''ISTINA NA HRT-U! Mišak u 10 minuta raskrinkao ‘klimatske promjene’! Nećete vjerovati što spremaju.. ''

https://www.dnevno.hr/vjera/vjera-kultura-i-znanost/istina-na-hrt-u-misak-u-10-minuta-raskrinkao-klimatske-promjene-necete-vjerovati-sto-spremaju-1369862/

Ali, ljudi su već sada pod apsolutnom kontrolom...Nisu potrebne klimatske promjene koje jesu REALNOST...

samo ljudska govna čitaju dnevno.govno

Sve što je dostupno u ovom materijalnom svijetu, sve ti pokazuje što je Istina...

Imate alate danas da vidite šire, što vaši preci nisu imali mogućnost, pa opet, pravite se slijepi...

Zašto nemamo više pravu zimu? Debeli snijeg, led, i temperature ispod nule koje traju barem mjesec dana? Umjesto zime imamo produženu jesen s kišama i maglom.
Istodobno, ljetni toplinski udari su sve snažniji, duži i opasniji. 

https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/191/nope-earth-isnt-cooling/

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

[list=footnotes]

[*]IPCC Fifth Assessment Report,
[*]Summary for Policymakers
B.D. Santer et.al., “A search for human influences on the thermal structure of the atmosphere,” Nature vol 382, 4 July 1996, 39-46
Gabriele C. Hegerl, “Detecting Greenhouse-Gas-Induced Climate Change with an Optimal Fingerprint Method,” Journal of Climate, v. 9, October 1996, 2281-2306
V. Ramaswamy et.al., “Anthropogenic and Natural Influences in the Evolution of Lower Stratospheric Cooling,” Science 311 (24 February 2006), 1138-1141
B.D. Santer et.al., “Contributions of Anthropogenic and Natural Forcing to Recent Tropopause Height Changes,” Science vol. 301 (25 July 2003), 479-483.
[*]In the 1860s, physicist John Tyndall recognized the Earth's natural greenhouse effect and suggested that slight changes in the atmospheric composition could bring about climatic variations. In 1896, a seminal paper by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius first predicted that changes in the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could substantially alter the surface temperature through the greenhouse effect.
[*]
[*]National Research Council (NRC), 2006. Surface Temperature Reconstructions For the Last 2,000 Years. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
[*]

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page3.php
[*]https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/faq/indicators.php
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp
[*]https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20170118/
[*]Levitus, S.; Antonov, J.; Boyer, T.; Baranova, O.; Garcia, H.; Locarnini, R.; Mishonov, A.; Reagan, J.; Seidov, D.; Yarosh, E.; Zweng, M. (2017). NCEI ocean heat content, temperature anomalies, salinity anomalies, thermosteric sea level anomalies, halosteric sea level anomalies, and total steric sea level anomalies from 1955 to present calculated from in situ oceanographic subsurface profile data (NCEI Accession 0164586). Version 4.4. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. doi:10.7289/V53F4MVP
[*]
[*]https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7159
[*]National Snow and Ice Data Center
World Glacier Monitoring Service
[*]National Snow and Ice Data Center
Robinson, D. A., D. K. Hall, and T. L. Mote. 2014. MEaSUREs Northern Hemisphere Terrestrial Snow Cover Extent Daily 25km EASE-Grid 2.0, Version 1. [Indicate subset used]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. doi: https://doi.org/10.5067/MEASURES/CRYOSPHERE/nsidc-0530.001. [Accessed 9/21/18].
http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/sotc/snow_extent.html
Rutgers University Global Snow Lab, Data History Accessed September 21, 2018.
[*]R. S. Nerem, B. D. Beckley, J. T. Fasullo, B. D. Hamlington, D. Masters and G. T. Mitchum. Climate-change–driven accelerated sea-level rise detected in the altimeter era.
[*]PNAS, 2018 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717312115
[*]https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/sotc/sea_ice.html
[*]USGCRP, 2017:
[*]Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I [Wuebbles, D.J., D.W. Fahey, K.A. Hibbard, D.J. Dokken, B.C. Stewart, and T.K. Maycock (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 470 pp, doi: 10.7930/J0J964J6
[*]http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F
[*]http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/Ocean+Acidification
[*]C. L. Sabine et.al., “The Oceanic Sink for Anthropogenic CO2,” Science vol. 305 (16 July 2004), 367-371
[*]
[*]Copenhagen Diagnosis, p. 36.
















[/list]
[*][*][*][*][*][*][*][*][*][*][*][*][*][*][*][*]

https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
[list=footnotes]

[*]IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, 2014
United States Global Change Research Program, "Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States," Cambridge University Press, 2009
Naomi Oreskes, "The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change," Science 3 December 2004: Vol. 306 no. 5702 p. 1686 DOI: 10.1126/science.1103618
[*]
Mike Lockwood, “Solar Change and Climate: an update in the light of the current exceptional solar minimum,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2 December 2009, doi 10.1098/rspa.2009.0519;
Judith Lean, “Cycles and trends in solar irradiance and climate,” Wiley


[/list]
[*][*]

https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

https://www.seas.harvard.edu/content/from-sea-to-rising-sea-climate-change-in-america

https://www.intechopen.com/books/global-warming-impacts-and-future-perspective/study-of-impacts-of-global-warming-on-climate-change-rise-in-sea-level-and-disaster-frequency#B43

https://phys.org/news/2004-08-21st-century-intense-frequent-longer.html

https://www.science.org.au/education/immunisation-climate-change-genetic-modification/science-climate-change

Do vraga, lažu li svi? I ako da, kako znamo da lažu i kome vjerovati?
Teoretičarima zavjere? 

https://www.nap.edu/resource/12782/Science-Report-Brief-final.pdf

A strong, credible body of scientific evidence shows that climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for a broad range of human and natural systems. As decision makers respond to these risks, the nation’s scientific enterprise can contribute both by continuing to improve understanding of the causes and consequences of climate change, and by improving and expanding the options available to limit the magnitude of climate change and to adapt to its impacts. To do so, the nation needs a comprehensive, integrated, and flexible climate change research enterprise that is closely linked with action-oriented programs at all levels. Also needed are a comprehensive climate observing system, improved climate models and other analytical tools, investments in human capital, and better linkages between research and decision making.

Panel Membership: Pamela A. Matson (Chair), Stanford University; Thomas Dietz (Vice Chair), Michigan State University, East Lansing; Waleed Abdalati, University of Colorado at Boulder; Antonio J. Busalacchi, Jr., University of Maryland, College Park; Ken Caldeira, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, California; Robert W. Corell, H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment; Ruth S. Defries, Columbia University; Inez Y. Fung, University of California, Berkeley; Steven Gaines, University of California, Santa Barbara; George M. Hornberger, Vanderbilt University; Maria Carmen Lemos,University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Susanne C. Moser, Susanne Moser Research & Consulting; Richard H. Moss, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Edward A. Parson, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; A. R. Ravishankara, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Raymond W. Schmitt, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; B. L. Turner, II, Arizona State University; Warren M. Washington, National Center for Atmospheric Research; John P. Weyant, Stanford University; David A. Whelan, The Boeing Company; Ian Kraucunas (Study Director), National Research Council. The National Academies appointed the above panel of experts to address the specific task, sponsored by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The members volunteered their time for this activity; their report is peer-reviewed and the final product signed off by both the committee members and the National Academies. This report brief was prepared by the National Research Council based on the committee’s report. For more information, contact the Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate at (202) 334-3426 or visit http://nationalacademies.org/basc or America’s Climate Choices at americasclimatechoices.org. Copies of Advancing the Science of Climate Change are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001; (800) 624-6242; www.nap.edu


Do vraga, zar je čitav svijet i sve relevantne znastvene institucije uključen u veliku prijevaru globalnih razmjera? 

https://climateatlas.ca/climate-change-basics#toc-2

97,1% znanstvenika se slaže da je upravo ljudski faktor uzrok globalnog zatopljenja.

References

[list=referencelist]
[*]Prairie Climate Centre. “Seeing is Believing: Temperature Records Prove Canada is Warming”
[*]Government of Canada. Historical Climate Data .
[*]United States of America. National Centres for Environmental Information. Climate Data Online
[*]United States of America. NASA. EarthData
[*]Hartmann, D.L. et al. “Observations: Atmosphere and Surface.” In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. [PDF]
[*]United States of America. NASA. Godard Institute for Space Studies. GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
[*]Columbia University Earth Institute. Global Temperature .
[*]Marcott, Shaun A., Jeremy D. Shakun, Peter U. Clark, and Alan C. Mix. “A Reconstruction of Regional and Global Temperature for the Past 11,300 Years ”. Science 339 (8 Mar 2013): 1198-1201.
[*]Prairie Climate Centre. “It Ain’t Natural: How we Know Humans are Causing Climate Change ”
[*]Reusswig, Fritz. “History and future of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming. ” Environmental Research Letters 8.3 (2013).
[*]IPCC. Publications and Reports.
[*]Natural Resources Canada. Climate Change: Impacts and Adaptation.
[/list]

Prestani širiti laži i obmanjivati napaćeni hrvatski puk...
Uostalome, i da si u pravu a što se negira, kome trebaju  debeli snijeg, led, i temperature ispod nule koje traju barem mjesec dana? 
Jedino koristi za svinjokolju, ništa drugo...

T. wrote:Prestani širiti laži i obmanjivati napaćeni hrvatski puk...
Uostalome, i da si u pravu a što se negira, kome trebaju  debeli snijeg, led, i temperature ispod nule koje traju barem mjesec dana? 
Jedino koristi za svinjokolju, ništa drugo...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-019-0400-0.epdf?referrer_access_token=VBStZrW1vEgBC_4aTVpG39RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0N7bTxBqLecWapiK43Tv3o5PzlP3yU4M1aQfVsGAWcU8tJH3Dlz8Ah2TzwPtfShkbMnf7a8zWT49_0PcfQeA-QLMwelS62wlNXQT_714EbUQHLfapGbdm6p0e2jZT_0hJIOHah57HENBzIj9pciIJnjkzfW5K-xq9NtqIa9HHD6qUxWrDYk58v1DDVd7XTdr-bH2fyIgct7ZsA73eVhjAcKcOiFEBfr_5Mw82LOxB8rofawUz9VqVrQc3eJ7niHsrU%3D&tracking_referrer=grist.org

Reconstructions and models yield practically identical values for the upper range of pre-industrial temperature trends (horizontal lines in Fig. 4a), again suggesting that climate models are skilful in simulating the natural range of multidecadal GMST variability.Of the reconstruction ensemble members, 79% have the largest 51 yr trend within the twentieth century, which includes two distinct periods of large trends. The first reflects the early twentieth century warming60, which was shown to originate from a combi-nation of forcings including anthropogenic forcings and internal multidecadal variability of the climate system3. The second reflects the modern period of strong warming, which extends from the mid-1970s to today. The temperature trends during these two industrial-era periods are outside the range of pre-industrial variability, even more so when compared with control runs, in which strong warming trends after volcanic cooling do not occur (dashed red line in Fig. 4a). All instrumental 51 yr trends starting in 1948  (and ending 1998 ) or later exceed the 99th percentile of reconstructed pre-industrial 51 yr trends.

The extraordinary rate of the industrial-era temperature increase is evident on timescales longer than approximately 20 yr (Fig. 4b), for which the probabilities of the occurrence of the largest trends greatly exceed the values expected from chance alone, using ran-dom noise predictors with realistic memory properties (Methods).In addition to using a variety of reconstruction methods, we assessed the robustness of our analysis of multidecadal GMST variability and trends using a range of sensitivity tests, including reconstructions based on detrended calibration and different real-izations of noise proxies, adjustments for variance changes back in time, and different calibration periods and proxy subsets. Our infer-ences on the multidecadal GMST variability for the Common Era are robust to all these permutations (Supplementary Figs. 17–20). Nevertheless, we cannot rule out biases due to errors in the indi-vidual proxy records and the unequal spatiotemporal distribution of proxy data (Supplementary Fig. 1). Warm-season-sensitive records from the Northern Hemisphere high and mid latitudes dominate the collection of proxy records21, thus our results may be biased towards this region and season, although these effects are reduced by using the global mean (Supplementary Section 3). The coherency across reconstruction methods nevertheless suggests a reduced sensitiv-ity of the results to methodological choices compared with earlier attempts23, perhaps in large part because of the use of the largest database of temperature-sensitive proxy data yet assembled21. With respect to the forced climate simulations, independent uncertain-ties include: the specification of long-timescale physical processes; relatively poorly known, slowly varying forcings; and representa-tion of grid- and sub-grid-scale processes61. That the reconstruc-tions presented here are coherently phased and of similar amplitude to CMIP5 simulated MDV suggests improved confidence in both these sources of information.

melikiore, odmah se odrekni friđa.
kompresor 1,5kg
ulje 0,2kg
kablovi i radijator 1kg

ostalo:
PU ili još gore PS-HD
PP ili PE
PVC

a, moderni friđ ima 50 kg

vjerovatno nemaš namještaj od drveta.


sve baci. rubovi na vratima od PP ili PE, stariji od PVC.
fronte ako nisu od furnira, PP, PE, PEvDH
čim nije puno drvo piljevina je tretirana s PE-Ld

na podu ako imaš laminat, a ne čisti parket.
gore ti je PE-HD ili PVC
unutra extrudirana piljevina s PP ili PP-HD

tipkaš preko PP, PE ili PEpp

yogurth piješ iz PVC

tetrapak više nema Al-folie već PP-folie.


odrekni se mjesec dana plastike pa nakon tih mjesec dana ukopčaj računalo i podijeli s nama tu traumu.

veber wrote:melikiore, odmah se odrekni friđa.
kompresor 1,5kg
ulje 0,2kg
kablovi i radijator 1kg

ostalo:
PU ili još gore PS-HD
PP ili PE
PVC

a, moderni friđ ima 50 kg

vjerovatno nemaš namještaj od drveta.


sve baci. rubovi na vratima od PP ili PE, stariji od PVC.
fronte ako nisu od furnira, PP, PE, PEvDH
čim nije puno drvo piljevina je tretirana s PE-Ld

na podu ako imaš laminat, a ne čisti parket.
gore ti je PE-HD ili PVC
unutra extrudirana piljevina s PP ili PP-HD

tipkaš preko PP, PE ili PEpp

yogurth piješ iz PVC

jasambrend wrote:

veber wrote:melikiore, odmah se odrekni friđa.
kompresor 1,5kg
ulje 0,2kg
kablovi i radijator 1kg

ostalo:
PU ili još gore PS-HD
PP ili PE
PVC

a, moderni friđ ima 50 kg

vjerovatno nemaš namještaj od drveta.


sve baci. rubovi na vratima od PP ili PE, stariji od PVC.
fronte ako nisu od furnira, PP, PE, PEvDH
čim nije puno drvo piljevina je tretirana s PE-Ld

na podu ako imaš laminat, a ne čisti parket.
gore ti je PE-HD ili PVC
unutra extrudirana piljevina s PP ili PP-HD

tipkaš preko PP, PE ili PEpp

yogurth piješ iz PVC

nema tu palac gore. to su činjenice.

mi bi se odrekli polimera, pa odrekni se pizda ti materina i stina i kušin.

ja bi malo slao prosvjene note preko PP tipkovnice putem Lan kabla koji ide na router koji pak šalje na baznu stanicu koja troši ko pol afričkog sela, ali na sat, a afričko selo dnevno.

pa bi malo protestiral u najkicama koje su 100% polimer i još ih slažu djeca..

onda ne bumo držali zečeve.
ne, kaj bumo držali?
tigrove?

onda ako pojedem tigra pak bum bil kriv.

sve na grenlad neka ližu glečer.

veber wrote:

jasambrend wrote:

veber wrote:melikiore, odmah se odrekni friđa.
kompresor 1,5kg
ulje 0,2kg
kablovi i radijator 1kg

ostalo:
PU ili još gore PS-HD
PP ili PE
PVC

a, moderni friđ ima 50 kg

vjerovatno nemaš namještaj od drveta.


sve baci. rubovi na vratima od PP ili PE, stariji od PVC.
fronte ako nisu od furnira, PP, PE, PEvDH
čim nije puno drvo piljevina je tretirana s PE-Ld

na podu ako imaš laminat, a ne čisti parket.
gore ti je PE-HD ili PVC
unutra extrudirana piljevina s PP ili PP-HD

tipkaš preko PP, PE ili PEpp

yogurth piješ iz PVC

nema tu palac gore. to su činjenice.

mi bi se odrekli polimera, pa odrekni se pizda ti materina i stina i kušin.

ja bi malo slao prosvjene note preko PP tipkovnice putem Lan kabla koji ide na router koji pak šalje na baznu stanicu koja troši ko pol afričkog sela, ali na sat, a afričko selo dnevno.

pa bi malo protestiral u najkicama koje su 100% polimer i još ih slažu djeca..

onda ne bumo držali zečeve.
ne, kaj bumo držali?
tigrove?

onda ako pojedem tigra pak bum bil kriv.

sve na grenlad neka ližu glečer.

I još jedan za trud...

I jedan zbog Ezeka...

I za Kaju i zečeve...

sve vas nabijem na kurac.


ono malo ćemo se pravit fini, a malo nebumo jeli meso, pa bumo. pa bumo otišli u eko dućan koji prodaje eko piliće u eko kartonu i onda malo odem eko prosvjedovat.

kada spizdim 1500l nafte s kaićem to je strava, ali isti ti pingvini koriste gumenjake od neoprenskog platna s poliesterskim dnom i evenrude od 150 koji ždere ko mojih 4 iznajmljena kaića od 1000ks. i naravno imaju žute pp žizme i žute PEpp kabanice u ime spasenja svijeta.


kamen oko vrata i plivaj.

ovdje u njemačkoj sam skoro jednu/jedno/jednog zakucao u stup. rekao mi je policajac da bolje ne.

melkior wrote:

T. wrote:Prestani širiti laži i obmanjivati napaćeni hrvatski puk...
Uostalome, i da si u pravu a što se negira, kome trebaju  debeli snijeg, led, i temperature ispod nule koje traju barem mjesec dana? 
Jedino koristi za svinjokolju, ništa drugo...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-019-0400-0.epdf?referrer_access_token=VBStZrW1vEgBC_4aTVpG39RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0N7bTxBqLecWapiK43Tv3o5PzlP3yU4M1aQfVsGAWcU8tJH3Dlz8Ah2TzwPtfShkbMnf7a8zWT49_0PcfQeA-QLMwelS62wlNXQT_714EbUQHLfapGbdm6p0e2jZT_0hJIOHah57HENBzIj9pciIJnjkzfW5K-xq9NtqIa9HHD6qUxWrDYk58v1DDVd7XTdr-bH2fyIgct7ZsA73eVhjAcKcOiFEBfr_5Mw82LOxB8rofawUz9VqVrQc3eJ7niHsrU%3D&tracking_referrer=grist.org

Reconstructions and models yield practically identical values for the upper range of pre-industrial temperature trends (horizontal lines in Fig. 4a), again suggesting that climate models are skilful in simulating the natural range of multidecadal GMST variability.Of the reconstruction ensemble members, 79% have the largest 51 yr trend within the twentieth century, which includes two distinct periods of large trends. The first reflects the early twentieth century warming60, which was shown to originate from a combi-nation of forcings including anthropogenic forcings and internal multidecadal variability of the climate system3. The second reflects the modern period of strong warming, which extends from the mid-1970s to today. The temperature trends during these two industrial-era periods are outside the range of pre-industrial variability, even more so when compared with control runs, in which strong warming trends after volcanic cooling do not occur (dashed red line in Fig. 4a). All instrumental 51 yr trends starting in 1948  (and ending 1998 ) or later exceed the 99th percentile of reconstructed pre-industrial 51 yr trends.

The extraordinary rate of the industrial-era temperature increase is evident on timescales longer than approximately 20 yr (Fig. 4b), for which the probabilities of the occurrence of the largest trends greatly exceed the values expected from chance alone, using ran-dom noise predictors with realistic memory properties (Methods).In addition to using a variety of reconstruction methods, we assessed the robustness of our analysis of multidecadal GMST variability and trends using a range of sensitivity tests, including reconstructions based on detrended calibration and different real-izations of noise proxies, adjustments for variance changes back in time, and different calibration periods and proxy subsets. Our infer-ences on the multidecadal GMST variability for the Common Era are robust to all these permutations (Supplementary Figs. 17–20). Nevertheless, we cannot rule out biases due to errors in the indi-vidual proxy records and the unequal spatiotemporal distribution of proxy data (Supplementary Fig. 1). Warm-season-sensitive records from the Northern Hemisphere high and mid latitudes dominate the collection of proxy records21, thus our results may be biased towards this region and season, although these effects are reduced by using the global mean (Supplementary Section 3). The coherency across reconstruction methods nevertheless suggests a reduced sensitiv-ity of the results to methodological choices compared with earlier attempts23, perhaps in large part because of the use of the largest database of temperature-sensitive proxy data yet assembled21. With respect to the forced climate simulations, independent uncertain-ties include: the specification of long-timescale physical processes; relatively poorly known, slowly varying forcings; and representa-tion of grid- and sub-grid-scale processes61. That the reconstruc-tions presented here are coherently phased and of similar amplitude to CMIP5 simulated MDV suggests improved confidence in both these sources of information.

evo ti malo obloga za mozak
stavljaj ujutro I navece tamo di je mekano   

ovaj ispod je radio za taj tvoj famozni UN politicki projekt zvani IPCC na koji se ti oduzimas




a ovaj je australijski znanstvenik sto je oizgubio poso jer je reko istinu o corall reef koji ne samo da ne propada nego i raste. Sram ga bilo nije se slozio sa tvojim tekstualnim ponjavama a ti se bas potrudio kopi pejstat