Trump uvodi carine Kini od 60 milijardi dolara

Trump u sridu.

Nema bez državne regulacije ekonomije, svoju ekonomiju zaštiti i protežirati.

Tu priču o neograničenom tržištu i nevidljivoj ruci je popušla samo istočnoeuropska mularija.

http://metro.co.uk/2017/08/24/chinese-soldiers-failed-fitness-tests-because-they-are-too-unfit-and-masturbate-too-much-6876635/


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/young-chinese-are-too-fat-and-masturbate-too-much-to-pass-army-fitness-tests-a3617881.html


A rising number of young Chinese people are failing fitness tests required to join the army because they are too fat and masturbate too much, state media has proclaimed.
The high rejection rate has triggered concerns that there are not enough youths in good physical condition to fill the ranks of the Chinese army.
A poor diet and frequent masturbation, leading to abnormally large testicular veins, are believed to be behind falling fitness levels, according to a report published in state-run military newspaper the People’s Liberation Army Daily.
Authorities also think the constant use of smartphones and drinking water with too high a mineral content are to blame.
In one city, 56.9 per cent of potential recruits were rejected after failing fitness tests. One in five was simply deemed too fat.

READ MORE

• China accused of racism over bizarre film of man doing Indian accent
  
  
• Meet China's youngest female billionaire: Zhang Zetian
  
  
• Up to 100 feared dead as earthquake strikes China's Sichuan province
  
  

The report claimed 8 per cent of male candidates suffered from enlarged testicular veins. “This is related to sitting too long on computer games, excessive masturbation and too little physical activity,” it said.
Some 46 per cent were rejected for failing the vision test, with the excessive use of electronic gadgets such as smartphones and tablets blamed.
The newspaper report added that the number of additives in junk food and fizzy drinks, as well as high mineral content in water, was damaging candidates’ livers and gallbladders.

crvenkasti wrote:SSSR i Kina su desetljećima bila Amerima glavni neprojatelji zbog svoje zatvorenosti i odsustva demokracije.

Eto, uspjeli su ih demokratizirati, otvoriti i uključiti u svjetsko tržište po njihovim pravilima.

Nije prošlo dugo i Amerima to odjednom toliko više ne paše da sad oni uvode carine i zatvaraju se poput nekad SSSR-a i Kine.

Kako ih nije sramota?

Fora je da su priču o ekonomskom liberalizmu prodali istočnoeuropskoj mulariji i vazalima...ovi zagrizli a oni se sad lijepo povukli :D

jedino naši papani još vjeruju u slobodno tržište i uništavaju ancionalnu ekonomiju i bogatstvo

nije kina što je nekada bila. rapidna transformacija iz komunističke države gdje se umiralo od gladi , i gdje bi ono što bi preživjeli jeli rižu i radili fizički cijeli dan i pili čistu vodu, u neoliberalnu kapitalističku zemlju, gdje većina kineza radi po cijele dane, gdje je 1milijarda ljudi stisnuta na istočnu obalu kine, gdje visoka urbanizacija, zatrovanost tla vode i hrane i zraka kemilikaljiama, i gdje kinezi odjedanput preko noći imaju jeftinu i kaloričnu junk food hranu(zapadnjaci tek počeli prije par godina trenirati, paziti na hranu, kinezima će biti potrebno koje desetljeće da skuže da jedu sranja gora nego ikada na zapadu itd), i hrpu monitora, kinezi opsjednuti tehnologijom, doslovno pogledajte neki skup na internetu, gdje su mladi kinezi recimo, vidit ćete da većina nosi cvike, a hrpa njih pretila.. itd.. nije to više to.

Nije ovo prvi svjetski rat pa digneš sve šta nosi hlače i može držat pušku,, te taj gojazni kineski cvikeraš drmne balističkom onda ćeš prestati pričati gluposti 

U 21 stoljeću smo


Kolumbo

RayMabus wrote:Nije ovo prvi svjetski rat pa digneš sve šta nosi hlače i može držat pušku,, te taj gojazni kineski cvikeraš drmne balističkom onda ćeš prestati pričati gluposti 

U 21 stoljeću smo


Kolumbo

da , ali za to trebaš imati neoliberalnu ekonomiju, urbanizaciju, pa da taj gojazni kinez , mora se školovati do 30godine, da bude doktor znanosti iz fizike ili strojarstva, pa da nauči raditi rakete itd.. onda elite tih država, skuže da se ne isplati ratovati..

Najiskrenije, mislim da pričati o tom ratu malo preuranjeno a ono idućih pet godina to nije opcija a i onda kad bude zakačit će se s nekim tu okolo prvo, isto kao i Japan pred ww dva

crvenkasti wrote:Zatvaraj se ti koliko hoćeš, ali nemoj druge bombardirati jer su zatvoreni.

USA izravno ili neizravno nije bombardirala Kinu ni Rusiju, a ni Venezuelu npr., što ne znači da neće 
a ako govoriš o USA politici na Bliskom Istoku, ne vjerujem da će se išta promijeniti:

"However, the world's remaining oil is very unevenly distributed. It is located primarily in the Eastern Hemisphere, mostly in the Persian Gulf, and much is controlled by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.
Scientific resource assessments indicate that about half of the world's remaining conventionally recoverable crude oil resource occurs in the Persian Gulf area. In terms of proved reserves (known recoverable oil), the Persian Gulf portion increases to almost two-thirds.
Only 15% of proved oil reserves and 23% of projected remaining recoverable oil is in the Western Hemisphere. Thus, it is unlikely that the demand for oil in this hemisphere could be balanced by oil produced in this hemisphere, as is sometimes suggested for security reasons".

(članak je malo stariji, ali mislim da se ništa bitno nije promijenilo)
https://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-89/issue-38/in-this-issue/exploration/dominant-middle-east-oil-reserves-critically-important-to-world-supply.html

Svaki put kad su to radili (podizali carine), obilo im se o glavu...

Triny wrote:Svaki put kad su to radili (podizali carine), obilo im se o glavu...

Obilo se o glavu jedino najkrupnijem američkom kapitalu. Radnički sloj na taj način nije izgubio radna mjesta nego upravo obrnuto.

RayMabus wrote:Nije ovo prvi svjetski rat pa digneš sve šta nosi hlače i može držat pušku,, te taj gojazni kineski cvikeraš drmne balističkom onda ćeš prestati pričati gluposti 

U 21 stoljeću smo


Kolumbo

vrh, svaka cast longi, ovak jebacki komantar neprocitah dugo :)

slidingdoorsoperator wrote:

Triny wrote:Svaki put kad su to radili (podizali carine), obilo im se o glavu...

Obilo se o glavu jedino najkrupnijem američkom kapitalu. Radnički sloj na taj način nije izgubio radna mjesta nego upravo obrnuto.

The 2002 United States steel tariff
The repercussions of this tariff are still fresh in plenty of Americans’ minds today. According to Trade Partnership, 200,000 steelworkers lost their jobs as a result of this tariff signed by George W Bush. Much like Trump, Bush imposed broad tariffs (not targeted at any particular country) and the economic consequences forced him to rescind it soon after signing it. This is the most recent example of tariff plans gone wrong, and it wouldn’t have hurt Trump to see how this impacted Bush and thousands of steelworkers in America. Just like Trump, Bush tried to send a message of strength, but in his case, he made allies and enemies alike wary.
The lesson from history, therefore, is clear. Controversial tariffs — like the ones mentioned above and Trump’s latest — are bad news, economically and politically. They can even widen divides in American society. And they’re often ditched when the government realises its mistake. Markets, left to their own devices, will lead to more balanced trade than any agreement a president can write up.

https://capx.co/five-times-us-tariffs-have-made-matters-worse/

Triny wrote:

slidingdoorsoperator wrote:

Triny wrote:Svaki put kad su to radili (podizali carine), obilo im se o glavu...

Obilo se o glavu jedino najkrupnijem američkom kapitalu. Radnički sloj na taj način nije izgubio radna mjesta nego upravo obrnuto.

The 2002 United States steel tariff
The repercussions of this tariff are still fresh in plenty of Americans’ minds today. According to Trade Partnership, 200,000 steelworkers lost their jobs as a result of this tariff signed by George W Bush. Much like Trump, Bush imposed broad tariffs (not targeted at any particular country) and the economic consequences forced him to rescind it soon after signing it. This is the most recent example of tariff plans gone wrong, and it wouldn’t have hurt Trump to see how this impacted Bush and thousands of steelworkers in America. Just like Trump, Bush tried to send a message of strength, but in his case, he made allies and enemies alike wary.
The lesson from history, therefore, is clear. Controversial tariffs — like the ones mentioned above and Trump’s latest — are bad news, economically and politically. They can even widen divides in American society. And they’re often ditched when the government realises its mistake. Markets, left to their own devices, will lead to more balanced trade than any agreement a president can write up.

https://capx.co/five-times-us-tariffs-have-made-matters-worse/

Kako sam i rekao. Obilo se o glavu jedino najkrupnijem američkim kapitalu koji sad kmeči preko svojih glasnogovornika i sljedbenika, jer sluti neizbježno smanjenje svojih profita.
Radnici na taj način nisu izgubili radna mjesta nego zbog seljenja pogona u zemlje sa jeftinijom radnom snagom što odgovara jedino interesima najkrupnijeg kapitala (povećava im ionako enormne profite).

Imaš pravo, kad poslodavac mora otpustiti radnike znači da mu obim posla i zarada opada.
Ali nema veze, bolje i to nego da ih zadrži ili zaposli još, koliki bi mu tek onda bio profit.

Triny wrote:Imaš pravo, kad poslodavac mora otpustiti radnike znači da mu obim posla i zarada opada.
Ali nema veze, bolje i to nego da ih zadrži ili zaposli još, koliki bi mu tek onda bio profit.

Pa ako država uvede dovoljno visoke carine na uvoz određenih proizvoda izvana, profit im svakako može ozbiljnije rasti. Ako su dovoljno sposobni, pametni itd.