Denkverbot
Page 27 of 50
Page 27 of 50 • 1 ... 15 ... 26, 27, 28 ... 38 ... 50
Re: Denkverbot
Riječ je o prilagođavanju, udovoljavanju u svemu, zatomljavanju osobnosti, a sve u cilju boljeg prolaska kako u školi tako i u životu....betty.boop wrote:
jel kuzis onda paradox u svojoj izjavi ispod ? ;)
Zašto nešto forsirati čisto da se udovolji uopćena forma prikladna za zajednicu u kojoj se pojedinac stavlja na margine. Zar se zbilja želi od ljudi stvoriti robote koji su jednolični?
Guest- Guest
Re: Denkverbot
Hmm, i sad ajde, biti pametan ili biti dosljedan?! :)Vegvísir wrote:
Stvar je u tome što se ne ocjenjuje samo pravopisni i gramatički aspekt, već i stilski. Kod različitih nastavnica sam također imala različite ocjene iz zadaćnica, iako sam uvijek pisala gotovo bez ijedne pravopisne ili gramatičke greške. Jednoj je moj stil pisanja bio suviše dramatičan, mračan i slobodan u igri riječima, dok se drugoj to baš sviđalo.
Guest- Guest
Re: Denkverbot
To se zove prirodan talenat :)IvyTeasdale wrote:Ja sam uvijek imala odlican. Poanta je sto se nikad nisam previse trudila.
Od prvog osnovne.
Mozda se dam u spisateljske vode, nikad nije kasno.
B-)
Guest- Guest
Re: Denkverbot
A meni padaju na pamet neke ideje od sinoć :D (to ste krivi ti i Abend) :)kic wrote:vid zena sto je udaraju xD
Guest- Guest
Re: Denkverbot
Tko zna što on smjera ;)Vegvísir wrote:Vidi njega što pokušava unijeti razdor gdje ga nema
Guest- Guest
Re: Denkverbot
mativka wrote:Hmm, i sad ajde, biti pametan ili biti dosljedan?! :)Vegvísir wrote:
Stvar je u tome što se ne ocjenjuje samo pravopisni i gramatički aspekt, već i stilski. Kod različitih nastavnica sam također imala različite ocjene iz zadaćnica, iako sam uvijek pisala gotovo bez ijedne pravopisne ili gramatičke greške. Jednoj je moj stil pisanja bio suviše dramatičan, mračan i slobodan u igri riječima, dok se drugoj to baš sviđalo.
Meni, nekako, je tad ipak bila draža dosljednost. A kasnije sam, srećom, imala profesoricu kojoj se moj stil sviđao tako da se više nisam pretjerano zamarala tom dvojbom.
Guest- Guest
Re: Denkverbot
mativka wrote:Tko zna što on smjera ;)Vegvísir wrote:Vidi njega što pokušava unijeti razdor gdje ga nema
Unijeti nemir u mirne vode, prikazati dobrodušnu raspravu kao okršaj žena protiv žene
Guest- Guest
Re: Denkverbot
pocelo je od prvog osnovne,kad je uciteljica pozvala majku i rekla joj da pisem bolje od nje(uciteljice)..majka je lukavo naslutila da ce do kraja skolovanja biti ponosna roditeljica.. ;Dmativka wrote:Hmm, i sad ajde, biti pametan ili biti dosljedan?! :)Vegvísir wrote:
Stvar je u tome što se ne ocjenjuje samo pravopisni i gramatički aspekt, već i stilski. Kod različitih nastavnica sam također imala različite ocjene iz zadaćnica, iako sam uvijek pisala gotovo bez ijedne pravopisne ili gramatičke greške. Jednoj je moj stil pisanja bio suviše dramatičan, mračan i slobodan u igri riječima, dok se drugoj to baš sviđalo.
_________________
“You will not be good teachers if you focus only on what you do and not upon who you are.”
― Rudolf Steiner
L'âme- Posts : 25744
2014-04-12
Re: Denkverbot
to se on igra..k'o i ostap..B-)Vegvísir wrote:mativka wrote:Tko zna što on smjera ;)Vegvísir wrote:Vidi njega što pokušava unijeti razdor gdje ga nema
Unijeti nemir u mirne vode, prikazati dobrodušnu raspravu kao okršaj žena protiv žene
_________________
“You will not be good teachers if you focus only on what you do and not upon who you are.”
― Rudolf Steiner
L'âme- Posts : 25744
2014-04-12
Re: Denkverbot
gospodjo, ona je nemoguca !
to je rekla uciteljica mojoj materi na prvom roditeljskom
to je rekla uciteljica mojoj materi na prvom roditeljskom
betty.boop-
Posts : 12712
2015-01-23
Re: Denkverbot
betty.boop wrote:gospodjo, ona je nemoguca !
to je rekla uciteljica mojoj materi na prvom roditeljskom
Guest- Guest
Re: Denkverbot
ma zayebajem se, nije me mater bas tako ocrnila :D
bila sam inace ok dijete
bila sam inace ok dijete
betty.boop-
Posts : 12712
2015-01-23
Re: Denkverbot
najgore je sto mi svi govorite ds sam kompliciran, a evo, upoznali ste mativkin stil :^^
Re: Denkverbot
zanimljivo mi je bilo kod onog Islandjanina mislim, koji crta stripove, i sad kalendarski prati zbivanja, stotinu stripova s ruganjem uglavnom, Bozic, Nova godina, Valentinovo itd, i dodje dan zena i samo je napisao mislim: sretan vam dan zena xD
Re: Denkverbot
https://phalx.com/2016/06/04/symbols-and-their-purpose-in-initiation/
My own opinion is that initiation serves to reorient the individual, away from his atomized self, away from materialism, and away from trends in secular thinking. He is reoriented, instead, toward the community (his Brothers in the fraternity or Order, his family, nation, humanity, etc.), toward the spiritual (especially by remembering his own mortality), and toward more archaic ways of thinking.
“Art” plays a particular role in initiation, of course. And if one could make a criticism of museums, it is that they display archaic objects under modern lighting, so that we see those objects from our perspective as modern people, and not how our ancestors saw them. You’ve probably visited a museum and seen a golden throne or Egyptian sarcophagus, with all its gold, and thought that it was gaudy, or that the gold was there merely to demonstrate the power of the monarch.
The real reason the throne or the sarcophagus was coated with gold leaf was that the room in which it stood or laid was lit by a fire, or perhaps by several smaller torches. The gold helped illuminate the room, but it would also have appeared quite different by flame — not flat and overly bright as it does under modern lighting. The same can be said about the display of secret society objects.
My own opinion is that initiation serves to reorient the individual, away from his atomized self, away from materialism, and away from trends in secular thinking. He is reoriented, instead, toward the community (his Brothers in the fraternity or Order, his family, nation, humanity, etc.), toward the spiritual (especially by remembering his own mortality), and toward more archaic ways of thinking.
“Art” plays a particular role in initiation, of course. And if one could make a criticism of museums, it is that they display archaic objects under modern lighting, so that we see those objects from our perspective as modern people, and not how our ancestors saw them. You’ve probably visited a museum and seen a golden throne or Egyptian sarcophagus, with all its gold, and thought that it was gaudy, or that the gold was there merely to demonstrate the power of the monarch.
The real reason the throne or the sarcophagus was coated with gold leaf was that the room in which it stood or laid was lit by a fire, or perhaps by several smaller torches. The gold helped illuminate the room, but it would also have appeared quite different by flame — not flat and overly bright as it does under modern lighting. The same can be said about the display of secret society objects.
Re: Denkverbot
To put it more bluntly, initiation and symbolism immerse the initiate in the primordial memory. They do not illuminate like the lights of the museum or shopping mall, so that we are forced to stand back and observe, but, instead, they draw the initiate into a darkness bathed in gold — illuminated as if by the sun at dawn or dusk, the eternal fire of the Zoroastrian temple, and so on. Reality is not less real, but more so. With us are our ancestors as well as those yet to be born. So, too are the gods and the sages of antiquity. Everything has depth. Art is not decoration but the reemergence of truths that can be seen, felt, and experienced.
Page 27 of 50 • 1 ... 15 ... 26, 27, 28 ... 38 ... 50
Page 27 of 50
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum