Švedska spolno ravnopravna policija u akciji :)

kic wrote:

Sabina Spielrein wrote:

kic wrote:

Sabina Spielrein wrote:

marcellus wrote:

završile bi u zatvoru zbog rasizma

ovako će dobit pohvalu

Napao ih je, bacio kamen na njih, mogle su ga u noge gađati.

nikad se ne gađa ud mislim da je to veliki rizik, mogle su upotrijebiti: tejzer-šoker, palicu, sprej, udarit ga nogom po ćelenki dobro-

zapravo su ga već imale na podu i nisu ga mogle u lisičine staviti, tako da je ovdje i previše propusta..

Je, pare malo nesposobne.
Imam frendicu, simpatična, draga i pristojna, u dve sekunde si na podu kad nakani.
Tako su ju učili, bez toga ne bi mogla biti to što je.

ma oke hrabre su, poslije i trče za njim, ali imaju pomoć neka dva lika naizmjence jer izgleda da ni oni ne vjeruju da ove to mogu..

meni ih je više žao, nije ovo lak posao-

Odoh pogledati predobru seriju o ženama i bijesu, Male laži, na HBO.

Sabina Spielrein wrote:

kic wrote:

Sabina Spielrein wrote:

kic wrote:

Sabina Spielrein wrote:

marcellus wrote:

završile bi u zatvoru zbog rasizma

ovako će dobit pohvalu

Napao ih je, bacio kamen na njih, mogle su ga u noge gađati.

nikad se ne gađa ud mislim da je to veliki rizik, mogle su upotrijebiti: tejzer-šoker, palicu, sprej, udarit ga nogom po ćelenki dobro-

zapravo su ga već imale na podu i nisu ga mogle u lisičine staviti, tako da je ovdje i previše propusta..

Je, pare malo nesposobne.
Imam frendicu, simpatična, draga i pristojna, u dve sekunde si na podu kad nakani.
Tako su ju učili, bez toga ne bi mogla biti to što je.

ma oke hrabre su, poslije i trče za njim, ali imaju pomoć neka dva lika naizmjence jer izgleda da ni oni ne vjeruju da ove to mogu..

meni ih je više žao, nije ovo lak posao-

Odoh pogledati predobru seriju o ženama i bijesu, Male laži, na HBO.

sad će Kolumbijska medicina na hrt3 :^^

ŠVEDSKE vlasti pokušavaju riješiti problem za koji se čini da pogađa samo najmlađe izbjeglice, a naziva se "sindrom povlačenja", piše Independent.
 
Zbog ovog sindroma djeca padaju u stanja nalik komi nakon što saznaju da im uskoro prijeti deportacija. Vjeruje se da bolest pogađa samo izbjeglice u ovoj državi, a prisutna je od ranog početka stoljeća.
 
Djeca padaju u stanje slično smrti
 
Prošle godine je čak 60 djece patilo od ovog sindroma. Djeca su postajala "potpuno pasivna, nepokretna, bez refleksa, povučena, nijema, nisu mogla jesti i piti te zadržavati mokraću, i nisu reagirala na fizičke podražaje ili bol", objavljeno je u medicinskom časopisu Acta Paediatrica.
 
Djeca ostaju vezana za krevete ili u kolicima, a hraniti ih se mora kroz cjevčice. Neki doktori opisali su ovo stanje kao "voljnu smrt", iako kod pogođene djece nema znakova oštećenja mozga.


Lijek za sindrom je boravišna dozvola?
 
Sličan je fenomen bio prisutan u nacističkim kampovima, objavio je New Yorker, koji je pogađao zatvorenike koji su u potpunosti izgubili nadu i odustali od borbe za život.
 

Obiteljske boravišne dozvole prepoznao je švedski Odbor za zdravlje i socijalnu skrb kao glavni "lijek" za ovaj sindrom. Djeci se obično stanje popravi nekoliko mjeseci nakon što dobiju pravo boravišta u novoj državi.
 
Kritičari ideje da je lijek za sindrom boravišna dozvola smatraju da takva ideja sprečava istinski medicinski pristup problemu.


 

prckov wrote:

Sabina Spielrein wrote:Da su ga upucale, ne bi imale nikakvih problema.

ma da, trebale su ga gadat atomskom

čvarcima il špekom.

Ej-men..vako treba..

to treba mlatit ko stoku

Odlično, trpaj još...nek im na nos liberalizam na nos izađe...dodaj još par vagona :)

nije švedska, al ko da to ima veze...

http://www.dnevno.hr/vijesti/svijet/video-imigrant-prebio-tri-policajke-one-ga-pustile-da-mirno-ode-1014376/

malo pozadine događaja s videa

Definitivno ti je ovaj forum vrelo inspiracije :)

catabbath wrote:Definitivno ti je ovaj forum vrelo inspiracije :)

a ne ovaj video sam vidio na fejsu i otvorio prvo temu ovdje pa napisao tamo što je bilo

Nemam stvarno volje za ove al evo vidim da vas zanima , dva su linka svaki je je veselje :


http://balkans.aljazeera.net/vijesti/svedski-premijer-zgranut-segregacijom-u-skolskom-autobusom

http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/planeta.299.html:658698-Proglasena-rasistom-jer-je-branila-imovinu-od-migranata

Ukratko : prvi link muška djeca ulaze na prednja vrata ženska na stražnja , Šveđani zgranuti , šerijat

drugi link ; imigranti upali ljubiteljici životinja na farmu i pretukli svinje , jedna svinja umrla , ova napala imigrante a Šveđani nju da je rasista.

I LOVE ŠVEDEN

Meni su baš fensi ...treba ih hebavat di god stigneš.

Kulturno politicki okvir za ovo sto se dogada u svedskoj a i na zapadu opcenito je posljedica postmodernistickog marksistickog svjetonazora i kulturoloskih promjena koje je on donio sa sobom.

Postmodernism is best understood as a questioning of the ideas and values associated with a form of modernism that believes in progress and innovation. Modernism insists on a clear divide between art and popular culture.
But like modernism, postmodernism does not designate any one style of art or culture. On the contrary, it is often associated with pluralism and an abandonment of conventional ideas of originality and authorship in favour of a pastiche of “dead” styles.

Theorists associated with postmodernism often used the term to mark a new cultural epoch in the West. For philosopher Jean-François Lyotard, the postmodern condition was defined as “incredulity towards metanarratives”; that is, a loss of faith in science and other emancipatory projects within modernity, such as Marxism.


Postmodernism can also be a critical project, revealing the cultural constructions we designate as truth and opening up a variety of repressed other histories of modernity. Such as those of women, homosexuals and the colonised.
The modernist canon itself is revealed as patriarchal and racist, dominated by white heterosexual men. As a result, one of the most common themes addressed within postmodernism relates to cultural identity.

While the lessons of postmodernism continue to haunt, the term has become unfashionable, replaced by a combination of others such as globalisation, relational aestheticss and contemporaneityy.

many of the characteristic doctrines of postmodernism constitute or imply some form of metaphysical, epistemological, or ethical relativism. (It should be noted, however, that some postmodernists vehemently reject the relativist label.) Postmodernists deny that there are aspects of reality that are objective; that there are statements about reality that are objectively true or false; that it is possible to have knowledge of such statements (objective knowledge); that it is possible for human beings to know some things with certainty; and that there are objective, or absolute, moral values. Reality, knowledge, and value are constructed by discourses; hence they can vary with them. This means that the discourse of modern science, when considered apart from the evidential standards internal to it, has no greater purchase on the truth than do alternative perspectives, including (for example) astrology and witchcraft. Postmodernists sometimes characterize the evidential standards of science, including the use of reason and logic, as “Enlightenment rationality.”

The broad relativism apparently so characteristic of postmodernism invites a certain line of thinking regarding the nature and function of discourses of different kinds. If postmodernists are correct that reality, knowledge, and value are relative to discourse, then the established discourses of the Enlightenment are no more necessary or justified than alternative discourses. But this raises the question of how they came to be established in the first place. If it is never possible to evaluate a discourse according to whether it leads to objective Truth, how did the established discourses become part of the prevailing worldview of the modern era? Why were these discourses adopted or developed, whereas others were not?

Part of the postmodern answer is that the prevailing discourses in any society reflect the interests and values, broadly speaking, of dominant or elite groups. Postmodernists disagree about the nature of this connection; whereas some apparently endorse the dictum of the German philosopher and economist Karl Marx that “the ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas of its ruling class,” others are more circumspect. Inspired by the historical research of the French philosopher Michel Foucault, some postmodernists defend the comparatively nuanced view that what counts as knowledge in a given era is always influenced, in complex and subtle ways, by considerations of power. There are others, however, who are willing to go even further than Marx. The French philosopher and literary theorist Luce Irigaray, for example, has argued that the science of solid mechanics is better developed than the science of fluid mechanics because the male-dominated institution of physics associates solidity and fluidity with the male and female sex organs, respectively.

Because the established discourses of the Enlightenment are more or less arbitrary and unjustified, they can be changed; and because they more or less reflect the interests and values of the powerful, they should be changed. Thus postmodernists regard their theoretical position as uniquely inclusive and democratic, because it allows them to recognize the unjust hegemony of Enlightenment discourses over the equally valid perspectives of nonelite groups. In the 1980s and ’90s, academic advocates on behalf of various ethnic, cultural, racial, and religious groups embraced postmodern critiques of contemporary Western society, and postmodernism became the unofficial philosophy of the new movement of “identity politics.”

đe sora?