Alternativna medicina opet truje ljude

Kao što je gore opisano, identificirali smo 20 gena koji su značajno (≥2 puta) reguliran 20 min nakon izlaganja Z-3-Hol, a ukupno 152 gena koji su pokazali značajno povećanje 60 min nakon izlaganja ovog hlapljivih spojeva. Mi samo mogli identificirati 4 gena koji preklapa u ekspresiji tijekom tog vremena, naravno uključujući helix-loop-helix DNA obvezujuće proteina (MZ00005265) i 3 genima nepoznate funkcije (Slika 1C). Gledajući vremenski tijek gena koji su različito izraženi u odabranim vremenskim točkama, posebno transkripcije regulatora, postalo je očito da je tijekom izlaganja Z-3-HOL vrlo različita seta tih regulatora izraženi su u vremenskom način. Samo gore spomenuti heliks-loop-heliks DNA vezujući protein je utvrđeno da je znatno preko vremenskog tijeka obuhvaćen ovom istraživanju (Slika 1A, B), snažno ukazuje na postojanje više slojeva regulaciji transkripcije Z-3-hol inducira odgovore. Geni uključeni u izravne ili neizravne obrana, lipida signalizacije, kao i onima s funkcijom u stanične stijenke pojačanje je samo bitno se na 60 minuta nakon izlaganja (Slika 1B).
thumbnail

SWE WAS TRIBA ZAPALIT.

ostrakon wrote:

veber_1 wrote:zato prije puhanja šaku sode u gubec.

Etanol ne reagira sa NaHCO3

referirao sam se na post od epija. sa sodom snizit ćeš kiselost.

u slučaju etanola reagira 200kn ako si u normali ;)

ne treba se buniti..ionako danas ljudi i predugo zive..

Ostrakon,mislim da ces se raznjeziti...

Studija koji je ovdje je pokrenut da se dobije bolji uvid u regulatorne mreže ranog gena koji su aktivirani Glv posebno unutar 1 sata. Odabrali smo Z-3-Hol kao naš "modela" spoj jer se emitira u većini biljaka nakon oštećenja, ali ne imati aldehid funkciju njegovog prekursora, Z-3-heksenala, što može uzrokovati nespecifične reakcije zbog svoje reaktivnosti. Također, u studiji [40] je pokazalo da biljke smanjuju aldehida alkohola u neoštećenom tkivu što je vjerojatnije da je Z-3-HOL je bitno Glv. Identificirali smo različite razine genetske aktivacije povezan sa značajnom indukcije tipičnih protiv biljojedi obrane. Također smo otkrili da je među običnim hlapivih obrane signala uključujući Meja, metil salicilata (Mesa), i etilena (E) samo Z-3-HOL pokazali takvu aktivnost u kukuruzu. Zajedno, podaci predstavljeni ovdje pruža dokaze za potencijal i važnost Glv da aktivira obrambene mjere kao odgovor na kukaca herbivory.
Rezultati

. Glavni proizvodi ove staze su Z-3-heksenal, Z-3-hexenol (Z-3-HOL), a Z-3-heksenil acetata i njihove E-2-enantiomeri [30,31]. Iako je HPL put već obilježeno 100 godina [30], što je tek nedavno stekao značaj, kada se pokazalo da su hlapljivi proizvodi ovaj put poslužiti kao moćan signale u inter- i intra-biljka signalizaciju. Na primjer, Bate i Rothstein [32] su pokazali da su pojedini članovi ove obitelji hlapljivih tvari, kada se primjenjuje kao čisti kemikalije, inducirano obrambenih povezanih gena u Arabidopsis. Međutim, ti odgovori su uvijek bili nepotpuni ili manje istaknute u odnosu na stvarne herbivory i podigli pitanja o učinkovitosti ove vrste hlapljivih signalizacije. U istraživanju [33] su pokazali da je Glv može imati funkciju osim samo omogućuje izravan zaštitu. Kukuruza sadnice koje su prethodno izloženi Glv iz susjednih biljaka proizveo znatno više JA i hlapljivih seskviterpeni na naknadnu obradu sa IE u odnosu na odgovarajuće kontrole. Ovo je prvo izvješće o usisavanja protiv insekata herbivory signalizira Glv te je pokazao da je taj učinak je posebno vezan za borbu protiv biljojedi obrane jer odgovora na mehanički ranjavanje sami nisu bili pogođeni.

Kako bi se dodatno usporediti Z-3-Hol izazvana gena s tim nakon IE tretmana također obavlja analizu mikropoljem od volicitin inducirane ekspresije gena u B73 kukuruza. Međutim, ovaj eksperiment je ograničena zbog prekida platforme od strane kukuruza MicroArray projekt na Sveučilištu u Arizoni. Dakle, samo 1 bod vrijeme (60 min) je pratila i na taj način omogućuje samo ograničeno procjenu IE-izazvanih globalnim promjenama u ekspresiji gena. Analizirali smo listova segmenta uključujući mjestu primjene elicitor koji su odgovarali onima koje se koriste za Z-3-HOL-induciranu ekspresiju gena studije. Dva lista segmenti su spojene na jedan biološki ponoviti i provedena su ukupno 4 bioloških ponavljanja. Identificirali smo 126 gena koji su znatno promijenjeni u izrazu (≥2 puta gore ili dolje reguliran) na ovoj vremenskoj točki (Tablica S3). Među tim genima smo identificirali 65 koji su također reguliran nakon izlaganja Z-3-Hol. Iako je prisutnost gotovo 50% nepoznatih gena čini teško okarakterizirati glavne razlike između Z-3-Hol i IE-inducirane ekspresije gena, primijetili smo nekoliko razlika koje potvrđene prethodne studije. Na primjer, gen za indol-3-glicerol liazu (Igl) (MZ00005958), koji je ključni enzim u nestabilnim indol biosinteze, je 3,6 puta upregulated 1H nakon IE liječenja, ali ne i nakon izlaganja Z-3-hol. Isto tako, gen za ACC oksidaze (MZ00039812), koja proizvodi etilen, bio je 3,3 puta regulirano tj, ali ne utječe na Z-3-Hol. Visok stupanj korelacije no utvrđeno je usporedbom gena koji su uključeni u izravne i neizravne obrane, uključujući inhibitore proteaze i onima koji su odgovorni za HIPV proizvodnju. Kad smo usporedili nakupljanje prijepis tih obrambenih gena na 1h vremenskoj točki na temelju podataka microarray za oba tretmana ustanovili smo da je između dva tretmana su inducirane ukupno 15 gena koji su uključeni u izravne i neizravne obrane odgovora protiv kukaca biljojeda (slika 5 ). Međutim, nisu svi geni su uzrokovana i tretmana na sličan način. Z-3-HOL inducira značajno nakupljanje 12 obrambenih gena u ovoj točki vremena, dok je tretman samo volicitin inducirana 9 tih gena. Samo tri obrane gena uključujući potencijalnog serin proteaze (MZ00043994), klase IV chitinase (MZ00018180) i Igl (kao što je gore navedeno) bili značajno viši izazvani u volicitin tretiranih kukuruzni sadnica u odnosu na Z-3-HOL-izloženih biljaka. Ovo otkriće je snažno sugerira visoku izravnu indukciju obrana potencijal za Z-3-Hol.

Early Transcriptome Analyses of Z-3-Hexenol-Treated Zea mays Revealed Distinct Transcriptional Networks and Anti-Herbivore Defense Potential of Green Leaf Volatiles

• Jurgen Engelberth ,
  
• Claudia Fabiola Contreras,
  
• Chinmay Dalvi,
  
• Ting Li,
  
• Marie Engelberth
  

• Published: October 14, 2013
  
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077465
  

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0077465

JEBEN WAM MAJKU.

bogomdani wrote:ne misli se na ukiseljavanje organizma,nego narusivanje balansa luznatosti..

umro bi da ti se u tijelu promjeni pH, ovi alternativci nemaju pojma što pričaju

bogomdani wrote:
pH je mjera za alkalitet (lužnatost)/aciditet (kiselost) neke tvari/otopine. Mjeri se na skali od 0 – 14. Što je broj koji označava pH manji od 7 (neutralno) to je veća kiselost, a što je taj broj veći, veća je lužnatost.

pH je mjera kiselosti, dok je pOH mjera za lužnatost, svejedno je kako izražavaš jer i jedno i drugo možeš izraziti na taj način
u principu te mjere govore koliko je slobodnih H+ ili OH- iona, pojednostavljeno rečeno...

šećer nije kisel, šećer je neutralan u vodenoj otopini
metabolizmom šećera nastaje CO2 i voda, CO2 otopljen u vodi može reagirati i kiselo i bazično jer je diprotonska kiselina
no ukoliko se ne gušiš i normalno izdišeš CO2 van ne bi trebalo doći do nikakvih problema

još jedna zanimljivost vezana za CO2, većina ljudi misli da mršavi znojenjem, dok zapravo mršaviš izdisanjem CO2
jer nakon što sagoriš masti i šećere u tijelu, izdahneš ih van u obliku CO2

dosta Poljak..bem te jos tipkovnicu nisi kupijo?

bravo, otjerali ste megi
a baš sam ju bio zainteresirao sa kemijom i formulama

ostrakon wrote:bravo, otjerali ste megi
a baš sam ju bio zainteresirao sa kemijom i formulama

kada ne znaš čemu služi pm

Neke stwari i da wam se nartaju neupijajte ih jer ste u kruzu,

ostrakon wrote:

bogomdani wrote:ne misli se na ukiseljavanje organizma,nego narusivanje balansa luznatosti..

umro bi da ti se u tijelu promjeni pH, ovi alternativci nemaju pojma što pričaju

bogomdani wrote:
pH je mjera za alkalitet (lužnatost)/aciditet (kiselost) neke tvari/otopine. Mjeri se na skali od 0 – 14. Što je broj koji označava pH manji od 7 (neutralno) to je veća kiselost, a što je taj broj veći, veća je lužnatost.

pH je mjera kiselosti, dok je pOH mjera za lužnatost, svejedno je kako izražavaš jer i jedno i drugo možeš izraziti na taj način
u principu te mjere govore koliko je slobodnih H+ ili OH- iona, pojednostavljeno rečeno...

šećer nije kisel, šećer je neutralan u vodenoj otopini
metabolizmom šećera nastaje CO2 i voda, CO2 otopljen u vodi može reagirati i kiselo i bazično jer je diprotonska kiselina
no ukoliko se ne gušiš i normalno izdišeš CO2 van ne bi trebalo doći do nikakvih problema

još jedna zanimljivost vezana za CO2, većina ljudi misli da mršavi znojenjem, dok zapravo mršaviš izdisanjem CO2
jer nakon što sagoriš masti i šećere u tijelu, izdahneš ih van u obliku CO2

Kako da ti objasnim..ne gledas samu supstancu kao takvu nego interakciju sa okolinom..sam organizam ima svoje granicne tolerancije,koje bas osiguravaju zivot,drugim rijecima,od disbalansa ne umiremo,ali itekako obolijevamo..sve sto se dogadja organizmu je produkt njegovog nastojanja da zadrzi taj balans na ustrb drugih tjelesnih sustava..ako je pH,ne pOH-a tijela, recimo 7.4,i taj balans narusavamo nabrojanim namirnicama..tijelo se trudi odrzati idealni balans i pri tome se napreze,povlaci resurse iz "sigurnijih" podrucja i time na trugom nivou stvara neki drugi disbalans..uzmimo primjer prekomjernog zderaca,lokaca,pusaca...tijelo se napreze do krajnjih granica da odrzi balans,i vidimo da u toj borbi stradavaju neki drugi sustavi,jednostavno covjek koji ima narusen balalns,pogotovo na dugo vrijeme,ne moze ostati zdrav..
Secer u vodi je neutralan,ali dok dodje u organizam..pa stavio sam onaj link gdje je sve lijepo argumentiranoa pa procitaj ako hoces da se ne ponavljam..

[size][url][/url][/size]

[size=30]THE COUNT OF SAINT GERMAIN[/size] THE FORMER DIRECTOR OF THE VIOLET RAY SESSION 09/DEC/03 Medium: Jorge Raul Olguin. Entity that came to dialogue: Master Ruanel. Interlocutor: There is a topic that has intrigued me very much and it is related to the legend of immortality forged around Saint Germain. Ruanel: You know that powers don't exist in the physical plane. Interlocutor: That is in fact the reason I would be interested to know how that legend was forged. Ruanel: Saint Germain was always a Master of Light and most of his followers simply magnified things. He has embodied many times, more than any other Ascended Master, and in each one of the times he embodied, he left a legacy for humanity. The incarnations best known were, aside from the Count of Saint Germain, Roger Bacon, Francis Bacon, Rosenkrantz in 1533. Interlocutor: I want to ratify the data of Saint Germain’s incarnation, since there is a lot of confusion. First, It was said that he was born on May 26 of 1696 and he died on January 27 of 1784 in the residence of the prince Charles, in Eckenforde. Ruanel: The information is correct. Interlocutor: Was his death recorded on the chronicles in the parish of Eckenforde? Ruanel: Yes. That fact is also correct. Interlocutor: There is an inscription put by his last sponsor, on his funeral monument that says: "He who called himself the Count of St Germain and Welldone, of whom there is no other information, has been buried in this church”. Ruanel: Correct. Interlocutor: Was he of Romanian nationality and son of the King of Transylvania Ferenz II Rakoczi and the princess Carlota in the Castle of the Carpathians Mountains? Ruanel: The information about his parents is correct, but not his nationality, because he was not Romanian but Hungarian. What happens is that there was always conflict between Romania and Hungary. In that time Transylvania was parte of Hungary. Today, XXI Century it belongs to Romania. Interlocutor: Where did it come from the legend he was immortal? There are many stories of people that met him being young and then decades later they saw his face again having the same youth. When they asked him about that eternal appearance of youth he told them that he had discovered the elixir of long life or something similar. To this mystery was added the fact that the Count never ate - at least they never saw him eating at the parties he went - and he barely drank mineral water. Besides They didn’t know where he lived, loving relationships, family or children. Ruanel: First of all, and to remove any doubt, the Count was human, that is to say homo sapiens sapiens, and son of humans. His birth was common as well as any other human. Nothing strange on this matter. In that time he was already in a plane of Light and Just like the Master Jesus he had contacted with extraterrestrials. Interlocutor: I already thought it must have been something like that! Extraterrestrials from where? Ruanel: From Anthea. Interlocutor: The same race that had the accident in Roswell? Ruanel: Yes, the same one. The Antheans are the Good Grays. He had exchanged a lot of technique with them. Interlocutor: Then, his extraordinary knowledge came from extraterrestrials? Ruanel: Yes, of course. The food he ate was even provided to him by them. Interlocutor: Now everything is explained. Ruanel: That feeding was the one that gave him an appearance of youth, but not immortality, because he aged too. Interlocutor: Were the Count's interests those we know about? Ruanel: Yes, he was interested in arts, especially music and painting. Interlocutor: Was he also interested in alchemy? Ruanel: Yes, also alchemy. Interlocutor: Always helped by extraterrestrials? Ruanel: Yes, always by them. Interlocutor: And his money? Because they say that he had fortune, although nobody knew where he had it hidden or how he made it. Ruanel: He already had fortune. Besides, in his land there were reefs of precious stones. Interlocutor: And Auriferous reefs? Ruanel: No, only precious stones he sold them to merchants on the field. Interlocutor: Then, Was his fortune real and not at all mysterious? Ruanel: Correct. Interlocutor: Did he also perform healings that seemed miraculous for that time? Ruanel: What he made were similar healings to current Reiki, but those who had to die eventually died. There was no miracle in his healings. Interlocutor: And he couldn’t request help from the Antheans? Ruanel: Yes, he could have asked their help because the Antheans had sophisticated healing artifacts, but he would have had to reveal things the people of that time were not prepared to know. For that reason he never allowed them to see him with strange companies. Interlocutor: Not even his friends? Ruanel: No, not even his friends. He kept the secret very well. Interlocutor: Was the incarnation of the Count of Saint Germain a model to emulate? I ask it because there are many stories of people that said they knew him very well considering him as a liar and a charlatan. Ruanel: Saint Germain always behaved as a being of Light. Those who spoke badly of him they did it because of their Ego. Interlocutor: Was Metaphysics founded by Saint Germain? Ruanel: No, not at all. Metaphysical word means "beyond physics." If they attributed miracles to him, those miracles didn't trespass the physical laws. The problem was created by the followers he had in the XIX and XX centuries and even now. Interlocutor: In which way "followers" of him? Ruanel: In fact, not his followers, but followers of his alleged doctrine. Interlocutor: Was Conny Mendez, considered one of the most conspicuous followers of the Count, a medium? Ruanel: Yes, but she didn't channel Saint Germain, but the spirits of error. Interlocutor: What you are telling me clarifies the doubt I had perfectly because this person's writings are little less than deliriant. And the same thing of her disciple's writings Ruben Cedeno. So Conny Mendez never channeled Saint Germain? Ruanel: No, never. Besides, Saint Germain never spoke of the "I am" in that way because it is a self-centered expression, and as a Master of Light he could never have done it. Interlocutor: Saint Germain knew that Jehovah was not the Absolute [Eon], but an Eloah who feel prey to ego, who passed himself off as him? Ruanel: Totally! Interlocutor: Is there a writing from Saint Germain? Ruanel: No, not at all. If a writing existed, it would be only formulas, not messages. Interlocutor: Then all the writings of Conny Méndez.? Ruanel: They are only a fruit exclusively of her deluded imagination influenced by her own ego and the spirits of error that are always stalking those who have a weak mind and they can make them work in their profit. If you notice Metaphysics books, they are all the same. When you read one you have read all of them. Interlocutor: Yes, I have noticed that repetition. And I must admit something. I have read some books of Metaphysics and I felt as overwhelmed because I didn't understand them. I thought that it was due to my lack of knowledge. Now everything is clear. I didn't understand them because they were delusional! Ruanel: Regrettably in the whole world there are more followers of this woman than you can imagine. Interlocutor: Concretely, Metaphysics, just as it has been spread, it is only nonsense from the start to the end? Ruanel: Correct, it doesn't make any sense. In spite of everything that Grupo Elron has informed about the real Metaphysics, the Violet Ray and its current director, the false Metaphysics followers do not pay attention to these messages. They are totally close-minded. Interlocutor: As you already know, yesterday I was writing a punctual critic to the teachings of Conny Méndez and her disciple Ruben Cedeno. Ruanel: Yes, I know and I approve what you have written. Interlocutor: I thank you for it, but I don't believe that all was mine. Who was helping me behind? Ruanel: It was your own Thetan and me. Interlocutor: Whenever I write Are you there? Ruanel: Always, you already know it. Interlocutor: Returning to Saint Germain, Was there a certain Gower or Gauver who was very similar to the Count and who was hired to discredit him with senseless declarations? I ask it because some authors have pointed out that many of the blunders that are attributed to Saint Germain were in fact from this person and not from him. Ruanel: Yes, That’s right. Interlocutor: Who was Cagliostro? I ask it because this so strange character said that the Count was a liar and a charlatan. Ruanel: Cagliostro was no more than somebody that wanted to show off as an alchemist and who wanted to boast. Interlocutor: A True or false alchemist? Ruanel: A false alchemist, because in fact he was not looking for spiritual elevation, but only transforming metals into gold. But with the time he realized which the true alchemy was. He didn’t have an outstanding performance. His legend is more than anything. Interlocutor: Juso out of curiosity. Was Cagliostro the previous reincarnation of Blavatsky? Ruanel: That's right. You have the correct information.