaganda and nothing more.

Speare Shaker wrote:

Noor wrote:a virus ide dalje!!

Brojevi novozaraženih (nažalost, ne i preminulih, ali oni uobičajeno malo kasne za novozaraženima) već stagniraju, a do kraja mjeseca će početi i ozbiljno opadati.
I to usprkos velikoj posjećenosti utakmici u Splitu i skupu u Zagrebu.
Ni virus ne može protiv prirode.

ništa neobično, tako je bilo i s prva 3 vala
no, znamo li da 5. neće biti? ili 6.?

Technocracy News & Trends readers should learn how to analyze “fact-check” or “debunking” stories that are frequently thrown in their face as “evidence” of ignorance and misapplication of otherwise real data. Here is a short analysis of one such article.

A publication in Ireland called The Journal claims to debunk reports based on the EU and US vaccine injury databases with the title: Debunked: No, EU and US databases do not show that thousands of people have died from Covid-19 vaccines.

The story’s subtitle reveals the theme of the article: Claims which rely on the EudraVigilance and VAERS databases are often misleading. The next 40 paragraphs give the reasons for its claim. The attack begins:

False claims about vaccines, which rely on the EudraVigilance and VAERS databases, have appeared in social media posts, including on Facebook and Twitter, on TV and radio, and even in literature distributed by a candidate in the upcoming Dublin Bay South by-election.”

The unilateral assertion that such claims are false is tied to the use of government-maintained vaccine injury data, which is published for all to see and examine. Somehow it makes a difference that social media posts, TV and radio are involved. How else would such reports be disseminated?

“However, claims which rely on EudraVigilance and VAERS to suggest that thousands of people are dying from Covid-19 vaccines are misleading and often false.”

By just scanning the data anyone can see that thousands of people have already died. But some reports are apparently often false. Is this to say that other reports are NOT false? If so, which ones? Again, no evidence or rationale is offered.

“However, like other systems, these are suspected adverse reactions which could relate to vaccination – but is not necessarily so. Often, the reported outcome and its link to vaccination has not been verified.”

Now doubt is sewn that the vaccine injury data is accurate. Vaccine injury events are only “suspected” and not specifically proven. It states that some reports have not been verified, thus implying that others have been verified. Which ones? No evidence or rationale is offered.

“The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) runs a similar reporting scheme titled Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which also features in false and misleading claims about vaccines.”

Now the authors flatly state that the CDC and VAERS are making “false and misleading claims about vaccines.” Which ones are false? No evidence is provided.

This is the tenor of the entire article, each paragraph suggesting that anyone’s conclusion that mRNA gene therapy injections could be harmful is wrong.

https://www.technocracy.news/breaking-down-medical-fact-checking-propaganda/

ma nego što, kriv je fact check...
nego, ko čita upute o korištenju baze podataka, tko šiša cijelu listu znanstvenih članaka koji se referiraju na bazu
ispravan je naravno gatewaypundit
how yes no

ljubo1212 wrote:ma nego što, kriv je fact check...
nego, ko čita upute o korištenju baze podataka, tko šiša cijelu listu znanstvenih članaka koji se referiraju na bazu
ispravan je naravno gatewaypundit
how yes no

Ne znam sto ti zelis dokazati. Da su VAERS i Enduravigilance fake podaci? Da nema mrtvih od vakcine koliko pise? Onda koliko ima mrtvih po tebi?  Nula? Jedan? Dva? Jedan? Dva? Da nije dokazano da su svi umrli od vakcine? Onda reci koliki broj ljudi je dokazano umro od vakcine jer nemoguce da su objavili netocne podatke.

Ili su Vaers i Enduravigilance fake podaci jer ih je objavio web portal koji po tebi siri fake vijesti?

I kako znas da ti tvoji fact checheri ne sire fake podatke. Jel ti checkiras te tvoje fact checkere ili im slijepo vjerujes?

ljubo1212 wrote:ma nego što, kriv je fact check...
nego, ko čita upute o korištenju baze podataka, tko šiša cijelu listu znanstvenih članaka koji se referiraju na bazu
ispravan je naravno gatewaypundit
how yes no

Aj faktčekni stožerovu izjavu da cijepljeni prenose 20 puta manje virusa.

Gnječ wrote:

ljubo1212 wrote:ma nego što, kriv je fact check...
nego, ko čita upute o korištenju baze podataka, tko šiša cijelu listu znanstvenih članaka koji se referiraju na bazu
ispravan je naravno gatewaypundit
how yes no

Ne znam sto ti zelis dokazati. Da su VAERS i Enduravigilance fake podaci? Da nema mrtvih od vakcine koliko pise? Onda koliko ima mrtvih po tebi?  Nula? Jedan? Dva? Jedan? Dva? Da nije dokazano da su svi umrli od vakcine? Onda reci koliki broj ljudi je dokazano umro od vakcine jer nemoguce da su objavili netocne podatke.

Ili su Vaers i Enduravigilance fake podaci jer ih je objavio web portal koji po tebi siri fake vijesti?

I kako znas da ti tvoji fact checheri ne sire fake podatke. Jel ti checkiras te tvoje fact checkere ili im slijepo vjerujes?

opetovano sam dokazao da širiš lažne vijesti na ovoj temi, da postaš na temi teorije zavjere, ne bi se ni osvrnuo na tvoje laži, samo lupaj
endura ti je jasno rekla o svojim podacima i za što se ne mogu koristiti, čitaj, imaš sažetak u mom postu
oni nisu objavili netočne podatke, tvoj izvor je, i ne prvi puta, i takav je kakav je, okarakteriziran godinama, širitelj teorija zavjere i lažnih informacija, za što je i presuđen
fact checker na kraju mog posta ti je samo potvrda, i čista zafrkancija (ali točno je checkirana prijašnja laž)

iznad toga u postu imaš znanstvene članke, s citatima, a vidio sam da jedan ima objavljene i pripadajuće recenzije, i to su brojke, i obrazloženja, statistički opravdana i utemeljena...ne talambasanja tebe i još pokojeg ovdje

mutava baštarda wrote:

ljubo1212 wrote:ma nego što, kriv je fact check...
nego, ko čita upute o korištenju baze podataka, tko šiša cijelu listu znanstvenih članaka koji se referiraju na bazu
ispravan je naravno gatewaypundit
how yes no

Aj faktčekni stožerovu izjavu da cijepljeni prenose 20 puta manje virusa.

kako rekoh, ti si nebitan, ne kužiš kurca, ali valjda znaš googlat ako te stožer tolko svrbi

ljubo1212 wrote:

mutava baštarda wrote:

ljubo1212 wrote:ma nego što, kriv je fact check...
nego, ko čita upute o korištenju baze podataka, tko šiša cijelu listu znanstvenih članaka koji se referiraju na bazu
ispravan je naravno gatewaypundit
how yes no

Aj faktčekni stožerovu izjavu da cijepljeni prenose 20 puta manje virusa.

kako rekoh, ti si nebitan, ne kužiš kurca, ali valjda znaš googlat ako te stožer tolko svrbi

Vidim da faktčekiraš pa velju da ti pomognen.

jedan bosanac ode pojavi se drugi još pametniji i naporniji sa faktčekerom i znanstvenim člancima...bokteiebo :/

ljubo1212 wrote:ma nego što, kriv je fact check...
nego, ko čita upute o korištenju baze podataka, tko šiša cijelu listu znanstvenih članaka koji se referiraju na bazu
ispravan je naravno gatewaypundit
how yes no

da skratimo tvoja sranja, sve kaj ti paše je znanstveno sve kaj ti ne paše je lažno..ok? ok i sad odjebi.
da se ne ponavljaš stalno i bezze.

ljubo1212 wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

ljubo1212 wrote:ma nego što, kriv je fact check...
nego, ko čita upute o korištenju baze podataka, tko šiša cijelu listu znanstvenih članaka koji se referiraju na bazu
ispravan je naravno gatewaypundit
how yes no

Ne znam sto ti zelis dokazati. Da su VAERS i Enduravigilance fake podaci? Da nema mrtvih od vakcine koliko pise? Onda koliko ima mrtvih po tebi?  Nula? Jedan? Dva? Jedan? Dva? Da nije dokazano da su svi umrli od vakcine? Onda reci koliki broj ljudi je dokazano umro od vakcine jer nemoguce da su objavili netocne podatke.

Ili su Vaers i Enduravigilance fake podaci jer ih je objavio web portal koji po tebi siri fake vijesti?

I kako znas da ti tvoji fact checheri ne sire fake podatke. Jel ti checkiras te tvoje fact checkere ili im slijepo vjerujes?

opetovano sam dokazao da širiš lažne vijesti na ovoj temi, da postaš na temi teorije zavjere, ne bi se ni osvrnuo na tvoje laži, samo lupaj
endura ti je jasno rekla o svojim podacima i za što se ne mogu koristiti, čitaj, imaš sažetak u mom postu
oni nisu objavili netočne podatke, tvoj izvor je, i ne prvi puta, i takav je kakav je, okarakteriziran godinama, širitelj teorija zavjere i lažnih informacija, za što je i presuđen
fact checker na kraju mog posta ti je samo potvrda, i čista zafrkancija (ali točno je checkirana prijašnja laž)

iznad toga u postu imaš znanstvene članke, s citatima, a vidio sam da jedan ima objavljene i pripadajuće recenzije, i to su brojke, i obrazloženja, statistički opravdana i utemeljena...ne talambasanja tebe i još pokojeg ovdje

Tko sam ja da tebe faktčekiram? Ako ti kažeš da talambasam onda mora da je istina. Već kad si tako obdaren debilizmom daj nam ovdje malo istine kako ustvari stvari stoje vidis da vidiš da su nas fejknjuzeri zajebali.

ljubo1212 wrote:

naravno da je fake, u svojoj srži, pogotovo po pitanju covida, visoko 4 i 6 mjesto u svijetu, čestitke

The Gateway Pundit is known as a source of viral falsehoods and hoaxes.^{[size=11][15][27][49]} It has been described by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology as one of the websites that "primarily propagate fake news",^[18] by Newsweek as a fake news website,^[50] and by CNN as a website "prone to peddling conspiracy theories".^[51] 

jel su to one iste news agencije koje su danima i mjesecima neprekidno objavljivali kako sadam husein ima oružje za masovno uništenje? i war on terror?
oni su napravili listu kaj je fake news? i rangirali?
ma jebenooooooo pa ako kaže cnn pa jebemu mater mora da je istina bokteiebo...svi drugi lažuuu :D

Noor wrote:

Speare Shaker wrote:

Noor wrote:a virus ide dalje!!

Brojevi novozaraženih (nažalost, ne i preminulih, ali oni uobičajeno malo kasne za novozaraženima) već stagniraju, a do kraja mjeseca će početi i ozbiljno opadati.
I to usprkos velikoj posjećenosti utakmici u Splitu i skupu u Zagrebu.
Ni virus ne može protiv prirode.

ništa neobično, tako je bilo i s prva 3 vala
no, znamo li da 5. neće biti? ili 6.?

Petog će sigurno biti. Ne postoji još dovoljna razina kolektivnog imuniteta u stanovništvu (najmanje 90%, lako moguće i 95%, stečenog na različite načine).
Hoće li i šestog, još nisam siguran, ali vjerojatno hoće.