Denkverbot

mativka wrote:

kic wrote:

mativka wrote:

kic wrote:isti klinac je rečen ne volim latinske poslovice, ili poslovice uopće..

Ja obožavam, i to one narodne :)

pa, prepisao sam jednu kratku Ecovu priču, o kraljevstvu poslovica, tu na forumu sad ne znam točno..  ugl nije funkcioniralo živjeti po poslovicama :D

Poslovice su bolje od linkova i svih modernih mudrolija, jer je u biti tako sve jednostavno. Sve filozofije od početka pa do, unedogled će se uvijek svesti na njih. Samo će se drugim nazivljima i pravcima nazivljati.
Ali, oduvijek je bilo isto sranje, samo različit dizajn pakovanja :)

u biti, nije sve tak jednostavno, poslovice su često foto-montaža-soundtrack koji dobro zvuči i izgleda, ali ne možeš živjeti po tome.. od poslovice je bolje malo dublje udahnit i usporit, iako, ima dobrih..

mativka wrote:

aben wrote:
e, bravo, natuknice:)
viš da je bilo nešto..
naravski daš stvoriti svoj kontekst nad pročitanim, al ne triba se toliko udaljavati od drugih ljudi i prenaglašavati jedinstvenost doživljaja; nismo mi u prosjwku toliko različiti da bi to ništo više znočilo.
mi smo razgovorali o konkretnin policies, i pametni ljudi su sve razložilia na nama je samo da to upijemo. tribalo bi razgovorati petnajst godin za sve to projti:)

Mi nemamo vremena za natuknice i 15 i više godina promišljanja o određenoj temi. Strast je ta koja prkosi vremenu. Imaš ju ili nemaš u sebi. Sve ostalo djeluje poput mrtvog puhala kroz razne instrumente.
Pametni ljudi?!
Zbog čega si uvjeren da je netko pametan?

ako meni neko nešto uspije objosniti, pametniji je omene.

kic wrote:
u biti, nije sve tak jednostavno, poslovice su često foto-montaža-soundtrack koji dobro zvuči i izgleda, ali ne možeš živjeti po tome..  od poslovice je bolje malo dublje udahnit i usporit, iako, ima dobrih..

Ne bih se složila s tobom...

aben wrote:
ako meni neko nešto uspije objosniti, pametniji je omene.

Upravo sam mislila na to :)

poslovice mistificiraju, ono što mi ovdje radimo je da se bavimo s modern times, a rasvijetljavanje tog traje, traje dok će bit modernosti..

kic wrote:poslovice mistificiraju, ono što mi ovdje radimo je da se bavimo s modern times, a rasvijetljavanje tog traje, traje dok će bit modernosti..

Smatram da si u krivu.
Mi se samo zezamo :)

što je za tebe modernost zezalo?

kic wrote:što je za tebe modernost zezalo?

Pa vaši stavovi, koji su promjenjivi.
Toliko sam na ovoj temi postavila pitanja, koja su samo prešla preko stranice. Sva ona moja ozbiljna promišljanja i na neki način zahtjevi objašnjenja su isparila u tečnosti bezveznih, pristalih rečenica.
Prije svega sviđa mi se naslov teme, i moram priznati da sam se opustila u svojim promišljanjima. Moj jezik je jednostavan, možda i previše. No, nema veze :)
Nisam moderna, majke mi! :)

kic wrote:poslovice mistificiraju, ono što mi ovdje radimo je da se bavimo s modern times, a rasvijetljavanje tog traje, traje dok će bit modernosti..

Modernost je mrtva, živjela postmodernost!

jesi se nahvalila i nas popljuvala :(

promjenjivost je normalna u svijetu novih pojava i spoznaja, da se stalno držimo istog bili bi ti dosadili prvi dan, uostalom stavovi u srži se ne pomiču previše, samo se mijenjaju situacije s kojima dođemo u doticaj..

kic wrote:jesi se nahvalila i nas popljuvala :(

promjenjivost je normalna u svijetu novih pojava i spoznaja, da se stalno držimo istog bili bi ti dosadili prvi dan, uostalom stavovi u srži se ne pomiču previše, samo se mijenjaju situacije s kojima dođemo u doticaj..

Što uopće znači hvala, kada se ja osjećam u svim svojim mislima zakinuta?!

Ja sam pobornik starih narodnih poslovica, a ti-novih spoznaja :)
Zbog čega želiš da se loše osjećam? :)
Nikada ne bih na tvoj ego udarala....ma, kakav on bio.....

hah, to moraš sebe pitati zašto se osjećaš zakinutom..

jer mi te očito ne ignoriramo tako da je odg u tebi.. fairly obviously.

evo jedna, od mog najdražeg rimskog car:

Uvijek su teže posljedice ljutnje, nego njeni uzroci.
Marko Aurelije

Smiješan si mi...

Mi?!( tko si to: mi) Ostale glupe fraze koje nemaju veze s vezom...

Kic, postojiš samo ti....

Aurelije je moj starinski frend :)

I, myself and Irene :^^

nepobjediva si, noć

Brexit is about culture, not economics..

what muslim problem? i ispadoše mu oči:))


evo analiza po mon guštu, bliža vlost je bolja od dalje vlosti..

Brexit: Individualism > Nationalism > Globalism

• 
  
  

179 COMMENTS
TAGSGlobal EconomyWorld HistoryPolitical Theory
06/22/2016Jeff Deist
Decentralization and devolution of state power is always a good thing, regardless of the motivations behind such movements.
Hunter S. Thompson, looking back on 60s counterculture in San Francisco, lamented the end of that era and its imagined flower-child innocence:

So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark — that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.

[size]
Does today’s Brexit vote, win or lose, similarly mark the spot where the once-inevitable march of globalism begins to recede? Have ordinary people around the world reached the point where real questions about self-determination have become too acute to ignore any longer? 
Globalism, championed almost exclusively by political and economic elites, has been the dominant force in the West for a hundred years. World War I and the League of Nations established the framework for multinational military excursions, while the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank set the stage for the eventual emergence of the US dollar as a worldwide reserve currency. Progressive government programs in Western countries promised a new model for universalism and peace in the aftermath of the destruction of Europe. Human rights, democracy, and enlightened social views were now to serve as hallmarks of a post-monarchical Europe and rising US.
But globalism was never liberalism, nor was it intended to be by its architects. As its core, globalism has always meant rule by illiberal elites under the guise of mass democracy. It has always been distinctly anti-democratic and anti-freedom, even as it purported to represent liberation from repressive governments and poverty.
Globalism is not, as its supporters claim, simply the inevitable outcome of modern technology applied to communication, trade,and travel. It is not “the world getting smaller.” It is, in fact, an ideology and worldview that must be imposed by statist and cronyist means. It is the civic religion of people named Clinton, Bush, Blair, Cameron, and Lagarde.
Yes, libertarians advocate unfettered global trade. Even marginally free trade has unquestionably created enormous wealth and prosperity for millions around the world. Trade, specialization, and an understanding of comparative advantage have done more to relieve poverty than a million United Nations or International Monetary Funds.
But the EU, GATT, WTO, NAFTA, TPP, and the whole alphabet soup of trade schemes are wholly illiberal impediments masquerading as real commercial freedom. In fact, true free trade occurs only in the absence of government agreements. The only legislation required is a unilateral one-sentence bill: Country X hereby eliminates all import duties, taxes, and tariffs on all Y goods imported from country Z.
And as Godfrey Bloom explains, the European Union is primarily a customs zone, not a free trade zone. A bureaucracy in Brussels is hardly necessary to enact simple pan-European tariff reductions. It is necessary, however, to begin building what globalism truly demands: a de factoEuropean government, complete with dense regulatory and tax rules, quasi-judicial bodies, a nascent military, and further subordination of national, linguistic, and cultural identities.
Which brings us to the Brexit vote, which offers Britons far more than simply an opportunity to remove themselves from a doomed EU political and monetary project. It is an opportunity to forestall the juggernaut, at least for a period, and reflect on the current path. It is a chance to fire a shot heard around the world, to challenge the wisdom of the “globalism is inevitable” narrative. It is the UK’s last chance to ask — in a time when even asking is an act of rebellion — the most important political question of our day or any day: who decides?
Ludwig von Mises understood that self-determination is the fundamental goal of liberty, of real liberalism. It’s true that libertarians ought not to concern themselves with “national sovereignty” in the political sense, because governments are not sovereign kings and should never be treated as worthy of determining the course of our lives. But it is also true that the more attenuated the link between an individual and the body purporting to govern him, the less control — self-determination — that individual has.
To quote Mises, from his 1927 classic (in German) Liberalismus:
[/size]

If it were in any way possible to grant this right of self-determination to every individual person, it would have to be done.

[size]
Ultimately, Brexit is not a referendum on trade, immigration, or the technical rules promulgated by the (awful) European Parliament. It is a referendum on nationhood, which is a step away from globalism and closer to individual self-determination. Libertarians should view the decentralization and devolution of state power as ever and always a good thing, regardless of the motivations behind such movements. Reducing the size and scope of any single (or multinational) state’s dominion is decidedly healthy for liberty.[/size]

kradeš od asile :))

čudi me da asila prati mises.org, veseli, ali i čudi..

da, evo malo i Mileta našeg:

http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/06/24/the-end-of-globalism/

"I mean, there’s a reason the Emperor Hadrian anticipated Trump by about two thousand years."
haha


It had been a peaceful night in Europe where all the women are strong, the men are good looking, and the children are above average. Martin woke up on his EU regulated bed and looked through his EU regulated window. This night, Martin had slept like a baby thanks to the 109 EU regulations concerning pillows, the 5 EU regulations concerning pillow cases, and the 50 EU laws regulating duvets and sheets. Martin went to brush his teeth with his toothbrush regulated by 31 EU laws.
After that, our EU-regulated man went to his EU regulated kitchen to grab a Class 1 EU regulated apple. For the benefit of society, the EU had defined what a “class 1” fruit actually is: to class a "Red Variety" apple as "class 1" then 50% of its surface must be red. To class a "Mixed red coloring variety" of apple as a "class 1" apple 33% of its surface must be red, and so it goes for the 3 quality classes and 287 individually named apple varieties...

https://mises.org/blog/just-another-day-regulated-europe

Milo je brutalno iskren, nikad od njega realpolitičara bojim se, mislim da mnogi Englezi ne dijele ravnodušnost prema posljedicama ovog događa tj odlasku Škota i Iraca.. ali dobro..