Europska komisija stala na stranu Slovenaca: "Očekujemo provedbu presude"

Regoč wrote:

mutava baštarda wrote:

Regoč wrote:Ova debela crta je granica teritorijalnoga mora. Tada i danas.

epikontinentalni pojas i teritorijalno more su dvije sasvim različite stvari

Tako je, a to se vidi na zemljovidu iznad tvoga upisa.

svele krivo smatra da je hrvatska dobila više jer ne računa unutrašnje morske vode koje talijani nemaju tako da početak hr teritorijanih voda ide od zapadne obale najudaljenijih otoka, dok se kod susujeda talijana računa od obale kopna....

mutava baštarda wrote:

Regoč wrote:

mutava baštarda wrote:

Regoč wrote:Ova debela crta je granica teritorijalnoga mora. Tada i danas.

epikontinentalni pojas i teritorijalno more su dvije sasvim različite stvari

Tako je, a to se vidi na zemljovidu iznad tvoga upisa.

svele krivo smatra da je hrvatska dobila više jer ne računa unutrašnje morske vode koje talijani nemaju tako da početak hr teritorijanih voda ide od zapadne obale najudaljenijih otoka, dok se kod susujeda talijana računa od obale kopna....

Svele se po običaju isprosipal pa pokunjen otišal pod Rujkine skute.

mutava baštarda wrote:svele krivo smatra da je hrvatska dobila više jer ne računa unutrašnje morske vode koje talijani nemaju tako da početak hr teritorijanih voda ide od zapadne obale najudaljenijih otoka, dok se kod susujeda talijana računa od obale kopna....

Nisam najbolje shvatio što on zastupa, ali sam stekao dojam kako tvrdi da je Jugoslavija imala pravo na više mora nego Hrvatska, što naravno nikakve veze nema sa realnim stanjem.
Ono što je imala Jugoslavija, sad imaju Hrvatska i Crna Gora, a Slovenija i BiH se tu ne računaju jer nemaju direktan teritorijalni kontakt s međunarodnim vodama nego pri plovidbi iz svojih voda u one međunarodne moraju proći kroz hrvatsko more na što imaju pravo po UNCLOS-u.
No, neka on objasni na što je mislio kada se vrati.

Da je nješto mislil, šutjel bi jer bi shvatil da ni o čem pojma nema.

Ovako bi bilo da se držimo staroga korita Dragonje.

Ovako je ako se vuče od Sv. Odorika.

Judges award Slovenia high seas access in row with Croatia




THE HAGUE (AFP) - 
International judges on Thursday awarded Slovenia key access to international waters off the Croatian coast, sparking a furious reaction from Zagreb which said it would refuse to implement the ruling.
In a complex 300-page judgement, the judges ruled Slovenia should have "a junction area" with international waters, allowing "freedom of communication" to all ships, civilian and military, seeking access to Slovenia.
They determined that the "junction between the Slovenian territorial sea and the 'High Sea' is an area in which ships and aircraft enjoy essentially the same rights of access to and from Slovenia as they enjoy on the high seas," presiding judge Gilbert Guillaume said, in a two-hour long judgement.
In Ljubljana, Slovenian Prime Minister Miro Cerar hailed the ruling as a "historic moment for Slovenia," saying the judgement "is definitive and must be applied on both countries, Slovenia and Croatia".
The Slovenian leader said he would call his Croatian counterpart during the day to "begin dialogue on implementing the decision".
"Slovenia will do nothing to harm relations between our countries or our citizens," he said.
But Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic said his country will refuse to implement the ruling, saying it was "not obliging us in any way".
- Poisoned relations -
The sea corridor will be about 2.5 nautical miles wide, and lies about 12 nautical miles beyond the territorial limits of both Croatia and Italy.
But in the case which was first lodged with the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2009, the court rejected Ljubljana's claim that the whole of the southwestern Piran bay was Slovenian territory.
Instead they determined the maritime border "shall be a straight line joining a point in the middle of the channel of the St Odoric Canal" heading straight into the bay from the mouth of the Dragonja River.
The area under dispute is a tranquil bay on the northern Adriatic Sea, where the medieval buildings of the southwestern Slovenian town of Piran tumble down to a sleepy port.
But the bay is also shared by Croatia, and the dispute over where the sea borders should be drawn has poisoned relations between the neighbours since they both declared independence from Yugoslavia in 1991.
In 2009, the two countries signed an EU-backed deal to allow the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague to solve the long-standing dispute over the 13 square kilometres (five square miles) of largely uninhabited land and Piran Bay.
Slovenia, which has just 46 kilometres (29 miles) of coastline, had argued its access to international waters was at stake because Croatia, whose coast stretches for 1,700 kilometres, wanted the border to be drawn down the middle of the disputed bay.
- 'Freedom of the seas' -
The judges stressed that the aim of the corridor was to "guarantee both the integrity of Croatia's territorial sea and Slovenia's freedoms of communication between its territory and the high seas."
Zagreb had only agreed to join the proceedings after Ljubljana lifted its veto in 2009 to Croatia's accession to the European Union. But it pulled out again in 2014 following a phone tapping scandal.
A Slovenian judge from the tribunal and a Ljubljana official were recorded discussing tactics for a ruling favourable to Slovenia.
Observers have warned that if Zagreb does not comply with the ruling it could further strain already tense relations with Slovenia, which is Croatia's key entry point into the passport-free Schengen zone.
http://www.france24.com/en/20170629-judges-award-slovenia-high-seas-access-row-with-croatia

Dudata, ajd još jednom. Možda njetko i poželi čitati.

Dobro je danas u Večernjaku napisao Ivkošić.


Sjebali su nas ko panta pitu... Uzeli nam telekomunikacije i uvaljali svoje banke pa od nas izvlače masnu paru a mi i dalje "pjevamo":

Danke Deutschland!

provocator wrote:Dobro je danas u Večernjaku napisao Ivkošić.


Sjebali su nas ko panta pitu... Uzeli nam telekomunikacije i uvaljali svoje banke pa od nas izvlače masnu paru a mi i dalje "pjevamo":

Danke Deutschland!

I Provo je za uspravnicu!

Regoč wrote:Dudata, ajd još jednom. Možda njetko i poželi čitati.

evo ja ću tebi parazitu copy pejstat pa krepaj od muke

Arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), is a technique for the resolution of disputes outside the courts. The parties to a dispute refer it to arbitration by one or more persons (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal"), and agree to be bound by the arbitration decision (the "award"). A third party reviews the evidence in the case and imposes a decision that is legally binding on both sides and enforceable in the courts.

mutava baštarda wrote:

Regoč wrote:

mutava baštarda wrote:

Regoč wrote:Ova debela crta je granica teritorijalnoga mora. Tada i danas.

epikontinentalni pojas i teritorijalno more su dvije sasvim različite stvari

Tako je, a to se vidi na zemljovidu iznad tvoga upisa.

svele krivo smatra da je hrvatska dobila više jer ne računa unutrašnje morske vode koje talijani nemaju tako da početak hr teritorijanih voda ide od zapadne obale najudaljenijih otoka, dok se kod susujeda talijana računa od obale kopna....

Ma sveleta boli kuratzopcenito..Kazem da Hrvatska pod nadzorom ima puno manju povrsinu,nego stara SFRJ u doba Tite,ai posliije,dok ovi to nisu prodali da udju u Europu,prodali su sve zivo,da udju u europu,a sad im ta ista Europa ne valja..Mora se vrijedno raditi,a Uhljebima to ne paše,pa su sad svabi krivi....

Gnječ wrote:

Regoč wrote:Dudata, ajd još jednom. Možda njetko i poželi čitati.

evo ja ću tebi parazitu copy pejstat pa krepaj od muke

Arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), is a technique for the resolution of disputes outside the courts. The parties to a dispute refer it to arbitration by one or more persons (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal"), and agree to be bound by the arbitration decision (the "award"). A third party reviews the evidence in the case and imposes a decision that is legally binding on both sides and enforceable in the courts.

De opet. Sad na fašističkom.

pismejker wrote:

mutava baštarda wrote:

Regoč wrote:

mutava baštarda wrote:

Regoč wrote:Ova debela crta je granica teritorijalnoga mora. Tada i danas.

epikontinentalni pojas i teritorijalno more su dvije sasvim različite stvari

Tako je, a to se vidi na zemljovidu iznad tvoga upisa.

svele krivo smatra da je hrvatska dobila više jer ne računa unutrašnje morske vode koje talijani nemaju tako da početak hr teritorijanih voda ide od zapadne obale najudaljenijih otoka, dok se kod susujeda talijana računa od obale kopna....

Ma sveleta boli kuratzopcenito..Kazem da Hrvatska pod nadzorom ima puno manju povrsinu,nego stara SFRJ u doba Tite,ai posliije,dok ovi to nisu prodali da udju u Europu,prodali su sve zivo,da udju u europu,a sad im ta ista Europa ne valja..Mora se vrijedno raditi,a Uhljebima to ne paše,pa su sad svabi krivi....

Ne izvrdavaj, jasno si tvrdil da je granica sada drukčija pa jasno sam ti pokazal da si pisal potpune gluposti.

Regoč wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

Regoč wrote:Dudata, ajd još jednom. Možda njetko i poželi čitati.

evo ja ću tebi parazitu copy pejstat pa krepaj od muke

Arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), is a technique for the resolution of disputes outside the courts. The parties to a dispute refer it to arbitration by one or more persons (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal"), and agree to be bound by the arbitration decision (the "award"). A third party reviews the evidence in the case and imposes a decision that is legally binding on both sides and enforceable in the courts.

De opet. Sad na fašističkom.

L'arbitrato (dal latino arbitratus, cioè giudizio) è un metodo alternativo di risoluzione delle controversie (cioè senza ricorso ad un procedimento giudiziario), che consiste nell'affidamento a uno o più soggetti terzi (gli arbitri) dell'incarico di risolvere una controversia, mediante una decisione (il lodo) che sarà vincolante per le parti e suscettibile di essere eseguita, anche in via forzata.

Čardaklije slave=trolaju.

Uzaludno je podastirati bilo kakve argumente ili linkove. Čardaklije se jedino može nadtrolati ili odustati.

granice vise nisu ni bitne,sad smo svi dio velike EU zajednice naroda 

Gnječ wrote:

Regoč wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

Regoč wrote:Dudata, ajd još jednom. Možda njetko i poželi čitati.

evo ja ću tebi parazitu copy pejstat pa krepaj od muke

Arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), is a technique for the resolution of disputes outside the courts. The parties to a dispute refer it to arbitration by one or more persons (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal"), and agree to be bound by the arbitration decision (the "award"). A third party reviews the evidence in the case and imposes a decision that is legally binding on both sides and enforceable in the courts.

De opet. Sad na fašističkom.

L'arbitrato (dal latino arbitratus, cioè giudizio) è un metodo alternativo di risoluzione delle controversie (cioè senza ricorso ad un procedimento giudiziario), che consiste nell'affidamento a uno o più soggetti terzi (gli arbitri) dell'incarico di risolvere una controversia, mediante una decisione (il lodo) che sarà vincolante per le parti e suscettibile di essere eseguita, anche in via forzata.

Ma bravo, piccolo iredentista!