Denkverbot

kic wrote:
to sam vidio u opisu programa, sve lijepo i onda liberalno..

hijacked pojam jbg..

kic wrote:
jedan jedini, Rick Sanchez ! :D

aben wrote:

mativka wrote:

aben wrote:

mativka wrote:

aben wrote:a ki ti to more verovati?

A, ča to točno? :)

pa da nisi mislila na seks:)

Kakvo ti to mišljenje imaš o meni? :)
Na sex pomislim samo kada ga ti spomeneš :)
Zna se, sex je sex, a natezanje je natezanje :)))))

daj molin te lipo, meni je seks* ča i liječenim alkoholičarima vino, a ti mi stalno pokušavaš ubociti nešto seksualno i tako isprovocirati relapse.


*razgovor o seksu

aben wrote:

mativka wrote:Zašto narod dozvoljava donošenje bolesnih zakona?

pa vi etatisti stalno trubite da je norod na izborimo do legitimitet zakonodavcu.

užasan zakon, 
a pazi agendu;

U Velikoj Britaniji zaštita djece utemeljena je na liberalnom stajalištu da siromašne obitelji i samohrane majke nisu u stanju biti dobri roditelji.




dakle na liberalnom stajalištu. jedini ki se moru suprotstaviti ovon ludilu su liberali. a njih se izravno okrivljuje.


left is the state, state is the left

aben wrote:mad scientist je smanji svog unuka i ubrizgo ga u svog bolesnog prijatelja da ga dijagnosticiro. međutin prijatelj umre, i da bi sposi unuka, jer se u truplu više ne izmjenjuju tvari i okolina potaje toksična, scientist stavi dinamit u truplo, odvede ga u orbitu i poveća ga na veličinu kontinenta, tj normalnu veličinu svog unuka, ki se tribo izvući kroz bradavicu trupla prije eksplozije dinamita. razumite li me za sa?
unuk izojde, dinamit ekplodiro a na kontinent počne kišiti krv.

kic wrote:
jedan jedini, Rick Sanchez ! :D

kic wrote:
mogli ste to sve stavljati na jednu temu o toj seriji, jer bih to citao tek kad je zavrsim, ovako sam na 5. epizodi tek..

mativka wrote:

aben wrote:

mativka wrote:

aben wrote:

mativka wrote:
A, ča to točno? :)

pa da nisi mislila na seks:)

Kakvo ti to mišljenje imaš o meni? :)
Na sex pomislim samo kada ga ti spomeneš :)
Zna se, sex je sex, a natezanje je natezanje :)))))

daj molin te lipo, meni je seks* ča i liječenim alkoholičarima vino, a ti mi stalno pokušavaš ubociti nešto seksualno i tako isprovocirati relapse.


*razgovor o seksu

Molin ja tebe lipo,
Nemoj mi te fore prodavati, pa nisan ti ja dite :) Prihvaćanje istine će te osloboditi. :)

mativka wrote:

aben wrote:

mativka wrote:Zašto narod dozvoljava donošenje bolesnih zakona?

pa vi etatisti stalno trubite da je norod na izborimo do legitimitet zakonodavcu.

užasan zakon, 
a pazi agendu;

U Velikoj Britaniji zaštita djece utemeljena je na liberalnom stajalištu da siromašne obitelji i samohrane majke nisu u stanju biti dobri roditelji.




dakle na liberalnom stajalištu. jedini ki se moru suprotstaviti ovon ludilu su liberali. a njih se izravno okrivljuje.


left is the state, state is the left

Narod daje legitimitet u dobroj vjeri. To što narod bude prevaren od strane onih u koje su imali povijerenje, to je druga priča. Vlast je slast u kojoj se često gube moralni kompasi.

Uvijek se za nešto pronađe krivac, a rijetko kad je to osobna odgovornost.

mativka wrote:

kic wrote:
jedan jedini, Rick Sanchez ! :D

Tko je taj? :scratch:

Gnječ wrote:
Yet, nothing quite so catastrophic occurs in Dark, and Jonas is catapulted to what we can all guess is a dystopian 2052, 33 years from his own 2019 and 66 years from 1986, the year he first travels to in “Alpha.” Interestingly, that future-finding form of time travel is theoretically possible, as Meyer explained, “Time is considered to be more of a dimension that’s constantly flowing forward. It’s shown that you could basically time travel, but only forward.” Yet, technically, that means Jonas' initial trip back to the '80s shouldn’t have happened. “It’s still not even really shown you can go back in time,” the PhD candidate said. “That might be completely impossible in general.”
But, since Older Jonas did set off that cesium-powered machine — which, Meyer pointed out “is [actually] just a pretty standard radioactive material” — in 1986, all three time periods start to experience bizarre electrical activity. In the Dark world that could hypothetically be possible, since the premise claims “that one single hotspot in that cave is basically all three times at once.” So, if something happens during one of those times, it happens in all three.

By the end of Dark, it's officially four times, as Jonas is squarely in the future from where his older self hails. Surmising the final seconds of “Alpha,” Meyer said, “What I thought at the end was that Older Jonas created an entirely new wormhole. You had the initial one caused by the nuclear plant, he might have destroyed that one, but then made another one, creating a loop.” A loop that technically shouldn't be possible due to the best-known theories on time travel, but a loop nonetheless.
All in all, Dark's science is obviously more thoughtful than whatever's going on in Hawkins, but a documentary the German thriller is not.

http://www.refinery29.com/2017/12/185318/dark-ending-time-travel-wormhole-season-1-finale-netflix

Ithildin wrote:

Gnječ wrote:
Yet, nothing quite so catastrophic occurs in Dark, and Jonas is catapulted to what we can all guess is a dystopian 2052, 33 years from his own 2019 and 66 years from 1986, the year he first travels to in “Alpha.” Interestingly, that future-finding form of time travel is theoretically possible, as Meyer explained, “Time is considered to be more of a dimension that’s constantly flowing forward. It’s shown that you could basically time travel, but only forward.” Yet, technically, that means Jonas' initial trip back to the '80s shouldn’t have happened. “It’s still not even really shown you can go back in time,” the PhD candidate said. “That might be completely impossible in general.”
But, since Older Jonas did set off that cesium-powered machine — which, Meyer pointed out “is [actually] just a pretty standard radioactive material” — in 1986, all three time periods start to experience bizarre electrical activity. In the Dark world that could hypothetically be possible, since the premise claims “that one single hotspot in that cave is basically all three times at once.” So, if something happens during one of those times, it happens in all three.

By the end of Dark, it's officially four times, as Jonas is squarely in the future from where his older self hails. Surmising the final seconds of “Alpha,” Meyer said, “What I thought at the end was that Older Jonas created an entirely new wormhole. You had the initial one caused by the nuclear plant, he might have destroyed that one, but then made another one, creating a loop.” A loop that technically shouldn't be possible due to the best-known theories on time travel, but a loop nonetheless.
All in all, Dark's science is obviously more thoughtful than whatever's going on in Hawkins, but a documentary the German thriller is not.

http://www.refinery29.com/2017/12/185318/dark-ending-time-travel-wormhole-season-1-finale-netflix

Procitala!

E sad, iako je u prijevodu cesto pisalo "crna rupa", zbog Trinity knota i Tannhausenove knjige, uvijek sam pomisljala na crvotocinu, tako da taj dio s crnom rupom iz clanka nisam ni uzimala kao neki ozbiljan prigovor. Ovaj dio u kojem fizicar spominje novu vremensku petlju posebno me se dojmio iz razloga sto me je iznenadilo daljnje putovanje kroz vrijeme. Nekako, tijekom sezone, mislila sam da su zahvacena samo ta tri vremenska razdoblja. 1986. bi bila referentna tocka, buduci da se te godine dogodila katastrofa u nuklearnoj elektrani koja je za posljedicu imala pojavu portala. Njena proslost, 1953., te njena buducnost, 2019.

Medjutim, buduci da se Jonas nasao u 2052., to me je nagnalo na razmisljanje da ne znamo dokle ide ta vremenska petlja, koliko daleko seze u buducnost i proslost. U principu, Noah bi tako mogao biti i iz daleke buducnosti, kao i iz daleke proslosti. Nekako mi se cini da nije stvorena nova vremenska petlja, vec da se stara proteze u nedogled.

Ithildin wrote:Pa to i velim, jer sve tri godine postaju time referentne tocke onog Trinity knota pa, time, svaka godina proteze se 33godine u proslost i buducnost. Tako mozemo ici do same pojave svemira.

kic wrote:
cekaj cekaj, prebacit cu damit xD

Ithildin wrote:

kic wrote:
mogli ste to sve stavljati na jednu temu o toj seriji, jer bih to citao tek kad je zavrsim, ovako sam na 5. epizodi tek..

Oprosti, mislila sam da sam jedina koja seriju gleda u rijetkim pauzama pa sam pretpostavila da su je svi vec dovrsili prije mene. Osim toga, ucinilo mi se da bi Mativka mogla reci koju o onome sto je odgledala, ali vidim da nije zainteresirana za dijalog u kojem Aben nema rijeci. :-P

Uglavnom, ne otvara mi se zaseban topic na kojem cu (bez Veg) voditi monologe. Osim ako se Gnjec ne misli pridruziti. U tom slucaju, ako ti se da, izvuci ovih par upisa pa prebaci na Film i serije.