Events
Publications
Latest imagesEU Dokument iz 2010...Daljnjih 192 milijuna Migranata za Deutschland..
Page 1 of 1
EU Dokument iz 2010...Daljnjih 192 milijuna Migranata za Deutschland..
by Guest 9/11/2018, 11:36
Germany could not only accommodate 82.5 million people, but would be able to have up to 274 million inhabitants. This information is contained in a study for the EU in 2010 on resettlement policy.
274 million inhabitants for Germany? A study for the EU from 2010 on the subject of resettlement policy is causing a stir. This was carried out in cooperation with EU-mandated consulting firms such as Eurasylum Limited, under a service contract of the European Refugee Fund for the EU.
In this context, the journalist Eva Herman asks the question: was the United Nations Global Compact on Migration first needed as an icebreaker, which should be signed in Morocco's Marrakesh in December 2018, in order to achieve the objectives of this EU paper from 2010? The paper had predicted how many migrants the individual EU countries should still tolerate.
On page 112 it is calculated how many additional inhabitants each European country would cope with. For Germany (currently 82.5 million people), for example, there is an immigration of 192 million other migrants to reach the number of 274 million inhabitants. Other EU countries are also affected, as Eva Herman explains in a subsequent video.
Their conclusion: If this paper is ever implemented, there will be nothing left of today's Europe.
HIER IS STUDY...english .pdf
https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/docs/pdf/final_report_relocation_of_refugees_en.pdf
josjedan dobar link na video..obvezno pogledati..Scenario postoji vjerovatno za svako drzavu Europe..pa da se ZNA odakle je krenulo..
https://www.epochtimes.de/politik/europa/eu-papier-von-2010-weitere-192-millionen-migranten-fuer-deutschland-a2696841.html?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com
274 million inhabitants for Germany? A study for the EU from 2010 on the subject of resettlement policy is causing a stir. This was carried out in cooperation with EU-mandated consulting firms such as Eurasylum Limited, under a service contract of the European Refugee Fund for the EU.
In this context, the journalist Eva Herman asks the question: was the United Nations Global Compact on Migration first needed as an icebreaker, which should be signed in Morocco's Marrakesh in December 2018, in order to achieve the objectives of this EU paper from 2010? The paper had predicted how many migrants the individual EU countries should still tolerate.
On page 112 it is calculated how many additional inhabitants each European country would cope with. For Germany (currently 82.5 million people), for example, there is an immigration of 192 million other migrants to reach the number of 274 million inhabitants. Other EU countries are also affected, as Eva Herman explains in a subsequent video.
Their conclusion: If this paper is ever implemented, there will be nothing left of today's Europe.
HIER IS STUDY...english .pdf
https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/docs/pdf/final_report_relocation_of_refugees_en.pdf
josjedan dobar link na video..obvezno pogledati..Scenario postoji vjerovatno za svako drzavu Europe..pa da se ZNA odakle je krenulo..
https://www.epochtimes.de/politik/europa/eu-papier-von-2010-weitere-192-millionen-migranten-fuer-deutschland-a2696841.html?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com
Guest- Guest
Re: EU Dokument iz 2010...Daljnjih 192 milijuna Migranata za Deutschland..
by Guest 9/11/2018, 11:37
dakle,Europa je oznacena kao Asylum zona...very,very bad.. 
Guest- Guest
Re: EU Dokument iz 2010...Daljnjih 192 milijuna Migranata za Deutschland..
by Guest 9/11/2018, 11:43
evo,ja sirim lazne vijesti... 
Guest- Guest
Re: EU Dokument iz 2010...Daljnjih 192 milijuna Migranata za Deutschland..
by Guest 9/11/2018, 11:51
Did you know that Polish people represent the highest percentage of the foreign-born population in Norway? Or that the largest proportion of immigrants to the Republic of Ireland hail from the UK?
These four maps, created by Jakub Marian, a Czech linguist, mathematician and artist, are based on a 2015 study by the United Nations on international migration. They show European migration split into various numbers:
1. The percentage of the population of each country that is made up of foreign-born migrants
2. The most common country of origin for that number
3. Whether that number has gone up or down in the past five years
4. The immigrant populations that are expanding the most
____________________________________________________________________________
Why Brexit will actually lead to a higher proportion of foreigners entering the UK
Are these the new migration superpowers?
____________________________________________________________________________
1. Number of foreign-born people as a percentage of the total population
In light of the Brexit vote, some might expect the UK to figure highly on this map, but it does not appear in the top five.
Percentage of immigrant (foreign-born) population
The population with the highest percentage of foreign-born people is Luxembourg (45.9%), followed by Switzerland (29.6%), Sweden (18.5%), Austria (17.4%), Estonia (15.8%) and Germany (14.5%).
The UK comes in at 13.4%.
Using data from Eurostat on asylum applications between January 2015 and June 2016, Marian then mapped which countries have been most affected by the European migration crisis. Austria and Sweden were the only European countries to register an above 1% increase in their foreign-born populations as percentage of the total, while Germany showed a less than 1% increase.
2. Where do the majority of immigrants come from?
The highest proportion of immigrants to the UK in 2015 hailed from India; for Norway, it’s Poland; and for Austria and Switzerland, it’s neighbouring Germany. Most of the Republic of Ireland’s foreign-born population comes from the UK.
Most common country of origin of foreign-born populations
France, Spain and Portugal’s immigrants come from further south (Algeria, Morocco and Angola respectively). For Greece and Macedonia, FYR, it’s Albanians. Poland and the Czech Republic saw the most immigrants from the Ukraine. In many eastern European countries, Russia has provided the most immigrants.
3. How that number has changed in the past five years
Marian’s third map shows how the political upheavals of the past five years have affected the original immigration figures.
Percentage point change in immigrant population between 2010 and 2015
The trends in map one, which showed the countries and their foreign-born population percentages, continue in map three.
For instance, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Sweden, Austria and Norway, which showed the highest percentage of foreign-born people compared to overall population, also saw the highest increases in immigrant populations between 2010 and 2015. The UK and Finland followed close behind.
The countries with the largest migrant populations settling elsewhere were Poland, Serbia, Germany and Romania.
4. The immigrant populations expanding the most in each country
In his fourth and final map, Marian looked at the immigrant populations expanding the most in each country by comparing the UN figures from 2010 to those of 2015.
Most expanding immigrant population between 2010 and 2015
Some countries, such as Poland and Greece, showed a decrease in their immigrant populations as a percentage of their populations. For around half of European countries the pattern remained more or less the same as the figures from 2015 (map 2), including Indians to the UK, British to Ireland and Poles to Norway.
Differences in other countries included more Cubans to Spain (Morocco previously), fewer Russians moving to eastern European countries, and an increase in Syrians as a percentage of the population of Sweden.
However, these figures, especially where declines are shown, could also be the result of a general fall in the population as a whole.
The designations employed and the presentation of material on these maps do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the World Economic Forum concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
These four maps, created by Jakub Marian, a Czech linguist, mathematician and artist, are based on a 2015 study by the United Nations on international migration. They show European migration split into various numbers:
1. The percentage of the population of each country that is made up of foreign-born migrants
2. The most common country of origin for that number
3. Whether that number has gone up or down in the past five years
4. The immigrant populations that are expanding the most
____________________________________________________________________________
Why Brexit will actually lead to a higher proportion of foreigners entering the UK
Are these the new migration superpowers?
____________________________________________________________________________
1. Number of foreign-born people as a percentage of the total population
In light of the Brexit vote, some might expect the UK to figure highly on this map, but it does not appear in the top five.
Percentage of immigrant (foreign-born) population
The population with the highest percentage of foreign-born people is Luxembourg (45.9%), followed by Switzerland (29.6%), Sweden (18.5%), Austria (17.4%), Estonia (15.8%) and Germany (14.5%).
The UK comes in at 13.4%.
Using data from Eurostat on asylum applications between January 2015 and June 2016, Marian then mapped which countries have been most affected by the European migration crisis. Austria and Sweden were the only European countries to register an above 1% increase in their foreign-born populations as percentage of the total, while Germany showed a less than 1% increase.
2. Where do the majority of immigrants come from?
The highest proportion of immigrants to the UK in 2015 hailed from India; for Norway, it’s Poland; and for Austria and Switzerland, it’s neighbouring Germany. Most of the Republic of Ireland’s foreign-born population comes from the UK.
Most common country of origin of foreign-born populations
France, Spain and Portugal’s immigrants come from further south (Algeria, Morocco and Angola respectively). For Greece and Macedonia, FYR, it’s Albanians. Poland and the Czech Republic saw the most immigrants from the Ukraine. In many eastern European countries, Russia has provided the most immigrants.
3. How that number has changed in the past five years
Marian’s third map shows how the political upheavals of the past five years have affected the original immigration figures.
Percentage point change in immigrant population between 2010 and 2015
The trends in map one, which showed the countries and their foreign-born population percentages, continue in map three.
For instance, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Sweden, Austria and Norway, which showed the highest percentage of foreign-born people compared to overall population, also saw the highest increases in immigrant populations between 2010 and 2015. The UK and Finland followed close behind.
The countries with the largest migrant populations settling elsewhere were Poland, Serbia, Germany and Romania.
4. The immigrant populations expanding the most in each country
In his fourth and final map, Marian looked at the immigrant populations expanding the most in each country by comparing the UN figures from 2010 to those of 2015.
Most expanding immigrant population between 2010 and 2015
Some countries, such as Poland and Greece, showed a decrease in their immigrant populations as a percentage of their populations. For around half of European countries the pattern remained more or less the same as the figures from 2015 (map 2), including Indians to the UK, British to Ireland and Poles to Norway.
Differences in other countries included more Cubans to Spain (Morocco previously), fewer Russians moving to eastern European countries, and an increase in Syrians as a percentage of the population of Sweden.
However, these figures, especially where declines are shown, could also be the result of a general fall in the population as a whole.
The designations employed and the presentation of material on these maps do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the World Economic Forum concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
Guest- Guest
Sponsored content
Similar topics» Prema Europi se kreće od 30 do 35 milijuna ekonomskih migranata
» Senf daje 3 milijuna kuna za LGBT aktivizam i integraciju 'migranata'
» Deutschland, Deutschland über alles
» Država daje 17,5 milijuna kuna za kupnju nekretnine, a zaradit će 95 milijuna na porezima
» U zadnja 3 mjeseca na imigrante potrošeno 120 milijuna kuna, svaki dan oko 1-2 milijuna
» Senf daje 3 milijuna kuna za LGBT aktivizam i integraciju 'migranata'
» Deutschland, Deutschland über alles
» Država daje 17,5 milijuna kuna za kupnju nekretnine, a zaradit će 95 milijuna na porezima
» U zadnja 3 mjeseca na imigrante potrošeno 120 milijuna kuna, svaki dan oko 1-2 milijuna
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum