Biden uvodi neo-marksisticke komesare u sve federalne institucije

red for ed(ucation)








#RedforEd movement, as expressed by its young founder at the Socialism 2018  conference held in Chicago this July, is to obtain political power to advance a socialist agenda.

prckov wrote:Executive Order on Further Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through The Federal Government - The White House

Federal Government Requiring Land Acknowledgements from Astronomers | National Review


Take one little-noticed reform at the National Science Foundation (NSF): Pursuant to Biden’s first-ever executive order, “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government,” the NSF dutifully published an “Equity Action Plan Summary,” detailing its eagerness “to encourage the full participation of all Americans and to remove barriers to their success.” What that meant, among other things, was mandating “Indigenous community acknowledgments” — also known as “land acknowledgments” — “as part of its programmatic agreements (PA) for some of its astronomical facilities,” requiring scientists who use specific sites to include said acknowledgments in their published research.


In addition, NSF has apparently begun “developing a land acknowledgment statement that could be used at the outset of NSF meetings and conferences” in general. The plan assures readers that “NSF’s Tribal Consultation and Engagement Working Group (TCE) will track progress” by ensuring that “the land acknowledgment statement is increasingly used in NSF meetings and conferences.”

If you’re not familiar with Indigenous land acknowledgments, they’re one of the latest and most absurd iterations of the kinds of self-flagellation rituals that Americans are now expected to subject themselves to on a routine basis.

The most innocuous description is simply that events, conferences, meetings and so on are expected to begin their proceedings with an acknowledgment of the history and cultural heritage of the Native American people who are indigenous to the region. But in practice, it’s much more of an accusation than a celebration. The Native Governance Center’s “Guide to Indigenous Land Acknowledgment” picks an apt quote from Northwestern University to describe the ritual’s premise: “It is important to understand the longstanding history that has brought you to reside on the land, and to seek to understand your place within that history. Land acknowledgements do not exist in a past tense, or historical context: colonialism is a current ongoing process, and we need to build our mindfulness of our present participation.” 

(“Use appropriate language,” the Native Governance Center guide urges readers. “Don’t sugarcoat the past. Use terms like genocide, ethnic cleansing, stolen land, and forced removal to reflect actions taken by colonizers”).

Unsurprisingly, given the painfully obvious purpose of the whole affair, land acknowledgments often include radical challenges to the basic legitimacy of the American nation itself — it’s typical to hear compliant proceedings begin with reference to the fact that “we are standing on stolen land,” with appropriately conciliatory noises about “genocide,” “white supremacy,” “settler-colonialism,” and so on. 

One of NSF’s graduate research fellows even compiled a handy list of “telescopes on stolen land,” informing readers that “it is abundantly clear that modern astronomy is the product of settler colonialism.”

ZAPADNO ZNANJE JE SAMO JEAN VID OD MNOGIH ZNANJA, UKLJUCUJUCI I DOMORODACKO ZNANJE (postmodernizam)


NSF itself, in keeping with its new equity agenda, now mandates land acknowledgments for researchers publishing work “on data collected in whole or in part” from a set of telescopes located on Native Hawaiian land. 




It’s not immediately clear what all this has to do with scientific discovery and the pursuit of knowledge. But then again, “knowledge,” as most Americans were raised to understand it, is regarded by the Biden administration as only one of many “ways of knowing,” and probably not the best one, either. 


The same equity agenda that produced the land acknowledgments has also sought to replace science — true science, as expressed best by traditional Western institutions — with a hodgepodge of vaguely New Age, vaguely premodern “Indigenous ways of knowing.”

zapadno znanje (znanost) je nemoralno jer se koristilo u nemoralne svrhe (kolonijalizam i sl), domorodacko znanje je moralno. Kad izjednacimo tkzv. domorodacko ili etnicko znanje sa znanoscu onda mozemo tvrdit da je domorodacko znanje bolje jer je moralno i u harmonicnom odnosu sa prirodom. 


Take the new White House Indigenous Knowledge guidance sheet, which writes: “At times, Western science has been used as a tool to oppress Tribal Nations and Indigenous Peoples.” 

But “Indigenous Knowledge,” on the other hand, has “been historically marginalized in scientific communities and excluded from research and academic resources, funding, and other opportunities. . . . 

This marginalization has resulted from a lack of awareness, unfamiliarity and methodological dogma, and, too often, racism and imperialism.” 


To correct this grievous historic wrong, White House agencies apparently “engaged more than 100 Federally recognized Tribal Nations and more than a thousand individuals and organizations in a White House-led effort to elevate Indigenous Knowledge in Federal decision making,” addressing their concerns about past “experiences where Indigenous Knowledge was avoided, undervalued, or ignored in Federal policy decisions.”

Indigenous “knowledge” or “ways of knowing” are just references to the “body of observations, oral and written knowledge, innovations, practices, and beliefs developed by Tribes and Indigenous Peoples,” based in the “in ethical foundations” espoused by those tribes, as the White House’s guidance sheet details.




 And that, of course, is what all this land acknowledgment business is about, too: An antipathy toward the ethical, moral, theological, and scientific foundations of our civilization — i.e., the West, and America as its specific instantiation — and a search for an alternative to replace it with. For the Americans who liked the original version just fine as it was, well, tough luck.


amerika kakvu smo do sad znali se ne moze srusit izvana, ali moze iznutra
fazon je sto su rusitelji u bijeloj kuci

crnaca doktora ima samo 6% a stanovnistva 12%
to Bidenov equity mora ispravit. 
identitetski marksizam

Doctor warns Tucker of the dangers of race-based hiring - YouTube

prcko predaj se:)

leftardi trebaju pokazat da je kineski pa cak i ruski model upravljanja drzavom bolji od americkog, cak je i ekonomski uspjesniji jer u kini ipak grade novih 400 termoelektrana i ako se dobro sjecam oko 24-6 nuklearke. Zato Black-rock fali totalitarizam, onaj kanadsko kopile takode a i her klaus


citava odrziva agenda sa hitnim prelaskom na skupa i nepouzdana energetska rjesenja je ideoloski alat. 
Ah da, eto nekim cudom leftardi konacno priznase da kovid virus nije mutiro pa skocio na coeka na pijaci, sto je otvorilo prozor of oportunity za her Klausa da uvede "stakeholder kapitalizam". Jos fali da se nekim cudom potvrdi i da je cijela stvar namjerno odradena uz svesrdnu pomoc americkih neomarksista. Mozda i to dozivimo nekad

dijagram wrote:prcko predaj se:)

nikad rob 

zaboravio sam napomenut da je biden nedavno zabranio bicevanje iako je ta praksa davno zavrsila, i iako je njegova partija bila kkk, i iako su imali clana kkk u svojoj partiji sve do nedavno kojem su svi glavni politicari-demokrati bili na sprovodu, od ekipe klinton pa nadalje