Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
Page 4 of 13
Page 4 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11, 12, 13
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
kave nemaju veze. činjenica da rusi imaju zaostalu tehnologiju. nikaj drugo.pismejker wrote:Kave to veze ima kad pola od toga potrose ne neki polovicni projekt tipa F-35...nekima niti lova ne pomaze..
veber- Posts : 53509
2014-12-30
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
veber wrote:kave nemaju veze. činjenica da rusi imaju zaostalu tehnologiju. nikaj drugo.pismejker wrote:Kave to veze ima kad pola od toga potrose ne neki polovicni projekt tipa F-35...nekima niti lova ne pomaze..
ajmo ovako..cinjenica je da ti ODNOSI u jednadzbi nisu jasni...
Weberu..koga bi vise znanstvenika cijenio..onog koji sa manjim budzetom bolje stvari radi,ili onog sa velikim budzetom,koji..pa eto...svako malo mu moras nogom guzicu potaknuti...
Naravno ti moras osigurati budzet..
Sam budzet po sebi nis ne garantira...
Guest- Guest
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
Velika vojska , veliki troškovi
Amerika, Kina, Rusija....ostali
Amerika, Kina, Rusija....ostali
RayMabus- Posts : 184137
2014-04-11
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
SAD ima već avione 6. generacije, budućnost ide u tom smjeru, tehnologija 5. generacije je iz 80ih
Guest- Guest
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
Poanta je u u efikasnosti iskoristavanja budzeta,dakle racionalnom koristenju...
Helm 360 u f-35 koshta u serijskoj proizvodnji oko 400000 dolara,a isti taj kuratz od hardwarea je utrostrucio cijenu CIJELOG projekta,jerbo se nije moglo softwareski rjesiti probleme..
Ili su Ameri stvarno tutleci,ili je u pittanju milenijsko pranje para...
Helm 360 u f-35 koshta u serijskoj proizvodnji oko 400000 dolara,a isti taj kuratz od hardwarea je utrostrucio cijenu CIJELOG projekta,jerbo se nije moglo softwareski rjesiti probleme..
Ili su Ameri stvarno tutleci,ili je u pittanju milenijsko pranje para...
Guest- Guest
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
misalokacija kapitalaRayMabus wrote:Velika vojska , veliki troškovi
država neefikasno troši novac, po svojoj definiciji država ne može proizvesti ništa kvalitetno niti izumiti novu tehnologiju
Guest- Guest
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
NPC wrote:
SAD ima već avione 6. generacije, budućnost ide u tom smjeru, tehnologija 5. generacije je iz 80ih
Opet kopija..ovaj puta svapskog projekta s kraja WW2..
Guest- Guest
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
Mislim da je to bombarder a ne nekakvi lovac 6 generacije
RayMabus- Posts : 184137
2014-04-11
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
B-2..istu namjenu kao i ovaj svapski koji je trebao amerima izruciti na glave svapski njuk..
Guest- Guest
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
ovo je tehnološki forum. tu spikamo o tehnologiji, materijalima i sl.
_________________
AfD
veber-
Posts : 53509
2014-12-30
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
Oznake lovac 1,2,3,4,5 ili 6 generacije odnose se na letjelice na mlazni pogon
Hitler je 1 generacija
U osnovi NLO vam je elektromagnetski pogon tako da te generacije mlaznih aviona idu samo dok ih pokreće mlazni pogon tj netko neubaci antigravitacijski motor
Hitler je 1 generacija
U osnovi NLO vam je elektromagnetski pogon tako da te generacije mlaznih aviona idu samo dok ih pokreće mlazni pogon tj netko neubaci antigravitacijski motor
RayMabus- Posts : 184137
2014-04-11
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
JA BIH JEBO...
KURAC HLADAN...
PIČKA VRUĆA...
DOBIT ĆU UPALU PLUCA...
svečev haiku...ajte zdravo postovani kolege...vrijeme za tortu i kavicu...
KURAC HLADAN...
PIČKA VRUĆA...
DOBIT ĆU UPALU PLUCA...
svečev haiku...ajte zdravo postovani kolege...vrijeme za tortu i kavicu...
Guest- Guest
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
Znanost i tehnologija ,jedno prati drugo
Ovo je još era mlaznih aviona i nevidim baš da su shvatili još da gravitacija nije sila nego naprezanje prostorvremena
Kad to shvate mogu radit kod mene u potpalublju
Ovo je još era mlaznih aviona i nevidim baš da su shvatili još da gravitacija nije sila nego naprezanje prostorvremena
Kad to shvate mogu radit kod mene u potpalublju
RayMabus- Posts : 184137
2014-04-11
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
Gravitacija na polovima i ekvatoru nije ista ,zatim plima i oseka zbog dijelovanja Mjeseca tj njegove sile teže znači izadeš iz kuće i staviš lopticu na tri metra visine da lebdi i plima i oseka različite veličine
Dakle imaš oscilacije i val u prostoru a ako imaš val onda surfaš na njemu
Dakle imaš oscilacije i val u prostoru a ako imaš val onda surfaš na njemu
RayMabus- Posts : 184137
2014-04-11
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
Dakle cijeli zrak oko vas i svemir je pun tih oscilacija,non stop a očito i dosta pravilnih i predvidljivih zbog predvidljivosti kretanja najblžih svemirskih tijela.....dakle oko vas je uzburkani ocean sa valovima
Vi idete na Mars .....raketni pogon dakle veslate .......galija
A da dignete jedra ?
Vi idete na Mars .....raketni pogon dakle veslate .......galija
A da dignete jedra ?
RayMabus- Posts : 184137
2014-04-11
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
With a price tag of between $115 million and $198 million per plane and an estimated program cost of a $1.5 trillion, the fifth-generation stealth combat jet has faced an endless string of costly setbacks in recent years, with the US temporarily grounding its entire fleet of F-35s last month in the wake of a crash.
Last week, Military.com reported that two airmen at a base in Florida had suffered a brush with death after being "indirectly" struck by lightning while clearing an F-35's flight line ahead of an expected storm.
Commenting on the incident, Task & Purpose explained that the Air Force has been forced to develop an anti-lightning contingency, and that the Marine Corps, which operate their own version of the plane, have also voiced concerns about the Lightning II's ability to handle lightning strikes.
Italy Slows Down Purchases of US F-35 Jets to Cut Spending - Reports
In August, the Marines put out a bidfor portable rods to attract lightning away from the planes parked at Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni in southern Japan. The Corps justified the bid by explaining that the F-35, "as a composite type aircraft, does not provide inherent passive lightning protection."
Indeed, unlike traditional aircraft, which have metal skin, the F-35 has a composite skin with radar-absorbent materials aimed at improving its stealth characteristics built in. The advanced stealth feature poses certain risks, however, including the plane's vulnerability to lightning strikes.
In 2012, a Pentagon report found that the F-35 would not be safe flying within 25 miles (40 km) of a thunderstorm due to fears that it could be damaged or destroyed by lightning. Specifically, the report identified "deficiencies" in the plane's fuel tank inerting system which could cause explosions if the plane is struck by lightning.
Lockheed Martin has promised to resolve the problem, with the issue reputedly fixed on aircraft for the US military. Other buyers of the F-35 have not been as fortunate, however, with Australian F-35As reportedly continuing to avoid flights around thunderstorms over the fuel tank issue. This summer, British defence officials demonstrated open annoyance after four F-35s destined for the UK were delayed from flying across the Atlantic Ocean over "adverse weather conditions."
[/size]
Royal Air Force Furious as 'All-Weather' F-35s Fail to Arrive on Time Due to Bad Weather
This summer, a report to Congress by the US Government Accountability Office found that the F-35 programme continues to have some 966 flaws, including over 100 critical defects which can injure or kill pilots or otherwise jeopardise the aircraft's security. More serious defects included visibility problems for the special helmet-mounted display, ejector seat issues causing neck injuries, a faulty oxygen-supply system, and a fragile aerial refuelling probe.[/size]
Last week, Military.com reported that two airmen at a base in Florida had suffered a brush with death after being "indirectly" struck by lightning while clearing an F-35's flight line ahead of an expected storm.
Commenting on the incident, Task & Purpose explained that the Air Force has been forced to develop an anti-lightning contingency, and that the Marine Corps, which operate their own version of the plane, have also voiced concerns about the Lightning II's ability to handle lightning strikes.
© PHOTO: PUBLIC DOMAIN / ROBERT SULLIVAN
[size]Italy Slows Down Purchases of US F-35 Jets to Cut Spending - Reports
In August, the Marines put out a bidfor portable rods to attract lightning away from the planes parked at Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni in southern Japan. The Corps justified the bid by explaining that the F-35, "as a composite type aircraft, does not provide inherent passive lightning protection."
Indeed, unlike traditional aircraft, which have metal skin, the F-35 has a composite skin with radar-absorbent materials aimed at improving its stealth characteristics built in. The advanced stealth feature poses certain risks, however, including the plane's vulnerability to lightning strikes.
In 2012, a Pentagon report found that the F-35 would not be safe flying within 25 miles (40 km) of a thunderstorm due to fears that it could be damaged or destroyed by lightning. Specifically, the report identified "deficiencies" in the plane's fuel tank inerting system which could cause explosions if the plane is struck by lightning.
Lockheed Martin has promised to resolve the problem, with the issue reputedly fixed on aircraft for the US military. Other buyers of the F-35 have not been as fortunate, however, with Australian F-35As reportedly continuing to avoid flights around thunderstorms over the fuel tank issue. This summer, British defence officials demonstrated open annoyance after four F-35s destined for the UK were delayed from flying across the Atlantic Ocean over "adverse weather conditions."
[/size]
© PHOTO: LOCKHEED MARTIN
[size]Royal Air Force Furious as 'All-Weather' F-35s Fail to Arrive on Time Due to Bad Weather
This summer, a report to Congress by the US Government Accountability Office found that the F-35 programme continues to have some 966 flaws, including over 100 critical defects which can injure or kill pilots or otherwise jeopardise the aircraft's security. More serious defects included visibility problems for the special helmet-mounted display, ejector seat issues causing neck injuries, a faulty oxygen-supply system, and a fragile aerial refuelling probe.[/size]
Guest- Guest
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
O jesus i marijo..kad moram vec svetogrđit...
In 2012, a Pentagon report found that the F-35 would not be safe flying within 25 miles (40 km) of a thunderstorm due to fears that it could be damaged or destroyed by lightning. Specifically, the report identified "deficiencies" in the plane's fuel tank inerting system which could cause explosions if the plane is struck by lightning.
In 2012, a Pentagon report found that the F-35 would not be safe flying within 25 miles (40 km) of a thunderstorm due to fears that it could be damaged or destroyed by lightning. Specifically, the report identified "deficiencies" in the plane's fuel tank inerting system which could cause explosions if the plane is struck by lightning.
Guest- Guest
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
https://sputniknews.com/military/201811151069832205-f35-lightning-vulnerability/?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com
Guest- Guest
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
Nova epizoda, izašla upravo danas
Hektorović- Posts : 26373
2018-04-10
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
moguće da su bolji. možda i nisu. to neznamo jel ih nisu rusi još koristili u borbi, ali špekaulacije su da je ovo bolji avion. lako moguće.
however, Ruska ekonomija nemože priuštiti veći broj SU-57
trenutno ih rusi imaju 10-15komada, ameri+300komada.. svojih
kolike su ono projekicije da će rusi napraviti max 100injak(ako i toliko) su-57 do neke 2030 ili 2050, ameri bi tada trebali imati oko 2000 F-35ica.... cijeli nato savez i više.. stoga čak i da je Su-57 bolji, opet nemaju šanse
Njemački tenkovi su bili daleko najbolji u WW2, pa opet nisu imali šanse od hordi ruskih i američkih tenkova(uglavnom financirano USA ekonomijom)
however, Ruska ekonomija nemože priuštiti veći broj SU-57
trenutno ih rusi imaju 10-15komada, ameri+300komada.. svojih
kolike su ono projekicije da će rusi napraviti max 100injak(ako i toliko) su-57 do neke 2030 ili 2050, ameri bi tada trebali imati oko 2000 F-35ica.... cijeli nato savez i više.. stoga čak i da je Su-57 bolji, opet nemaju šanse
Njemački tenkovi su bili daleko najbolji u WW2, pa opet nisu imali šanse od hordi ruskih i američkih tenkova(uglavnom financirano USA ekonomijom)
_________________
May Allah destroy Australia
AssadNaPodmornici- Posts : 22332
2018-06-14
Re: Rusi: Su-57 bolji je i od F-22 i F-35
https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-admits-defeat-su-57-not-going-into-mass-production-2018-7
jest da je zapadni izvor, koji opet citira ruse, ali ono, izgleda da i ova brojka od stotinjak SU-57ica bi mogla biti preteška za rusku vojsku, ispada avion također kao i američki f-35 probija sve rokove, i postaje sve skuplji, navodno ima i grešaka dosta, nedovršen.. znamo da se i uvođenje Su-57 u rusku vojsku odužilo pun kurac, ruski vojno-industrijski kompelks teško može štancati ove avione u dovoljnoj količini preskupi su a navodno postoje i nedostaci koje treba otkloniti..
jest da je zapadni izvor, koji opet citira ruse, ali ono, izgleda da i ova brojka od stotinjak SU-57ica bi mogla biti preteška za rusku vojsku, ispada avion također kao i američki f-35 probija sve rokove, i postaje sve skuplji, navodno ima i grešaka dosta, nedovršen.. znamo da se i uvođenje Su-57 u rusku vojsku odužilo pun kurac, ruski vojno-industrijski kompelks teško može štancati ove avione u dovoljnoj količini preskupi su a navodno postoje i nedostaci koje treba otkloniti..
_________________
May Allah destroy Australia
AssadNaPodmornici- Posts : 22332
2018-06-14
Page 4 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11, 12, 13
Similar topics
» Rusi: 'Imamo novi avion bolji od Airbusa i Boeinga
» Hrvati u šoku: Pa zar i Rumuni bolji od nas
» Hrvati u šoku: Pa zar i Rumuni bolji od nas
» Vucinic: Bolji smo od svih
» obični ljudi bolji od političara no shit
» Hrvati u šoku: Pa zar i Rumuni bolji od nas
» Hrvati u šoku: Pa zar i Rumuni bolji od nas
» Vucinic: Bolji smo od svih
» obični ljudi bolji od političara no shit
Page 4 of 13
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum