Klerofašistica Selina

prckov wrote:

marcellus wrote:Sarnavka misli da bijeli muškarci moraju pišati sjedećki radi jednakosti, ali arapi mogu silovati po cesti jer je to progresivno i multikulti

u americi ide kazna za "men spreading" u javnom prevozu. Cak i zatvor

Stribor wrote:

prckov wrote:

marcellus wrote:Sarnavka misli da bijeli muškarci moraju pišati sjedećki radi jednakosti, ali arapi mogu silovati po cesti jer je to progresivno i multikulti

u americi ide kazna za "men spreading" u javnom prevozu. Cak i zatvor

Ča? Kristuš!!!

marcellus wrote:

Stribor wrote:

prckov wrote:

marcellus wrote:Sarnavka misli da bijeli muškarci moraju pišati sjedećki radi jednakosti, ali arapi mogu silovati po cesti jer je to progresivno i multikulti

u americi ide kazna za "men spreading" u javnom prevozu. Cak i zatvor

Ča? Kristuš!!!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11643052/Manspreading-arrests-the-long-arm-of-the-law-just-invaded-our-personal-space.html

Stribor wrote:

prckov wrote:

marcellus wrote:Sarnavka misli da bijeli muškarci moraju pišati sjedećki radi jednakosti, ali arapi mogu silovati po cesti jer je to progresivno i multikulti

u americi ide kazna za "men spreading" u javnom prevozu. Cak i zatvor

Ča? Kristuš!!!

As two men are arrested for 'manspreading' on the New York metro, Joel Snape argues that we should all take a bit of responsibility rather than making anti-social behaviour illegal

marcellus wrote:zato srećom na zapadu ima i antifašista

marcellus wrote:

Stribor wrote:

prckov wrote:

marcellus wrote:Sarnavka misli da bijeli muškarci moraju pišati sjedećki radi jednakosti, ali arapi mogu silovati po cesti jer je to progresivno i multikulti

u americi ide kazna za "men spreading" u javnom prevozu. Cak i zatvor

Ča? Kristuš!!!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11643052/Manspreading-arrests-the-long-arm-of-the-law-just-invaded-our-personal-space.html

marcellus wrote:For almost ten years, Wikan has campaigned to change Norwegian policies towards immigrants, arguing that generous welfare and a policy of multicultural tolerance are creating a culture of welfare dependence, and destroying self-respect. A reviewer of her book "Generous Betrayal: Politics of Culture in the New Europe" claims that she used invalid methodology, not giving "a far more complex social reality" its due. "'Unsympathetic readers" might see it as a "racist polemic."[1]

She has argued that far from being a racist, she has significant empathy for the lives of many of the Muslim men she has portrayed in her most recent books. In a well-known case in Norway (The Anooshe case), she argued that the state had not taken into account the social expectations of immigrant men, and this had led to rootless men whose social expectations were not met or even acknowledged, arguing that violence is a product of immigrant conditions when host country laws conflict with the “unwritten social rules” of immigrant societies. [2]

In a recent debate about the culture of gang rape arising amongst Muslim immigrants in Norway, she controversially stated that if immigration into Norway is to be tolerated, then “Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes” because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative.

marcellus wrote:ne to je druga... iskreno ja bi radije jebo klerofašisticu nego antifašisticu dvaput...

marcellus wrote:zato srećom na zapadu ima i antifašista

mrincredible wrote:

marcellus wrote:zato srećom na zapadu ima i antifašista

Ovaj troglodit je ljubomoran na atraktivne cure koje se izazovno oblače pa projicira na njih krivnju za to što ih se napastvuje. Ljubomorno đubre koje se skriva iza tobožnjeg liberalizma i tolerancije.

Fénix wrote:

marcellus wrote:For almost ten years, Wikan has campaigned to change Norwegian policies towards immigrants, arguing that generous welfare and a policy of multicultural tolerance are creating a culture of welfare dependence, and destroying self-respect. A reviewer of her book "Generous Betrayal: Politics of Culture in the New Europe" claims that she used invalid methodology, not giving "a far more complex social reality" its due. "'Unsympathetic readers" might see it as a "racist polemic."[1]

She has argued that far from being a racist, she has significant empathy for the lives of many of the Muslim men she has portrayed in her most recent books. In a well-known case in Norway (The Anooshe case), she argued that the state had not taken into account the social expectations of immigrant men, and this had led to rootless men whose social expectations were not met or even acknowledged, arguing that violence is a product of immigrant conditions when host country laws conflict with the “unwritten social rules” of immigrant societies. [2]

In a recent debate about the culture of gang rape arising amongst Muslim immigrants in Norway, she controversially stated that if immigration into Norway is to be tolerated, then “Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes” because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative.

 Bože, što je nekad i blagoslov biti glup... Posebice kad se ovo sve pročita.

gargamel0101 wrote:Kažu feministice da bi svijet bio bolje mjesto kada bi njime žene upravljale.

kaja_333 wrote:

marcellus wrote:zato srećom na zapadu ima i antifašista

Unni jedva čeka da ju netko siluje, čini mi se..