aktualno stanje u realnom vremenu COvID19

T. wrote:

Legendovich wrote:2,665,627

Nešto više od 0,03% svjetske populacije je zaraženo...
Ovo je sada već kataklizma biblijskih razmjera...
RH je još gora od prosjeka, 0,05 % zaraženih...
O umrlima da i ne govorimo, nešto više od 0,001% populacije, pravi pomor...

nitko zdrave pameti ne vjeruje u te službene brojke. prije će biti 266,562,700...a možda i 2,665,627,000

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:

T. wrote:

Legendovich wrote:2,665,627

Nešto više od 0,03% svjetske populacije je zaraženo...
Ovo je sada već kataklizma biblijskih razmjera...
RH je još gora od prosjeka, 0,05 % zaraženih...
O umrlima da i ne govorimo, nešto više od 0,001% populacije, pravi pomor...

jadno čovječanstvo, kuga je pojedine djelove europe kosila tako da bi pobila 60-70% stanovništva, a nu panike ovoga

čuj, moraš imati jebeno dobar razlog za zaustaviti život. ako nije virus odnosno pandemija onda šta?

Gnječ wrote:

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:

T. wrote:

Legendovich wrote:2,665,627

Nešto više od 0,03% svjetske populacije je zaraženo...
Ovo je sada već kataklizma biblijskih razmjera...
RH je još gora od prosjeka, 0,05 % zaraženih...
O umrlima da i ne govorimo, nešto više od 0,001% populacije, pravi pomor...

jadno čovječanstvo, kuga je pojedine djelove europe kosila tako da bi pobila 60-70% stanovništva, a nu panike ovoga

čuj, moraš imati jebeno dobar razlog za zaustaviti život. ako nije virus odnosno pandemija onda šta?

dobro sad...hehehehe..sjetih se kako skruseno pozivaju Čehe,Madjare,domace goste,slovake,sve redom "prezrenu" klijentelu iz "dobrih dana" i "elitnog turizma"..

sad bude dobro ako dojdu i oni koji mazu pasteticu  ijedu paradajz na plazi..

poanta..tutleki ne kuze neku stvar,dok ih ne klepi po glavi...

Gnječ wrote:

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:

T. wrote:

Legendovich wrote:2,665,627

Nešto više od 0,03% svjetske populacije je zaraženo...
Ovo je sada već kataklizma biblijskih razmjera...
RH je još gora od prosjeka, 0,05 % zaraženih...
O umrlima da i ne govorimo, nešto više od 0,001% populacije, pravi pomor...

jadno čovječanstvo, kuga je pojedine djelove europe kosila tako da bi pobila 60-70% stanovništva, a nu panike ovoga

čuj, moraš imati jebeno dobar razlog za zaustaviti život. ako nije virus odnosno pandemija onda šta?

Lova i moć, šta bi drugo bilo...
Pa vidiš da plenky i mutti govore u dlaku isto...
Oni već znaju da virus neće nestati, da ništa neće biti kao prije...
A nisu epidemiolozi...
A ni epidemiolozi ne znaju...
Izlazi navodno 25000 e-mailova debilla gatesa, who & co. ...
Biće zanimljivo sve to pratit...

T. wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:

T. wrote:

Legendovich wrote:2,665,627

Nešto više od 0,03% svjetske populacije je zaraženo...
Ovo je sada već kataklizma biblijskih razmjera...
RH je još gora od prosjeka, 0,05 % zaraženih...
O umrlima da i ne govorimo, nešto više od 0,001% populacije, pravi pomor...

jadno čovječanstvo, kuga je pojedine djelove europe kosila tako da bi pobila 60-70% stanovništva, a nu panike ovoga

čuj, moraš imati jebeno dobar razlog za zaustaviti život. ako nije virus odnosno pandemija onda šta?

Lova i moć, šta bi drugo bilo...
Pa vidiš da plenky i mutti govore u dlaku isto...
Oni već znaju da virus neće nestati, da ništa neće biti kao prije...
A nisu epidemiolozi...
A ni epidemiolozi ne znaju...
Izlazi navodno 25000 e-mailova debilla gatesa, who & co. ...
Biće zanimljivo sve to pratit...

sve ovo što sam pročitao a pročitao sam pun kurac stručne literature i dokumenata tek sam jedan mali dio stavio ovdje počelo me polako sve to ić nakurac jer je razvidno da u ovoj igri neki probisvijeti jebeno muljaju i lažu. počnimo od SARS-a 2003. 2005. godine. da li su otkrili odakle virus SARS-a? šta ti misliš?
ja ću ti reći: nisu otkrili odakle je taj virus dopalio. mediji plasiraju priču da je SARS virus od šišmiša. to je netočno. neznaju. nemaju niti jedan konkretni dokaz. muljaju političari, doktori, virolozi...svi.

Where did the SARS virus come from? — Still a myth

“One decade has passed by,” says Dr. Jianfeng He with emotion, “We have better disease control system, we have better communication platforms, and the general public’s knowledge and awareness of the prevention and control of infectious disease have dramatically improved. However, the source of SARS virus remains a myth.” A recent report denied the role of civets in transmitting SARS virus and argued that bat is the real culprit. According to Dr. He, however, this is not a new story: early in 2005, some scientists had made the same conclusion. However, up to now there has been no final conclusion.

In January 2003, He and his colleagues conducted an urgent epidemiological survey in Zhongshan City and wrote a report titled “A Preliminary Report on the Survey on the Local outbreak of An Unexplained Acute Respiratory Infectious Disease in Zhongshan City in 2003”, which became the first field epidemiological report on SARS. He was still a young expert then. Today, as the chief expert of the Guangdong Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the director of Guangdong Institute for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, he plays an important role in the prevention and control of major communicable diseases such as avian influenza and foot and mouth disease.

Nanfang Daily: Recently, in a report titled “Masked palm civet has been wronged for a decade, bat was the real culprit of SARS virus”, CCTV cited the argument made by Prof Kwok-Yung Yuen, a renowned professor of communicable diseases from HKU Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, that the natural host of SARS virus was Rhinolophus sinicus, or Chinese Rufous Horseshoe Bat. What do you think? Where was the SARS virus actually from?

Dr. He: This is not a new finding. In September 2005, Prof Kwok-Yung Yuen and his research team declared that wild bats were SARS virus’ natural host, and their findings were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on 27 September. Meanwhile, Prof. Zheng-Li Shi from Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Prof. Shu-Yi Zhang from the Institute of Zoology, and some researchers from Australia also tracked the source of SARS virus to bats, and their findings were published in Science in September 2005. However, these findings remain controversial. The SARS virus carried by bats is quite different from that found in human body, whereas the virus carried by civets has much higher homology. There is a possibility that the virus spread from bats to civets, in which it experienced some mutations before it was transmitted to human beings. However, there lacked sufficient evidences.

In my opinion, tracking the source of SARS virus must be based on objective evidences rather than assumptions. Many people believe that the virus might come from wild animal market, and its hosts might include civets, cats, snakes, wild boars, muntjac, rabbits, pheasants, and bats. However, no specific source has been identified. Today we still do not know where the SARS virus came from and how it disappeared.

Nanfang Daily: Why is the research so challenging?

Dr. He: This can be explained by the relationship between the virus and its hosts. They co-exist. If the host is a person, the premise of a good research is that he/she must survive. He/she can be diseased but can not die. Once he/she dies, so does the virus. Without the stage (the patient) and the actor (the virus), the audience (the scientists) will be hard to find the clues. SARS was highly fatal, with a mortality reaching 10%. Without proper management, the case-fatality could be much higher. Therefore, it was quite difficult to carry out relevant research.

Nanfang Daily: Is it safe to say that research on the live SARS virus is still in an embarrassing state?

Dr. He: You’re right. In addition to the host issues, the requirements for the preservation of SARS virus are also high. Biosafety level 3 (P3) lab is required. Only one or two labs in China meet these criteria. Also, due to high demand for biological safety, research on SARS virus falls into a state of stagnation.

Nanfang Daily: Are there any other research approaches available?

Dr. He: In fact there are many methodologies for SARS research. Currently most scientific articles are focusing on its genes, protein structure, and enzyme regulation. However, since no cases of SARS have been reported among persons up to now, and there lacks sufficient motivation for SARS research. Therefore, a global joint effort in this regard is needed.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3747529/

i tako...

ali zato kurbini sinovi znaju iskemijati virus u laboratoriju virus koji u prirodi ne postoji ili koji je postojao ali ga danas nema.

10 Deadly Viruses And Bacteria Created In Labs

Scientists are at it again. This time, they are creating new viruses and bacteria in their laboratories. Scientists usually prefer altering already-existing or extinct bacteria and viruses to produce new strains that will defeat our immunity, vaccines, and drugs.

Sometimes, they prefer creating new viruses and bacteria from scratch. However, these strains are not always dangerous to humans even though they could be deadly to animals like mice and even to other bacteria.

Horsepox

Scientists at the University of Alberta have created horsepox, a lethal virus closely related to the equally deadly smallpox. Unlike smallpox, horsepox does not affect humans and is only fatal to horses.

The scientists created the virus during a six-month study sponsored by pharmaceutical company Tonix. The researchers purchased DNA pieces via mail order and arranged them to form the virus. The entire project was not expensive. The DNA pieces used to create the virus cost just $100,000.

The study caused a dilemma at the time it was revealed. Other scientists were concerned that governments or even terrorists could use the knowledge to create smallpox virus for biological weapons. A smallpox epidemic could become deadly for us today. We no longer get vaccinated for it because we eradicated the disease in 1980.

The researchers clarified that they created the virus because they wanted to develop improved smallpox vaccines. Tonix later revealed that it had produced a smallpox vaccine with the horsepox virus.

Other scientists say that the researchers could have extracted horsepox from wild horse populations instead of creating it from scratch. Tonix said they would have done just that if they had known they had natural access to the virus.

However, lead researcher David Evans said they recreated the virus because Tonix would have been unable to commercialize the horsepox virus taken from the wild.[1]

Black Death

Between 1347 and 1351, millions of Europeans were afflicted with a mysterious disease that killed over 50 million people. Today, we know this disease is the Black Death, which is caused by the Yersinia pestis bacteria. Although the Black Death is still around, it is not as potent as it used to be.

A few years ago, researchers from several schools, including the University of Tubingen in Germany and McMaster University in Canada, recreated the deadly bacteria from DNA samples extracted from the teeth of a victim who died during the plague. They got only 30 milligrams of the bacteria from the teeth, but that was enough to recreate it.

As a result, researchers confirmed the original bacteria’s relationship to the Black Death around today. Some scientists had claimed that the bacteria were of different strains, but they are now confirmed to be the same. The one we have around today only became less deadly after it mutated.[2]

Polio

Like their counterparts at the University of Alberta, scientists at the State University of New York have created a deadly artificial virus by buying DNA pieces via mail order. This time, it is polio—and it is as potent as the natural one. Mice exposed to the artificial polio got sick just as they would have if exposed to natural polio.

The laboratory-created polio was controversial among scientists. The researchers who produced it had taken its code from databases available to almost anybody. Other researchers fear that people with ulterior motives could develop their own artificial polio, which is much easier to make than other dangerous viruses like smallpox.

Smallpox’s genetic code is 185,000 letters long while polio’s is just 7,741 letters long. Although we are already at the brink of eradicating polio, scientists fear that we will still need to be vaccinated against the disease because it could be recreated.[3]

Mousepox

A few years ago, researchers at the Australian National University and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) produced a deadly mutated strain of mousepox by mistake. Mousepox is another lethal virus that belongs to the same family as horsepox and smallpox.

The researchers were trying to develop birth control for mice at the time that they mistakenly created the virus. They inserted a gene that promoted the creation of interleukin 4 (IL-4) into mousepox, which they injected into some mice. The mice were vaccinated and were not supposed to be harmed by the mousepox.

Instead of making the mice infertile as researchers had expected, the weakened virus turned lethal and destroyed the immune systems of the mice, killing them in nine days. The new mousepox was so dangerous that it was resistant to vaccination. Half of the other vaccinated mice exposed to the mutated mousepox also died.

The researchers were so scared by their invention that they did not want to publish their findings. They even met with the Australian military to confirm if it was safe to publish.[4]

Scientists fear that human smallpox could also mutate and become deadlier if injected with IL-4. However, they are unsure because no one has tried it yet. We know it’s only a matter of time before some scientist does.

e ovo je zanimljivo:

SARS 2.0

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a lethal virus. More than 700 people were killed during a SARS epidemic that infected 8,000 people in 29 countries between 2002 and 2003. Now, scientists have made it deadlier.

The new mutant SARS virus was created by a group of researchers led by Dr. Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina. They call it SARS 2.0. The researchers developed the virus by adding some protein to the naturally occurring SARS. SARS 2.0 is immune to vaccines and treatments used to cure the naturally occurring SARS virus.[5]

The team said that the research was necessary because the natural SARS virus could mutate and become immune to our vaccines. By creating a deadlier and mutated virus, we could develop stronger vaccines that will save us from a more lethal SARS epidemic—that is, if the natural SARS ever mutates.

However, other scientists are concerned because the SARS 2.0 that is supposed to save us from a deadly SARS epidemic could start that epidemic if it ever escapes from the lab.


MERS-Rabies Virus Hybrid

Scientists have created a MERS-rabies hybrid virus. The idea is to use the virus to develop a vaccine that will protect us from both viruses. Rabies is a deadly disease that can be transmitted to humans through the bites of infected dogs that usually have the virus in their saliva.

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is a new virus that appeared in Saudi Arabia a few years ago. It is closely related to SARS and is spread from bats to camels and, finally, to humans. MERS infected 1,800 people at the time of its first epidemic and killed over 630. Its fatality rate is around 35 percent.

As we mentioned in the previous entry, SARS infected over 8,000 people during a 2003 epidemic but killed just over 700. Although SARS caused more deaths in absolute terms, it has a lower fatality rate than MERS. Only about 10 percent of SARS victims died. And for now, we do not have any vaccine for MERS.

To create the MERS-rabies hybrid, researchers took some proteins from the MERS virus and added it to rabies. They used the new virus to develop a new vaccine that made mice resistant to rabies and MERS. They believe that the vaccine can also be used for humans and camels at risk of getting MERS.[6]

Phi-X174

Phi-X174 is another artificial virus we have produced in laboratories. It was created by researchers at the Institute of Biological Energy Alternatives in Rockville, Maryland. The researchers modeled the artificial virus after the natural phiX virus. PhiX is a bacteriophage, a category of viruses that infect and kill bacteria. However, it has no effect on humans.[7]

The researchers created the artificial virus in 14 days, yet it resembles the natural virus so much that it is impossible to tell them apart. The researchers hope that the new virus is the first step in developing mutant and artificial bacteria that can be used for the benefit of man.

Unnamed Virus

Researchers from University College London and the National Physical Laboratory have created an unnamed virus that kills bacteria and behaves like a real virus. Like phi-X174, it is a bacteriophage but deadlier.

The unnamed virus attacks any bacteria around it. Within seconds, it breaks into smaller parts that attach and create holes on the bodies of the bacteria. The holes quickly become larger, forcing the bacteria to leak their contents. The bacteria die soon after.

Despite its scary potency, the unnamed virus is not dangerous to humans and did not attack human cells during tests. However, it could enter human cells just like natural viruses. Researchers hope the results will be used to treat and study bacterial diseases in humans. The virus could also be used to alter the human gene.[8]

Bird Flu

Some Dutch scientists have created a mutant and deadlier version of the already-lethal bird flu. Natural bird flu is not easily transmitted among humans. However, the researchers altered it so that it could be. To test their new virus, the researchers exposed some ferrets to it. Ferrets were chosen because they had similar bird flu symptoms to humans.

Ten generations later, the already-changed virus mutated again and became airborne. Natural bird flu is not an airborne disease. The study was controversial in the science community. It became even more so when the Dutch researchers attempted to publish the process to create the deadly virus.[9]

Although scientists fear that terrorists could use the study to produce a deadly biological weapon that could kill half the people in the world, the researchers involved say that the study was necessary to allow us prepare for a mutated bird flu epidemic.

H1N1 Virus

In 1918, the world witnessed the arrival of a deadly flu epidemic. This was the H1N1 virus. By the time it was over, up to 100 million people were dead. The flu caused blood to seep into the lungs of victims. They released blood from their noses and mouths before drowning in the blood inside their lungs.

The flu returned in 2009. But it was less lethal even though it was mutated and deadlier than it should have been. Scientist Yoshihiro Kawaoka took samples of the mutated strain that caused the 2009 epidemic and used it to create a deadlier strain that was resistant to vaccines. This strain was similar to the one that caused the 1918 epidemic.[10]

Kawaoka was not planning to produce a more lethal version of the flu at the time. He only wanted to create the original version of the flu so that he could study how it mutated and was able to bypass our immunity. The deadly virus is stored in a lab and could become fatal if ever released.

kako rekoh prije 7 dana... sutra do ponoći smo na 200 000 mrtvih, usa i dalje ubrzava na obje trase, ona treća trasa tko zna koliki su brojevi... ako je istina ili bar djelomično da ima istine u podacima koje je serbinjo stavio u vezi zgrušavanja krvi, mogli bi mi biti desetkovani... s druge strane jebeš i djelić istine, ako su podaci do kojih je gnječ došao obična natruha, mi smo odjebali karijeru.... ovo nas bude tuklo i jedinačno i rafalno, i u glavu a i po leđima....

USA 49,845 umrlih.
Od toga u New Yorku 20,861 (42% od ukupnog broja). NY je manje od 6% ukupnog broja stanovništva USA.
Ne treba naglašavati da se u NY događa prava drama...
Nešto lošiji rezultat je samo još u Ney Jersey-u, a ostalo je u USA puno bolje nego u EU.
Rekao bih sasvim ok.

michaellcmacha wrote:kako rekoh prije 7 dana... sutra do ponoći smo na 200 000 mrtvih, usa i dalje ubrzava na obje trase, ona treća trasa tko zna koliki su brojevi... ako je istina ili bar djelomično da ima istine u podacima koje je serbinjo stavio u vezi zgrušavanja krvi, mogli bi mi biti desetkovani... s druge strane jebeš i djelić istine, ako su podaci do kojih je gnječ došao obična natruha, mi smo odjebali karijeru.... ovo nas bude tuklo i jedinačno i rafalno, i u glavu a i po leđima....

Mracno receno ali vrlo logicno..sjetih se zmijskih toxina..sustina jest da svi redom izazivaju brzo i brutalno zgrusavanje krvi..poboldat cu dio Gnječovog texta,koji mi je privukao pozornost..napad Bakteriofag-a,na bakteriju...vrlo agresivan pristup,koji se moze iskorititi da bakteriofakmnapadne i obicnu stanicu ljudskog tijela..ako se budu slicno ponasale napadnute stanice,doslovno cemo se raspadati i "topiti" u hodu...ako je to meni,kao laiku palo na pamet.....

Gnječ wrote:e ovo je zanimljivo:

SARS 2.0

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a lethal virus. More than 700 people were killed during a SARS epidemic that infected 8,000 people in 29 countries between 2002 and 2003. Now, scientists have made it deadlier.

The new mutant SARS virus was created by a group of researchers led by Dr. Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina. They call it SARS 2.0. The researchers developed the virus by adding some protein to the naturally occurring SARS. SARS 2.0 is immune to vaccines and treatments used to cure the naturally occurring SARS virus.[5]

The team said that the research was necessary because the natural SARS virus could mutate and become immune to our vaccines. By creating a deadlier and mutated virus, we could develop stronger vaccines that will save us from a more lethal SARS epidemic—that is, if the natural SARS ever mutates.

However, other scientists are concerned because the SARS 2.0 that is supposed to save us from a deadly SARS epidemic could start that epidemic if it ever escapes from the lab.


MERS-Rabies Virus Hybrid

Scientists have created a MERS-rabies hybrid virus. The idea is to use the virus to develop a vaccine that will protect us from both viruses. Rabies is a deadly disease that can be transmitted to humans through the bites of infected dogs that usually have the virus in their saliva.

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is a new virus that appeared in Saudi Arabia a few years ago. It is closely related to SARS and is spread from bats to camels and, finally, to humans. MERS infected 1,800 people at the time of its first epidemic and killed over 630. Its fatality rate is around 35 percent.

As we mentioned in the previous entry, SARS infected over 8,000 people during a 2003 epidemic but killed just over 700. Although SARS caused more deaths in absolute terms, it has a lower fatality rate than MERS. Only about 10 percent of SARS victims died. And for now, we do not have any vaccine for MERS.

To create the MERS-rabies hybrid, researchers took some proteins from the MERS virus and added it to rabies. They used the new virus to develop a new vaccine that made mice resistant to rabies and MERS. They believe that the vaccine can also be used for humans and camels at risk of getting MERS.[6]

Phi-X174

Phi-X174 is another artificial virus we have produced in laboratories. It was created by researchers at the Institute of Biological Energy Alternatives in Rockville, Maryland. The researchers modeled the artificial virus after the natural phiX virus. PhiX is a bacteriophage, a category of viruses that infect and kill bacteria. However, it has no effect on humans.[7]

The researchers created the artificial virus in 14 days, yet it resembles the natural virus so much that it is impossible to tell them apart. The researchers hope that the new virus is the first step in developing mutant and artificial bacteria that can be used for the benefit of man.

Unnamed Virus

Researchers from University College London and the National Physical Laboratory have created an unnamed virus that kills bacteria and behaves like a real virus. Like phi-X174, it is a bacteriophage but deadlier.

The unnamed virus attacks any bacteria around it. Within seconds, it breaks into smaller parts that attach and create holes on the bodies of the bacteria. The holes quickly become larger, forcing the bacteria to leak their contents. The bacteria die soon after.

Despite its scary potency, the unnamed virus is not dangerous to humans and did not attack human cells during tests. However, it could enter human cells just like natural viruses. Researchers hope the results will be used to treat and study bacterial diseases in humans. The virus could also be used to alter the human gene.[8]

Bird Flu

Some Dutch scientists have created a mutant and deadlier version of the already-lethal bird flu. Natural bird flu is not easily transmitted among humans. However, the researchers altered it so that it could be. To test their new virus, the researchers exposed some ferrets to it. Ferrets were chosen because they had similar bird flu symptoms to humans.

Ten generations later, the already-changed virus mutated again and became airborne. Natural bird flu is not an airborne disease. The study was controversial in the science community. It became even more so when the Dutch researchers attempted to publish the process to create the deadly virus.[9]

Although scientists fear that terrorists could use the study to produce a deadly biological weapon that could kill half the people in the world, the researchers involved say that the study was necessary to allow us prepare for a mutated bird flu epidemic.

H1N1 Virus

In 1918, the world witnessed the arrival of a deadly flu epidemic. This was the H1N1 virus. By the time it was over, up to 100 million people were dead. The flu caused blood to seep into the lungs of victims. They released blood from their noses and mouths before drowning in the blood inside their lungs.

The flu returned in 2009. But it was less lethal even though it was mutated and deadlier than it should have been. Scientist Yoshihiro Kawaoka took samples of the mutated strain that caused the 2009 epidemic and used it to create a deadlier strain that was resistant to vaccines. This strain was similar to the one that caused the 1918 epidemic.[10]

Kawaoka was not planning to produce a more lethal version of the flu at the time. He only wanted to create the original version of the flu so that he could study how it mutated and was able to bypass our immunity. The deadly virus is stored in a lab and could become fatal if ever released.

zabrinjavajuce..samo mu treba dati instrukcije da napadne ljudske stanice,i onda doslovno odosmo u pičkumaterinu,i to jako brzo..

https://www.trackcorona.live/

odlicna stranica..

https://bacteriophages.info/en/news/the-perfect-predator/

https://bacteriophages.info/uploads/Instruction/Piofag_instruction_1502703180.pdf

Tko bi rekao..UKRAJINA...

u sustini bakteriofag-i su korisni,ali se mogu reprogramirati i dati im se ne tako "humane" mogucnosti

Mysterious blood clots in COVID-19 patients have doctors alarmed

By Rachael Rettner - Senior Writer 17 hours ago
Some hospitals are putting all COVID-19 patients on low doses of blood thinners.
 Comments (2)


(Image: :copyright: Shutterstock)


As doctors learn more about what makes COVID-19 so severe for some patients, they have discovered a mysterious and potentially lethal complication of the disease: blood clots.
Many doctors have reported seeing an alarming number of COVID-19 patients with blood clots — gel-like clumps in the blood that can cause serious problems, such as heart attack and stroke, according to news reports.

"The number of clotting problems I'm seeing in the ICU [intensive care unit], all related to COVID-19, is unprecedented," Dr. Jeffrey Laurence, a hematologist at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City, told CNN.

CORONAVIRUS SCIENCE AND NEWS
—Coronavirus in the US: Map & cases
—What are coronavirus symptoms?
—How deadly is the new coronavirus?
—How long does coronavirus last on surfaces?
—Is there a cure for COVID-19?
—How does coronavirus compare with seasonal flu?
—How does the coronavirus spread?
—Can people spread the coronavirus after they recover?

Some doctors started to notice that their COVID-19 patients were developing clots in their legs, even while they were on blood thinners, according to The Washington Post. Others reported trouble with dialysis machines for COVID-19 patients, because clots in the patients' blood would clog the machine tubing, according to CNN.

In addition, some COVID-19 autopsies have found tiny blood clots throughout the lungs, the Post reported.
Reports are also surfacing of relatively young people, in their 30s and 40s, who are having strokes after being infected with the new coronavirus, according to CNN. It's known that strokes are often caused by blot clots that break free and travel to vessels in the brain.
The link between COVID-19 and clots has led some hospitals to put all COVID-19 patients on low doses of blood thinners to prevent clots, according to CNN.

It's not uncommon for patients in the ICU to experience blood clots, but the level of clotting with COVID-19 does appear out of the ordinary, CNN reported. A recent study from the Netherlands, published in the journal Thrombosis Research, found that out of 184 COVID-19 patients in the ICU, more than 30% experienced some type of clotting issue. This number is "alarming," Dr. Behnood Bikdeli, cardiovascular medicine fellow at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, told CNN.
Given that COVID-19 is a respiratory illness, doctors expected the most serious effects to be in the lungs, not the blood. It's still unclear why COVID-19 patients are experiencing these clots.
The clots could be the result of an overactive immune system, which leads to an imbalance in "clotting factors" that can cause clotting or bleeding, the Post reported.
But doctors note that many COVID-19 patients in the ICU also have other risk factors for blood clots, such as diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure, according to CNN.
Doctors say there is an urgent need to study this issue and whether blood thinners can help COVID-19 patients, CNN reported.

•  The 12 deadliest viruses on Earth  
  
• 20 of the worst epidemics and pandemics in history  
  
• Going viral: 6 new findings about viruses 
  

[size]
https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-blood-clots.html[/size]

dobar mi je ero... u usa "samo" je probem new york i new jersey... pa kud ćeš više od tog dvoje, ali na stranu i to... 50 000 mrtvih u manje od 2 mjeseca, ako se održi otprilike ovaj tempo smrtnosti u 3 godine po 2 cuga oni će izgubiti više ljudi nego u ww2 ili otprilike toliko... s tim da ih ovo izginuće košta bar 20 puta više nego ona ratna izginuća...

michaellcmacha wrote:dobar mi je ero... u usa "samo" je probem new york i new jersey... pa kud ćeš više od tog dvoje, ali na stranu i to... 50 000 mrtvih u manje od 2 mjeseca, ako se održi otprilike ovaj tempo smrtnosti u 3 godine po 2 cuga oni će izgubiti više ljudi nego u ww2 ili otprilike toliko... s tim da ih ovo izginuće košta bar 20 puta više nego ona ratna izginuća...

još im dan dva fali da dosegnu vietnam

Umorili se od brojanja?