Dankverbot

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Noor wrote:
očito zato i pitaš :)

to je lakmus pitanje, pocrvenila si, i sa je gotovo

lakmus pitanje? što ne bi lakmus odgovor pa da vidimo kako ti crveniš i sa je gotovo.

bilo ki odgovor  na lakmus pitanje je lakmus odgovor. ako je da, socijalist si, ako je ne, nisi

mlatiš li još suprugu?

ne koliko bi hoti

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:
to je lakmus pitanje, pocrvenila si, i sa je gotovo

lakmus pitanje? što ne bi lakmus odgovor pa da vidimo kako ti crveniš i sa je gotovo.

bilo ki odgovor  na lakmus pitanje je lakmus odgovor. ako je da, socijalist si, ako je ne, nisi

mlatiš li još suprugu?

ne koliko bi hoti

a zato onaj tvoj referat o seksu u rvata i braku u rvata.

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

lakmus pitanje? što ne bi lakmus odgovor pa da vidimo kako ti crveniš i sa je gotovo.

bilo ki odgovor  na lakmus pitanje je lakmus odgovor. ako je da, socijalist si, ako je ne, nisi

mlatiš li još suprugu?

ne koliko bi hoti

a zato onaj tvoj referat o seksu u rvata i braku u rvata.

ne sićun se, ki referat?

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:
bilo ki odgovor  na lakmus pitanje je lakmus odgovor. ako je da, socijalist si, ako je ne, nisi

mlatiš li još suprugu?

ne koliko bi hoti

a zato onaj tvoj referat o seksu u rvata i braku u rvata.

ne sićun se, ki referat?

kaskaš...

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

mlatiš li još suprugu?

ne koliko bi hoti

a zato onaj tvoj referat o seksu u rvata i braku u rvata.

ne sićun se, ki referat?

kaskaš...

vjerojatno,

a ki referat?

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:
ne koliko bi hoti

a zato onaj tvoj referat o seksu u rvata i braku u rvata.

ne sićun se, ki referat?

kaskaš...

vjerojatno,

a ki referat?

an?

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

a zato onaj tvoj referat o seksu u rvata i braku u rvata.

ne sićun se, ki referat?

kaskaš...

vjerojatno,

a ki referat?

an?

ki referat o seksu u rvata i braku u rvata?

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

aben wrote:
ne sićun se, ki referat?

kaskaš...

vjerojatno,

a ki referat?

an?

ki referat o seksu u rvata i braku u rvata?

ae!

e?

Gnječ wrote:e?

ča je?

eee...

The libertarian case is that compulsion is never right for older children, teenagers, for example, and does not become viable even for little children, merely on the assumption that some homes are insufficient to the task. The libertarian will not hold that all homes are sufficient to the task. He or she will say, however, that if we think most homes are adequate, and yet we have compulsory education, we are left in an odd position. We are requiring all families to send their children to school on the ground that some families do not understand the importance of equipping their children with elementary cognitive and moral training. But why should most people be forced to send their children to school when they would do this voluntarily, just because a minority will not comply?

Officialdom tends to argue that there are externalities involved in education, which discourage it under private finance. First, I cannot stop other people from benefiting from my knowledge, so I will not acquire it without some public recompense. Secondly I cannot stop others from benefiting from my virtuous behaviour. Again I will demand less education. Overall, citizens will undertake less education than is optimal. Therefore the state must step in, both funding the experience, and for a certain minimum number of years, making it compulsory.

All this is nonsense. Education is a private good which is over-demanded when it is publicly financed. Nor is there any evidence that when it is compulsory the stock of human capital formed by education is increased. Human capital depends on a particular articulation between knowledge and markets. The Soviet Union was rich in knowledge formation, but not in human capital formation. Russia and Cuba and the other Communist societies were characterised by an economically useless accumulation of knowledge. So idle chatter about the theory of "human capital" or "human capital formation" cannot rescue compulsory education.

ne moreš nojti ni deset redaka dobroga teksta a da se neko ne popišo na komunizam:)

Then came compulsory education. Our State began requiring that all parents must send their children to public school for fear that some children would not be educated because of an irresponsible parent. Since that day, the proverbial pendulum has swung in the wrong direction.

Some parents completely disengage themselves from their obligation to oversee and ensure the successful education of their children. Some parents act as if the responsibility to educate, and even care for their child, is primarily the responsibility of the public school system. As a result, our teachers and schools have been forced to become surrogate parents, expected to do everything from behavioral counseling, to providing adequate nutrition, to teaching sex education, as well as ensuring full college and career readiness.

aben aben ....ben...ben...en...n..n..

Stavila sam si kapicu. Dijete se zabavlja. :D

Evo jos jedne...

violator wrote:Stavila sam si kapicu. Dijete se zabavlja. :D

Evo jos jedne...

sad ćeš dobit salatu. ček da metilda dođe i vidi što si joj od avatara uradila.

Gnječ wrote:

violator wrote:Stavila sam si kapicu. Dijete se zabavlja. :D

Evo jos jedne...

sad ćeš dobit salatu. ček da metilda dođe i vidi što si joj od avatara uradila.

:D

Daj si izaberi avatar da i tebe ukrasim..

---

Ili ova..