Denkverbot

ebenica wrote:

aben wrote:nika ni bilo, da ni nekako bilo.
mozda je to sansa za pokopati socijalizam, mozda je to sansa da popravimo drustvo.

treba vas povješat po stupovima, dok se trilioni talože po bankama za odabranu nekolicinu većina poslije ovog sranja neće imat kai za jest i di za živjet jer su od prvog do prvog uštedjeli kurčine.

e, siromšćina uvika tako svrši.

Psychologists say they’ve found the exact amount of money you need to be happy

Money can buy you happiness, but only a certain amount.

Psychologists from Purdue University and the University of Virginia analyzed World Gallup Poll data from 1.7 million people in 164 countries, and cross-referenced their earnings and life satisfaction. Although the cost and standard of living varies across these countries, researchers came up with a bold conclusion: The ideal income for individuals is $95,000 a year for life satisfaction and $60,000 to $75,000 a year for emotional well-being. Families with children, of course, will need more.

The study, published in the journal Nature Human Behavior, found that once that threshold was reached, further increases in income were actually associated with reduced happiness. People from wealthier countries were satisfied with their lives later on, said Andrew Jebb, the lead author of the study and doctoral student at Purdue’s Department of Psychological Sciences, perhaps because they’re more likely to compare themselves to others. “Evaluations tend to be more influenced by the standards by which individuals compare themselves to other people,” Jebb said.

Researchers defined life satisfaction as an overall assessment of how one is doing, while emotional well-being refers to a person’s day-to-day feelings such as happiness, sadness, excitement or anger.

There is a happiness tipping point: The more you have, the more you want, the study concluded. “The small decline puts one’s level of well-being closer to individuals who make slightly lower incomes, perhaps due to the costs that come with the highest incomes,” Jebb said. “These findings speak to a broader issue of money and happiness across cultures. Money is only a part of what really makes us happy, and we’re learning more about the limits of money.”

Americans, who have experienced stagnant wages for several years, seem to be stuck in a rut. This week, polling firm Gallup and digital health company Sharecare, painted a bleak picture: Not one state showed an improvement in well-being by a statistically significant measure — the first time that’s happened in the nearly 10-year history of the Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index. South Dakota claimed the top spot, scoring 64.1 out of 100 points, followed by Vermont and Hawaii.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-is-exactly-how-much-money-you-need-to-be-truly-happy-earning-more-wont-help-2018-02-14

Gnječ wrote:Psychologists say they’ve found the exact amount of money you need to be happy

Money can buy you happiness, but only a certain amount.

Psychologists from Purdue University and the University of Virginia analyzed World Gallup Poll data from 1.7 million people in 164 countries, and cross-referenced their earnings and life satisfaction. Although the cost and standard of living varies across these countries, researchers came up with a bold conclusion: The ideal income for individuals is $95,000 a year for life satisfaction and $60,000 to $75,000 a year for emotional well-being. Families with children, of course, will need more.

The study, published in the journal Nature Human Behavior, found that once that threshold was reached, further increases in income were actually associated with reduced happiness. People from wealthier countries were satisfied with their lives later on, said Andrew Jebb, the lead author of the study and doctoral student at Purdue’s Department of Psychological Sciences, perhaps because they’re more likely to compare themselves to others. “Evaluations tend to be more influenced by the standards by which individuals compare themselves to other people,” Jebb said.

Researchers defined life satisfaction as an overall assessment of how one is doing, while emotional well-being refers to a person’s day-to-day feelings such as happiness, sadness, excitement or anger.

There is a happiness tipping point: The more you have, the more you want, the study concluded. “The small decline puts one’s level of well-being closer to individuals who make slightly lower incomes, perhaps due to the costs that come with the highest incomes,” Jebb said. “These findings speak to a broader issue of money and happiness across cultures. Money is only a part of what really makes us happy, and we’re learning more about the limits of money.”

Americans, who have experienced stagnant wages for several years, seem to be stuck in a rut. This week, polling firm Gallup and digital health company Sharecare, painted a bleak picture: Not one state showed an improvement in well-being by a statistically significant measure — the first time that’s happened in the nearly 10-year history of the Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index. South Dakota claimed the top spot, scoring 64.1 out of 100 points, followed by Vermont and Hawaii.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-is-exactly-how-much-money-you-need-to-be-truly-happy-earning-more-wont-help-2018-02-14

provoj proguglati ki poslovi ti doju ploću od 95 iljod godišnje. to su ljudi ki su duugo ulogali, mučili se, imali izrazito nisku vremensku preferenciju. velika većina ljudi ni takova, i zoto su siromasi.

Gnječ wrote:

opa, točni ekonomski zakoni? 
minjoš se, gnječ, a braća na ljevici te se pomalo odriču...

aben wrote:

ebenica wrote:

aben wrote:nika ni bilo, da ni nekako bilo.
mozda je to sansa za pokopati socijalizam, mozda je to sansa da popravimo drustvo.

treba vas povješat po stupovima, dok se trilioni talože po bankama za odabranu nekolicinu većina poslije ovog sranja neće imat kai za jest i di za živjet jer su od prvog do prvog uštedjeli kurčine.

e, siromšćina uvika tako svrši.

e, treba te objesit na stup bez ikakvog pardona.

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:Psychologists say they’ve found the exact amount of money you need to be happy

Money can buy you happiness, but only a certain amount.

Psychologists from Purdue University and the University of Virginia analyzed World Gallup Poll data from 1.7 million people in 164 countries, and cross-referenced their earnings and life satisfaction. Although the cost and standard of living varies across these countries, researchers came up with a bold conclusion: The ideal income for individuals is $95,000 a year for life satisfaction and $60,000 to $75,000 a year for emotional well-being. Families with children, of course, will need more.

The study, published in the journal Nature Human Behavior, found that once that threshold was reached, further increases in income were actually associated with reduced happiness. People from wealthier countries were satisfied with their lives later on, said Andrew Jebb, the lead author of the study and doctoral student at Purdue’s Department of Psychological Sciences, perhaps because they’re more likely to compare themselves to others. “Evaluations tend to be more influenced by the standards by which individuals compare themselves to other people,” Jebb said.

Researchers defined life satisfaction as an overall assessment of how one is doing, while emotional well-being refers to a person’s day-to-day feelings such as happiness, sadness, excitement or anger.

There is a happiness tipping point: The more you have, the more you want, the study concluded. “The small decline puts one’s level of well-being closer to individuals who make slightly lower incomes, perhaps due to the costs that come with the highest incomes,” Jebb said. “These findings speak to a broader issue of money and happiness across cultures. Money is only a part of what really makes us happy, and we’re learning more about the limits of money.”

Americans, who have experienced stagnant wages for several years, seem to be stuck in a rut. This week, polling firm Gallup and digital health company Sharecare, painted a bleak picture: Not one state showed an improvement in well-being by a statistically significant measure — the first time that’s happened in the nearly 10-year history of the Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index. South Dakota claimed the top spot, scoring 64.1 out of 100 points, followed by Vermont and Hawaii.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-is-exactly-how-much-money-you-need-to-be-truly-happy-earning-more-wont-help-2018-02-14

provoj proguglati ki poslovi ti doju ploću od 95 iljod godišnje. to su ljudi ki su duugo ulogali, mučili se, imali izrazito nisku vremensku preferenciju. velika većina ljudi ni takova, i zoto su siromasi.

znam da je ovaj medij (forum) koji se koristi samo pisanim slovima u interpersonalnoj komunikaciji ograničeni medij gdje jedino dobro plivaju oni koji imaju urođeni talent ili su naučili spretno slagati slova u riječi i rečenice u svrhu manipulacije sugovornika destruktivne svrhe a takvih je najviše ja ih zovem interpersonalni predatori. ona manjina koja pisanu komunikaciju koristi u dobre svrhe /konstruktivne je osuđena na poraz.

ti si jedan od tih u većini a takvih kao što si ti je krcat forum. zat kažem da je ovo mjesto toksično.

da ti malo pojasnim ma da nije potrebno jer to već i sam znaš jedino se praviš mutav ili si skroz tup ko cok da iznad u tekstu piše minimalno novaca tj. minimalna plaća koja bi bila ok da se ljudi osjećaju zadovoljno i bez stresa da mogu podmiriti sve svoje potrebe koje sa novcem mogu kupiti.

ti si okrenuo pilu naopako i krenuo krivom logikom zaključivati da oni koji nemaju taj novac su uglavnom ljenčine i niškoristi. znači 7 milijardi ljudi je niškoristi a onaj 1% bogatih su bogati jer su vrijedni i marljivi.

daj prestani više meni prodavati snake oil.

jesi čitao Simone Weil, aben?

http://libgen.li/item/index.php?md5=217F8CD3EBBA39D58B2365D63B05E99A&fbclid=IwAR2Ce5tIeB7JS2s30nq6D1BeNLRMbVthEHkA_9xtj8Si2wNKEhrnitTjMzk

ebenica wrote:

aben wrote:

ebenica wrote:

aben wrote:nika ni bilo, da ni nekako bilo.
mozda je to sansa za pokopati socijalizam, mozda je to sansa da popravimo drustvo.

treba vas povješat po stupovima, dok se trilioni talože po bankama za odabranu nekolicinu većina poslije ovog sranja neće imat kai za jest i di za živjet jer su od prvog do prvog uštedjeli kurčine.

e, siromšćina uvika tako svrši.

e, treba te objesit na stup bez ikakvog pardona.

a ča sun jo kriv ča oni nisu štedili, pa da me tribo obisiti, ajde moj

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:Psychologists say they’ve found the exact amount of money you need to be happy

Money can buy you happiness, but only a certain amount.

Psychologists from Purdue University and the University of Virginia analyzed World Gallup Poll data from 1.7 million people in 164 countries, and cross-referenced their earnings and life satisfaction. Although the cost and standard of living varies across these countries, researchers came up with a bold conclusion: The ideal income for individuals is $95,000 a year for life satisfaction and $60,000 to $75,000 a year for emotional well-being. Families with children, of course, will need more.

The study, published in the journal Nature Human Behavior, found that once that threshold was reached, further increases in income were actually associated with reduced happiness. People from wealthier countries were satisfied with their lives later on, said Andrew Jebb, the lead author of the study and doctoral student at Purdue’s Department of Psychological Sciences, perhaps because they’re more likely to compare themselves to others. “Evaluations tend to be more influenced by the standards by which individuals compare themselves to other people,” Jebb said.

Researchers defined life satisfaction as an overall assessment of how one is doing, while emotional well-being refers to a person’s day-to-day feelings such as happiness, sadness, excitement or anger.

There is a happiness tipping point: The more you have, the more you want, the study concluded. “The small decline puts one’s level of well-being closer to individuals who make slightly lower incomes, perhaps due to the costs that come with the highest incomes,” Jebb said. “These findings speak to a broader issue of money and happiness across cultures. Money is only a part of what really makes us happy, and we’re learning more about the limits of money.”

Americans, who have experienced stagnant wages for several years, seem to be stuck in a rut. This week, polling firm Gallup and digital health company Sharecare, painted a bleak picture: Not one state showed an improvement in well-being by a statistically significant measure — the first time that’s happened in the nearly 10-year history of the Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index. South Dakota claimed the top spot, scoring 64.1 out of 100 points, followed by Vermont and Hawaii.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-is-exactly-how-much-money-you-need-to-be-truly-happy-earning-more-wont-help-2018-02-14

provoj proguglati ki poslovi ti doju ploću od 95 iljod godišnje. to su ljudi ki su duugo ulogali, mučili se, imali izrazito nisku vremensku preferenciju. velika većina ljudi ni takova, i zoto su siromasi.

znam da je ovaj medij (forum) koji se koristi samo pisanim slovima u interpersonalnoj komunikaciji ograničeni medij gdje jedino dobro plivaju oni koji imaju urođeni talent ili su naučili spretno slagati slova u riječi i rečenice u svrhu manipulacije sugovornika destruktivne svrhe a takvih je najviše ja ih zovem interpersonalni predatori. ona manjina koja pisanu komunikaciju koristi u dobre svrhe /konstruktivne je osuđena na poraz.

ti si jedan od tih u većini a takvih kao što si ti je krcat forum. zat kažem da je ovo mjesto toksično.

da ti malo pojasnim ma da nije potrebno jer to već i sam znaš jedino se praviš mutav ili si skroz tup ko cok da iznad u tekstu piše minimalno novaca tj. minimalna plaća koja bi bila ok da se ljudi osjećaju zadovoljno i bez stresa da mogu podmiriti sve svoje potrebe koje sa novcem mogu kupiti.

ti si okrenuo pilu naopako i krenuo krivom logikom zaključivati da oni koji nemaju taj novac su uglavnom ljenčine i niškoristi. znači 7 milijardi ljudi je niškoristi a onaj 1% bogatih su bogati jer su vrijedni i marljivi.

daj prestani više meni prodavati snake oil.

ok, minimalno da bi bili zadovoljni, pa ča?
ljudi bi bilo zadovoljni s ploćun doktora, go figure. a bi li bili zadovoljni s deset godina učenja?

da, 7 milijardi ljudi su linčine i malokoristi. jedun de njih nemo kapaciteta, a oni ki imaju, nemaju volje.


ne razumin zoč sun intepersonalni ..ča si ono reko..lovac,  jer želiš razgovorati samo o količini šoldov koja čini ljude sritnima? ali to ni sporno.

kic wrote:
jesi čitao Simone Weil, aben?

nis,
imo ča dobroga?

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:Psychologists say they’ve found the exact amount of money you need to be happy

Money can buy you happiness, but only a certain amount.

Psychologists from Purdue University and the University of Virginia analyzed World Gallup Poll data from 1.7 million people in 164 countries, and cross-referenced their earnings and life satisfaction. Although the cost and standard of living varies across these countries, researchers came up with a bold conclusion: The ideal income for individuals is $95,000 a year for life satisfaction and $60,000 to $75,000 a year for emotional well-being. Families with children, of course, will need more.

The study, published in the journal Nature Human Behavior, found that once that threshold was reached, further increases in income were actually associated with reduced happiness. People from wealthier countries were satisfied with their lives later on, said Andrew Jebb, the lead author of the study and doctoral student at Purdue’s Department of Psychological Sciences, perhaps because they’re more likely to compare themselves to others. “Evaluations tend to be more influenced by the standards by which individuals compare themselves to other people,” Jebb said.

Researchers defined life satisfaction as an overall assessment of how one is doing, while emotional well-being refers to a person’s day-to-day feelings such as happiness, sadness, excitement or anger.

There is a happiness tipping point: The more you have, the more you want, the study concluded. “The small decline puts one’s level of well-being closer to individuals who make slightly lower incomes, perhaps due to the costs that come with the highest incomes,” Jebb said. “These findings speak to a broader issue of money and happiness across cultures. Money is only a part of what really makes us happy, and we’re learning more about the limits of money.”

Americans, who have experienced stagnant wages for several years, seem to be stuck in a rut. This week, polling firm Gallup and digital health company Sharecare, painted a bleak picture: Not one state showed an improvement in well-being by a statistically significant measure — the first time that’s happened in the nearly 10-year history of the Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index. South Dakota claimed the top spot, scoring 64.1 out of 100 points, followed by Vermont and Hawaii.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-is-exactly-how-much-money-you-need-to-be-truly-happy-earning-more-wont-help-2018-02-14

provoj proguglati ki poslovi ti doju ploću od 95 iljod godišnje. to su ljudi ki su duugo ulogali, mučili se, imali izrazito nisku vremensku preferenciju. velika većina ljudi ni takova, i zoto su siromasi.

znam da je ovaj medij (forum) koji se koristi samo pisanim slovima u interpersonalnoj komunikaciji ograničeni medij gdje jedino dobro plivaju oni koji imaju urođeni talent ili su naučili spretno slagati slova u riječi i rečenice u svrhu manipulacije sugovornika destruktivne svrhe a takvih je najviše ja ih zovem interpersonalni predatori. ona manjina koja pisanu komunikaciju koristi u dobre svrhe /konstruktivne je osuđena na poraz.

ti si jedan od tih u većini a takvih kao što si ti je krcat forum. zat kažem da je ovo mjesto toksično.

da ti malo pojasnim ma da nije potrebno jer to već i sam znaš jedino se praviš mutav ili si skroz tup ko cok da iznad u tekstu piše minimalno novaca tj. minimalna plaća koja bi bila ok da se ljudi osjećaju zadovoljno i bez stresa da mogu podmiriti sve svoje potrebe koje sa novcem mogu kupiti.

ti si okrenuo pilu naopako i krenuo krivom logikom zaključivati da oni koji nemaju taj novac su uglavnom ljenčine i niškoristi. znači 7 milijardi ljudi je niškoristi a onaj 1% bogatih su bogati jer su vrijedni i marljivi.

daj prestani više meni prodavati snake oil.

ok, minimalno da bi bili zadovoljni, pa ča?
ljudi bi bilo zadovoljni s ploćun doktora, go figure. a bi li bili zadovoljni s deset godina učenja?

da, 7 milijardi ljudi su linčine i malokoristi. jedun de njih nemo kapaciteta, a oni ki imaju, nemaju volje.


ne razumin zoč sun intepersonalni ..ča si ono reko..lovac,  jer želiš razgovorati samo o količini šoldov koja čini ljude sritnima? ali to ni sporno.

odustajem. ne zato jer ja nemam argumenata nego zato jer ti nemaš argumenata. ono što ti prezentiraš nisu argumenti nego najobičnije sofističko preseravanje.

kako je napisao ebenica: treba te objesit na stup bez ikakvog pardona.

slažem se 100%

aben wrote:

kic wrote:
jesi čitao Simone Weil, aben?

nis,
imo ča dobroga?

evo link na njenu zadnju knjigu, s 33g je preminula usred ww2..

https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/need-roots.pdf

ova knjiga je rezultat nekog rada-izvještaja kako bi trebalo Francusku izgraditi nakon rata, i s obzirom da je bila ljevičarka koja je išla u Španjolski građanski rat borit se u redovima Anarhista, ovo su neke originalne misli, bar meni..

kic wrote:

aben wrote:

kic wrote:
jesi čitao Simone Weil, aben?

nis,
imo ča dobroga?

evo link na njenu zadnju knjigu, s 33g je preminula usred ww2..

https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/need-roots.pdf

ova knjiga je rezultat nekog rada-izvještaja kako bi trebalo Francusku izgraditi nakon rata, i s obzirom da je bila ljevičarka koja je išla u Španjolski građanski rat borit se u redovima Anarhista, ovo su neke originalne misli, bar meni..

ljevičarka? 
hm, počinje ko klasični liberal, definirajući kako obligacija prethodi pravima. 
današnji ljevičari su pičkice.

 There are collectivities which, instead of serving as food, do just the opposite: they devour souls. In such cases, the social body is diseased, and the first duty is to attempt a cure; in certain circumstances, it may be necessary to have recourse to surgical methods...


ali, čitojmo dalje...

pa, počela je kao ljevičarka

ali onda otišla namjerno raditi u tvornicu i u polje, i neki flip joj se dogodio, zapravo je iznad tih podjela lijevo-desno

For instance, an employer who is incapable or guilty of an offence against his workmen ought to be made to suffer far more, both in the spirit and in the flesh, than a workman who is incapable or guilty of an offence against his employer. 

evo, prvo ča se ne složin, o dijelu equality. ni precizirala zoč bi to bilo tako.
ali, opet, ni da morin odbociti celi odjeljak, jer, 

Equality is all the greater in proportion as different human conditions are regarded as being, not more nor less than one another, but simply as other. Let us look on the professions of miner and minister simply as two different vocations, like those of poet and mathematician. And let the material hardships attaching to the miner’s condition be counted in honor of those who undergo them. In wartime, if an army is filled with the right spirit, a soldier is proud and happy to be under fire instead of at headquarters; a general is proud and happy to think that the successful outcome of the battle depends on his forethought; and at the same time the soldier admires the general and the general the soldier. Such a balance constitutes an equality.

aben wrote:For instance, an employer who is incapable or guilty of an offence against his workmen ought to be made to suffer far more, both in the spirit and in the flesh, than a workman who is incapable or guilty of an offence against his employer. 

evo, prvo ča se ne složin, o dijelu equality. ni precizirala zoč bi to bilo tako.
ali, opet, ni da morin odbociti celi odjeljak, jer, 

Equality is all the greater in proportion as different human conditions are regarded as being, not more nor less than one another, but simply as other. Let us look on the professions of miner and minister simply as two different vocations, like those of poet and mathematician. And let the material hardships attaching to the miner’s condition be counted in honor of those who undergo them. In wartime, if an army is filled with the right spirit, a soldier is proud and happy to be under fire instead of at headquarters; a general is proud and happy to think that the successful outcome of the battle depends on his forethought; and at the same time the soldier admires the general and the general the soldier. Such a balance constitutes an equality.

francuskinje su Jeanne d'Arc il su Belle de Jour, nema između

kic wrote:

aben wrote:For instance, an employer who is incapable or guilty of an offence against his workmen ought to be made to suffer far more, both in the spirit and in the flesh, than a workman who is incapable or guilty of an offence against his employer. 

evo, prvo ča se ne složin, o dijelu equality. ni precizirala zoč bi to bilo tako.
ali, opet, ni da morin odbociti celi odjeljak, jer, 

Equality is all the greater in proportion as different human conditions are regarded as being, not more nor less than one another, but simply as other. Let us look on the professions of miner and minister simply as two different vocations, like those of poet and mathematician. And let the material hardships attaching to the miner’s condition be counted in honor of those who undergo them. In wartime, if an army is filled with the right spirit, a soldier is proud and happy to be under fire instead of at headquarters; a general is proud and happy to think that the successful outcome of the battle depends on his forethought; and at the same time the soldier admires the general and the general the soldier. Such a balance constitutes an equality.

francuskinje su Jeanne d'Arc il su Belle de Jour, nema između

a ova je ta prva.

izgubila me na free speech, i freedom of associations. ipak, došo sun do kraja prvog dela, i morun reći da je sve to resonable. dobro detektiro i definiro aksiome, ili potribe duše, kako ona to zove. ali ni dobra u day-to-day uređenju. čudno, jer je puno veći problijem opisati zoč čovik imo obavezu prema čoviku -There exists an obligation towards every human being for the sole reason that he or she is a human being- nego se zakonski odrediti prema štampi- Protection of freedom of thought requires that no group should be permitted by law to express an opinion. For when a group starts having opinions, it inevitably tends to impose them on its members.

aben wrote:

kic wrote:

aben wrote:For instance, an employer who is incapable or guilty of an offence against his workmen ought to be made to suffer far more, both in the spirit and in the flesh, than a workman who is incapable or guilty of an offence against his employer. 

evo, prvo ča se ne složin, o dijelu equality. ni precizirala zoč bi to bilo tako.
ali, opet, ni da morin odbociti celi odjeljak, jer, 

Equality is all the greater in proportion as different human conditions are regarded as being, not more nor less than one another, but simply as other. Let us look on the professions of miner and minister simply as two different vocations, like those of poet and mathematician. And let the material hardships attaching to the miner’s condition be counted in honor of those who undergo them. In wartime, if an army is filled with the right spirit, a soldier is proud and happy to be under fire instead of at headquarters; a general is proud and happy to think that the successful outcome of the battle depends on his forethought; and at the same time the soldier admires the general and the general the soldier. Such a balance constitutes an equality.

francuskinje su Jeanne d'Arc il su Belle de Jour, nema između

a ova je ta prva.

izgubila me na free speech, i freedom of associations. ipak, došo sun do kraja prvog dela, i morun reći da je sve to resonable. dobro detektiro i definiro aksiome, ili potribe duše, kako ona to zove. ali ni dobra u day-to-day uređenju. čudno, jer je puno veći problijem opisati zoč čovik imo obavezu prema čoviku -There exists an obligation towards every human being for the sole reason that he or she is a human being- nego se zakonski odrediti prema štampi- Protection of freedom of thought requires that no group should be permitted by law to express an opinion. For when a group starts having opinions, it inevitably tends to impose them on its members.

nemoguće se složiti sa svim, da je tako, taj čovjek bi bio Simone Weil^^ čak i u uvodu piše tako nešto..

to je ono religijsko, priznati svakom čovjeku da je čovjek i ne napadati ga, ne ubij (Peterson i njegova biblical serija)

ljudi i samo prihvaćaju šta im mediji serviraju, mediji rade male majmune od svojih pratitelja, evo vidim da je podrška vladinim mjerama preko 90%

kic wrote:

aben wrote:

kic wrote:

aben wrote:For instance, an employer who is incapable or guilty of an offence against his workmen ought to be made to suffer far more, both in the spirit and in the flesh, than a workman who is incapable or guilty of an offence against his employer. 

evo, prvo ča se ne složin, o dijelu equality. ni precizirala zoč bi to bilo tako.
ali, opet, ni da morin odbociti celi odjeljak, jer, 

Equality is all the greater in proportion as different human conditions are regarded as being, not more nor less than one another, but simply as other. Let us look on the professions of miner and minister simply as two different vocations, like those of poet and mathematician. And let the material hardships attaching to the miner’s condition be counted in honor of those who undergo them. In wartime, if an army is filled with the right spirit, a soldier is proud and happy to be under fire instead of at headquarters; a general is proud and happy to think that the successful outcome of the battle depends on his forethought; and at the same time the soldier admires the general and the general the soldier. Such a balance constitutes an equality.

francuskinje su Jeanne d'Arc il su Belle de Jour, nema između

a ova je ta prva.

izgubila me na free speech, i freedom of associations. ipak, došo sun do kraja prvog dela, i morun reći da je sve to resonable. dobro detektiro i definiro aksiome, ili potribe duše, kako ona to zove. ali ni dobra u day-to-day uređenju. čudno, jer je puno veći problijem opisati zoč čovik imo obavezu prema čoviku -There exists an obligation towards every human being for the sole reason that he or she is a human being- nego se zakonski odrediti prema štampi- Protection of freedom of thought requires that no group should be permitted by law to express an opinion. For when a group starts having opinions, it inevitably tends to impose them on its members.

nemoguće se složiti sa svim, da je tako, taj čovjek bi bio Simone Weil^^  čak i u uvodu piše tako nešto..

to je ono religijsko, priznati svakom čovjeku da je čovjek i ne napadati ga, ne ubij (Peterson i njegova biblical  serija)

ljudi i samo prihvaćaju šta im mediji serviraju, mediji rade male majmune od svojih pratitelja, evo vidim da je podrška vladinim mjerama preko 90%

ma, jo imun otu predodžbu, da su ljevičari oni ki su zabrinuti za siromahe iz topline svojih salona, nešto ko ebenica iz podsljemenske zone, ali ova je izgljedo real thing. kad se ljudi složu na toj elementarnoj razini, tipa da je čovik čovik, da je bez obzira vridniji od pasa i slično, jo verujen da je pitanje vrimena, i samo tehničko pitanje kako urediti društvo na radost svih.

šimije među nama su sritni ča su šimije, oni žudu za otin ča mediji od njih rodu. ne tribo ih žaliti, njima je bolje nego meni, to je siguro.