Ozbiljna korona tema - zbirno

[size=42]INDIA NEWS Kids, adults have similar antibodies: AIIMS Sero Survey
[/size]
[size=42]As compared to the 74.7% in urban settlements of South Delhi, the prevalence was 59.3% in villages of Delhi and Ballabhgarh. “Results show that a large majority of the population had already been infected by the time we conducted the study at Delhi urban site which belongs to lower and middle socioeconomic strata population and very congested neighbourhood,” the study said. With all locations other than Delhi being rural, the average seroprevalence in rural areas stood at 58.8% as per the study.[/size]
[size=42]The highest seroprevalence was found in Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh where 87.9% of the people had been exposed to the infection.[/size]






[size=42]Kovid sekta na aparatima[/size]

mutava baštarda wrote:[size=42]INDIA NEWS Kids, adults have similar antibodies: AIIMS Sero Survey
[/size]
[size=42]As compared to the 74.7% in urban settlements of South Delhi, the prevalence was 59.3% in villages of Delhi and Ballabhgarh. “Results show that a large majority of the population had already been infected by the time we conducted the study at Delhi urban site which belongs to lower and middle socioeconomic strata population and very congested neighbourhood,” the study said. With all locations other than Delhi being rural, the average seroprevalence in rural areas stood at 58.8% as per the study.[/size]
[size=42]The highest seroprevalence was found in Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh where 87.9% of the people had been exposed to the infection.[/size]


[size=42]Kovid sekta na aparatima[/size]

Stvarno? Oh, holy cow ...

Gnječ wrote:

Točno to Gnječo!
"This pandemic is about the vaccine."
Kako rekoh i prije, mutavi je to odlično sročio još pred neko vrijeme.

Do nedavno sam se blago nećkao, ali sada mislim da novac ipak nije primarni cilj plasmana i inzistiranja na cjepivu.
Mislim da je primarni cilj ostvarivanje "zdravstvenog" učinka cjepiva, naravno govorim o ovim mRNA sranjima.
Jasno, korisnih idiota na lopate u svim ešalonima svih institucija - držim da većina još uvijek ne zna što čini.

Inventor of mRNA Shot Exposes Covid Vaccine

June 19th, 2021

Scientists are working on vaccines that spread like a disease. What could possibly go wrong?

How they work. Self-spreading vaccines are essentially genetically engineered viruses designed to move through populations in the same way as infectious diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection. Built on the chassis of a benign virus, the vaccines have genetic material from a pathogen added to them that stimulates the creation of antibodies or white blood cells in “infected” hosts.

https://thebulletin.org/2020/09/scientists-are-working-on-vaccines-that-spread-like-a-disease-what-could-possibly-go-wrong/

Transmissible Viral Vaccines

Genetic engineering now enables the design of live viral vaccines that are potentially transmissible. Some designs merely modify a single viral genome to improve on the age-old method of attenuation whereas other designs create chimeras of viral genomes. Transmission has the benefit of increasing herd immunity above that achieved by direct vaccination alone but also increases the opportunity for vaccine evolution, which typically undermines vaccine utility. Different designs have different epidemiological consequences but also experience different evolution. Approaches that integrate vaccine engineering with an understanding of evolution and epidemiology will reap the greatest benefit from vaccine transmission.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966842X17302123#bib0045

Gnječ wrote:<iframe width="100%" height="200" src="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-rar-radio-network-79250385/episode/johns-hopkins-university-confirms-that-self-82320768/?embed=true" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Johns Hopkins University confirms that self spreading vaccines are real.

Gotovi smo, moj Gnječo, nema nan spasa.

Slovoslagar wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

Točno to Gnječo!
"This pandemic is about the vaccine."
Kako rekoh i prije, mutavi je to odlično sročio još pred neko vrijeme.

Do nedavno sam se blago nećkao, ali sada mislim da novac ipak nije primarni cilj plasmana i inzistiranja na cjepivu.
Mislim da je primarni cilj ostvarivanje "zdravstvenog" učinka cjepiva, naravno govorim o ovim mRNA sranjima.
Jasno, korisnih idiota na lopate u svim ešalonima svih institucija - držim da većina još uvijek ne zna što čini.

Elita koja ovo vodi je puna novca. Vjerujem da je i iskreno zabrinuta za planet na svoj izopačeni način. Također vjerujem da smrtnost od cijepiva nije primarni cilj, nego se to dogodilo nepredviđeno, zbog čega je stoka sitnsitnog zuba sada uznemirena, a pravi cilj su dugoročne nuspojave. 
Od nuspojava može mi padati na pamet sterilizacija jer su autopsije na ljudima umrlim od ovog cijepiva pokazali najviše koncentracije u jajnicima.
Zamisli da si autistični luđak pun novca i još imaš takvih oko sebe, nećeš ići smanjiti populaciju u jednu godinu, nego pomalo, rodne ideologije, feminizam, cijepiva ( poslijedice ćemo još vidjeti, sterilizacija ili bolesti kroz neko vrijeme )

PhRMA COVID-19 Treatment Progress
An Ecosystem Designed for Progress

https://www.phrma.org/en/Coronavirus/Activity-Tracker

Self Spreading Vaccines

Paul Jones made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health

The request was refused by Ministry of Health.

--------------------------------------------

From: Paul Jones

May 03, 2021

Dear Ministry of Health,

Would you please provide documentation the Ministry of Health or its related organisations have on the topic of "Self Spreading Vaccines"?

"Self Spreading Vaccines" are those that only require administration to a small portion of a population, and those vaccinated then shed/spread the vaccine through out the community, as described in the following article.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2...

As vaccination in New Zealand requires completion of "consent" forms. Please outline if this self spreading vaccination technology is legal to use in New Zealand.

Furthermore what assurances have you received from Pfizer that their mRNA COVID-19 vaccination does not contain "self spreading" technology?

What assurances have you received from Pfizer that their mRNA COVID-19 vaccine does not shed from vaccinated persons, whether that is the mRNA or spike proteins produced?

Yours faithfully,

Paul Jones

------------------------------------------

From: OIA Requests

May 03, 2021

Attachment image001.jpg
5K Download

Kia ora



Thank you for your request for official information received 3 May 2021:





“Would you please provide documentation the Ministry of Health or its
related organisations have on the topic of "Self Spreading Vaccines"?

"Self Spreading Vaccines" are those that only require administration to a
small portion of a population, and those vaccinated then shed/spread the
vaccine through out the community, as described in the following article.

https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&...

As vaccination in New Zealand requires completion of "consent" forms.
Please outline if this self spreading vaccination technology is legal to
use in New Zealand.

Furthermore what assurances have you received from Pfizer that their mRNA
COVID-19 vaccination does not contain "self spreading" technology?

What assurances have you received from Pfizer that their mRNA COVID-19
vaccine does not shed from vaccinated persons, whether that is the mRNA or
spike proteins produced?”



The Ministry's reference number for your request is: H202105235.



As required under the Official Information Act 1982 we will endeavour to
respond to your request no later than 31 May 2021, being 20 working days
after the day your request was received.



If we are unable to respond to your request within this time frame, we
will notify you of an extension of that time frame.



If you have any queries related to this request, please do not hesitate to
get in touch.







OIA Services

Government Services

Office of the Director-General

Ministry of Health

------------------------------------------------------------

OIA Response 5235.pdf

https://fyi.org.nz/request/15329/response/57976/attach/html/4/OIA%20Response%205235.pdf.html

https://fyi.org.nz/request/15329-self-spreading-vaccines

06/02/21
•


‘Self-Spreading’ Vaccines Pose Multiple Risks to Society — Including the End of Informed Consent

Proponents argue self-disseminating vaccines could mean they no longer have to run complex mass vaccination programs. Critics say the vaccines pose many health risks and would also spell the end of informed consent.

In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security co-sponsored the “pandemic exercise,” Event 201.

A little more than a year later, when the Event 201 scenario morphed from “hypothetical” to concrete, it became clear that sponsors of the event intended to see the majority of the world vaccinated against COVID-19.

Accomplishing this goal is a “monumental challenge,” however. In the U.S., more than one-third (38% to 45%) of adults continue to decline the unlicensed, Emergency Use Authorization injections, despite a marketing blitz that has included both carrots (ranging from the chance to win cash payments to a free order of fries) and sticks (such as nasty calls to “get personal” and “shun” the unvaccinated).

Although some of the uninjected tell pollsters they plan to eventually get the vaccine, a solid minority remains committed to never doing so. The same pattern appears to hold true globally: Roughly one-third of adults worldwide said they will not take a COVID shot.

While social and behavioral science researchers apply “soft science” techniques in an attempt to maneuver vaccine confidence into more acquiescent territory, bench scientists have a different option potentially waiting in the wings — genetically engineered vaccines that “move through populations in the same way as communicable diseases,” spreading on their own “from host to host.”

Not mainstream (yet)

In theory, self-spreading vaccines (also referred to as self-disseminating or autonomous) can be designed to be either transferable (“restricted to a single round of transmission”) or transmissible (“capable of indefinite transmission).”

Vaccine scientists concede transmissible vaccines “are still not mainstream, but the revolution in genome engineering poises them to become so.”

The makers of self-disseminating vaccines use recombinant vector technology to build genetic material from a target pathogen onto the “chassis” of a viral vector deemed “benign,” “innocuous” or “avirulent.” This is similar to the viral vector approach used to produce the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca COVID vaccines.

For Johns Hopkins, the appeal of vaccines that are intentionally engineered to be self-disseminating seems obvious. The university’s Center for Health Security made its case explicit in a 2018 report, “Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks.” The report stated, “These vaccines could dramatically increase vaccine coverage in human … populations without requiring each individual to be inoculated.”

Further spelling out the utilitarian implications of self-disseminating vaccines, the report’s authors stated, “only a small number of vaccinated individuals would be required to confer protection to a larger susceptible population, thus eliminating the need for mass vaccination operations.”

From a programmatic standpoint, this strategy would have the advantage of being “cheaper than vaccinating everyone by hand.” Perhaps even more significantly, however, it would override one of the “thorny ethical questions” that mass vaccination programs routinely wrestle with: informed consent.

As the university’s Center for Health Security briefly acknowledged in its report, self-disseminating vaccines would essentially make it impossible for “those to whom the vaccine subsequently spreads” to provide informed consent at all.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/self-spreading-vaccines-risks-to-society-informed-consent/

mutava baštarda wrote:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1405553551162675201

Koristi od cjepiva protiv COVIDA-19 kod djece “ne prevladavaju rizike”, kažu stručnjaci iz FDA

Who Owns Big Pharma + Big Media? You’ll Never Guess.

Story at-a-glance:

Big Pharma and mainstream media are largely owned by two asset management firms: BlackRock and Vanguard.

Drug companies are driving COVID-19 responses — all of which, so far, have endangered rather than optimized public health — and mainstream media have been willing accomplices in spreading their propaganda, a false official narrative that leads the public astray and fosters fear based on lies.

Vanguard and BlackRock are the top two owners of Time Warner, Comcast, Disney and News Corp, four of the six media companies that control more than 90% of the U.S. media landscape.

BlackRock and Vanguard form a secret monopoly that own just about everything else you can think of too. In all, they have ownership in 1,600 American firms, which in 2015 had combined revenues of $9.1 trillion. When you add in the third-largest global owner, State Street, their combined ownership encompasses nearly 90% of all S&P 500 firms.

Vanguard is the largest shareholder of BlackRock. Vanguard itself, on the other hand, has a unique structure that makes its ownership more difficult to discern, but many of the oldest, richest families in the world can be linked to Vanguard funds.

Who are the Vanguard?

The word “vanguard” means “the foremost position in an army or fleet advancing into battle,” and/or “the leading position in a trend or movement.” Both are fitting descriptions of this global behemoth, owned by globalists pushing for a Great Reset, the core of which is the transfer of wealth and ownership from the hands of the many into the hands of the very few.

Interestingly, Vanguard is the largest shareholder of BlackRock, as of March 2021. Vanguard itself, on the other hand, has a “unique” corporate structure that makes its ownership more difficult to discern. It’s owned by its various funds, which in turn are owned by the shareholders. Aside from these shareholders, it has no outside investors and is not publicly traded. As reported in the featured video:

“The elite who own Vanguard apparently do not like being in the spotlight but of course they cannot hide from who is willing to dig. Reports from Oxfam and Bloomberg say that 1% of the world, together owns more money than the other 99%. Even worse, Oxfam says that 82% of all earned money in 2017 went to this 1%.

“In other words, these two investment companies, Vanguard and BlackRock hold a monopoly in all industries in the world and they, in turn, are owned by the richest families in the world, some of whom are royalty and who have been very rich since before the Industrial Revolution.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/blackrock-vanguard-own-big-pharma-media/

BlackRock

BlackRock, Inc. is an American multinational investment management corporation based in New York City. Founded in 1988, initially as a risk management and fixed income institutional asset manager, BlackRock is the world's largest asset manager, with over $8 trillion in assets under management as of January 2021

Assets under management: 8.676 trillion USD (2020 annual)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackRock

Gnječo, šteta tvoga truda, uglavnom to nitko ovdje ne čita.
Previše je, predugo i preznanstveno za ovaj glupi forum.
Osobno bih ti bio zahvalan kad bi na kraju izvukao svoj rezime sa zaključkom.
To bih sa zadovoljstvom pročitao.

Eroo wrote:Gnječo, šteta tvoga truda, uglavnom to nitko ovdje ne čita.
Previše je, predugo i preznanstveno za ovaj glupi forum.
Osobno bih ti bio zahvalan kad bi na kraju izvukao svoj rezime sa zaključkom.
To bih sa zadovoljstvom pročitao.

Ok kada je kraće, a kad stavi tapet onda preletim ili preskoči. 
Ja obično skratim max, link i najzanimljiviji dio. Ali opet poštujem svačiji način osim onog srbina koji stavi bombastičan naslov i zalipi neki srpski link.

Eroo wrote:Gnječo, šteta tvoga truda, uglavnom to nitko ovdje ne čita.
Previše je, predugo i preznanstveno za ovaj glupi forum.
Osobno bih ti bio zahvalan kad bi na kraju izvukao svoj rezime sa zaključkom.
To bih sa zadovoljstvom pročitao.

moj je stav da je svatko sposoban razmišljati svojom glavom i samostalno donositi zaključke i odluke. ne treba nikoga voditi za ručice tako da iz tog razloga moj rezime neš vidjeti ni pročitati. a rezime se daje tek na kraju kad je plan-demija gotova a vidim da plan-demija još traje.

ja čitam gnječa, i ima zanimljive informacije, hrpa njih je točna , čak i one koje sam mislio u početku.. samo bolja je metoda, skratiti priču u neki text, i postaviti link

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:ja čitam gnječa, i ima zanimljive informacije, hrpa njih je točna , čak i one koje sam mislio u početku.. samo bolja je metoda, skratiti priču u neki text, i postaviti link

meni je lakše staviti kratki tekst sa bitnim informacijama i link. ali ponekad stavim cijeli tekst jer sam se uvjerio da cenzura itekako radi pa se dešavalo da članak iz nekog nepoznatog razloga nestane sa neta i ili link bude odjednom nedostupan.