Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Page 5 of 8
Page 5 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Bilo bi pošteno i da se libertadi kolektivno samoubiju jer su im preci sjebali crnce pa da konačno završi ta jebena šarada... sad su, već svi postali dosadni u pičku materinu... ne šikne li tkogod par atomskih, nema se u biti što zanimljivog pratiti... blesavi švaba ide po drugi mandat ionako...
darth_vader- Posts : 19766
2014-04-17
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
umjesto da keljiš slike s neta, uslikaj svoj...ako ga imašLegendovich wrote:vuksadinare wrote:bice teskih pizdarija naoruzajte se i cuvajte ledja
_________________
It's So Good To Be Bad
Noor- Posts : 25907
2017-10-06
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
E da vidis i ja sam o tomu razmisljao, kolektivno samoubojstvo svih koji se osjecaju krivima je jedini nacin da se otplate dugovi. Ja se nadam da ce imati cast i to napraviti. Ili da se grohotom nasmijem toj ideji racunajuci o kakvim se primatima radi.jasambrend wrote:Bilo bi pošteno i da se libertadi kolektivno samoubiju jer su im preci sjebali crnce pa da konačno završi ta jebena šarada... sad su, već svi postali dosadni u pičku materinu... ne šikne li tkogod par atomskih, nema se u biti što zanimljivog pratiti... blesavi švaba ide po drugi mandat ionako...
omni-
Posts : 7009
2014-04-12
Lokacija: : 9 krug
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
omni wrote:E da vidis i ja sam o tomu razmisljao, kolektivno samoubojstvo svih koji se osjecaju krivima je jedini nacin da se otplate dugovi. Ja se nadam da ce imati cast i to napraviti. Ili da se grohotom nasmijem toj ideji racunajuci o kakvim se primatima radi.jasambrend wrote:Bilo bi pošteno i da se libertadi kolektivno samoubiju jer su im preci sjebali crnce pa da konačno završi ta jebena šarada... sad su, već svi postali dosadni u pičku materinu... ne šikne li tkogod par atomskih, nema se u biti što zanimljivog pratiti... blesavi švaba ide po drugi mandat ionako...
A koja jeftina patetika... čuj prosvjeduju tjednima, ližu noge... pa bacaj se sa zgrade, pokaži koliko ti je zapravo stalo i koliko si ogorčen nečovječnošću svojih predaka...
darth_vader-
Posts : 19766
2014-04-17
Age : 46
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Sad ce im Raz Simone pokazati tko je tata, Raz pa Staljin pa Bog. Imovinu na gotovs hehehe letjece glave, revolucija jebe svoju djecu :D
omni-
Posts : 7009
2014-04-12
Lokacija: : 9 krug
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Balkanization
Balkanisation (British English), or Balkanization (American English), is a pejorative geopolitical term for the process of fragmentation or division of a region or state into smaller regions or states, which are often hostile or uncooperative with one another.
I study civil wars. While I don’t believe a civil war is yet likely in the United States, I do see some unnerving parallels between the current American political environment and those in the former Soviet Union and former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. The combination of constitutional crises, nationalist demagoguery, and weak institutions proved fatal to national unity in those cases, spawning wars that tore countries apart and killed hundreds of thousands of people.
The civil wars in the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia did not come on suddenly. In fact, the initial conflicts between groups were confined to political institutions. Immature legislatures in newly independent states struggled to deal with issues of language, citizenship, and the relative powers of central and local governments. Nationalist demagogues on all sides fatally undermined the search for compromise, subverting public confidence in political institutions and allowing conflict to spill out into the streets. External states then threw gasoline on the smoldering civil conflict in pursuit of their own geopolitical objectives.
What does this have to do with the United States? How can decades-old wars in the Balkans and the former Soviet Union teach us anything instructive about the American political environment today? After all, American political institutions are manifestly stronger and more resilient than their counterparts in the former Soviet Union and former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. Political rhetoric in the U.S. has generally been more responsible and less overtly nationalist than was the case in the post-Soviet and post-Yugoslav countries. Finally, Russia directly abetted several separatist movements in the former Soviet Union and Serbia did the same in the Balkans, but no foreign power is directly fomenting civil war in the U.S.
But the parallels between those countries then and America now are greater than they seem. Strong institutions and norms against nationalist and racist political rhetoric take generations to build and constant effort to maintain, but can be eroded in a fraction of that time. And foreign interference no longer need take the form of provision of weapons and equipment to separatists.
Rhetoric from President Donald Trump alleging that our elections are rigged, that the intelligence community is working to undermine him, and that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is full of “angry Democrats” working to bring him down is not normal political speech in the United States. It is unprecedented for a President of the United States to engage in a sustained attack on the institutions of his own executive branch. Unfortunately, the opposition to President Trump has taken his bait and mounted attacks on executive branch agencies whose actions it doesn’t like. The call from prominent Democrats to abolish the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency is an example of this.
These attacks come at a cost to the integrity and legitimacy of our institutions. A July 2018 poll found that Americans are increasingly divided in how they view the agencies at the center of the controversies surrounding the Trump administration. Support for the FBI among Republicans has fallen from 65% to 49% since Trump took office, while 76% of Democrats have a favorable view of the agency. Views of ICE are even more polarized, with 72% of Republicans holding a favorable view of the agency and 72% of Democrats holding a negative view.
Despite the attacks from President Trump on the agencies he believes to be populated with his opponents, the truth is that officers in these agencies routinely check their political views at the door when they show up for work. In a 30-year career in the U.S. Army, I worked with dozens of officers from the CIA, FBI, and State Department—all agencies Trump has alleged are part of a “Deep State” conspiracy to undermine his will and subvert American democracy. Although we disagreed at times, those disagreements were over policy, not politics.
For instance, agencies might differ over whether the U.S. should sell a certain piece of military equipment to a certain country, but those differences reflect different institutional viewpoints, not partisan political ones. In this case, the Department of Defense may support the sale because the country is a priority partner and a key contributor to the effort to stabilize Afghanistan. The State Department may resist the sale because it would be provocative to a neighboring state, and the intelligence community may be concerned about the technology falling into the wrong hands.
These are normal disagreements based on policy differences, not partisan politics. In a normal environment, the relevant agencies would work out these differences and agree on a policy. But in a supercharged partisan environment where agencies are believed to have political agendas rather than policy preferences and where large majorities of the American public trust certain agencies and distrust others based on those perceived political agendas, normal functioning of government can break down.
...
Aside from eroding trust in political institutions, this rhetoric stokes partisan, racial, and religious tensions. It causes fear in some groups and causes other groups to assume they have tacit approval to act on their most extreme impulses. The bombs mailed to President Trump’s perceived opponents, the mass murder at a Pittsburgh synagogue, and the murder of two African-Americans in a Kentucky supermarket are only the most recent examples of rising political, racial, and religious violence in America.
To be fair, the rise in identity-motivated violence preceded President Trump’s election, and the hollowing of the political center is not a uniquely American phenomenon. The Brexit vote in the United Kingdom and the election of governments outside of the political mainstream in Hungary, Poland, Italy, and Brazil—to name only a few—indicate that growing skepticism about politics as usual is widespread. But previous presidents have generally sought to heal social divisions and temper fiery political rhetoric, and even the most conservative consistently and unequivocally condemned racism and religious hatred. Although President Trump reliably reads prepared statements condemning such violence, other comments—often made off-the-cuff and therefore seen as more indicative of his true beliefs—often imply support for nationalism and nativism. Indeed, he has called himself a nationalist and threatened to tone up rather than tone down his rhetoric.
In the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, external intervention escalated civil unrest into civil war by providing weapons and fighters to separatist groups, neither of which is possible on any significant scale in the U.S. But weapons are already plentiful here, and, in any case, there are more effective and less visible ways for foreign adversaries to intervene. Russia’s attempts to sow division and cause disruption in American society are well-known. What is becoming clear is that Americans have learned from Russia’s success. Lawmakers, tech company officials, and experts agree that the primary purveyors of hate speech, disinformation, and conspiracy theories online are now Americans. When it began its attempts to divide and weaken American society, the Russian government could scarcely have imagined that Americans would adopt and then enhance its methods.
https://www.fpri.org/article/2018/11/rhetoric-violence-and-civil-war-the-balkanization-of-america/
Balkanisation (British English), or Balkanization (American English), is a pejorative geopolitical term for the process of fragmentation or division of a region or state into smaller regions or states, which are often hostile or uncooperative with one another.
I study civil wars. While I don’t believe a civil war is yet likely in the United States, I do see some unnerving parallels between the current American political environment and those in the former Soviet Union and former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. The combination of constitutional crises, nationalist demagoguery, and weak institutions proved fatal to national unity in those cases, spawning wars that tore countries apart and killed hundreds of thousands of people.
The civil wars in the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia did not come on suddenly. In fact, the initial conflicts between groups were confined to political institutions. Immature legislatures in newly independent states struggled to deal with issues of language, citizenship, and the relative powers of central and local governments. Nationalist demagogues on all sides fatally undermined the search for compromise, subverting public confidence in political institutions and allowing conflict to spill out into the streets. External states then threw gasoline on the smoldering civil conflict in pursuit of their own geopolitical objectives.
What does this have to do with the United States? How can decades-old wars in the Balkans and the former Soviet Union teach us anything instructive about the American political environment today? After all, American political institutions are manifestly stronger and more resilient than their counterparts in the former Soviet Union and former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. Political rhetoric in the U.S. has generally been more responsible and less overtly nationalist than was the case in the post-Soviet and post-Yugoslav countries. Finally, Russia directly abetted several separatist movements in the former Soviet Union and Serbia did the same in the Balkans, but no foreign power is directly fomenting civil war in the U.S.
But the parallels between those countries then and America now are greater than they seem. Strong institutions and norms against nationalist and racist political rhetoric take generations to build and constant effort to maintain, but can be eroded in a fraction of that time. And foreign interference no longer need take the form of provision of weapons and equipment to separatists.
Rhetoric from President Donald Trump alleging that our elections are rigged, that the intelligence community is working to undermine him, and that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is full of “angry Democrats” working to bring him down is not normal political speech in the United States. It is unprecedented for a President of the United States to engage in a sustained attack on the institutions of his own executive branch. Unfortunately, the opposition to President Trump has taken his bait and mounted attacks on executive branch agencies whose actions it doesn’t like. The call from prominent Democrats to abolish the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency is an example of this.
These attacks come at a cost to the integrity and legitimacy of our institutions. A July 2018 poll found that Americans are increasingly divided in how they view the agencies at the center of the controversies surrounding the Trump administration. Support for the FBI among Republicans has fallen from 65% to 49% since Trump took office, while 76% of Democrats have a favorable view of the agency. Views of ICE are even more polarized, with 72% of Republicans holding a favorable view of the agency and 72% of Democrats holding a negative view.
Despite the attacks from President Trump on the agencies he believes to be populated with his opponents, the truth is that officers in these agencies routinely check their political views at the door when they show up for work. In a 30-year career in the U.S. Army, I worked with dozens of officers from the CIA, FBI, and State Department—all agencies Trump has alleged are part of a “Deep State” conspiracy to undermine his will and subvert American democracy. Although we disagreed at times, those disagreements were over policy, not politics.
For instance, agencies might differ over whether the U.S. should sell a certain piece of military equipment to a certain country, but those differences reflect different institutional viewpoints, not partisan political ones. In this case, the Department of Defense may support the sale because the country is a priority partner and a key contributor to the effort to stabilize Afghanistan. The State Department may resist the sale because it would be provocative to a neighboring state, and the intelligence community may be concerned about the technology falling into the wrong hands.
These are normal disagreements based on policy differences, not partisan politics. In a normal environment, the relevant agencies would work out these differences and agree on a policy. But in a supercharged partisan environment where agencies are believed to have political agendas rather than policy preferences and where large majorities of the American public trust certain agencies and distrust others based on those perceived political agendas, normal functioning of government can break down.
...
Aside from eroding trust in political institutions, this rhetoric stokes partisan, racial, and religious tensions. It causes fear in some groups and causes other groups to assume they have tacit approval to act on their most extreme impulses. The bombs mailed to President Trump’s perceived opponents, the mass murder at a Pittsburgh synagogue, and the murder of two African-Americans in a Kentucky supermarket are only the most recent examples of rising political, racial, and religious violence in America.
To be fair, the rise in identity-motivated violence preceded President Trump’s election, and the hollowing of the political center is not a uniquely American phenomenon. The Brexit vote in the United Kingdom and the election of governments outside of the political mainstream in Hungary, Poland, Italy, and Brazil—to name only a few—indicate that growing skepticism about politics as usual is widespread. But previous presidents have generally sought to heal social divisions and temper fiery political rhetoric, and even the most conservative consistently and unequivocally condemned racism and religious hatred. Although President Trump reliably reads prepared statements condemning such violence, other comments—often made off-the-cuff and therefore seen as more indicative of his true beliefs—often imply support for nationalism and nativism. Indeed, he has called himself a nationalist and threatened to tone up rather than tone down his rhetoric.
In the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, external intervention escalated civil unrest into civil war by providing weapons and fighters to separatist groups, neither of which is possible on any significant scale in the U.S. But weapons are already plentiful here, and, in any case, there are more effective and less visible ways for foreign adversaries to intervene. Russia’s attempts to sow division and cause disruption in American society are well-known. What is becoming clear is that Americans have learned from Russia’s success. Lawmakers, tech company officials, and experts agree that the primary purveyors of hate speech, disinformation, and conspiracy theories online are now Americans. When it began its attempts to divide and weaken American society, the Russian government could scarcely have imagined that Americans would adopt and then enhance its methods.
https://www.fpri.org/article/2018/11/rhetoric-violence-and-civil-war-the-balkanization-of-america/
Guest- Guest
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
pa dobro,ovo ce se umnazati progressivno po cijeloj Jusi,posto camuga ima podosta svuda..
Guest- Guest
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Ameriku i Evropu samo napunit obojenima i nema zime.
Kulturna revolucija.
Stranci će htjeti prava starosjedioca.
Kulturna revolucija.
Stranci će htjeti prava starosjedioca.
RayMabus- Posts : 184282
2014-04-11
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Danas Africi prijeti teška glad... Uslijed krize uzrokovane koronom doslovno će dolje ljudi umirati kao muhe od gladi... Da nije bilo Kolumba ovi prosvjednici bi bili kandidati za umrit od gladi...
_________________
Iduća dva tjedna su ključna
mutava baštarda- Posts : 21037
2015-09-14
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Da nije bilo Kolumba netko drugi bi otkrio novi kontinent. Logično.mutava baštarda wrote:Danas Africi prijeti teška glad... Uslijed krize uzrokovane koronom doslovno će dolje ljudi umirati kao muhe od gladi... Da nije bilo Kolumba ovi prosvjednici bi bili kandidati za umrit od gladi...
RayMabus- Posts : 184282
2014-04-11
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Koliko i kako ja vidim bijeloj rasi se sprema genocid i istrebljenje
A sad, ko stoji iza te strategije pitanje je za veliku diskusiju
A sad, ko stoji iza te strategije pitanje je za veliku diskusiju
Ringo10- Posts : 21669
2015-09-24
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
jedna od tih statua koje su rusili pala je nekom liku na glavu i skoro ga ubila,lik je trenutno u komi
_________________
Counter-Strike- Posts : 4231
2018-03-12
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Pusta steta ako krepa ...Unimatrix_Zero wrote:jedna od tih statua koje su rusili pala je nekom liku na glavu i skoro ga ubila,lik je trenutno u komi
Jos ako je bijeli liberal, jedan od onih koji sad ljube crncugama noge, ma super
Ringo10- Posts : 21669
2015-09-24
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
ne kuze oni to...bitne su nike patike...IQ50mutava baštarda wrote:Danas Africi prijeti teška glad... Uslijed krize uzrokovane koronom doslovno će dolje ljudi umirati kao muhe od gladi... Da nije bilo Kolumba ovi prosvjednici bi bili kandidati za umrit od gladi...
vuksadinare- Posts : 100392
2015-09-08
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Ne znam jel ko gledo seriju Gotham, al ovo totalno podsjeća na to, naročito na onu zadnju sezonu kad od grada naprave karantenu, niko nutra niko van a unutra vladaju krimosi
_________________
marcellus- Posts : 46005
2014-04-16
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
I treba da mu ruše spomenike. Jebem ga radoznalog.
_________________
dzango- Posts : 28141
2014-04-19
Lokacija: : Velika Srbija
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
sto si ti za čamuge?dzango wrote:I treba da mu ruše spomenike. Jebem ga radoznalog.
vuksadinare- Posts : 100392
2015-09-08
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Da braća Čamugari steraju im ga mami.vuksadinare wrote:sto si ti za čamuge?dzango wrote:I treba da mu ruše spomenike. Jebem ga radoznalog.
Naročito ovo đubre Kolumbo. Nije mogao mirno da sedi kući nego je morao da ide okolo i jede govna.
dzango- Posts : 28141
2014-04-19
Lokacija: : Velika Srbija
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
pa lik je trebao naci mirodije i zlato...za to je dobio debelu nagradu od španjolaca...on je preteca sirenja biznisa i trazenja trzistadzango wrote:Da braća Čamugari steraju im ga mami.vuksadinare wrote:sto si ti za čamuge?dzango wrote:I treba da mu ruše spomenike. Jebem ga radoznalog.
Naročito ovo đubre Kolumbo. Nije mogao mirno da sedi kući nego je morao da ide okolo i jede govna.
vuksadinare- Posts : 100392
2015-09-08
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
Da je sedeo kući umesto što je jeo govna, velike bede bi nas ratosiljao.vuksadinare wrote:pa lik je trebao naci mirodije i zlato...za to je dobio debelu nagradu od španjolaca...on je preteca sirenja biznisa i trazenja trzistadzango wrote:Da braća Čamugari steraju im ga mami.vuksadinare wrote:sto si ti za čamuge?dzango wrote:I treba da mu ruše spomenike. Jebem ga radoznalog.
Naročito ovo đubre Kolumbo. Nije mogao mirno da sedi kući nego je morao da ide okolo i jede govna.
dzango- Posts : 28141
2014-04-19
Lokacija: : Velika Srbija
Re: Diljem SAD-a uništavaju Kolumbove spomenike
istrazivacki duh i želja za pustolovinama bili su jaci od ljencarenjadzango wrote:Da je sedeo kući umesto što je jeo govna, velike bede bi nas ratosiljao.vuksadinare wrote:pa lik je trebao naci mirodije i zlato...za to je dobio debelu nagradu od španjolaca...on je preteca sirenja biznisa i trazenja trzistadzango wrote:Da braća Čamugari steraju im ga mami.vuksadinare wrote:sto si ti za čamuge?dzango wrote:I treba da mu ruše spomenike. Jebem ga radoznalog.
Naročito ovo đubre Kolumbo. Nije mogao mirno da sedi kući nego je morao da ide okolo i jede govna.
vuksadinare- Posts : 100392
2015-09-08
Page 5 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Similar topics
» Dok u americi ruše spomenike...
» I Australija počinje rušiti spomenike vlastite nacionalne povijesti
» Dacic: Hrvatska moze da dize spomenike Hitleru, Himleru, Gebelsu...
» Trump prosvjednicima prijeti silom: Neće rušiti naše spomenike
» Nizozemci uništavaju tulipane
» I Australija počinje rušiti spomenike vlastite nacionalne povijesti
» Dacic: Hrvatska moze da dize spomenike Hitleru, Himleru, Gebelsu...
» Trump prosvjednicima prijeti silom: Neće rušiti naše spomenike
» Nizozemci uništavaju tulipane
Page 5 of 8
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum