UN-ove Agende

by Kermit 20/9/2015, 22:30

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld

“We recognize the positive contribution of migrants for inclusive growth and sustainable development. We also recognize that international migration is a multidimensional reality of major relevance for the development of countries of origin, transit and destination, which requires coherent and comprehensive responses. We will cooperate internationally to ensure safe, orderly and regular migration involving full respect for human rights and the humane treatment of migrants regardless of migration status, of refugees and of displaced persons.“ (Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 29.)

by Kermit 20/9/2015, 22:31

http://en.kalitribune.com/chaos-hypothesis/

by Kermit 20/9/2015, 22:31

Let’s begin with daring hypothesis. While you read these lines, there’s probably whole lot of catering, cleaning windows and dust busting going on at the seat of UN in New York as this, some would say:”useless”, institution prepares for celebration of 70th anniversary of it’s founding. However, it won’t all be organic food and soda galore. It will be a working celebration.Namely, from 25 to 27 of the current month UN will be debating the operative plan for implementation of latest in the long line of documents calling for sustainable development. We won’t bore the reader with analysis of this ominous term as it was already done in this author’s analysis of notorious Agenda 21 UN document. Suffice it to say that one of the UN’s obscure panels is submitting new installment in the tedious series of Agendas – Agenda to end all Agendas – the so called Agenda 2030. The purpose of this document is to provide a blueprint to finally make us all – and “all” means literary all people – sustainably developed until 2030., therefore in a short span of 15 years. Not to dwell on minutes of what really means being sustainably developed, we’ll just point out two glaring moments. Worldwide sustainable development means, among other things, eradicating poverty, not merely as a fact, but as an ontological category. In plain English: fifteen years from now, no one will be poor anymore. The other flashpoint is what concerns us the most in the light of refugee crisis.

by Kermit 20/9/2015, 22:31

Two words in bold will suffice. Since when have “immigrants” turned into “migrants”, one may ask? Why, we all know that. It is since sometimes last year. Well, not exactly. The fact that you unintentionally and unconsciously started using the term doesn’t mean it is a consequence of natural transformation of your language. The term is prominent, albeit still not widely disseminated, in some old Trilateral Commission documents and, more recently in one 2012. document, a draft law devised by 5 members of international NGO, now presided by Tony Blair, called The European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation, and named „The Model European Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance“ . This charming piece of recyclable paper was already dissected on Kali Tribune, so now we’ll focus on it’s bare essentials. Implementation of Tolerance, if the law gets implemented in EU member states legislations, will essentially criminalize intolerance, i.e. any kind of speech, act and, finally, thought somehow offensive to the whole range of social groups, from feminists to, you guessed it, poor migrants. However, true purpose of this piece of legislature is to eradicate any semblance of the individual or person as a feasible subject of rights, and transferring the legal, but at the same time moral, focus on groups. In the Preamble of the document, the dignity of individual is presented as founded in diversity, i.e. his or hers – and by now probably ‘it’s’, too – group-based difference towards members of other groups. So, while until now group identity was properly related to social groups, in next few years we’ll witness the endeavor to make it a definition of individual in quite literal sense. You are bound to become a legion, dear reader. And it is no joke, it is this literal:

by Kermit 20/9/2015, 22:40

In conclusion, we have at least two documents with outrageous and implicitly sinister ambitions, one global and the other European in scope, projecting the future in a certain fashion. This future – this transformation, as the authors of Agenda 2030 call it, presupposes complete and utter destruction of existing respective social orders both in Europe and in the world at large. They are conceived and drafted by small number of highly positioned people and are determined to see the world transformed according to set time table. If you consider this author crazy, you of necessity consider them crazy too, because that’s what they proclaim as their aim. If you think they are unaware of refuge crisis, you must of necessity consider them less informed then average old widow from Croatian backwater. But, let’s be honest here. They are anything but ill informed. Those are people who consciously influence and mould education, media and general postmodern culture of Western world.

At the moment of writing this article, a prominent media image of refugees is a group of Croatian locals playing soccer with young Syrians, while most of the people along their path towards Slovenian border help them out as much as they can. There are some voices dubbing them “deserters”, of course, but as one young Syrian said to our source on site, you can join the NATO bred and raised crazies or be either shot or beheaded – there is no third solution, except to run. So acclamations of humaneness of Croatian people are ringing in our ears, SJWs are advising female volunteers to cover their heads as not to offend Muslims indisposed to legacy of feminist’s struggle, Magyar Government accuses it’s Croatian counterpart for letting the Europe down by letting the refugees in, etc., etc. It’s all, let’s say: manageable. But when the numbers of refugees swell and new waves of people start to choke the bottleneck, the things will take radical spiral downwards. And, naturally, something will break.

Taking everything into consideration, this author has an ominous feeling that in the next year or two he will watch the dissolution of the West from the front row seat. Not an enviable position to be sure. But if we take into consideration time tables set by globalists in their white papers and documents almost nobody bothers to read, it won’t matter much here anyway. Just a little more mud on your face and perhaps blood on your hands, than you would expect to get in “developed democracies”.

by Kermit 20/9/2015, 22:43

"I think there’s a resurgence of antisemitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we’re gonne be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive." rendeer

by Guest 20/9/2015, 22:45

by Sponsored content

UN-ove Agende

UN-ove Agende

Re: UN-ove Agende

Re: UN-ove Agende

Re: UN-ove Agende

Re: UN-ove Agende

Re: UN-ove Agende

Re: UN-ove Agende

Re: UN-ove Agende