Re: Nova robovska šema u Hrvatskoj

by Trinity Mon 5 Feb - 21:32

Gnječ wrote:
Leviathan2 wrote:ma aben se radi grbav

čudo jedno kako većina hrvata uopće ne cijeni niti poštuje tuđi posao ali svoj posao i cijenu dižu u nebesa.

To nije čudo, to je normalno.

by aben Mon 5 Feb - 21:34

epikur37 wrote:Kad je u pitanju ekonomija, čini mi se da bih najprije dedi dao mjesto ministra.

Lud jeste ali nije neoliberalni klon već malo šire gleda.

totalno gay stav,

mislin,
dedalos se založe za državnu potrošnju krez državne firme,
ti si u državnoj firmi,
ergo podržavaš punjenje svog takulina

intelektualna nula

by epikur37 Mon 5 Feb - 21:35

aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:Kad je u pitanju ekonomija, čini mi se da bih najprije dedi dao mjesto ministra.

Lud jeste ali nije neoliberalni klon već malo šire gleda.
totalno gay stav,

mislin,
dedalos se založe za državnu potrošnju krez državne firme,
ti si u državnoj firmi,
ergo podržavaš punjenje svog takulina

intelektualna nula

Trebam tebi puniti takuin!?

Provalilo mi u brod i iščupalo tv, jebena ciganija.

by Guest Mon 5 Feb - 21:37

Triny wrote:Hoćeš reći da bi te agencije trebalo zabraniti?

For most of the 20th century, private employment agencies were considered quasi illegal entities under international law. The International Labour Organization instead called for the establishment of public employment agencies. To prevent the abusive practices of private agencies, they were either to be fully abolished, or tightly regulated. In most countries they are legal but regulated.

Probably inspired by the dissenting judgements in a US Supreme Court case called Adams v. Tanner, the International Labour Organization's first ever Recommendation was targeted at fee charging agencies. The Unemployment Recommendation, 1919 (No.1), Art. 1 called for each member to,

"take measures to prohibit the establishment of employment agencies which charge fees or which carry on their business for profit. Where such agencies already exist, it is further recommended that they be permitted to operate only under government licenses, and that all practicable measures be taken to abolish such agencies as soon as possible."

The Unemployment Convention, 1919, Art. 2 instead required the alternative of,

"a system of free public employment agencies under the control of a central authority. Committees, which shall include representatives of employers and workers, shall be appointed to advise on matters concerning the carrying on of these agencies."

In 1933 the Fee-Charging Employment Agencies Convention (No.34) formally called for abolition. The exception was if the agencies were licensed and a fee scale was agreed in advance. In 1949 a new revised Convention (No.96) was produced. This kept the same scheme, but secured an ‘opt out’ (Art.2) for members that did not wish to sign up. Agencies were an increasingly entrenched part of the labor market. The United States did not sign up to the Conventions. The latest Convention, the Private Employment Agencies Convention, 1997 (No.181) takes a much softer stance and calls merely for regulation.

In most countries, agencies are regulated, for instance in the UK under the Employment Agencies Act 1973, or in Germany under the Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz (Employee Hiring Law of 1972).

by Guest Mon 5 Feb - 21:42

Triny wrote:
Gnječ wrote:
Leviathan2 wrote:ma aben se radi grbav

čudo jedno kako većina hrvata uopće ne cijeni niti poštuje tuđi posao ali svoj posao i cijenu dižu u nebesa.
To nije čudo, to je normalno.

meni to nije normalno.

by aben Mon 5 Feb - 21:42

epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:Kad je u pitanju ekonomija, čini mi se da bih najprije dedi dao mjesto ministra.

Lud jeste ali nije neoliberalni klon već malo šire gleda.
totalno gay stav,

mislin,
dedalos se založe za državnu potrošnju krez državne firme,
ti si u državnoj firmi,
ergo podržavaš punjenje svog takulina

intelektualna nula

Trebam tebi puniti takuin!?

Provalilo mi u brod i iščupalo tv, jebena ciganija.

ne, to je legitimna pozicija, ali je samo tribo prikazati onakova kakova je, a ne se skrivati iza neoliberala i ostalih opasnosti po društvo.

nadan se da ti nisu uništili vroto, a za televiziju...po si mi u očima, ćo; brod, misečina, bonaca, ča će ti televizija, bosančero?!

by Leviathan2 Mon 5 Feb - 21:44

aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:Kad je u pitanju ekonomija, čini mi se da bih najprije dedi dao mjesto ministra.

Lud jeste ali nije neoliberalni klon već malo šire gleda.
totalno gay stav,

mislin,
dedalos se založe za državnu potrošnju krez državne firme,
ti si u državnoj firmi,
ergo podržavaš punjenje svog takulina

intelektualna nula

Trebam tebi puniti takuin!?

Provalilo mi u brod i iščupalo tv, jebena ciganija.
ne, to je legitimna pozicija, ali je samo tribo prikazati onakova kakova je, a ne se skrivati iza neoliberala i ostalih opasnosti po društvo.

nadan se da ti nisu uništili vroto, a za televiziju...po si mi u očima, ćo; brod, misečina, bonaca, ča će ti televizija, bosančero?!

by epikur37 Mon 5 Feb - 21:45

aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:Kad je u pitanju ekonomija, čini mi se da bih najprije dedi dao mjesto ministra.

Lud jeste ali nije neoliberalni klon već malo šire gleda.
totalno gay stav,

mislin,
dedalos se založe za državnu potrošnju krez državne firme,
ti si u državnoj firmi,
ergo podržavaš punjenje svog takulina

intelektualna nula

Trebam tebi puniti takuin!?

Provalilo mi u brod i iščupalo tv, jebena ciganija.
ne, to je legitimna pozicija, ali je samo tribo prikazati onakova kakova je, a ne se skrivati iza neoliberala i ostalih opasnosti po društvo.

nadan se da ti nisu uništili vroto, a za televiziju...po si mi u očima, ćo; brod, misečina, bonaca, ča će ti televizija, bosančero?!

Tv je zbog glupih turista i wi-fi.

Meni ne treba.

Razvalili bravu, iščupali telku i malo nereda. Sreća sam eletroniku odnio doma preko zime.

by Trinity Mon 5 Feb - 21:45

Gnječ wrote:
Triny wrote:Hoćeš reći da bi te agencije trebalo zabraniti?

For most of the 20th century, private employment agencies were considered quasi illegal entities under international law. The International Labour Organization instead called for the establishment of public employment agencies. To prevent the abusive practices of private agencies, they were either to be fully abolished, or tightly regulated. In most countries they are legal but regulated.

Probably inspired by the dissenting judgements in a US Supreme Court case called Adams v. Tanner, the International Labour Organization's first ever Recommendation was targeted at fee charging agencies. The Unemployment Recommendation, 1919 (No.1), Art. 1 called for each member to,

"take measures to prohibit the establishment of employment agencies which charge fees or which carry on their business for profit. Where such agencies already exist, it is further recommended that they be permitted to operate only under government licenses, and that all practicable measures be taken to abolish such agencies as soon as possible."

The Unemployment Convention, 1919, Art. 2 instead required the alternative of,

"a system of free public employment agencies under the control of a central authority. Committees, which shall include representatives of employers and workers, shall be appointed to advise on matters concerning the carrying on of these agencies."

In 1933 the Fee-Charging Employment Agencies Convention (No.34) formally called for abolition. The exception was if the agencies were licensed and a fee scale was agreed in advance. In 1949 a new revised Convention (No.96) was produced. This kept the same scheme, but secured an ‘opt out’ (Art.2) for members that did not wish to sign up. Agencies were an increasingly entrenched part of the labor market. The United States did not sign up to the Conventions. The latest Convention, the Private Employment Agencies Convention, 1997 (No.181) takes a much softer stance and calls merely for regulation.

In most countries, agencies are regulated, for instance in the UK under the Employment Agencies Act 1973, or in Germany under the Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz (Employee Hiring Law of 1972).

Agencije uzimaju proviziju?
A ovi na Zavodu za zpošljavanje rade džabe?
U stvari ne rade ništa, agencije su učinkovitije.

by Leviathan2 Mon 5 Feb - 21:47

Triny wrote:
Gnječ wrote:
Triny wrote:Hoćeš reći da bi te agencije trebalo zabraniti?

For most of the 20th century, private employment agencies were considered quasi illegal entities under international law. The International Labour Organization instead called for the establishment of public employment agencies. To prevent the abusive practices of private agencies, they were either to be fully abolished, or tightly regulated. In most countries they are legal but regulated.

Probably inspired by the dissenting judgements in a US Supreme Court case called Adams v. Tanner, the International Labour Organization's first ever Recommendation was targeted at fee charging agencies. The Unemployment Recommendation, 1919 (No.1), Art. 1 called for each member to,

"take measures to prohibit the establishment of employment agencies which charge fees or which carry on their business for profit. Where such agencies already exist, it is further recommended that they be permitted to operate only under government licenses, and that all practicable measures be taken to abolish such agencies as soon as possible."

The Unemployment Convention, 1919, Art. 2 instead required the alternative of,

"a system of free public employment agencies under the control of a central authority. Committees, which shall include representatives of employers and workers, shall be appointed to advise on matters concerning the carrying on of these agencies."

In 1933 the Fee-Charging Employment Agencies Convention (No.34) formally called for abolition. The exception was if the agencies were licensed and a fee scale was agreed in advance. In 1949 a new revised Convention (No.96) was produced. This kept the same scheme, but secured an ‘opt out’ (Art.2) for members that did not wish to sign up. Agencies were an increasingly entrenched part of the labor market. The United States did not sign up to the Conventions. The latest Convention, the Private Employment Agencies Convention, 1997 (No.181) takes a much softer stance and calls merely for regulation.

In most countries, agencies are regulated, for instance in the UK under the Employment Agencies Act 1973, or in Germany under the Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz (Employee Hiring Law of 1972).
Agencije uzimaju proviziju?
A ovi na Zavodu za zpošljavanje rade džabe?
U stvari ne rade ništa, agencije su učinkovitije.

halo, me uzimaju proviziju nego prodaju ljude na sat
koja kurceva provizija
jeste vi ljudi blentavi?

by Trinity Mon 5 Feb - 21:48

Na sat, mjesec, godinu...koja je razlika?

by Guest Mon 5 Feb - 21:50

Triny wrote:
Gnječ wrote:
Triny wrote:Hoćeš reći da bi te agencije trebalo zabraniti?

For most of the 20th century, private employment agencies were considered quasi illegal entities under international law. The International Labour Organization instead called for the establishment of public employment agencies. To prevent the abusive practices of private agencies, they were either to be fully abolished, or tightly regulated. In most countries they are legal but regulated.

Probably inspired by the dissenting judgements in a US Supreme Court case called Adams v. Tanner, the International Labour Organization's first ever Recommendation was targeted at fee charging agencies. The Unemployment Recommendation, 1919 (No.1), Art. 1 called for each member to,

"take measures to prohibit the establishment of employment agencies which charge fees or which carry on their business for profit. Where such agencies already exist, it is further recommended that they be permitted to operate only under government licenses, and that all practicable measures be taken to abolish such agencies as soon as possible."

The Unemployment Convention, 1919, Art. 2 instead required the alternative of,

"a system of free public employment agencies under the control of a central authority. Committees, which shall include representatives of employers and workers, shall be appointed to advise on matters concerning the carrying on of these agencies."

In 1933 the Fee-Charging Employment Agencies Convention (No.34) formally called for abolition. The exception was if the agencies were licensed and a fee scale was agreed in advance. In 1949 a new revised Convention (No.96) was produced. This kept the same scheme, but secured an ‘opt out’ (Art.2) for members that did not wish to sign up. Agencies were an increasingly entrenched part of the labor market. The United States did not sign up to the Conventions. The latest Convention, the Private Employment Agencies Convention, 1997 (No.181) takes a much softer stance and calls merely for regulation.

In most countries, agencies are regulated, for instance in the UK under the Employment Agencies Act 1973, or in Germany under the Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz (Employee Hiring Law of 1972).
Agencije uzimaju proviziju?
A ovi na Zavodu za zpošljavanje rade džabe?
U stvari ne rade ništa, agencije su učinkovitije.

a čuj, na zavodu za zapošljavanje imaš i neka prava recimo ako si dobio otkaz imaš neku financijsku pomoć određeno vrijeme zdravstveno i tako to a kod lešinarskih agencija za zapošljavanje dobiješ nogu u dupe i marš na cestu pronto. ne poznaju te više ne postojiš.

by aben Mon 5 Feb - 21:50

epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:Kad je u pitanju ekonomija, čini mi se da bih najprije dedi dao mjesto ministra.

Lud jeste ali nije neoliberalni klon već malo šire gleda.
totalno gay stav,

mislin,
dedalos se založe za državnu potrošnju krez državne firme,
ti si u državnoj firmi,
ergo podržavaš punjenje svog takulina

intelektualna nula

Trebam tebi puniti takuin!?

Provalilo mi u brod i iščupalo tv, jebena ciganija.
ne, to je legitimna pozicija, ali je samo tribo prikazati onakova kakova je, a ne se skrivati iza neoliberala i ostalih opasnosti po društvo.

nadan se da ti nisu uništili vroto, a za televiziju...po si mi u očima, ćo; brod, misečina, bonaca, ča će ti televizija, bosančero?!

Tv je zbog glupih turista i wi-fi.

Meni ne treba.

Razvalili bravu, iščupali telku i malo nereda. Sreća sam eletroniku odnio doma preko zime.

a,
moje isprike za impliciranje da ti triba televizija na moru.

by Guest Mon 5 Feb - 21:52

Triny wrote:Na sat, mjesec, godinu...koja je razlika?

prodaju ljude.

by Leviathan2 Mon 5 Feb - 21:52

Triny wrote:Na sat, mjesec, godinu...koja je razlika?

razlika j e da ako firma iznajmljuje radnika onda placa kazne

by aben Mon 5 Feb - 21:55

Gnječ wrote:
Triny wrote:Na sat, mjesec, godinu...koja je razlika?

prodaju ljude.

gizes cryst

by epikur37 Mon 5 Feb - 21:56

aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
totalno gay stav,

mislin,
dedalos se založe za državnu potrošnju krez državne firme,
ti si u državnoj firmi,
ergo podržavaš punjenje svog takulina

intelektualna nula

Trebam tebi puniti takuin!?

Provalilo mi u brod i iščupalo tv, jebena ciganija.
ne, to je legitimna pozicija, ali je samo tribo prikazati onakova kakova je, a ne se skrivati iza neoliberala i ostalih opasnosti po društvo.

nadan se da ti nisu uništili vroto, a za televiziju...po si mi u očima, ćo; brod, misečina, bonaca, ča će ti televizija, bosančero?!

Tv je zbog glupih turista i wi-fi.

Meni ne treba.

Razvalili bravu, iščupali telku i malo nereda. Sreća sam eletroniku odnio doma preko zime.
a,
moje isprike za impliciranje da ti triba televizija na moru.

Na moru mi ne treba ništa i nitko.

Da mi je da uhvatim dan dva vremena za sebe....gore kod Škarde ili dolje u Kornate.

ali mrka kapa...teško.

by aben Mon 5 Feb - 21:58

epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:

Trebam tebi puniti takuin!?

Provalilo mi u brod i iščupalo tv, jebena ciganija.
ne, to je legitimna pozicija, ali je samo tribo prikazati onakova kakova je, a ne se skrivati iza neoliberala i ostalih opasnosti po društvo.

nadan se da ti nisu uništili vroto, a za televiziju...po si mi u očima, ćo; brod, misečina, bonaca, ča će ti televizija, bosančero?!

Tv je zbog glupih turista i wi-fi.

Meni ne treba.

Razvalili bravu, iščupali telku i malo nereda. Sreća sam eletroniku odnio doma preko zime.
a,
moje isprike za impliciranje da ti triba televizija na moru.

Na moru mi ne treba ništa i nitko.

Da mi je da uhvatim dan dva vremena za sebe....gore kod Škarde ili dolje u Kornate.

ali mrka kapa...teško.

reci in da ti je ureso nokat pa hodi na bolovanje dvo tri miseca

by Guest Mon 5 Feb - 22:00

aben wrote:
Gnječ wrote:
Triny wrote:Na sat, mjesec, godinu...koja je razlika?

prodaju ljude.
gizes cryst

a kako bi ti tu rabotu nazvao?

by epikur37 Mon 5 Feb - 22:01

aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
epikur37 wrote:
aben wrote:
ne, to je legitimna pozicija, ali je samo tribo prikazati onakova kakova je, a ne se skrivati iza neoliberala i ostalih opasnosti po društvo.

nadan se da ti nisu uništili vroto, a za televiziju...po si mi u očima, ćo; brod, misečina, bonaca, ča će ti televizija, bosančero?!

Tv je zbog glupih turista i wi-fi.

Meni ne treba.

Razvalili bravu, iščupali telku i malo nereda. Sreća sam eletroniku odnio doma preko zime.
a,
moje isprike za impliciranje da ti triba televizija na moru.

Na moru mi ne treba ništa i nitko.

Da mi je da uhvatim dan dva vremena za sebe....gore kod Škarde ili dolje u Kornate.

ali mrka kapa...teško.
reci in da ti je ureso nokat pa hodi na bolovanje dvo tri miseca

Ne, nakon ljeta uzet ću 2 mjeseca neplaćenog. Mislim da je to fer.

by Guest Mon 5 Feb - 22:01

aben wrote:
mislin,
dedalos se založe za državnu potrošnju krez državne firme,

ne, On se zalaže za:

abortus
senicid
eutanaziju
smrtnu kaznu
eugeniku

i još možda poneku stvar...

jer ne vjeruje da kultura i civilizacija proizlaze iz filozofije, iz ideja, da je netko kapitalist jer priča o kapitalizmu, ili da je moralan jer je kršćanin pa neće krast...

On vjeruje da kultura i civilizacija proizlaze iz biološkog temelja, da su ekspresija gena u okolišu, te ako se želi promjeniti "sustav" da promjene moraju ići iz bioloških temelja, a ne iz apstraktnih filozofskih oblaka

Europa trenutno prolazi kroz proces biološke promjene populacije, tako da će njena sutrašnja civilizacija i kultura biti bitno drugačija od današnje, bez obzira na kršćansku religiju i kapitalizam, jer netko ne može živjeti kršćanski moral ni biti kapitalist ako nema gene koji uzrokuju te obrazce ponašanja

by Sponsored content