Crkva i HDZ sretni: Propadaju nakladnici knjiga

slidingdoorsoperator wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

slidingdoorsoperator wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

slidingdoorsoperator wrote:

Ne postoji tako nešto kao što je apsolutni mrak.

postoji na 0 Kelvina. ali  nisam o tome pričao pitanje se odnosi da li postoji svjetlo u totalnom mraku ili da pojednostavnim pitanje da li čovjek može vidjeti svjetlo u apsolutnom mraku mraku.

Absolute zero cannot be achieved, although it is possible to reach temperatures close to it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_zero

Apsolutni mrak ne postoji pa tvoje pitanje nema smisla, jer nema odgovora.

pa jebotebog te jebo da te netko spusti u rudnik gdje nemože doprijeti ni jedan jedini foton da li bi bilo svjetla? bi li vidio ti nešto? išta?

Does true darkness exist or is it just the lowest intensity of light?

Well, if I define "true darkness" to be the total absence of light, then maybe what you're asking is: Is there such a thing as true darkness?

The answer is: no, not in this universe.

Our universe is flooded with radiation (light) and matter (particles) of all descriptions and energies, pretty much anywhere you go.
But even if you could imagine constructing a chamber which was shielded from all radiation and energetic particles, and somehow shielded out all neutrinos, and was cooled down to "absolute zero" so that the walls of the chamber didn't emit thermal radiation -- even then, if you looked around, you would see a tiny bit of light, which comes from the production of "virtual pairs" of particles.
This is due to the nonzero "vacuum energy" -- the cold vacuum of space is constantly seething with virtual particles which are created in pairs, and annihilate each other again.

The resulting bit of light is extremely far below the limit of the human eye's sensitivity, or of the sensitivity of any known instrument.

In fact, if you were trying to look with  your human eye, you would guarantee that it wasn't dark because your body is very hot, and emits plenty of its own radiation (mostly infrared -- which can be picked up with high-tech surveillance systems).
You can't have an observer who is non-emissive.

What if you had an observer inside a black hole inside the chamber, so that she could see out, but none of her own thermal radiation could escape the black hole into the room.
Even then, the black hole would emit radiation that it picked up from the vacuum (this is called "Hawking radiation" and exists because even the black hole has a temperature of sorts).

http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/1997-12/875751731.Ph.r.html

slidingdoorsoperator wrote:
Atoms Absorb and Emit Light

Gnječ wrote:zanimljivo je proučavati rvacki mentalni sklop.

Regoč wrote:

Gnječ wrote:zanimljivo je proučavati rvacki mentalni sklop.

Kažu da je mentalni sklop nemoguće proučavati u Mletčićah jer nemaju mozak.

Gnječ wrote:

Regoč wrote:

Gnječ wrote:zanimljivo je proučavati rvacki mentalni sklop.

Kažu da je mentalni sklop nemoguće proučavati u Mletčićah jer nemaju mozak.

bit će da su zbog te falinke imali republiku koja je neprekidno trajala 1070 godina. s druge strane imamo rvate koji imaju nevjerojatno kompliciran mentalni sklop a i država im je isto tako komplicirana pa se eto nakon nepunih 27 godina urušava kao kula od karata.

Boobah the owl wrote:
urušio je Napoleon, i prestanimo s takvim slikicamah..

Boobah the owl wrote:
urušio je Napoleon, i prestanimo s takvim slikicamah..

Boobah the owl wrote:
urušio je Napoleon, i prestanimo s takvim slikicamah..

veber wrote:

Boobah the owl wrote:
urušio je Napoleon, i prestanimo s takvim slikicamah..

nije ju urušio. ukinuo ju je ;)

metilda wrote:

Boobah the owl wrote:
urušio je Napoleon, i prestanimo s takvim slikicamah..

opet si pristran.. eskaped može vrijeđati koga hoće i kako hoće, a kad je netko isprovociran njegovim nebulozama ti opominješ tog drugoga..
vjerojatno ti to olakšava pisanje na jagoda forumu...

metilda wrote:

Boobah the owl wrote:
urušio je Napoleon, i prestanimo s takvim slikicamah..

opet si pristran.. eskaped može vrijeđati koga hoće i kako hoće, a kad je netko isprovociran njegovim nebulozama ti opominješ tog drugoga..
vjerojatno ti to olakšava pisanje na jagoda forumu...

glas uhljeba wrote:

slidingdoorsoperator wrote:
Atoms Absorb and Emit Light

ako ne emitiraju u području vidljive svjetlosti možeš imati potpuni mrak
treba ti crno tijelo koje nema emisivnost u određenom dijelu spektra

Boobah the owl wrote:

metilda wrote:

Boobah the owl wrote:
urušio je Napoleon, i prestanimo s takvim slikicamah..

opet si pristran.. eskaped može vrijeđati koga hoće i kako hoće, a kad je netko isprovociran njegovim nebulozama ti opominješ tog drugoga..
vjerojatno ti to olakšava pisanje na jagoda forumu...

ustaške slike su oke?

glas uhljeba wrote:ili recimo pomoću polarizacije možeš dobiti potpunu tamu, budući da je svjetlost transverzalni val

Regoč wrote:

veber wrote:

Boobah the owl wrote:
urušio je Napoleon, i prestanimo s takvim slikicamah..

nije ju urušio. ukinuo ju je ;)

Kao i Dubrovnik. No, smisal je da je Serenissima propala i postoji samo u poviesnih udžbenicih, a Hrvatska i danas ponosno stoji, unatoč Gnječevu poviesnom revizionizmu.