Krah Američkog sna

Sovak wrote:

epikur37 wrote:

marcellus wrote:

Ringo10 wrote:

marcellus wrote:

... jer je blagostanje u Australiji posve neovisno o ekonomiji SAD...

Australia je politicki i vojno naslonjena na Ameriku ali ekonomski... prilicno slabo

ekonomski je planeta naslonjena na SAD, kad SAD kihnu svjetska ekonomija dobije gripu... dosta je sjetit se što se dogodilo kad je banrkotirao lehman bros

I dobar dio svemira, kihne li SAD propadamo svi odavde do Alpha Centauri :)

Ne propadamo skroz, ali da nas bogovski zanese njihov kasljuc - bome da!

Svidjelo se tebi ili ne.

to je zato jer su nametnuli dollar kao globalnu valutu.

Bretton Woods System and 1944 Agreement

The 1944 Bretton Woods agreement established a new global monetary system. It replaced the gold standard with the U.S. dollar as the global currency. By so doing, it established America as the dominant power in the world economy. After the agreement was signed, America was the only country with the ability to print dollars.

The agreement created the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. These U.S.-backed organizations would monitor the new system.

The Bretton Woods Agreement
The Bretton Woods agreement was created in a 1944 conference of all of the World War II Allied nations. It took place in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire.

Under the agreement, countries promised that their central banks would maintain fixed exchange rates between their currencies and the dollar. How exactly would they do this? If a country's currency value became too weak relative to the dollar, the bank would buy up its currency in foreign exchange markets. That would lower the currency's supply and raise its price. If its currency became too high, the bank would print more. That would increase the supply and lower its price.

Members of the Bretton Woods system agreed to avoid trade wars.1 For example, they wouldn't lower their currencies strictly to increase trade. But they could regulate their currencies under certain conditions. For example, they could take action if foreign direct investment began to destabilize their economies. They could also adjust their currency values to rebuild after a war.

How It Replaced the Gold Standard
Before Bretton Woods, most countries followed the gold standard. That meant each country guaranteed that it would redeem its currency for its value in gold. After Bretton Woods, each member agreed to redeem its currency for U.S. dollars, not gold. Why dollars? The United States held three-fourths of the world's supply of gold. No other currency had enough gold to back it as a replacement. The dollar's value was 1/35 of an ounce of gold. Bretton Woods allowed the world to slowly transition from a gold standard to a U.S. dollar standard.

The dollar had now become a substitute for gold. As a result, the value of the dollar began to increase relative to other currencies. There was more demand for it, even though its worth in gold remained the same. This discrepancy in value planted the seed for the collapse of the Bretton Woods system three decades later.

Why It Was Needed
Until World War I, most countries were on the gold standard. But they went off so they could print the currency needed to pay for their war costs. It caused hyperinflation, as the supply of money overwhelmed the demand. The value of money fell so dramatically that, in some cases, people needed wheelbarrows full of cash just to buy a loaf of bread. After the war, countries returned to the safety of the gold standard.

All went well until the Great Depression. After the 1929 stock market crash, investors switched to forex trading and commodities. It drove up the price of gold, resulting in people redeeming their dollars for gold. The Federal Reserve made things worse by defending the nation's gold reserve by raising interest rates. It's no wonder that countries were ready to abandon a pure gold standard.

The Bretton Woods system gave nations more flexibility than a strict adherence to the gold standard. It also provided less volatility than a currency system with no standard at all. A member country still retained the ability to alter its currency's value if needed to correct a "fundamental disequilibrium" in its current account balance.

Role of the IMF and World Bank
The Bretton Woods system could not have worked without the IMF.2 Member countries needed it to bail them out if their currency values got too low. They'd need a kind of global central bank they could borrow from in case they needed to adjust their currency's value and didn't have the funds themselves. Otherwise, they would just slap on trade barriers or raise interest rates.

The Bretton Woods countries decided against giving the IMF the power of a global central bank. This power involved printing money as needed. Instead, they agreed to contribute to a fixed pool of national currencies and gold to be held by the IMF. Each member of the Bretton Woods system was then entitled to borrow what it needed, within the limits of its contributions. The IMF was also responsible for enforcing the Bretton Woods agreement.

The World Bank, despite its name, was not the world's central bank. At the time of the Bretton Woods agreement, the World Bank was set up to lend to the European countries devastated by World War II. Now the purpose of the World Bank is to loan money to economic development projects in emerging market countries.

The Collapse of the Bretton Woods System
In 1971, the United States was suffering from massive stagflation. That's a deadly combination of inflation and recession. It was partly a result of the dollar's role as a global currency. In response, President Nixon started to deflate the dollar's value in gold.3 Nixon revalued the dollar to 1/38 of an ounce of gold, then 1/42 of an ounce.

But the plan backfired. It created a run on the U.S. gold reserves at Fort Knox as people redeemed their quickly devaluing dollars for gold. In 1973, Nixon unhooked the value of the dollar from gold altogether. Without price controls, gold quickly shot up to $120 per ounce in the free market. The Bretton Woods system was over.

The Bottom Line
The Bretton Woods System was established as the new international monetary system in 1944. It was a shift from the gold standard. The U.S. dollar became the new international measure for currency valuation.

Its creation resulted in:

-Countries pegging their currencies to the U.S. dollar. In turn, the dollar was pegged to the price of gold.

-U.S. dominance in the world economy. It was the only nation that could print the global currency.

-More currency flexibility for countries than that provided by the old gold standard.

-The establishment of the IMF and the World Bank.

The Bretton Woods System ended in the 1970s, when President Nixon dissolved the U.S. gold standard.

Gnječ wrote:

Sovak wrote:

epikur37 wrote:

marcellus wrote:

Ringo10 wrote:
Australia je politicki i vojno naslonjena na Ameriku ali ekonomski... prilicno slabo

ekonomski je planeta naslonjena na SAD, kad SAD kihnu svjetska ekonomija dobije gripu... dosta je sjetit se što se dogodilo kad je banrkotirao lehman bros

I dobar dio svemira, kihne li SAD propadamo svi odavde do Alpha Centauri :)

Ne propadamo skroz, ali da nas bogovski zanese njihov kasljuc - bome da!

Svidjelo se tebi ili ne.

to je zato jer su nametnuli dollar kao globalnu valutu.

Bretton Woods System and 1944 Agreement

The 1944 Bretton Woods agreement established a new global monetary system. It replaced the gold standard with the U.S. dollar as the global currency. By so doing, it established America as the dominant power in the world economy. After the agreement was signed, America was the only country with the ability to print dollars.

The agreement created the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. These U.S.-backed organizations would monitor the new system.

The Bretton Woods Agreement
The Bretton Woods agreement was created in a 1944 conference of all of the World War II Allied nations. It took place in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire.

Under the agreement, countries promised that their central banks would maintain fixed exchange rates between their currencies and the dollar. How exactly would they do this? If a country's currency value became too weak relative to the dollar, the bank would buy up its currency in foreign exchange markets. That would lower the currency's supply and raise its price. If its currency became too high, the bank would print more. That would increase the supply and lower its price.

Members of the Bretton Woods system agreed to avoid trade wars.1 For example, they wouldn't lower their currencies strictly to increase trade. But they could regulate their currencies under certain conditions. For example, they could take action if foreign direct investment began to destabilize their economies. They could also adjust their currency values to rebuild after a war.

How It Replaced the Gold Standard
Before Bretton Woods, most countries followed the gold standard. That meant each country guaranteed that it would redeem its currency for its value in gold. After Bretton Woods, each member agreed to redeem its currency for U.S. dollars, not gold. Why dollars? The United States held three-fourths of the world's supply of gold. No other currency had enough gold to back it as a replacement. The dollar's value was 1/35 of an ounce of gold. Bretton Woods allowed the world to slowly transition from a gold standard to a U.S. dollar standard.

The dollar had now become a substitute for gold. As a result, the value of the dollar began to increase relative to other currencies. There was more demand for it, even though its worth in gold remained the same. This discrepancy in value planted the seed for the collapse of the Bretton Woods system three decades later.

Why It Was Needed
Until World War I, most countries were on the gold standard. But they went off so they could print the currency needed to pay for their war costs. It caused hyperinflation, as the supply of money overwhelmed the demand. The value of money fell so dramatically that, in some cases, people needed wheelbarrows full of cash just to buy a loaf of bread. After the war, countries returned to the safety of the gold standard.

All went well until the Great Depression. After the 1929 stock market crash, investors switched to forex trading and commodities. It drove up the price of gold, resulting in people redeeming their dollars for gold. The Federal Reserve made things worse by defending the nation's gold reserve by raising interest rates. It's no wonder that countries were ready to abandon a pure gold standard.

The Bretton Woods system gave nations more flexibility than a strict adherence to the gold standard. It also provided less volatility than a currency system with no standard at all. A member country still retained the ability to alter its currency's value if needed to correct a "fundamental disequilibrium" in its current account balance.

Role of the IMF and World Bank
The Bretton Woods system could not have worked without the IMF.2 Member countries needed it to bail them out if their currency values got too low. They'd need a kind of global central bank they could borrow from in case they needed to adjust their currency's value and didn't have the funds themselves. Otherwise, they would just slap on trade barriers or raise interest rates.

The Bretton Woods countries decided against giving the IMF the power of a global central bank. This power involved printing money as needed. Instead, they agreed to contribute to a fixed pool of national currencies and gold to be held by the IMF. Each member of the Bretton Woods system was then entitled to borrow what it needed, within the limits of its contributions. The IMF was also responsible for enforcing the Bretton Woods agreement.

The World Bank, despite its name, was not the world's central bank. At the time of the Bretton Woods agreement, the World Bank was set up to lend to the European countries devastated by World War II. Now the purpose of the World Bank is to loan money to economic development projects in emerging market countries.

The Collapse of the Bretton Woods System
In 1971, the United States was suffering from massive stagflation. That's a deadly combination of inflation and recession. It was partly a result of the dollar's role as a global currency. In response, President Nixon started to deflate the dollar's value in gold.3 Nixon revalued the dollar to 1/38 of an ounce of gold, then 1/42 of an ounce.

But the plan backfired. It created a run on the U.S. gold reserves at Fort Knox as people redeemed their quickly devaluing dollars for gold. In 1973, Nixon unhooked the value of the dollar from gold altogether. Without price controls, gold quickly shot up to $120 per ounce in the free market. The Bretton Woods system was over.

The Bottom Line
The Bretton Woods System was established as the new international monetary system in 1944. It was a shift from the gold standard. The U.S. dollar became the new international measure for currency valuation.

Its creation resulted in:

-Countries pegging their currencies to the U.S. dollar. In turn, the dollar was pegged to the price of gold.

-U.S. dominance in the world economy. It was the only nation that could print the global currency.

-More currency flexibility for countries than that provided by the old gold standard.

-The establishment of the IMF and the World Bank.

The Bretton Woods System ended in the 1970s, when President Nixon dissolved the U.S. gold standard.

Ne bas. 

SAD su prije 1941. bile izolacionisticke skroz.

Pa ipak, burzovni krah 1929. je zanjihao sav svijet.

Sovak wrote:

Ne bas. 

SAD su prije 1941. bile izolacionisticke skroz.

Pa ipak, burzovni krah 1929. je zanjihao sav svijet.

President Wilson was reluctant to enter World War I. When the War began, Wilson declared U.S. neutrality and demanded that the belligerents respect American rights as a neutral party. He hesitated to embroil the United States in the conflict, with good reason. Americans were deeply divided about the European war, and involvement in the conflict would certainly disrupt Progressive reforms. In 1914, he had warned that entry into the conflict would bring an end to Progressive reform. "Every reform we have won will be lost if we go into this war," he said. A popular song in 1915 was "I Didn't Raise My Boy to Be a Soldier."

....

In January 1917, Germany announced that it would resume unrestricted submarine warfare. This announcement helped precipitate American entry into the conflict. Germany hoped to win the war within five months, and they were willing to risk antagonizing Wilson on the assumption that even if the United States declared war, it could not mobilize quickly enough to change the course of the conflict.

Then a fresh insult led Wilson to demand a declaration of war. In March 1917, newspapers published the Zimmerman Note, an intercepted telegram from the German Foreign Secretary Arthur Zimmerman to the German ambassador to Mexico.

The telegram proposed that Mexico ally with Germany in the event that the United States entered the war against Germany. In return, Germany promised to help Mexico recover the territory it had lost to the U.S. during the 1840s, including Texas, New Mexico, California, and Arizona.

The Zimmerman Note and German attacks on three U.S. ships in mid-March led Wilson to ask Congress for a declaration of war.

http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtid=2&psid=3476


The Wall Street Crash of October 1929 was a massive psychological blow. America had lent huge sums of money to European countries. When the stock market collapsed, they suddenly recalled those loans. This had a devastating impact on the European economy.

Hektorović wrote:

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:prije se radi da USA države koje kontroliraju demokrati počinju lagano propadati

California je u totalnom komunalnom kaosu, New York isto gomila pobleme.


Texas je pristojan... go figure...

u Texasu su najizrazenije tendencije za osamostaljenjem

pa ti baci čik...

Ne moze USA nikada propasti kao mi, o sebi se trebamo zabaviti a za one tamo je lako, neka se sami snalaze.

ako ostanu republikanci na vlasti nece ali ako dodju demokrate otisli su u kukac

Legendovich wrote:svi uposljeni,a placa ista kao i minimalac u Svabiji...Ameri se poceli ravnati prema europi u islati placija..naravno,visa sprema donosi visu lovu,svugdje..

Eto,pitaj Medu koliko ima mjesecno

MA pusti ti njegove tupave nazovi statistike. Sve je to frizirano.

Pola ih ne radi ful time nego part time a sa prosjecnim placama ne mogu prezivjeti pa dobivaju one food stamps.

Sve je skupo do pizde materina i da bi sa placom zivio lijepo morala bi placa biti oko 6000 dolara

A socijalna prava nikakva. Sve to lijepo izgleda  na papiru i u statistikama, pusti ti propagandu... ali kad se tamo suocis sa realnim zivotom stvari su drasticno drukcije.

Amerika se moze poklopiti usima pred Australijom, Kanadom i zemljama Skandinavije. Pa i pred Nizozemskom i Njemackom.

Uglavnom, germanski dio Europe je OK i Irska nije losa, a sve juznije je jadac.

U Americi sam bio i nikad tamo ne bih zivio pored ovih navedenih zemalja.

ne, to nije zbog dolara, nego zato jer su SAD do ne tako davno bile pol svjeske ekonomije, po BDP-u, i jer su ekonomski SAD u centru svega, sve relevantne korporacije od shell oila do microsofta i od IBM-a i Applea do Forda i General Motorsa, banke, kartične kompanije, franšize, hollywood, plus su najjača vojna sila svijeta...

Legendovich wrote:Kako je to moguce,kad yoda kaze da jemericka ekonomija puca u nebesa..???

Kaj god. Sad ce Amerika propast. Samo sto nije.

marcellus wrote:ne, to nije zbog dolara, nego zato jer su SAD do ne tako davno bile pol svjeske ekonomije, po BDP-u, i jer su ekonomski SAD u centru svega, sve relevantne korporacije od shell oila do microsofta i od IBM-a i Applea do Forda i General Motorsa, banke, kartične kompanije, franšize, hollywood, plus su najjača vojna sila svijeta...

Mascelus je opet amerofil.
Ne možeš, krv nije voda.

Sovak wrote:

Legendovich wrote:Kako je to moguce,kad yoda kaze da jemericka ekonomija puca u nebesa..???

Kaj god. Sad ce Amerika propast. Samo sto nije.

amerika nije vajt Hauz,nego gradjani Juse,genije..a njih je sve vise na ulicama ,i sve vise na tajlcajt đobovima..i sa sve manjim standardom..clanak je vrlo jasan ,no balkancima niti dodana pojacnjenja ne pomazu..

Legendovich wrote:

Sovak wrote:

Legendovich wrote:Kako je to moguce,kad yoda kaze da jemericka ekonomija puca u nebesa..???

Kaj god. Sad ce Amerika propast. Samo sto nije.

amerika nije vajt Hauz,nego gradjani Juse,genije..a njih je sve vise na ulicama ,i sve vise na tajlcajt đobovima..i sa sve manjim standardom..clanak je vrlo jasan ,no balkancima niti dodana pojacnjenja ne pomazu..

Boli me racku za tvoje Balkance.

Amerika propada. Evo samo sto nije.

marcellus wrote:ne, to nije zbog dolara, nego zato jer su SAD do ne tako davno bile pol svjeske ekonomije, po BDP-u, i jer su ekonomski SAD u centru svega, sve relevantne korporacije od shell oila do microsofta i od IBM-a i Applea do Forda i General Motorsa, banke, kartične kompanije, franšize, hollywood, plus su najjača vojna sila svijeta...

ako gledas sustav bez gradjana,mozda bi i bio u pravu..mozda...
Ponavljam,drzava unatoc ekonomiji,kojom se preko poreza debelih podrzava,lagano tone prema dolje,u smislu pada standarda svojih gradjana..
Mislim i svabija ima kasicu prasicu koja puca od nabijene lovuše,ali sto to znaci prosjecnom svabi,koji radi tajlcajt đob plus josh miniđob,da bi kolikotoliko spojio kraj sa krajem..kako rekoh niti jedna drzava nece propasti,ali ce problemi u njoj toliko porasti,da vise nece moci,niti financijski,niti politicki izigravati nekog serifa na nivou cijelog svijeta..osim za kilave fukojebine..

Nabrajas homesite,nekih firmija,sto nish ne znaci..
pogledajmo gdje su najvece i najjace banke svijeta..


[size=39]The 10 Biggest Banks in the World[/size]





By KEVIN B. JOHNSTON
 Updated Nov 21, 2019

International banks continue to grow their assets as the world economy expands. If no major economy falters, the expansion may continue. While there is some debate about whether China’s economy is bigger than that of the United States, there is no questioning which nation is home to the largest banks. The power in banking is unquestionably shifting eastward to China. Out of the top 10 largest banks by assets, only two are American banks. They rank number six and nine. The leading banks by far are Chinese banks. China holds the top four slots in the top 10.

Japan and France are also represented, and England has the No. 5 bank. In short, only five countries are represented on the list of top 10 banks in the world. This concentration of financial activity does not necessarily represent a concentration of wealth. All of the banks on our top 10 list do international business, so wealth from countries with smaller banks is flowing through the top 10 players.

 
We have listed the world’s banks from largest to smallest and indicated the dollar value of their assets. All figures are current as of April 23, 2017.

1. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China

This is the largest bank in the world when measured by assets. It has $3.62 trillion in total assets.1 The bank’s revenues come in at $134.8 billion. Measured by revenues, this is the fourth largest bank in the world.

Though this is a commercial bank, it is state-owned. The bank provides loans, financing for businesses, credit cards, as well as money management for high-net-worth individuals and companies. The bank also offers money market vehicles, investing opportunities and exchange and transfer services.

2. China Construction Bank Corp.

This is the second Chinese bank on our top 10 list. It offers corporate banking, which deals with credit, company e-banking, credit lines, and commercial loans. The personal banking segment offers personal loans, credit cards, deposits and wealth management for individual investors.

The bank also operates a Treasury sector that deals with money markets, debt securities, and currencies. The China Construction Bank has assets of $2.94 trillion.2

3. Agricultural Bank of China

This Beijing bank has branches across China, plus London, Tokyo, New York and Sydney, Australia. Not only is it the third-largest bank on our list, but it is also one of the 10 largest companies in the world.3 Agricultural Bank of China is state-owned.

The bank deals with small farmers and large agricultural wholesale companies. It also works with non-agricultural companies. Its largest growth segment is mid-sized companies. The bank has assets of $2.82 trillion.

4. Bank of China

The Bank of China offers investment banking, insurance and investing services. It also provides personal loans, credit card services, debit cards, mortgages, asset and liability management, and insurance. Assets total $2.63 trillion.4

5. HSBC Holdings (HSBC)

This is a bank based in England. The bank has offices in 80 countries and has 1,800 locations in the U.K. It provides private banking and consumer finance, along with corporate banking and investment services. HSBC has $2.57 trillion in assets.5

6. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)

This is the first bank on the list that is based in the United States. It is based in New York, but it is a multinational bank.

Though it is ranked sixth-largest in the world, it is the largest bank in the United States. It is involved in investment services, asset management, wealth management, and securities. Assets total $2.45 trillion.6

7. BNP Paribas

This French bank has assets of $2.4 trillion.7 It has offices in 75 countries, including the United States. This bank was ranked second among banks in the euro zone in 2016.

8. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group

This is a Japanese bank that offers consumer banking, as well as business and private banking. This is also an investment bank. It offers asset management and real estate banking. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has assets worth $2.8 trillion.8

9. Bank of America (BAC)

Bank of America is a U.S. bank that offers services for personal banking, small businesses, mid-sized businesses, and large corporations. It offers investment services in addition to its deposit and checking accounts. The bank has nearly 5,000 retail outlets, with assets topping $2.15 trillion.9

10. Credit Agricole Group

This is the second French bank on the list. It has assets of $1.91 trillion.10 This bank has a history of working with farmers. It is part of a network of 39 French banks.

HAHAHAHAHA..yeboteIrud,Micubishi ima jacu banku,nego sto je to Bank of america....

https://www.google.com.tr/search?source=hp&ei=QwAjXqPeMemhrgSol4HoAg&q=where+is+the+biggest+bank+in+the+world+%3F&oq=where+is+the+biggest+bank+in+the+world+%3F&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i7i30l2j0i30.3885.28218..30940...0.0..0.204.5714.0j39j1......0....1..gws-wiz.......0j0i10j0i13j0i19j0i13i30i19j0i22i30i19j0i8i13i30i19j0i22i30j0i13i30j0i8i13i30.Z1ouO_05ryY&ved=0ahUKEwjji6uWmY3nAhXpkIsKHahLAC0Q4dUDCAY&uact=5

Sovak wrote:

Legendovich wrote:

Sovak wrote:

Legendovich wrote:Kako je to moguce,kad yoda kaze da jemericka ekonomija puca u nebesa..???

Kaj god. Sad ce Amerika propast. Samo sto nije.

amerika nije vajt Hauz,nego gradjani Juse,genije..a njih je sve vise na ulicama ,i sve vise na tajlcajt đobovima..i sa sve manjim standardom..clanak je vrlo jasan ,no balkancima niti dodana pojacnjenja ne pomazu..

Boli me racku za tvoje Balkance.

Amerika propada. Evo samo sto nije.

nemoj tako..pa i ti si jedan od njia..

ta propast mora biti neko zivo blato u nekom ratu gdje ce se istrositi opasno i toliko da bi mogli uletiti ozbiljniji igraci i dovrsiti posao

Medo reci ti nama neukima..Jel u Jemerici tece med i mlijeko za njene gradjane,..ono za najveci broj njia?

Mislim svaka drzava moze biti jaka ,guleci kozu sa ledja svojih gradjana,i bacajuci ih na ulice ,kao beskucnike..

Legendovich wrote:Medo reci ti nama neukima..Jel u Jemerici tece med i mlijeko za njene gradjane,..ono za najveci broj njia?

samo na holivudskim filmovima,nugatino i masta mogu svasta

Legendovich wrote:Mislim svaka drzava moze biti jaka ,guleci kozu sa ledja svojih gradjana,i bacajuci ih na ulice ,kao beskucnike..

danas mi jedan amer na poslu kaze da ne vjeruje u sluzbenu verziju 9-11 a takvih ima koliko hoces,mozda i vise od pola,samo iz psotovanje prema zrtvama cute

Unimatrix_Zero wrote:

Legendovich wrote:Medo reci ti nama neukima..Jel u Jemerici tece med i mlijeko za njene gradjane,..ono za najveci broj njia?

samo na holivudskim filmovima,nugatino i masta mogu svasta

Eto vidis,a ovi balkanski eksperti na daljinski,tvrde da Jemerika ne propada..mislim,drzavu cini nacija,gradjani..ne vlada i kongres,vajt hauz..
no bitno da je u pitanju Jusa,pa joj se klanja na veliko..No ti bash i ne hitaju u Jusu,nego se drze ,Skandinavije,australije i tako..cak i je u Svabija mila majka u socijalnom programu,naspram jemerike..neuki kazu da su vece place u Jemerici..samo zato jer dolaze u brutto isplati,a ti ondaplacaj sam zdravstveno,ovo i ono...pa kad platis i podvuces crtu,nemas vise nego prosjecni svabo..