Ruska invazija na Ukrajinu

Gnječ wrote:

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:

Noor wrote:

https://twitter.com/Press_Focusnik/status/1498996279761940481

ovo su padobranci, to je inače elita ruske vojske.. od običnih ročnika se selektiraju najbolji i oni idu u padobrance.. i ovi su u ranim dvadesetim.. dosta ruskih profesionalaca padobranaca je ovako glupo izginulo..

a vidim i dalje rusi forsiraju helikopterske desante dole po jugu, pokušavaju unaprijed zauzeti što više infrastrukture prije nego ukrainci unište .. hrpa njih bude pobijena i zarobljena kao ovi

ma tako se ne postupa sa ratnim zarobljenicima koristeći ih u patetične političke propagandne svrhe. ali dobro vidim da je ovdje većini mozak otišo na kvasinu. jeste vi normalni ili još uvijek ratujete sa srbima ovako preko ukrajinaca i rusa???

Article 2, paragraph 2 of the 1929 Geneva Prisoners of War Convention used almost identical language: "[Prisoners of war] shall at all times be humanely treated and protected, particularly against acts of violence, from insults and from public curiosity."

PRISONERS OF WAR: PUBLICITY AND PROPAGANDA

The Third Geneva Convention of 1949 requires prisoners of war to be
treated with humanity at all times (Article 13). In particular, prisoners of war
must be protected against insults and public curiosity. However, this provision
was agreed before the advent of television and contemporary communication
technology. It has been argued that the prohibition against insults and public
curiosity must be interpreted in the light of modern capabilities.

On the one hand, a newspaper photograph or television picture of a prisoner of war can be claimed to prove that he/she is alive, and to show his/her
standard of treatment. On the other hand, such publicity can humiliate the
prisoner of war, endanger his/her family and make his/her return to his/her
own State more difficult. Consequently the media must be prudent and
consider the consequences of their actions.

A practical way forward is to interpret the prohibition against insults and
public curiosity as prohibiting the transmission of images of prisoners of war
as individuals, whilst permitting images of prisoners of war who cannot be
individually recognized, e.g. a shot of the backs of prisoners of war, of prisoners of war marching at a distance, or of a prisoner-of-war camp in the
distance would be acceptable. In addition, prisoners of war should not be pictured making a declaration, since these are often made under duress and
contravene the right of a prisoner of war only to provide personal information
(Article 17, paragraph four).
The problems described above arose during the Gulf War, although they
have also occurred in other armed conflicts.

https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/files/S0020860400080542a.pdf

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:

Gnječ wrote:

AssadNaPodmornici wrote:
ovo su padobranci, to je inače elita ruske vojske.. od običnih ročnika se selektiraju najbolji i oni idu u padobrance.. i ovi su u ranim dvadesetim.. dosta ruskih profesionalaca padobranaca je ovako glupo izginulo..

a vidim i dalje rusi forsiraju helikopterske desante dole po jugu, pokušavaju unaprijed zauzeti što više infrastrukture prije nego ukrainci unište .. hrpa njih bude pobijena i zarobljena kao ovi

ma tako se ne postupa sa ratnim zarobljenicima koristeći ih u patetične političke propagandne svrhe. ali dobro vidim da je ovdje većini mozak otišo na kvasinu. jeste vi normalni ili još uvijek ratujete sa srbima ovako preko ukrajinaca i rusa???

Article 2, paragraph 2 of the 1929 Geneva Prisoners of War Convention used almost identical language: "[Prisoners of war] shall at all times be humanely treated and protected, particularly against acts of violence, from insults and from public curiosity."

PRISONERS OF WAR: PUBLICITY AND PROPAGANDA

The Third Geneva Convention of 1949 requires prisoners of war to be
treated with humanity at all times (Article 13). In particular, prisoners of war
must be protected against insults and public curiosity. However, this provision
was agreed before the advent of television and contemporary communication
technology. It has been argued that the prohibition against insults and public
curiosity must be interpreted in the light of modern capabilities.

On the one hand, a newspaper photograph or television picture of a prisoner of war can be claimed to prove that he/she is alive, and to show his/her
standard of treatment. On the other hand, such publicity can humiliate the
prisoner of war, endanger his/her family and make his/her return to his/her
own State more difficult. Consequently the media must be prudent and
consider the consequences of their actions.

A practical way forward is to interpret the prohibition against insults and
public curiosity as prohibiting the transmission of images of prisoners of war
as individuals, whilst permitting images of prisoners of war who cannot be
individually recognized, e.g. a shot of the backs of prisoners of war, of prisoners of war marching at a distance, or of a prisoner-of-war camp in the
distance would be acceptable. In addition, prisoners of war should not be pictured making a declaration, since these are often made under duress and
contravene the right of a prisoner of war only to provide personal information
(Article 17, paragraph four).
The problems described above arose during the Gulf War, although they
have also occurred in other armed conflicts.

https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/files/S0020860400080542a.pdf

znam da nije. nitko ih ne muči niti išta. 

to je možda zločin ali manjeg tipa. bolje da ih ovako stave pred kameru i ovi pozdrave roditelje , nego da ih mlate i zlostavljaju

dijagram wrote:Svi znamo da ce ukrofasisti ove neduzne momke strpati u fojbe, ovcare ili slicno.

Frustrirani gnjec pise budalastine.

vuksadinare wrote:https://narod.hr/svijet/rusija-zbog-americkih-sankcija-prijeti-rusenjem-medunarodne-svemirske-postaje-na-sad-ili-europu

violator. wrote:Aha, a Putin je pravi cica Spasoje. :) Bolesnik kao i njegovi oponenti. Gonite se svi u tri pizde materine zaludjene dok iz vasih naslonjaca pametujete, a Rusi i Ukrajinci pogibaju. Forumski sljam, to ste.

violator. wrote:Aha, a Putin je pravi cica Spasoje. :) Bolesnik kao i njegovi oponenti. Gonite se svi u tri pizde materine zaludjene dok iz vasih naslonjaca pametujete, a Rusi i Ukrajinci pogibaju. Forumski sljam, to ste.

dijagram wrote:Svi znamo da ce ukrofasisti ove neduzne momke strpati u fojbe, ovcare ili slicno.

Frustrirani gnjec pise budalastine.

mentalitet wrote:

violator. wrote:Aha, a Putin je pravi cica Spasoje. :) Bolesnik kao i njegovi oponenti. Gonite se svi u tri pizde materine zaludjene dok iz vasih naslonjaca pametujete, a Rusi i Ukrajinci pogibaju. Forumski sljam, to ste.

Gle za zene je kuvacha i krevet a ne politika.Dodushe vi sa svojom mashtom znate biti poganije od bilo koga mushksrca.Barem ja ovdje ne navijam za niciju stranu ali recimo da te netko sacheka u noci nedaj boze i hoce da te siluje jer eto misli da je to npormalno i krshi nikakav zakon. Prisloni ti noz na grlo a ti imash bombu u dzepu.Sta bi radila stisnula je pa neka piizda leti zajedno sa tobom ili bi uzivala u silovanju.Ja ovdje ne opravdavam nikoga nego branim pravo svakome da se brani svim sredstvima.Tak da to odvojish od navijachkih poklika sa tribina i fotela.

Šandor Winnetou wrote:

Noor wrote:njima je najbolje da se predaju, ukrajinci će ih nahraniti, napojiti i ostat će živi
jadna djeca

Eroo wrote:

violator. wrote:Aha, a Putin je pravi cica Spasoje. :) Bolesnik kao i njegovi oponenti. Gonite se svi u tri pizde materine zaludjene dok iz vasih naslonjaca pametujete, a Rusi i Ukrajinci pogibaju. Forumski sljam, to ste.

Noor wrote:

Šandor Winnetou wrote:

Noor wrote:njima je najbolje da se predaju, ukrajinci će ih nahraniti, napojiti i ostat će živi
jadna djeca

vidi ovo :(