NATO’s next mission: Find a new boss (Politico)

NATO’s next mission: Find a new boss
Search to succeed Jens Stoltenberg as secretary-general puts focus on women leaders from Eastern Europe.

Kersti Kaljulaid, Dalia Grybauskaitė and Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović | AFP via Getty Images


https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-mission-new-secretary-general-jens-stoltenberg-successor/

Nakon čitanja ovog članka dobio sam utisak da je KGK bez konkurencije,
kad je u pitanju mjesto Generalne tajnice NATO-a.

Gle nije najbolji izbor... općenito te žemske, alli naša je pa ajde.

daleko najbolji izbor za nato između ponuđenih kandidatkinja...
za takvo se mjesto traži osoba koja nema ono što ona nema, a druge dvije imaju...

U članku se uglavnom svaki drugi mogući izbor uglavnom uspoređuje s KGK.
Imam osjećaj kao da je već izabrana i da drugi nemaju nikakve šanse u srazu sa KGK.
Vijeće Europe već vodite, još NATO i postajete pupak svijeta.

Eroo wrote:NATO’s next mission: Find a new boss
Search to succeed Jens Stoltenberg as secretary-general puts focus on women leaders from Eastern Europe.

Kersti Kaljulaid, Dalia Grybauskaitė and Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović | AFP via Getty Images


https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-mission-new-secretary-general-jens-stoltenberg-successor/

 zanimljiv kandidat za šefa natoa ova u sredini koja je bila komunist cccr-a .
Pušu li to neki novi vjetrovi u NATO-u?

mutava baštarda wrote:

Eroo wrote:NATO’s next mission: Find a new boss
Search to succeed Jens Stoltenberg as secretary-general puts focus on women leaders from Eastern Europe.

Kersti Kaljulaid, Dalia Grybauskaitė and Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović | AFP via Getty Images


https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-mission-new-secretary-general-jens-stoltenberg-successor/

 zanimljiv kandidat za šefa natoa ova u sredini koja je bila komunist cccr-a .
Pušu li to neki novi vjetrovi u NATO-u?

pusu
woke
i iskljucivo biranje zena i relativizacija gendera je wokizam
tako da taj zenski lenjin ima najvise sansi

evo da ne ispadne da pricam napamet


8. Marcuse and Feminism
Marcuse’s search for a form of radical subjectivity that could serve as an impetus for revolution or social transformation led him down a path not traveled by his Frankfurt School colleagues. Indeed, one of the criticisms of Marcuse is that he gave in to pessimism and gave up on the working class as revolutionary subject. For Marcuse, we must look to “the substratum of the outcasts and outsiders, etc,” for any social change (MacIntyre 1970: 87).

One of the social movements that Marcuse turns to is the feminist movement. On March 7, 1974 Marcuse gave a  at Stanford University entitled, “Marxism and Feminism”. In it he statpaperes:
I believe the women’s liberation movement today is, perhaps the most important and potentially the most radical political movement that we have. (Marcuse 2005a: 165)

For Marcuse, the women’s liberation movement was important not only for the liberation of women, but also for the liberation of all oppressed people in our society. His hope was that the struggle for the liberation of women would create a new type of performance principle and aid in the cultivation of a new sensibility. In short, certain feminine qualities would replace brutish, violent, masculine qualities. Marcuse actually advocated a form of androgyny.
One of the main criticisms of Marcuse’s attitude toward feminism is that he simply reinforces gendered stereotypes as he falls back into essentialism. Nina Power has recently defended Marcuse against this charge. Her argument is similar to the one that Marcuse made in an interview with Brian Magee in 1978. Power and Marcuse both argue that although so-called feminine categories are social constructs, they still can be universalized in such a way that all human beings develop a new sensibility. Power states that:
Feminist socialism would universalize these so-called feminine characteristics so that they were no longer specifically “feminine” at all but would characterize all culture, culminating in androgyny. Residual aggression would be channeled into “the destruction of the ugly destructiveness of capitalism,” in Marcuse’s rather neat phrase. “Feminism is a revolt against decaying capitalism” and will ultimately have to develop its “own morality”. (Power 2013: 79)



https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marcuse/#MarFem

od vremena kad su prcko i slicni napucili zapadne drzave nude nam se ovako lijepe kandidatnkinje

jasno je da su svojim dolaskom obogatili i usmjerili zapadni zivalj u novo doba, novo vrijeme, u nove velike pobjede

prckov wrote:

mutava baštarda wrote:

Eroo wrote:NATO’s next mission: Find a new boss
Search to succeed Jens Stoltenberg as secretary-general puts focus on women leaders from Eastern Europe.

Kersti Kaljulaid, Dalia Grybauskaitė and Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović | AFP via Getty Images


https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-mission-new-secretary-general-jens-stoltenberg-successor/

 zanimljiv kandidat za šefa natoa ova u sredini koja je bila komunist cccr-a .
Pušu li to neki novi vjetrovi u NATO-u?

pusu
woke
i iskljucivo biranje zena i relativizacija gendera je wokizam
tako da taj zenski lenjin ima najvise sansi

Ova liva pripadnuta kao predzadnji izvođač penala za Engleze u finalu. ova u sredini bivši komunist, još je Kolinda i najbolja. Ako bi se još izjasnila da je muško, vjerujem da bi bila 100% izabrana.

prckov wrote:evo da ne ispadne da pricam napamet


8. Marcuse and Feminism
Marcuse’s search for a form of radical subjectivity that could serve as an impetus for revolution or social transformation led him down a path not traveled by his Frankfurt School colleagues. Indeed, one of the criticisms of Marcuse is that he gave in to pessimism and gave up on the working class as revolutionary subject. For Marcuse, we must look to “the substratum of the outcasts and outsiders, etc,” for any social change (MacIntyre 1970: 87).

One of the social movements that Marcuse turns to is the feminist movement. On March 7, 1974 Marcuse gave a  at Stanford University entitled, “Marxism and Feminism”. In it he statpaperes:
I believe the women’s liberation movement today is, perhaps the most important and potentially the most radical political movement that we have. (Marcuse 2005a: 165)

For Marcuse, the women’s liberation movement was important not only for the liberation of women, but also for the liberation of all oppressed people in our society. His hope was that the struggle for the liberation of women would create a new type of performance principle and aid in the cultivation of a new sensibility. In short, certain feminine qualities would replace brutish, violent, masculine qualities. Marcuse actually advocated a form of androgyny.
One of the main criticisms of Marcuse’s attitude toward feminism is that he simply reinforces gendered stereotypes as he falls back into essentialism. Nina Power has recently defended Marcuse against this charge. Her argument is similar to the one that Marcuse made in an interview with Brian Magee in 1978. Power and Marcuse both argue that although so-called feminine categories are social constructs, they still can be universalized in such a way that all human beings develop a new sensibility. Power states that:
Feminist socialism would universalize these so-called feminine characteristics so that they were no longer specifically “feminine” at all but would characterize all culture, culminating in androgyny. Residual aggression would be channeled into “the destruction of the ugly destructiveness of capitalism,” in Marcuse’s rather neat phrase. “Feminism is a revolt against decaying capitalism” and will ultimately have to develop its “own morality”. (Power 2013: 79)



https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marcuse/#MarFem

The New Sensibility
The new Sensibility has become a political factor. This event, which may well indicate a turning point in the evolution of contemporary societies, demands that critical theory incorporate the new dimension into its concepts, project its implications for the possible construction of a free society

mutava baštarda wrote:

prckov wrote:

mutava baštarda wrote:

Eroo wrote:NATO’s next mission: Find a new boss
Search to succeed Jens Stoltenberg as secretary-general puts focus on women leaders from Eastern Europe.

Kersti Kaljulaid, Dalia Grybauskaitė and Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović | AFP via Getty Images


https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-mission-new-secretary-general-jens-stoltenberg-successor/

 zanimljiv kandidat za šefa natoa ova u sredini koja je bila komunist cccr-a .
Pušu li to neki novi vjetrovi u NATO-u?

pusu
woke
i iskljucivo biranje zena i relativizacija gendera je wokizam
tako da taj zenski lenjin ima najvise sansi

Ova liva pripadnuta kao predzadnji izvođač penala za Engleze u finalu. ova u sredini bivši komunist, još je Kolinda i najbolja. Ako bi se još izjasnila da je muško, vjerujem da bi bila 100% izabrana.

non binary
to se sad trazi
tj marcuse trazi, to je ta nova senzibilnost, zato su bijeli muskarci problem, zato pukovnik americke vojske izjavljuje (naravno po diktatu jer je glup sam od sebe) da bi i on volio da razumije "bijes bijelih muskaraca" Ima i video ako koga zanima

da bi se srusio kapitalizam koji potlacuje treba promjenit musku prirodu, ugradit im novi senzibilitet na bazi kriticke teorije. Poziva se na frojdovu "strukturu instinkta" kao model

kad klintonica izjavljuje the future is female ona ne misli da ce muskrci izumrijet
nego da je zenstvenost buducnost drustva, bas kako je marcuse zamislio

u tom kontekstu se treba promatrat i pojavu termina toxic masculinity u mainstream,
pod toksicnoscu se podrazumjeva muskost a ne naziv za konkretna nedjela pojedinih muskaraca

Nisam uvjeren da će dobiti mjesto glavne tajnice.

Pričali su svojedobno tako i o prvoj ženi na mjestu glavnog tajnika UN-a, pa je ispao Guiterrez. A UN je debatni klub.