Natural asset companies (preduzeca za prirodna dobra)

Beware the SEC's Creation of 'Natural Asset' Companies | RealClearMarkets



[size=13][size=13]Select Language[/size]
[size=51]Beware the SEC's Creation of 'Natural Asset' Companies[/size]
[/size][size]
By Margaret Byfield
December 01, 2023[/size]


[size=10]AP

To anyone who tracks the efforts of environmentalists, their policies often have an ulterior motive. They neither result in a better society nor do they produce better habitats. Their policy preferences also do not consider how using the land improves the land for man and wildlife. Instead, many environmentalists advocate for policies at the expense of farmers, miners, and others who create usable, tangible, societal benefits from the land. This often leaves observers to wonder: what are environmentalists really after?
The answer is power and money. It turns out, that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) are quietly working on a rule that may prove this ulterior motive.
On September 29, the SEC, at the request of the NYSE, proposed a rule that would create an entirely new type of company called a Natural Asset Company (NAC). NACs, according to the Proposed Rule, “hold the rights to ecological performance.” These companies would be given license to control lands, both public and private, and would be required not to conduct any “unsustainable activities, such as mining, that lead to the degradation of the ecosystems.”  In effect, this means that these companies would somehow seek to profit off the lands without using the lands. Whatever they do, it must be “sustainable.”
rule -  2023-22041.pdf (govinfo.gov)

How might a company make control of land profitable while also not using the land? The method is admittedly confusing, perhaps intentionally. They profit from “ecological performance” such as “conservation, restoration, or sustainable management.” These NACs would quantify and monetize these natural outputs (such as air or water). The best comparison would be using the air we breathe as a cryptocurrency of sorts. And, these natural assets that collectively belong to all of us would now belong to corporations run by what many would call environmental special interests.

The Biden administration has already suggested that it would cede this power to the NACs. The Office of Science and Technology Policy has also created a method to track the values of nature and place those so-called natural assets onto the federal balance sheet. It described this effort as “the transition we need for sustainable growth and development, a stable climate, and a healthy planet.” The Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are taking similar steps to facilitate the enrollment of our federal lands into NACs.


This effort would be a huge windfall for the federal government and the NACs. The government would create an entirely new revenue stream that would solely benefit the Davos-type crowd that gives the current administration support. Both Big Government and radical environmentalists stand to benefit. 



They would control our lands and profit from them at the same time. Handing rights to America’s greatest national treasures – along with the air we breathe – to wealthy special interests may seem like an extravagantly bizarre idea, but we’re now less than 45 days until it could be our reality.
[/size]

Natural Capital :: GLOBE International (archive.org)

ukratko velike korporacije ce kupit zemlju koja se ne koristi i profitirat od nje tako sto je nece koristit. Novac ce dobijat od "klimatske takse" i odrzivog razvoja. Zgadija ce popusit "zajednicko dobro"

sad je jasnije sto je Gates najveci vlasnik poljoprivrednih zemljista a ne koristi ga i zasto kineska komunisticka partija kupuje zemljista po americi takode. Privatno i javno partnerstvo (politika (partija) + korporacije)

puno njih krade bogatstvo iz zemlje dok ljudi ni ne znaju što imaju

prckov wrote:

new asset class on the NY stock exchange 

zato smo mi imali "voice referendum" de su leftardi trazili da se ogromne povrsine australije kao daju aboridzinima (koji su vecinom odbili taj predlog) radi fol zastite nekakvih njihovih vjerskih mjesta. Isto se zahtjevala zabrana koriscenja zemlje u bilo koje svrhe ukljucujuci i gradnju kuca. Ono to sad evo postaje asset u NY stock exchange-u.

It's being facilitated through another creation, the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures, which appears to be central to how the scam works, shifting us away from real accounting to "ecological" accounting that enables the whole enviro-Communist Degrowth scam.

We need to understand how Natural Asset Companies work. Normal companies hold property like factories, hardware, land, and intellectual property, etc. NACs appear to focus on holding the right to manage "natural assets" such as forests, farmlands, and even coral reefs.

An NAC, on the other hand, is not allowed to use its cash on "unsustainable activities" which include mining. They are intrinsically designed around making it (falsely and insanely) profitable to do ESG in line with very radical Degrowth agendas.


Normal companies try to assess the value of their property using standard accounting rules (i.e., how much money is in the bank, going to payroll, how much are our patents worth?). The Natural Asset Companies scam looks to get around this by creating its own voodoo accounting.




NACs will try to assess the value of their property and services using a "new accounting methodology": 

the IEG's Ecological Performance Reporting Framework which is established in the United Nations's "System of Environmental-Economic Accounting—Ecosystem Accounting Framework."

plan je do 2030 proglasit 30% planete zasticenim zonama, odnosno prirodnim dobrima, na kojim ce kompanije tipa Black Rock (koji to uz Nestle i druge gura UN itd) zaradivat lovu tako sto nece dozvolit nista na tim zonama sto nije u skladu sa WEF-ovim ciljem odrzivog razvoja, sto znaci nista. Pazite da dijelovi Jadrana ili otoka ne postanu zasticene zone u vlasnistvu kompanija jer kontam masovni turizam nije bas u skladu sa "sustainable development goals", a bome ni slavonija.
Istovremeno najavljuju, osim krize vode, i krizu proteina. Pripremaju nas za progres


Tackling the protein crisis through cultured meat ― the potential for new foods | Stories | Science Japan (jst.go.jp)

njima zemlja, voda i zrak

a nama:

Natural Asset Companies (NACs) | Impact Entrepreneur

prckov wrote:njima zemlja, voda i zrak

a nama:

https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1739880543511015681    

nama diversity, equity and inclusion + digitalni ID i digitalna lova