Policajka na Kosovu pobila cijelu obitelj

Psihički je zlostavljali da se uda pa ova pukla. A nemoš nikoga na silu tirat u krevet s drugim ( u brak )

https://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/hronika/aktuelno.291.html:848227-Roditelji-i-braca-policajki-PREBACIVALI-sto-se-NIJE-UDALA-otisla-ranije-sa-posla-i-sve-ih-POBILA-Da-li-je-ovo-motiv-jezivog-zlocina-kod-Gnjilana

Tako je mene mater psihički zlostavljala da se oženim pa mi na kraju došla s nečakom i ispri njega meni govori da ako se ja ne oženim da će on sve nasljedit. Ja pričeka da sestra pokupi maloga i onda ubija Boga u njoj i izbacija je iz kuće i od tada ne smi vamo privirit.

To ti je psihičko zlostavljanje , kljuca te u mozak dok ne pukneš. Ova je pukla na kraju. Pa ne možeš ti nekog silovat da ode spavat u krevet s nekim ako neće a to u biti brak , zlostavljaš psihički nekog tko neće da ide spavat s drugom osobom.

Open main menu

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

• 
  

• 
  

• 
  
• 
  

[size]



[/size]




Suppressive Person

• Language
  
• Download PDF
  
  
• Watch
  
• Edit
  

Suppressive Person, often abbreviated SP, is a term used in Scientology to describe the "antisocial personalities" who, according to Scientology's founder L. Ron Hubbard, make up about 2.5% of the population. A statement on a Church of Scientology website describes this group as including notorious historic figures such as Adolf Hitler.^[size=12][1]

The term is often applied to those whom the Church perceives as its enemies, such as those whose "disastrous" and "suppressive" acts are said to impede the progress of individual Scientologists or the Scientology movement.^[2]

One of the reasons Scientology doctrines portray Suppressive Persons as such a danger is that they are supposed to make people around them become Potential Trouble Sources (abbreviated PTS). Scientology defines a PTS as "a person who is in some way connected to and being adversely affected by a suppressive person. Such a person is called a potential trouble source because he can be a lot of trouble to himself and to others."^[3] Hubbard suggested that Potential Trouble Sources make up 17.5% of the population.^[4]

Origins and definitions

As with most Scientology terminology, "Suppressive Person" was coined by L. Ron Hubbard. Ruth A. Tucker writes in her book Another Gospel: Cults, Alternative Religions, and the New Age Movement that the concept appears to have first been introduced into Scientology in the 1960s "as membership grew and as authoritarian control [by Hubbard] increased". Tucker notes that many of those who joined Scientology during this period were "well-educated people who prided themselves in independent thinking [and] struggled with the idea of allowing any other individual to completely dominate their opinions."^[5] Many of Hubbard's early writings on Suppressive Persons focus on their alleged responsibility for poor management within the Church of Scientology.^[6][7]

The church's official glossary defines a Suppressive Person as being:

[/size]

a person who possesses a distinct set of characteristics and mental attitudes that cause him to suppress other people in his vicinity. This is the person whose behavior is calculated to be disastrous. Also called antisocial personality.^[size=13][8][/size]

[size]

The church regards these "antisocial personalities" as being those "who possess characteristics and mental attitudes that cause them to violently oppose any betterment activity or group,"^[9] This concern with "groups" continues in the official Scientology Handbook, which states the corollary: "The antisocial personality supports only destructive groups."^[10]

Policies and practices

According to the Hubbard textbook Introduction to Scientology Ethics ("the Ethics book"), when an individual is found to be under the influence of a Suppressive Person, it is believed that this will affect their general well-being. An individual with an SP in their vicinity is likely to be under stress or frequently upset, and this would potentially jeopardize the stability of any treatment or education. Therefore, a parishioner who is found to have such suppressive connections is not permitted to participate in certain Scientology classes and counseling until the situation has been adequately resolved.

The Ethics book provides a guideline for use in sorting out such a condition. A first step is always to educate the person about the phenomenon of the Suppressive Person and the effects this is believed to have on the individuals close to the SP. Once the education step is completed, the person can further follow the guidelines to sort out the situation so that the parishioner is no longer negatively affected.

Scientology Security checks are also common for SP and PTS situations. If reasonable attempts have been made to "handle" the situation to no avail, the parishioner may take the option of "disconnecting" from the SP. In Introduction to Scientology Ethics, "disconnection" is defined as a self-determined decision made by an individual that he is not going to be connected to another. It is a severing of communication by one individual against the other.

The concept of the Suppressive Person in Scientology has been the source of some controversy, due in some part to aversion to the idea of "disconnecting" from close family members and friends.

Another source of controversy related to the Suppressive Person doctrine is the formal administrative judgment that labels an individual a "Suppressive Person". This is known as an "SP Declare", and has been issued as a "Flag Ethics Order" since 1976.^[11] This is because presently, an SP Declare needs to be approved by the "International Justice Chief" (IJC),^[12] who resides at Gold Base, which is not a formal Scientology office and thus not authorized to issue Ethics Orders.^[13]

Non-Scientologists can be and have been labelled Suppressive Persons. A Suppressive Person is anyone who has been responsible for "suppressive acts", defined by Hubbard as being "the overt or covert actions or omissions knowingly and willfully undertaken to suppress, reduce, prevent or destroy case gains, and/or the influence of Scn on activities, and/or the continued Scn success and actions on the part of organizations actions and Scientologists."^[14] Similarly, entire groups can be declared Suppressive; Suppressive Groups, in Hubbard's view, are "those which seek to destroy Scn or which specialize in injuring or killing persons or damaging their cases or which advocate suppression of mankind."^[15] Under this broader definition, suppressiveness included more than just publicly opposing Scientology; it also included any group supporting activities to which Hubbard was strongly opposed, especially psychiatry. Specifically, Hubbard considered reporters and government agents to be members of Suppressive Groups: "There are no good reporters. There are no good government or SP group agents. The longer you try to be nice, the worse off you will be. And the sooner one learns this, the happier he will be."^[16]

The Church of Scientology maintains a central list of ex-members and splinter groups formally declared to be Suppressive. In an executive directive of 1992, the Church's "International Justice Chief" lists over 400 groups and over 2,300 individuals considered to be Suppressive.^[17] The list includes individual ex-Scientologists and breakaway groups regarded as hostile or heretical, such as Erhard Seminars Training (EST).

Abuse of the label

In a lecture he made on 19 July 1966, L. Ron Hubbard expressed concern about the possible abuse of the "Suppressive Person" label in respect of those who are otherwise good citizens and contribute to civil society:

[/size]

You should upgrade your idea of what an SP is. Man, meet one sometime! A real one! A real monster....Well, in all the time we've been around here we only had one SP that I know of. One real SP that was on staff.... And I don't know of another single SP that we've ever had on staff. Isn't that interesting. You see all these SP orders and so on...Don't throw it around carelessly, because this is an—a very exaggerated condition, SP.^{[size=13][18]}[/size]

[size]

Some former Scientologists have alleged that there has indeed been such abuse. For example, Bent Corydon describes seeing Scientology franchise holder Gary Smith declared Suppressive on the spot during the October 1982 Mission Holders' Conference, simply for not obeying a shouted order to change his seat.^[19] There are also instances where SP declarations have disrupted families and businesses.^[20]

According to a 2006 St. Petersburg Times article entitled "SP profiles", one Scientologist found himself declared an SP after he repeatedly challenged the validity of a "patter drill" in which he was instructed to read passages of a course to a wall. He insisted the drill was not based on Hubbard teachings and stated that he had been previously threatened with an SP declare after a run-in with a Scientology attorney on an unrelated issue.^[21]

Views by religious scholars on disconnection

Main article: Disconnection

Those who communicate with Suppressive Persons can face being branded SPs themselves by Scientology. Associates of the branded SP are ordered to disconnect from that person. Religious scholars have taken a negative view of Scientology's disconnection policies, which includes many who have previously testified on behalf of Scientology. For example, religious scholar J. Gordon Melton stated, "I just think it would be better for all concerned if they just let them go ahead and get out and everyone goes their own way, and not make such a big deal of it. The policy hurts everybody."^[22]

See also

References

External links

[/size]



Last edited 14 days ago by Montrealguy123

Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.

• Terms of Use
  
  
• Privacy
  
  
• Desktop
  
  

Open main menu

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

• 
  

• 
  

• 
  
• 
  

[size]



[/size]




Disconnection

• Language
  
• Download PDF
  
  
• Watch
  
• Edit
  

For other uses, see Disconnection (disambiguation).

Disconnection is the severance of all ties between a Scientologist and a friend, colleague, or family member deemed to be antagonistic towards Scientology. The practice of disconnection is a form of shunning.^{[size=12][1][page needed]} Among Scientologists, disconnection is viewed as an important method of removing obstacles to one's spiritual growth. In some circumstances, disconnection has ended marriages and separated children from their parents.^{[2][3][4][5][6]} The Church of Scientology has repeatedly denied that such a policy exists,^[7][8][9] though as of February 2012 its website acknowledged the practice and described it as a human right.^[10] In the United States, the Church has tried to argue in court that disconnection is a constitutionally protected religious practice. However, this argument was rejected because the pressure put on individual Scientologists to disconnect means it is not voluntary.^[11]

Policy

Antagonists to the Church of Scientology are declared by the Church to be antisocial personalities, Potential Trouble Sources (PTS), or Suppressive Persons (SPs). The Church teaches that association with these people impedes a member's progress along the Bridge to Total Freedom.^{[citation needed]}

In Introduction to Scientology Ethics, L. Ron Hubbard sets out the doctrine that by being connected to Suppressive Persons, a Scientologist could become a Potential Trouble Source (PTS):

[/size]

A Scientologist can become PTS by reason of being connected to someone that is antagonistic to Scientology or its tenets. In order to resolve the PTS condition, he either HANDLES the other person's antagonism (as covered in the materials on PTS handling) or, as a last resort when all attempts to handle have failed, he disconnects from the person. He is simply exercising his right to communicate or not to communicate with a particular person.^{[size=13][12]}[/size]

[size]

Hubbard defined "handling" as an action to lessen a situation towards an antagonistic individual by means of communication, and disconnection as a decision to cut communication with another individual.^[12] Hubbard also wrote that Scientology Ethics Officers should recommend handling rather than disconnection when the antagonistic individual is a close relative.^[13] He also stated that failure, or refusal, to disconnect from a Suppressive Person is a Suppressive Act by itself.^[14] In one case cited by the UK Government, a six-year-old girl was declared Suppressive for failing to disconnect from her mother.^[6] Sociologist Roy Wallis reports that Scientologists connected to a suppressive would usually be required to handle or disconnect, although he found some "Ethics Orders" which ordered unconditional disconnection.^{[1][page needed]}

According to Church statements, disconnection is used as a "last resort," only to be employed if the people antagonistic to Scientology do not cease their antagonism — even after being provided with "true data" about Scientology, since it is taught that usually only people with false data are antagonistic to the Church.^[15]

Originally, disconnection involved not only ending communication with someone but also declaring it publicly.^{[1][page needed][16]} The Scientology publication The Auditor included notices of disconnection from named individuals. It was also common for Scientologists to send short letters to the suppressive person, to warn them that they were disconnected.^{[1][page needed]} Roy Wallis interviewed a number of people who had been declared suppressive, some of whom had received hundreds of these letters.^[1]: The Scientologist was also required to take "any required civil action such as disavowal, separation or divorce" to cut off contact with the suppressive.^[16]

The policy was introduced in 1965 in a policy letter written by Hubbard.^[16] The "Code of Reform" introduced by Hubbard in 1968 discontinued Fair Game and Security Checks, and cancelled "disconnection as a relief to those suffering from familial suppression."^[17] In reality, these practices were never discontinued; however, the words "Fair Game," "Disconnection," and "Security Checking" were discontinued, as the use of these words caused bad public relations.^[18] When the New Zealand Government set up a Commission of Inquiry into Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard wrote to them saying that disconnection had been cancelled and that there was no intention to bring it back. The Commission welcomed the letter, but noted Hubbard did not promise never to re-introduce the practice of disconnection.^[19]

In his book A Piece of Blue Sky, Jon Atack cites an internal document dated August 1982 that, he alleges, re-introduced the disconnection policy.^[20] A belief that disconnection was being used again, and not as a last resort, led a group of British Scientologists to resign from the Church in 1984, while keeping their allegiance to the beliefs of Scientology.^[21] Their interpretation was that the teachings of L. Ron Hubbard "encourage the unity of the family" and therefore that the disconnection policy was "a misrepresentation or misapplication".^[22]

Examples of application

Comments by religious scholars

In popular culture

See also

Notes

External links

[/size]



Last edited 14 days ago by Montrealguy123

RELATED ARTICLES

• 
  
  

  Fair Game (Scientology)

  Policies and practices carried out by Church of Scientology towards people considered enemies
  
  
• 
  
  

  Suppressive Person

  in Scientology
  
  
• 
  
  

  List of Scientology security checks

  Wikimedia list article
  
  

[size]

Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
[/size]

• Terms of Use
  
  
• Privacy
  
  
• Desktop
  
  

Supresivna osoba = ona koja tlači

PTS osoba = ona koju se tlači

Diskonekting = odvajanje od supresivne osobe s ciljem da se PTS osoba izvuće iz tog kruga supresije i mentalno oporavi jer inače će otić u kurac.

Majka je inače najveći djetetov restimulator engrama ( reaktivni um ) pa ako te takva osoba kljuca svako malo onda ćeš puknit na kraju


Zato san ja mater izbacija iako je imala puno upozorenja i još me privarila prije toga i opet san joj da šansu al kad je s nečakom upala onda joj je bilo gotovo.

Ja san se odreka vlastite matere. Izbacija je iz kuće i odreka je se.

I lipo san se psihički oporavija od kako nje nema. Super se osjećam.

Potencija trouble source osoba ( pts person ) je potencijalni izvor problema osoba.

Nju netko davi , ponižava , vrši pritisak i onda takva osoba npr vozi auto i misli su joj tlačene i izleti dijete i ona ga ne vidi i udre.

Zato ih zovemo potencial trouble source osobama.

Mora se diskonetirat od supresivne osobe tj one koja ju tlači.

Ova policajka je problem rješila mehanizmom Crne pantere tj ako si ti u hodniku a crna pantera na skalama a želiš ići spavari na kat postoje pet načina rješenja problema.

Jedan i jedini ispravni je Crna pantera.

Ubij crnu panteru ( rješi problem ).

No ona zbog manjka znanja iz psihologije nije znala da se mora odvojit od supresiv person dakle od svoje obitelji pa je na kraju pobila cijelu obitelj.

Crna pantera.

Crna pantera.

To je ono šta ja kao generql GF s pet zvjezdica imam u svom motu postrojbe :

Koga nema taj ne postoji

Nije neka šteta , pet Šipaca manje a ujedno malo i da se društvo zamisli nad tim psihičkim zlostavljanjem rodbine na pojedincu kojemu se ne da u brak.

Zlostavljate ga/ju a još ako je ima neku vezu pa je to puklo onda mu još i trljate sol na ranu.

Da su ljudi malo žešći pa ne daju na sebe ovoga bi bilo svaki tjedan a ovako bude dosta rijetko.

Sad je gotovo. Sutra sprovod i za dva dana se nitko ovoga neće ni sjećati.

Završena priča.

RayMabus wrote:Psihički je zlostavljali da se uda pa ova pukla. A nemoš nikoga na silu tirat u krevet s drugim ( u brak )

https://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/hronika/aktuelno.291.html:848227-Roditelji-i-braca-policajki-PREBACIVALI-sto-se-NIJE-UDALA-otisla-ranije-sa-posla-i-sve-ih-POBILA-Da-li-je-ovo-motiv-jezivog-zlocina-kod-Gnjilana

Znači,emancipirala se

סמאל wrote:

RayMabus wrote:Psihički je zlostavljali da se uda pa ova pukla. A nemoš nikoga na silu tirat u krevet s drugim ( u brak )

https://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/hronika/aktuelno.291.html:848227-Roditelji-i-braca-policajki-PREBACIVALI-sto-se-NIJE-UDALA-otisla-ranije-sa-posla-i-sve-ih-POBILA-Da-li-je-ovo-motiv-jezivog-zlocina-kod-Gnjilana

Znači,emancipirala se

nije se udala..znaci nema dodatnog kapitala u obitelji samim time-teret...treba je hranit,oblacit

סמאל wrote:

RayMabus wrote:Psihički je zlostavljali da se uda pa ova pukla. A nemoš nikoga na silu tirat u krevet s drugim ( u brak )

https://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/hronika/aktuelno.291.html:848227-Roditelji-i-braca-policajki-PREBACIVALI-sto-se-NIJE-UDALA-otisla-ranije-sa-posla-i-sve-ih-POBILA-Da-li-je-ovo-motiv-jezivog-zlocina-kod-Gnjilana

Znači,emancipirala se

Emanicipirala se na balkanski način. Da se emancipirala ko one na zapadu onda bi našla svoj stan pa sama plaćala stanarinu , hranu i režije.

סמאל wrote:

RayMabus wrote:Psihički je zlostavljali da se uda pa ova pukla. A nemoš nikoga na silu tirat u krevet s drugim ( u brak )

https://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/hronika/aktuelno.291.html:848227-Roditelji-i-braca-policajki-PREBACIVALI-sto-se-NIJE-UDALA-otisla-ranije-sa-posla-i-sve-ih-POBILA-Da-li-je-ovo-motiv-jezivog-zlocina-kod-Gnjilana

Znači,emancipirala se

izgleda ne treba njima srba za smanjenje populacije

nadam se da je kic bar malo progledao
treba poznavati okolinu kicko

Mlada jebi ga ... tek napunila 45 godina

RayMabus wrote:Nije neka šteta , pet Šipaca manje

Meni je Šiptara žao isto kao da smo i mi Hrvati.
Srba, Srba, njih mi ne bi bilo žao.