Trolling for Trump
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Trolling for Trump
śutra poĆinjemoVictor&Victoria wrote:Osim sto Ćistim efikasno i etniĆki, dajem i besplatne online tutorials.
Winter is coming- Posts : 9181
2014-04-14
Re: Trolling for Trump
jel ti sebe vidis "u igri" ili korisni idiot ?marcellus wrote:svaki fašistički režim treba vanjskog neprijatelja koji je kriv za sve i kvari divnu demokraciju i idilu, a poznato je da bi svi amerikanci glasali za onu predivnu hillary clinton da nije rusa koji su hakirali američke mašine za zbrajanje glasova na izborima, propagandno utjecali na amerikance nasuprot američkim divnim, poštenim i nepristranim medijima koji su istinito i nepristrano prikazivali trumpa...
koji bulšit jebote pa gebelsu bi bilo neugodno i beriji
debotoijusto- Posts : 31574
2014-04-12
Re: Trolling for Trump
debotoijusto wrote:jel ti sebe vidis "u igri" ili korisni idiot ?marcellus wrote:svaki fašistički režim treba vanjskog neprijatelja koji je kriv za sve i kvari divnu demokraciju i idilu, a poznato je da bi svi amerikanci glasali za onu predivnu hillary clinton da nije rusa koji su hakirali američke mašine za zbrajanje glasova na izborima, propagandno utjecali na amerikance nasuprot američkim divnim, poštenim i nepristranim medijima koji su istinito i nepristrano prikazivali trumpa...
koji bulšit jebote pa gebelsu bi bilo neugodno i beriji
Guest- Guest
Re: Trolling for Trump
debotoijusto wrote:jel ti sebe vidis "u igri" ili korisni idiot ?marcellus wrote:svaki fašistički režim treba vanjskog neprijatelja koji je kriv za sve i kvari divnu demokraciju i idilu, a poznato je da bi svi amerikanci glasali za onu predivnu hillary clinton da nije rusa koji su hakirali američke mašine za zbrajanje glasova na izborima, propagandno utjecali na amerikance nasuprot američkim divnim, poštenim i nepristranim medijima koji su istinito i nepristrano prikazivali trumpa...
koji bulšit jebote pa gebelsu bi bilo neugodno i beriji
ajmo definirat fašizam...
- medijska hajka i difamacija neprijatelja uz generaliziranje svih koji nisu "naši" (svi koji podržavaju trumpa su rasisti, fašisti ---> svi židovi su bankari, kapitalisti, krvopije)
- ako dozvolimo neprijatelju da pobijedi naša zemlja će propasti, zato su sva sredstva protiv njega dozvoljena (protiv trumpa i njegovih birača, jasno)
- nasilje protiv onih koji ne glasaju "kako treba" - fizičko i pritisak svake vrste, otkazi onima koji nisu "na liniji partije", itd.
- naročito nasilje protiv crnaca, latinosa i pedera te žena koje su podržale trumpa - "izdajice svoje rase" (spola, čega već)
- nepriznavanje izbornih rezultata, pokušaji manipuliranja izborima (pritisak na elektore), itd.
- cenzura u medijima, jednoumlje
- vanjski neprijatelj stoji iza svega, i domaće izdajice
- vanjski neprijatelj (Putin) je sam Sotona, a domaće izdajice treba potamaniti ko štakore
_________________
marcellus- Posts : 46005
2014-04-16
Re: Trolling for Trump
dakle, neovisni mediji - "židovska propaganda", pardon "Putinova propaganda"
zato treba uvesti cenzuru da "ne truju narod lažima"
zato treba uvesti cenzuru da "ne truju narod lažima"
_________________
marcellus- Posts : 46005
2014-04-16
Re: Trolling for Trump
kao što su brojni pametni ameri primijetili - "liberali" u SAD su se pretvorili u sve ono protiv čega su se uvijek kao borili.
A moralna panika i histerija su siguran znak ozbiljnih bolesti društva, ili njegovog dijela (moralna panika se kod "liberala" očituje u lovu na vještice, u stilu mccarthyja, samo ovaj put ne love "komuniste" nego "fašiste" "rasiste" "homofobe" (a za trumpa najviše glasalo latinosa i pedera u odnosu na obamu 4 godine ranije - manjine su mu donijele pobjedu!)
bijelaca je ovaj put glasalo 6 milijuna manje nego prošli put - i od toga 3 milijuna manje za rep. kandidata i tri manje za demokrata.
ali crni birači i latinosi su ovaj put PUNO više glasali za republikance.
A moralna panika i histerija su siguran znak ozbiljnih bolesti društva, ili njegovog dijela (moralna panika se kod "liberala" očituje u lovu na vještice, u stilu mccarthyja, samo ovaj put ne love "komuniste" nego "fašiste" "rasiste" "homofobe" (a za trumpa najviše glasalo latinosa i pedera u odnosu na obamu 4 godine ranije - manjine su mu donijele pobjedu!)
bijelaca je ovaj put glasalo 6 milijuna manje nego prošli put - i od toga 3 milijuna manje za rep. kandidata i tri manje za demokrata.
ali crni birači i latinosi su ovaj put PUNO više glasali za republikance.
_________________
marcellus- Posts : 46005
2014-04-16
Re: Trolling for Trump
inače, da, Ben Carson je bijeli rasist. A Milo je homofob. Ozbiljno, to američki mediji pišu i misle ozbiljno. Oni su totalno pukli.
_________________
marcellus- Posts : 46005
2014-04-16
Re: Trolling for Trump
_________________
И показа ми чисту реку воде живота, бистру као кристал, која излажаше од престола Божијег и Јагњетовог.
Winter is coming-
Posts : 9181
2014-04-14
Re: Trolling for Trump
'Post-Truth' Named 2016 Word of the Year
“Post-Truth” is Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year.
The Oxford Dictionaries website told readers post-truth could be “one of the defining words of our time.”
The term comes from an idea that became popular during the 2016 election campaign in the United States.
Post-truth, as the website defines it, means to relate to situations where “objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.”
Oxford Dictionaries officials say they chose post-truth as Word of the Year because of its rising popularity. They said the term’s usage appeared to increase 2,000% in 2016 alone.
Casper Grathwohl is the president of Oxford Dictionaries. He said that the choice was no surprise after a year filled with difficult discussions about politics.
Grathwohl said post-truth has become popular at a time when more people are using social media to get news. Some people trust social media more for news and information than establishment media or political leaders.
Choosing the Word of the Year
If you plan to use the word, Oxford Dictionaries defines it as an adjective. An example of it is the expression “post-truth politics.”
The website said that post-truth has gone from being a new term to a word often used in political commentary. Major publications now use the term without feeling the need to define its meaning.
A number of other terms were under consideration for Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year. They included “Brexiteer,” which means someone who supported Britain’s decision to exit, or leave, the European Union. Another choice was “alt-right,” which describes a group tied to extreme conservative ideas, and known to reject traditional politics. A third possibility was “adulting,” a noun meaning the action of someone behaving like a responsible adult.
History of “Post Truth”
It appears that post-truth, with its current meaning, has been in existence for more than 20 years.
Oxford Dictionaries found its first use in a 1992 commentary published in The Nation magazine. Steve Tesich, a Serbian-American playwright, used “post-truth” in writing about the Iran-Contra scandal and the Gulf War.
"We, as a free people, have freely decided that we want to live in some post-truth world," he wrote.
I’m Phil Dierking.
This story first appeared on VOANews.com. Phil Dierking adapted the story for Learning English. George Grow was the editor.
http://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/post-truth-named-2016-word-of-the-year/3603012.html
“Post-Truth” is Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year.
The Oxford Dictionaries website told readers post-truth could be “one of the defining words of our time.”
The term comes from an idea that became popular during the 2016 election campaign in the United States.
Post-truth, as the website defines it, means to relate to situations where “objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.”
Oxford Dictionaries officials say they chose post-truth as Word of the Year because of its rising popularity. They said the term’s usage appeared to increase 2,000% in 2016 alone.
Casper Grathwohl is the president of Oxford Dictionaries. He said that the choice was no surprise after a year filled with difficult discussions about politics.
Grathwohl said post-truth has become popular at a time when more people are using social media to get news. Some people trust social media more for news and information than establishment media or political leaders.
Choosing the Word of the Year
If you plan to use the word, Oxford Dictionaries defines it as an adjective. An example of it is the expression “post-truth politics.”
The website said that post-truth has gone from being a new term to a word often used in political commentary. Major publications now use the term without feeling the need to define its meaning.
A number of other terms were under consideration for Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year. They included “Brexiteer,” which means someone who supported Britain’s decision to exit, or leave, the European Union. Another choice was “alt-right,” which describes a group tied to extreme conservative ideas, and known to reject traditional politics. A third possibility was “adulting,” a noun meaning the action of someone behaving like a responsible adult.
History of “Post Truth”
It appears that post-truth, with its current meaning, has been in existence for more than 20 years.
Oxford Dictionaries found its first use in a 1992 commentary published in The Nation magazine. Steve Tesich, a Serbian-American playwright, used “post-truth” in writing about the Iran-Contra scandal and the Gulf War.
"We, as a free people, have freely decided that we want to live in some post-truth world," he wrote.
I’m Phil Dierking.
This story first appeared on VOANews.com. Phil Dierking adapted the story for Learning English. George Grow was the editor.
http://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/post-truth-named-2016-word-of-the-year/3603012.html
Guest- Guest
Re: Trolling for Trump
Interesantno kako se prebrojavanje radi samo u državana gdje je DT pobijedio iako je u nekim državama HC pobijedila sa daleko manjim brojem glasova ali to Steinici nije interesantno. Isto tako Jill je u par dana skupila više love za prebrojavanje nego za kompletnu svoju kampanju
Brain32-
Posts : 1394
2014-04-15
Re: Trolling for Trump
od tog njezinog prebrojavanja neće biti ništaBrain32 wrote:Interesantno kako se prebrojavanje radi samo u državana gdje je DT pobijedio iako je u nekim državama HC pobijedila sa daleko manjim brojem glasova ali to Steinici nije interesantno. Isto tako Jill je u par dana skupila više love za prebrojavanje nego za kompletnu svoju kampanju
gargamel0101- Posts : 3558
2015-07-23
Re: Trolling for Trump
A slusaj - sve je bolje od ulaska Stephena Bannona u Bijelu Kucu. To ce biti total blackout - ako se dogodi.Brain32 wrote:Interesantno kako se prebrojavanje radi samo u državana gdje je DT pobijedio iako je u nekim državama HC pobijedila sa daleko manjim brojem glasova ali to Steinici nije interesantno. Isto tako Jill je u par dana skupila više love za prebrojavanje nego za kompletnu svoju kampanju
Guest- Guest
Re: Trolling for Trump
inace, da. Ben Carson is not exactly the brightest crayon in the box. evo samo jednog od njegovih bisera...marcellus wrote:inače, da, Ben Carson je bijeli rasist. A Milo je homofob. Ozbiljno, to američki mediji pišu i misle ozbiljno. Oni su totalno pukli.
On Nazi Germany and guns
"I think the likelihood of Hitler being able to accomplish his goals would have been greatly diminished if the people had been armed," Carson said in an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Thursday. "I'm telling you, there is a reason these dictatorial people take the guns first."
The comment followed Blitzer's reading of a passage from Carson's new book, “A More Perfect Union: What We the People Can Do To Reclaim Our Constitutional Liberties," in which the retired neurosurgeon wrote that "German citizens were disarmed by their government in the late 1930s, and by the mid-1940s, Hitler's regime had mercilessly slaughtered 6 million Jews and numerous others whom they considered inferior. Through a combination of removing guns and disseminating deceitful propaganda, the Nazis were able to carry out their evil intentions with relatively little resistance."
Carson explained what he meant in subsequent interviews the next day.
"This is a general pattern that you see before tyranny occurs. There are many countries where that has occurred where they disarm the populace before they impose their tyrannical rule," he said on MSNBC's "Andrea Mitchell Reports" in October. "That’s not a rare situation and that’s something that we don’t want to ever even think about, and that’s one of the reasons that Daniel Webster said what he said. He said there will never be tyranny in the United States because the people are armed."
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/ben-carson-controversial-quotes-214614
Guest- Guest
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum